Top

Published in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Influencing Factors of Farmers’ Risk Perception on Returning Their Lands: Evidence from Chongqing, China

Author : Zhaolin Wang

Published in: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the risk perception and its influencing factors of farmers to return their lands in China. We use Ordered Probit Model to examine this topic based on primary data in Chongqing. Our finding indicates that (1) From the risk perception of homestead return: famers’ age, whether major family members settle in city, expectation of life quality after returning lands, trust of land-returning policy have a significant and negative impact on risk perception of famers’ returning. Meanwhile, stable residence lost after returning lands, unable to have enough compensation after returning lands have a significant and positive impact on the risk perception of farmers’ returning homestead (2) From the risk conception of contracted farmlands return: farmers, whether the family has a stable non-agricultural income, whether major family members have the new rural social pension insurance, expectation of life quality after returning lands, trust of land-returning policy have a significant and negative impact on the risk perception of farmers returning contracted farmlands. Meanwhile, variables unable to have stable employment for livelihood after returning lands, unable to have expenditure for pension and medical treatment after returning lands, unable to have enough compensation after returning lands have a significant and positive impact on the dependent variable the risk perception of farmers returning contracted farmlands.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Research on Environmental Benefits of Prefabricated Buildings—A Literature Review Method

next chapter Review on Building Energy Performance Labeling: Whole Life-Cycle Perspective

Cabini, E., Fontana, L., Malavasi, P., & Iavicoli, I. (2018). Land use: The perception of risk by the citizens and local administrators in the North of Italy. Land Use Policy, 76, 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.036CrossRef

Cha, S., Zhang, T., & Liu, H. (2006). Risks and their prevention for ‘company + peasant household’ business mode. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 6(3), 25–28. (in Chinese).

Chen, C., & Ding, S. (2003). Analysis of farmers’ household’ treatment strategies for risk. Chinese Rural Economy, 12, 68–72. (in Chinese).

Chen, J. X., Zhang, T. H., & Zhou, Y. W. (2020). Dynamics of a risk-averse newsvendor model with continuous-time delay in supply chain financing. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 169, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2019.09.009CrossRef

Dreher, A., & Voigt, S. (2011). Does membership in international organizations increase governments’ credibility? Testing the effects of delegating powers. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(3), 326–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2011.04.003CrossRef

Essig, G. F., Niermeyer, W. L., Essandoh, M., Dewhirst, E., Gerlach, R. M., Gonzalez, L. S., & Chaney, M. A. (2020). Averting risk of airway loss during surgical management of retrosternal goiters. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 34(8), 2260–2268. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.03.015CrossRef

Fields, G., & Song, Y. (2020). Modeling migration barriers in a two-sector framework: A welfare analysis of the Hukou reform in China. Economic Modelling, 84, 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.04.019 CrossRef

Gu, H. Y., Ling, Y. K., Shen, T. Y., & Yang, L. D. (2020). How does rural homestead influence the Hukou transfer intention of rural-urban migrants in China? Habitat International, 105, 102267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102267

Huang, Z., & Huang, Z. (1996). Risk management in farmers’ scale land operations. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 17(14), 191–193. (in Chinese).

10.

Johnson, L. (2017). Bordering Shanghai: China’s Hukou system and processes of urban bordering. Geoforum, 80, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.01.005CrossRef

11.

Kang, S. B., & Létourneau, P. (2016). Investors’ reaction to the government credibility problem: A real option analysis of emission permit policy risk. Energy Economics, 54, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.023CrossRef

12.

Li, L., Li, S. M., & Chen, Y. F. (2010). Better city, better life, but for whom? The Hukou and resident card system and the consequential citizenship stratification in Shanghai. City, Culture and Society, 1(3), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2010.09.003 (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916610000160)

13.

Liu, L., Shangguan, D. Y., Li, X. F., & Jiang, Z. D. (2020). Influence of peasant household differentiation and risk perception on soil and water conservation tillage technology adoption- an analysis of moderating effects based on government subsidies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 125092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125092

14.

Liu, M. M., Bi, J., Yang, J. X., Qu, S., & Wang J. N. (2020). Social media never shake the role of trust building in relieving public risk perception. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124442.

15.

Lu, W., & Xi, A. (2005). Farmers’ response to agricultural production risk: MOTAD model analysis from Zhejiang province. Chinese Rural Economy, 12, 68–72. (in Chinese).

16.

Luo, J., & Wang, X. X. (2020). Hukou identity and trust—Evidence from a framed field experiment in China. China Economic Review, 59, 101383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101383CrossRef

17.

Pan, D., He, M. M., & Kong, F. B. (2020). Risk attitude, risk perception, and farmers’ pesticide application behavior in China: A moderation and mediation model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124241CrossRef

18.

Sawik, T. (2020). On the risk-averse selection of resilient multi-tier supply portfolio. Omega, 102267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102267

19.

Shapiro, A. (2021). Tutorial on risk neutral, distributionally robust and risk averse multistage stochastic programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 288 (1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.03.065. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221720302988)

20.

Sheng, J. L., Xu, S., An, Y. B., & Yang, J. (2021). Dynamic portfolio strategy by loss-averse fund managers facing performance-induced fund flows. International Review of Financial Analysis, 73, 101609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101609CrossRef

21.

Song, Q., & Smith, J. P. (2019). Hukou system, mechanisms, and health stratification across the life course in rural and urban China. Health & Place, 58, 102150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102150CrossRef

22.

Wang, F. C., Milner, C., & Scheffel, J. (2020). Labour market reform and firm-level employment adjustment: Evidence from the Hukou reform in China. Journal of Development Economics, 102584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102584

23.

Wang, Z. L., Yang, Q. Y., & Zang, B. (2011). Study on famers’ willingness and its influencing factors to withdraw from land in the reform of Hukou in Chongqing. Chinese Rural Economy, 11, 49–61. (in Chinese).

24.

Wang, Z. L., & Yang, Q. Y. (2014). Study on decision making and its influencing factors of famers’ land withdrawal in Chongqing. China Land Science, 28(09), 32–38. (in Chinese).

25.

Wu, K., & Chen, X. (2011). Willingness of farmers returning lands key points: A case of Chongqing. Reform, 10, 61–66.

26.

Xiong, X. (2010). Urban-rural integration development: Intersections, difficulties of adjusting the pattern of urban and rural interests and urbanization path- “China’s urban-rural integration development: Status and prospects seminar summary.” Chinese Rural Economy, 11, 93–94.

27.

Yin, X., Ma, D., & Chen, B. (2011). Institutional change analysis of Urban-rural integration development household registration system reform in Chongqing. Discovery, 2, 138–142.

28.

Zhang, J. P., Huang, J., Wang, J. H., & Guo, L. (2020). Return migration and Hukou registration constraints in Chinese cities. China Economic Review, 63, 101498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101498CrossRef

29.

Zhang, X., & Ding, R. (2009). Returning mechanism of underdeveloped rural and remote areas homestead: A case study. China Rural Survey, 6, 23–27.

Title: Influencing Factors of Farmers’ Risk Perception on Returning Their Lands: Evidence from Chongqing, China
Author: Zhaolin Wang
Publisher: Springer Singapore
Book: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3586-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-16-3587-8

Copyright Year: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3587-8_45

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"