Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 1/2015

01-03-2015 | Original Paper

Influence of Particle Size on the Friction and Interfacial Shear Strength of Sands of Similar Morphology

Authors: Prashanth Vangla, Gali Madhavi Latha

Published in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering | Issue 1/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Size and morphological characteristics of particles play vital role on the shear and interfacial shear strength of sands. Often, effects of these parameters are merged and cannot be easily separated. Effect of size of the particles on the shear and interfacial shear strength of sands is presented in this paper through direct shear and interface direct shear tests complemented with image analyses and surface roughness studies. To eliminate the effect of morphological characteristics, three sands of different particle sizes with similar morphological characteristics like angularity, roundness, sphericity and roughness were selected for the study. These morphological characteristics for all three sands were determined from the analysis of scanning electron microscope images and were found to be similar for all three sands. It was observed from the symmetric direct shear tests that the particle size has no effect on the peak friction angle when the tests were carried out at same void ratio. However, ultimate friction angles were affected by the particle size. Shear band thickness was estimated from image segmentation analysis of the profiles of colored sand columns during shear and the same was correlated to the particle size. Interface direct shear tests were carried out on sand–geomembrane interfaces to study the effect of particle size on the interfacial shear strength. Microscopic images of geomembranes were captured after the interface shear tests to understand the change in surface roughness of the geomembrane due to particle indentations. Surface roughness studies on geomembrane samples after the tests confirmed that the plowing and groove formation on geomembranes during interface shear tests depend on the particle size as well as the relative roughness of the sand particles with respect to the membrane. Sand of medium particle size showed highest interfacial strength because of more number of effective contacts per unit area of the interface.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Vangla P, Latha GM (2014) Image segmentation technique to analyze deformation profiles in different direct shear tests. Geotech Test J ASTM 37:828–839 Vangla P, Latha GM (2014) Image segmentation technique to analyze deformation profiles in different direct shear tests. Geotech Test J ASTM 37:828–839
3.
go back to reference Mallick SB, Zhai H, Adanur S, Elton DJ (1996) Pullout and direct shear testing of geosynthetic reinforcement: state of art report. Transportation Research Record 1534, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC, 80–90 Mallick SB, Zhai H, Adanur S, Elton DJ (1996) Pullout and direct shear testing of geosynthetic reinforcement: state of art report. Transportation Research Record 1534, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC, 80–90
4.
go back to reference Uesugi M, Kishida H (1986) Influential factors of friction between steel and dry sands. Soils Found 26:33–46CrossRef Uesugi M, Kishida H (1986) Influential factors of friction between steel and dry sands. Soils Found 26:33–46CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Subba Rao KS, Allam MM, Robinson RG (1996) A note on the choice of interfacial friction angle. Geotech Eng ICE Lond 119:123–128CrossRef Subba Rao KS, Allam MM, Robinson RG (1996) A note on the choice of interfacial friction angle. Geotech Eng ICE Lond 119:123–128CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Subba Rao KS, Allam MM, Robinson RG (1998) Interfacial friction between sands and solid surfaces. Proc Inst Civ Eng, Geotech Eng 131:75–82CrossRef Subba Rao KS, Allam MM, Robinson RG (1998) Interfacial friction between sands and solid surfaces. Proc Inst Civ Eng, Geotech Eng 131:75–82CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Santamarina JC, Cho GC (2004) Soil behavior: the role of particle shape. In: Proceedings skempton conference, London, 1–14 Santamarina JC, Cho GC (2004) Soil behavior: the role of particle shape. In: Proceedings skempton conference, London, 1–14
8.
go back to reference Cho G, Dodds J, Santamarina JC (2006) Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness and strength-natural and crushed sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132:591–602CrossRef Cho G, Dodds J, Santamarina JC (2006) Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness and strength-natural and crushed sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132:591–602CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Göktepe AB, Sezer A (2010) Effect of particle shape on density and permeability of sand. Proc Inst Civ Eng 163:307–320CrossRef Göktepe AB, Sezer A (2010) Effect of particle shape on density and permeability of sand. Proc Inst Civ Eng 163:307–320CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rouse PC, Fennin RJ, Shuttle DA (2008) Influence of roundness on the void ratio and strength of uniform sand. Geotechnique 58:227–231CrossRef Rouse PC, Fennin RJ, Shuttle DA (2008) Influence of roundness on the void ratio and strength of uniform sand. Geotechnique 58:227–231CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shinohara K, Mikihiro O, Goldman B (2000) Effect of particle shape on angle of internal friction by triaxial compression test. Powder Technol 107:131–136CrossRef Shinohara K, Mikihiro O, Goldman B (2000) Effect of particle shape on angle of internal friction by triaxial compression test. Powder Technol 107:131–136CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Witt KJ, Brauns J (1983) Permeability- anisotropy due to particle shape. J Geotech Eng 109:1181–1187CrossRef Witt KJ, Brauns J (1983) Permeability- anisotropy due to particle shape. J Geotech Eng 109:1181–1187CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Williams ND, Houlihan MF (1987) Evaluation of interface friction properties between geosynthetics and soils. In: Proceedings of geosynthetics 87, New Oreleans, 616–627 Williams ND, Houlihan MF (1987) Evaluation of interface friction properties between geosynthetics and soils. In: Proceedings of geosynthetics 87, New Oreleans, 616–627
14.
go back to reference Fuggle AR, Frost JD (2010) Particle size effects in interface shear behavior and geomembrane wear. In: Proceedings of international symposium on characterization and behavior of interfaces, IOS, Atlanta, pp. 51–57 Fuggle AR, Frost JD (2010) Particle size effects in interface shear behavior and geomembrane wear. In: Proceedings of international symposium on characterization and behavior of interfaces, IOS, Atlanta, pp. 51–57
15.
go back to reference O’Rourke TD, Druschel SJ, Netravali AN (1990) Shear strength characteristics of sand polymer interfaces. J Geotech Eng 116:451–469CrossRef O’Rourke TD, Druschel SJ, Netravali AN (1990) Shear strength characteristics of sand polymer interfaces. J Geotech Eng 116:451–469CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dove JE (1996) Particle-geomembrane interface strength behavior as influenced by surface topography, Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Dove JE (1996) Particle-geomembrane interface strength behavior as influenced by surface topography, Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
17.
go back to reference Dove JE, Frost JD (1999) Peak friction behavior of smooth geomembrane particle interfaces. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125:544–555CrossRef Dove JE, Frost JD (1999) Peak friction behavior of smooth geomembrane particle interfaces. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125:544–555CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Athanasopoulos GA (1993) Effect of particle size on the mechanical behaviour of sand-geotextile composites. Geotext Geomembr 12:255–273CrossRef Athanasopoulos GA (1993) Effect of particle size on the mechanical behaviour of sand-geotextile composites. Geotext Geomembr 12:255–273CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lim MS, Wijeyesekera DC, Zainorabidin A, Bakar I (2012) The effects of particle morphology (shape and sizes) characteristics on its engineering behaviour and sustainable engineering performance of sand. Int J Integr Eng 4:27–37 Lim MS, Wijeyesekera DC, Zainorabidin A, Bakar I (2012) The effects of particle morphology (shape and sizes) characteristics on its engineering behaviour and sustainable engineering performance of sand. Int J Integr Eng 4:27–37
20.
go back to reference Santamarina JC, Cascante G (1998) Effect of surface roughness on wave propagation parameters. Geotechnique 48:129–137CrossRef Santamarina JC, Cascante G (1998) Effect of surface roughness on wave propagation parameters. Geotechnique 48:129–137CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fuggle AR (2011) Geomaterial gradation influences on interface shear behavior. Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Fuggle AR (2011) Geomaterial gradation influences on interface shear behavior. Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
22.
go back to reference Pan T (2002) Fine aggregate characterization using digital image analysis. Master’s Thesis, Louisiana State University, USA Pan T (2002) Fine aggregate characterization using digital image analysis. Master’s Thesis, Louisiana State University, USA
23.
go back to reference Altuhafi F, O’Sullivan C, Cavarretta I (2013) Analysis of an image-based method to quantify the size and shape of sand particles. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139:1290–1307CrossRef Altuhafi F, O’Sullivan C, Cavarretta I (2013) Analysis of an image-based method to quantify the size and shape of sand particles. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139:1290–1307CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ohm HS (2013) Image-based soil particle size and shape characterization. PhD Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI Ohm HS (2013) Image-based soil particle size and shape characterization. PhD Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
25.
go back to reference Pentland A (1927) A method of measuring the angularity of sands. MAG MN AL Acta Eng Dom 21:XCIII Pentland A (1927) A method of measuring the angularity of sands. MAG MN AL Acta Eng Dom 21:XCIII
26.
go back to reference Riley NA (1941) Projection sphericity. J Sediment Petrol 11:94–97 Riley NA (1941) Projection sphericity. J Sediment Petrol 11:94–97
27.
go back to reference Janoo V (1998) Quantification of shape, angularity and surface texture of base coarse materials. Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, US Army Corps of Engineers, Vermont Agency of Transportation, Special Report 98–101 Janoo V (1998) Quantification of shape, angularity and surface texture of base coarse materials. Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, US Army Corps of Engineers, Vermont Agency of Transportation, Special Report 98–101
28.
go back to reference Wadell H (1935) Volume, shape and roundness of quartz particles. J Geol 43:250–279CrossRef Wadell H (1935) Volume, shape and roundness of quartz particles. J Geol 43:250–279CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Krumbein WC (1941) Measurement and geological significance of shape and roundness of sedimentary particles. J Sediment Petrol 11:64–72CrossRef Krumbein WC (1941) Measurement and geological significance of shape and roundness of sedimentary particles. J Sediment Petrol 11:64–72CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sympatec (2008) Germany windox 5.4.1.0—operating instructions. 475–476 Sympatec (2008) Germany windox 5.4.1.0—operating instructions. 475–476
31.
go back to reference Santamarina JC, Cho GC (2001) Determination of critical state parameters in sandy soils—simple procedure. Geotech Test J 24:185–192CrossRef Santamarina JC, Cho GC (2001) Determination of critical state parameters in sandy soils—simple procedure. Geotech Test J 24:185–192CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Holtz RD, Kovacs WD (1981) An introduction to geotechnical engineering. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood cliffs Holtz RD, Kovacs WD (1981) An introduction to geotechnical engineering. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood cliffs
33.
go back to reference Herle I, Gudehus G (1999) Determination of parameters of a hypoplastic constitutive model from properties of grain assemblies. Mech Cohesive-Frict Mater 4:461–486CrossRef Herle I, Gudehus G (1999) Determination of parameters of a hypoplastic constitutive model from properties of grain assemblies. Mech Cohesive-Frict Mater 4:461–486CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Atkinson J (2007) The mechanics of soils and foundations. Taylor and Francis, London Atkinson J (2007) The mechanics of soils and foundations. Taylor and Francis, London
35.
go back to reference ASTM C1444-00 (2001) Standard method for measuring the angle of repose of free-flowing mold powders. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society of Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, p 694–695 ASTM C1444-00 (2001) Standard method for measuring the angle of repose of free-flowing mold powders. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society of Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, p 694–695
36.
go back to reference Miura K, Maeda K, Toki S (1997) Method of measurement for the angle of repose of sands. Soils Found 37:89–96CrossRef Miura K, Maeda K, Toki S (1997) Method of measurement for the angle of repose of sands. Soils Found 37:89–96CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Zhichao Liu (2008) Measuring the angle of repose of granular systems using hollow cylinders, Master of Science Thesis, B S Southwest Jiaotong University, China Zhichao Liu (2008) Measuring the angle of repose of granular systems using hollow cylinders, Master of Science Thesis, B S Southwest Jiaotong University, China
38.
go back to reference Cerato AB, Lutenegger AL (2006) Specimen size and scale effects of direct shear box tests of sands. Geotech Test J 29:1–10 Cerato AB, Lutenegger AL (2006) Specimen size and scale effects of direct shear box tests of sands. Geotech Test J 29:1–10
39.
go back to reference DeJaeger J (1994) Influence of grain size and shape on the dry sand shear behaviour. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering 1:13–16 DeJaeger J (1994) Influence of grain size and shape on the dry sand shear behaviour. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering 1:13–16
40.
go back to reference Kita K, Okamura M (2000) Bearing capacity test. Centrifuge 98(2):1067–1075 Kita K, Okamura M (2000) Bearing capacity test. Centrifuge 98(2):1067–1075
41.
go back to reference Roscoe KH (1970) Tenth Rankine lecture: the influence of strains in soil mechanics. Geotechnique 20:129–170CrossRef Roscoe KH (1970) Tenth Rankine lecture: the influence of strains in soil mechanics. Geotechnique 20:129–170CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Hartley S (1982) Shear bands in sand part II. Project Report, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK Hartley S (1982) Shear bands in sand part II. Project Report, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK
43.
go back to reference DeJaeger J (1991) Influence de la morphologie des sables sur leur comportement mecanique. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve DeJaeger J (1991) Influence de la morphologie des sables sur leur comportement mecanique. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve
44.
go back to reference Palmeira EM, Milligan GWE (1989) Scale effects in direct shear tests on sand. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1:739–742 Palmeira EM, Milligan GWE (1989) Scale effects in direct shear tests on sand. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1:739–742
45.
go back to reference Alshibli KA, Sture S (1999) Sand shear band thickness measurements by digital imaging techniques. J Comput Civil Eng 13:103–109CrossRef Alshibli KA, Sture S (1999) Sand shear band thickness measurements by digital imaging techniques. J Comput Civil Eng 13:103–109CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Dove JE, Bents DD, Wang J, Gao B (2006) Particle-scale surface interactions of non-dilative interface systems. Geotext Geomembr 24:156–168CrossRef Dove JE, Bents DD, Wang J, Gao B (2006) Particle-scale surface interactions of non-dilative interface systems. Geotext Geomembr 24:156–168CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of Particle Size on the Friction and Interfacial Shear Strength of Sands of Similar Morphology
Authors
Prashanth Vangla
Gali Madhavi Latha
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 2199-9260
Electronic ISSN: 2199-9279
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-014-0008-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 1/2015 Go to the issue