Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
European SME Financing: An Empirical Taxonomy Read chapter Read first chapter

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Innovation and Investment Finance in Comparison

Author : Volker Zimmermann

Published in: Contemporary Developments in Entrepreneurial Finance

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article compares the financing of innovation and investment in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SME). The central finding of the study is that the financing of these two types of projects differs substantially. Innovations are for the most part covered by internal funds. Other sources of funding play a subordinate role. For investments, on the other hand, both internal funds and bank loans play an important role. The study provides evidence that points to the existence of special restrictions for the external financing of innovations. For example, the share of bank loans only increases comparatively little as innovation expenditure goes up. In addition, the share of bank loans decreases as the share of R&D expenditure on innovation spending increases. This is in line with the consideration that special features of innovation projects, such as uncertainty about the success and asymmetric information between the firm and the potential outside investor combined with a lack of new assets to collateralise bank loans, counteract external financing. Financing restrictions are likely to lead to the innovation potential lying idle due to market imperfections. Working against it thus represents a permanent task of economic policy.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter The European Capital Markets Union and its Impact on Future SME Financing
next chapter Trends in Financing Programmes for the Development of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Nigeria: A Qualitative Meta-synthesis
Footnotes
1
Since the Stata programme package used for the analysis has not implemented t-tests for weighted values, Wald tests are used for this purpose.
 
2
These include expenditures for internal and external R&D, innovation-related expenses for machinery, equipment, software and external knowledge (e.g. patents, licences). In addition, this includes expenses for product design, engineering, conceptualisation of services and preparation for the production and sale of innovations, as well as training in connection with innovations and their market introduction.
 
3
Values of 500 indicate a massive default in payment and 600 the suspension of payments. In order to exclude enterprises that were already experiencing massive payment difficulties, the analysis only includes enterprises with a credit rating of no worse than 400.
 
4
Due to a small number of missing observations on some characteristics, the results may differ slightly from those for the whole dataset.
 
5
The innovation financing of young enterprises is the only category examined here, in which equity financing could be determined to an evaluable extent.
 
6
In order to rule out any influence of the current financing on the credit rating, the credit ratings used, refer to the beginning of the period under consideration.
 
7
The category “excellent–very good” includes the companies with an index value of maximum 199, the categories “good” and “good–medium” the index values from 200 to 249 and 250 to 299 and the category “medium–weak” companies from an index value of 300.
 
8
Also for classifying the return on sales, the value refers to the previous period.
 
Literature
Almeida, H., & Campello, M. (2007). Financial constraints, asset tangibility, and corporate investment. Review of Financial Studies, 20, 1429–1460.CrossRef
Arend, J., & Zimmermann, V. (2009). Innovationshemmnisse in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen. KfW Research. Mittelstands- und Strukturpolitik, 43, 57–95.
Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity (pp. 609–625). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (MA): Economic and Social Factors.CrossRef
Behrens, V., Berger, M., Hud, M., Hünermund, P., Iferd, Y., Peters, B., Rammer, C., & Schubert, T. (2017). Innovation activities of firms in Germany – Results of the German CIS 2012 and 2014. Dokumentation Nr. 17-04. Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.
Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1990). Collateral, loan quality and bank risk. Journal of Monetary Economics, 25, 21–42.CrossRef
Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1995). Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance. Journal of Business, 68, 351–381.CrossRef
Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1998). The economics of small business finance. The role of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 613–673.CrossRef
Bhattacharya, S., & Ritter, J. (1983). Innovation and communications: Signalling partial disclosure. The Review of Economic Studies, 50, 331–346.CrossRef
Calomiris, C. W., & Hubbard, R. G. (1990). Firm heterogeneity, internal finance, and ‘credit rationing’. The Economic Journal, 100, 90–104.CrossRef
Carpenter, R., & Petersen, B. (2002). Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment and new equity financing. The Econometrics Journal, 112, 54–72.
Coad, A., Frankish, J. S., Roberts, R. G., & Storey, D. J. (2016a). Predicting new venture survival and growth: Does the fog lift? Small Business Economics, 47, 217–241.CrossRef
Coad, A., & Rao, E. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy, 37, 633–648.CrossRef
Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2016b). Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role? Research Policy, 45(2), 387–400.CrossRef
Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996). A reprise of size and R&D. The Econometrics Journal, 106, 925–951.
Cosh, A., & Hughes, A. (1994). Size, financial structure and profitability: UK companies in the 1980s. In A. Hughes & D. Storey (Eds.), finance and the small firm (pp. 18–63). London: Routledge.
Czarnitzki, D. (2006). Research and development in small and medium-sized enterprises: The role of financial constraints and public funding. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 53(3), 335–357.CrossRef
Czarnitzki, D., & Hottenrott, H. (2010). Financing constraints for industrial innovation: What do we know? ReBEL, 55(3), 346–263.
Czarnitzki, D., & Hottenrott, H. (2011). R&D investment and financing constraints of small and medium-sized firms. Small Business Economics, 36(1), 65–83.CrossRef
D’Attoma, I., & Pacei, S. (2018). Evaluating the effects of product innovation on the performance of European firms by using the generalised propensity score. The German Economic Review, 19(1), 94–112.CrossRef
Dachs, B., Hud, M., Koehler, C., & Peters, B. (2017). Innovation, creative destruction and structural chance: Firm-level evidence from European countries. Industry and Innovation, 2(4), 346–381.CrossRef
Encaoua, D., Laisney, F., Hall, B., & Mairesse, J. (2000). The economics and econometrics of innovation. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Falk, M. (2015). Employment effects of technological and organizational innovations: Evidence based on linked firm-level data for Austria. Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik, 235(3), 268–285.CrossRef
Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2008). Trade-off and pecking order theories of debt. In B. E. Eckbo (Ed.), Handbook of corporate finance: Empirical corporate finance (pp. 135–202). Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland.CrossRef
Fritsch, M., Brixy, U., & Falck, O. (2006). The effect of industry, region and time on new business survival – A multi-dimensional analysis. Review of Industrial Organization, 28, 285–306.CrossRef
Galbraith, J. K. (1952). American capitalism. The concept of countervailing power. Boston: Hougthon Mifflin.
Garcia-Quevedo, J., Segarra-Blasco, A., & Teruel, M. (2018). Financial constraints and the failure of innovation projects. Technological Forecasting and Social, 127, 127–140.CrossRef
Gerstenberger, J., Zimmermann, V., & Bretz, M. (2016). Unternehmensbonität – eine nicht zu vernachlässigende Größe. In Bundesverband Credit Management e.V (Ed.), Verlässliches Credit Management in turbulenten Zeiten (pp. 25–48). Kleve: Credit & Finance Verlag.
Giebel, M., & Kraft, K. (2018). Bank credit supply and firm innovation. (ZEW Discussion Paper No. 18-011). Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.
Guiso, L. (1998). High-tech firms and credit rationing. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35, 39–59.CrossRef
Hall, B. H. (1992). Research and Development at the firm level: Does the source of financing matter? (NBER Working Paper No. 4096). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (pp. 609–639). Amsterdam: Elsevier–North Holland.CrossRef
Hao, K. Y., & Jaffe, A. B. (1993). Effect of liquidity on firms’ R&D spending. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2, 275–282.CrossRef
Harhoff, D. (1998). Are there financing constraints for R&D and investment in German manufacturing firms? Annales d’Économie et de Statistique, 49/50, 421–456.CrossRef
Harhoff, D., & Körting, T. (1998). Lending relationships in Germany – Empirical evidence from survey data. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 1317–1353.CrossRef
Himmelberg, C. P., & Petersen, B. C. (1994). R&D and internal finance: A panel study of small firms in high-tech industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 38–51.CrossRef
Holmstrom, B. (1989). Agency costs and innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12, 305–327.CrossRef
Hottenrott, H., & Peters, B. (2012). Innovative capability and financing constraints for innovation – more money, more innovation? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(4), 1126–1142.CrossRef
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). The theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRef
Kerr, W. R., & Nanda, R. (2015). Financing innovation. Annual Review of Financial, 7(1), 445–462.CrossRef
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Lachenmaier, S., & Rottmann, H. (2007). Employment effects of innovation at the firm level. Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik, 227(3), 254–272.CrossRef
Levenson, A. R., & Willard, K. L. (2000). Do firms get the financing they want? Measuring credit rationing experienced by small businesses in the U.S. Small Business Economics, 14, 83–94.CrossRef
Magri, S. (2009). The financing of small innovative firms: The Italian case. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(2), 181–204.CrossRef
Martin, S., & Scott, J. (2000). The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation. Research Policy, 29, 437–448.CrossRef
Mohnen, P. A., Palm, F., van der Loeff, S. S., & Tiwari, A. (2008). Financial constraints and other obstacles: Are they a threat to innovation activity? De Economist, 156, 201–214.CrossRef
Müller, S., & Stegmaier, J. (2014). Economic failure and the role of plant age and size. First evidence from German administrative data (IAB Discussion Paper 13/2014). Nürnberg: Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung.
Müller, E., & Zimmermann, V. (2009). The importance of equity finance for R&D activity. Small Business Economics, 33(3), 303–318.CrossRef
Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39, 575–592.CrossRef
Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187–221.CrossRef
OECD. (2015). Frascati Manual 2015. Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development, the measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. Paris: OECD.
Peters, B., Roberts, M. J., & Vuong, V. A. (2017). Dynamic R&D choice and the impact of the firm’s financial strength. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(1–2), 134–149.CrossRef
Petersen, M., & Rajan, R. G. (1994). The benefits of firm-creditor relationships: Evidence from small business data. The Journal of Finance, 49, 3–37.CrossRef
Rammer, C., Berger, M., Doherr, T., Hud, M., Hünermund, P., Iferd, Y., Peters, B., & Schubert, T. (2017). Indikatorenbericht zur Innovationserhebung 2016. Mannheim: Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung.
Rammer, C., Gottschalk, S., Peters, B., Bersch, J., & Erdsiek, D. (2016). Die Rolle von KMU für Forschung und Innovation in Deutschland, Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. 10/2016. Berlin: Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation.
Rammer, C., & Peters, B. (2010). Innovationsverhalten der Unternehmen in Deutschland 2008: Aktuelle Entwicklungen – Innovationsperspektiven – Beschäftigungsbeitrag von Innovationen. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. 17-2010. Berlin: Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation.
Rammer, C., & Peters, B. (2015). Dokumentation zur Innovationserhebung 2014. Innovationen mit Bezug zur Energiewende, Finanzierung von Innovationen (Dokumentation Nr. 15-02). Mannheim: Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung.
Rammer, C., & Schubert, T. (2018). Concentration on the Few: Mechanisms behind a falling share of innovative firms in Germany. Research Policy, 47, 379–389.CrossRef
Schäfer, D., & Stephan, A. (2017). Innovation and investment funding in the post-crisis period: Have financing patterns and financial constraints of German firms changed? Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 86(1), 129–142.CrossRef
Schäfer, D., Stephan, A., & Solórzano Mosquera, J. (2017). Innovation capabilities and financing constraints of family firms. Small Business Economics, 48(4), 931–951.CrossRef
Scherer, F. M., & Harhoff, D. (2000). Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 559–566.CrossRef
Schwartz, M. (2017). KfW-Mittelstandspanel 2017; Rekordjagd im Inland geht ungebremst weiter – neue Herausforderungen durch sektoralen Wandel. Frankfurt: KfW Research.
Spielkamp, A., & Rammer, C. (2009). Financing of innovation – Thresholds and options. Management and Marketing, 4(2), 3–18.
Stifterverband. (2017). ˌɑ:r ən ˈdi: Zahlenwerk 2017. Stifterverband für die deutsche Wissenschaft e.V., Essen.
Stiglitz, J. E. (1985). Credit markets and capital controls. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 17, 133–152.CrossRef
Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.
Thomä, J., & Zimmermann, V. (2016). Innovationhemmnisse in KMU: Eine empirische Analyse unter Berücksichtigung des Handwerks. Göttinger Beiträge zur Handwerksforschung Nr. 6. Göttingen: Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität.
Ueda, M. (2004). Banks versus venture capital: Project evaluation, screening and expropriation. The Journal of Finance, 59(2), 601–621.CrossRef
Ulku, H. (2004). R&D, Innovation, and economic growth: An empirical analysis (IMF Working Paper 04/195). Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
Winker, P. (1996). Rationierung auf dem Markt für Unternehmenskredite in der BRD. Tübingen: Mohr & Siebeck.
Zimmermann, V. (2009). The impact of innovation on employment in small and medium enterprises with different growth rates. Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik, 229(2+3), 313–326.CrossRef
Zimmermann, V. (2013b). Bestimmungsfaktoren der Innovationsfinanzierung in mittelständischen Unternehmen. Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 61(3), 197–218.CrossRef
Zimmermann, V. (2014). Innovation und Beschäftigung. Die Beschäftigungswirkung verschiedener Arten von Innovationen in expandierenden und schrumpfenden mittelständischen Unternehmen. JBE, ZfB-Special Issue 4/2013:131–149.
Zimmermann, V. (2015). Innovationsfinanzierung – Herausforderungen für mittelständische Unternehmen. Corporate Finance, 6, 183–190.
Zimmermann, V. (2016). Access to credit varies considerably depending on the purpose (Focus on Economics No. 148), Frankfurt: KfW Research.
Zimmermann, V. (2017). KfW SME Innovation Report 2016: Innovation is concentrated in increasingly fewer enterprises. Frankfurt: KfW Research.
Zimmermann, V. (2018). KfW SME innovation report 2017: Trend towards fewer innovators continues. Frankfurt: KfW Research.
Metadata
Title
Innovation and Investment Finance in Comparison
Author
Volker Zimmermann
Copyright Year
2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Book
Contemporary Developments in Entrepreneurial Finance

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17611-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-17612-9

Copyright Year: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17612-9_3