Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Public Organization Review 2/2017

02-12-2015

Intelligent Public Organisations

Authors: Jari Stenvall, Petri Virtanen

Published in: Public Organization Review | Issue 2/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The article explores the nature of the intelligence and organisational learning of public sector organisations with regard to both individual organisations and multiple organisational ecosystems. The main ideas behind modern systems theory (MST) and the logic developed by the MST theorists in the domain of organisational intelligence are pinpointed in the paper. The article presupposes that the basic structure of the organisational features of intelligence consists of leadership, strategy and foresight, people, partnerships and resources, and organisational processes, and the intelligence builds on these features. The article concludes with an explicit definition of the organisational activities that generate organisational intelligence, putting forward best practice examples with regard to these activities while also presenting scientific evidence to back up these claims.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. An essay on the division of expert labour. Chicago: University of Chicago press. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. An essay on the division of expert labour. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
go back to reference Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J. C., & Keskin, H. (2007). Organizational intelligence: a structuration view. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(3), 272–289.CrossRef Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J. C., & Keskin, H. (2007). Organizational intelligence: a structuration view. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(3), 272–289.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, P. (1999). Perspective: complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216–232.CrossRef Anderson, P. (1999). Perspective: complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216–232.CrossRef
go back to reference Argyris, C. (2010). Organizational traps: Leadership, culture, organizational design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Argyris, C. (2010). Organizational traps: Leadership, culture, organizational design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Billis, D. (2010a). From welfare bureaucracies to welfare hybrids. In D. Billis (Ed.), Hybrid organizations and the third sector (pp. 46–71). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Billis, D. (2010a). From welfare bureaucracies to welfare hybrids. In D. Billis (Ed.), Hybrid organizations and the third sector (pp. 46–71). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Billis, D. (2010b). Towards a theory of hybrid organizations. In D. Billis (Ed.), Hybrid organizations and the third sector (pp. 46–71). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Billis, D. (2010b). Towards a theory of hybrid organizations. In D. Billis (Ed.), Hybrid organizations and the third sector (pp. 46–71). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Blomberg, J. (1998). Myter om project. Stockholm: Nerenius & Santérus. Blomberg, J. (1998). Myter om project. Stockholm: Nerenius & Santérus.
go back to reference Blomberg, J. (2003). Projektorganisationen. Kritiska analyser av projektprat och praktik. Malmö: Liberekonomi. Blomberg, J. (2003). Projektorganisationen. Kritiska analyser av projektprat och praktik. Malmö: Liberekonomi.
go back to reference Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing performance. International comparisons. London: Routledge. Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing performance. International comparisons. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Bovard, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation – user and community co-production of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.CrossRef Bovard, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation – user and community co-production of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, K., Waterhouse, J., & Flynn, C. (2003). Change management practices: is a hybrid model a better alternative for public sector agencies? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16(3), 230–241.CrossRef Brown, K., Waterhouse, J., & Flynn, C. (2003). Change management practices: is a hybrid model a better alternative for public sector agencies? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16(3), 230–241.CrossRef
go back to reference Brunsson, N., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000). Constructing organizations: the example of public sector reform. Organization Studies, 21(4), 721–746.CrossRef Brunsson, N., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000). Constructing organizations: the example of public sector reform. Organization Studies, 21(4), 721–746.CrossRef
go back to reference Brusoni, S., & Prencipe, A. (2013). The organization of innovation in ecosystems: problem framing, problem solving, and patterns of coupling. Advances in Strategic Management, 30(2013), 167–194.CrossRef Brusoni, S., & Prencipe, A. (2013). The organization of innovation in ecosystems: problem framing, problem solving, and patterns of coupling. Advances in Strategic Management, 30(2013), 167–194.CrossRef
go back to reference Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and modern systems theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and modern systems theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
go back to reference Burnes, B. (2005). Complexity theories and organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 73–90.CrossRef Burnes, B. (2005). Complexity theories and organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 73–90.CrossRef
go back to reference Catino, M. (2013). Organizational myopia. Problems of rationality and foresight in organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Catino, M. (2013). Organizational myopia. Problems of rationality and foresight in organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Checkland, P. (1980). The systems movement and the”failure” of management science. Cybernetics and Systems, 11(4), 317–324.CrossRef Checkland, P. (1980). The systems movement and the”failure” of management science. Cybernetics and Systems, 11(4), 317–324.CrossRef
go back to reference Checkland, P. (1985). From optimizing to learning. A development of systems thinking for the 1990s. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36(9), 757–767.CrossRef Checkland, P. (1985). From optimizing to learning. A development of systems thinking for the 1990s. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36(9), 757–767.CrossRef
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
go back to reference Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2008). Open innovation. Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2008). Open innovation. Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Choi, T., & Meyers Chandler, S. (2015). Exploration, exploitation, and public sector innovation: an organizational learning perspective for the public sector. Human Service Organizations Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(2), 139–151.CrossRef Choi, T., & Meyers Chandler, S. (2015). Exploration, exploitation, and public sector innovation: an organizational learning perspective for the public sector. Human Service Organizations Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(2), 139–151.CrossRef
go back to reference Davis, J. P. (2013). The emergence and coordination of synchrony in organizational ecosystems. Advances in Strategic Management Vol., 30(2013), 197–237.CrossRef Davis, J. P. (2013). The emergence and coordination of synchrony in organizational ecosystems. Advances in Strategic Management Vol., 30(2013), 197–237.CrossRef
go back to reference de Rond, M., & Morley, I. (Eds.) (2010). Serendipity. Fortune and the prepared mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. de Rond, M., & Morley, I. (Eds.) (2010). Serendipity. Fortune and the prepared mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Dickinson, H., & Glasby, J. (2010). Why partnership working doesn’t work? Public Management Review, 12(6), 811–828.CrossRef Dickinson, H., & Glasby, J. (2010). Why partnership working doesn’t work? Public Management Review, 12(6), 811–828.CrossRef
go back to reference DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2012). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In C. Calhoun et al. (Eds.), Contemporary sociological theory (pp. 175–192). London: Wiley & Blackwell. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2012). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In C. Calhoun et al. (Eds.), Contemporary sociological theory (pp. 175–192). London: Wiley & Blackwell.
go back to reference Fernandez, S., & Pitts, D. W. (2007). Under what conditions do public managers favor and pursue organizational change? The American Review of Public Administration, 2007, 324–341.CrossRef Fernandez, S., & Pitts, D. W. (2007). Under what conditions do public managers favor and pursue organizational change? The American Review of Public Administration, 2007, 324–341.CrossRef
go back to reference Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 2006, 168–176.CrossRef Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 2006, 168–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Finkelstein, S., & Jackson, E. M. (2005). Immunity from impulsion: building smart leadership. Ivey Business Journal, 2005, 1–7. Finkelstein, S., & Jackson, E. M. (2005). Immunity from impulsion: building smart leadership. Ivey Business Journal, 2005, 1–7.
go back to reference Flood, R. L. (2010). The relationship between ‘systems thinking’ to action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(4), 269–284.CrossRef Flood, R. L. (2010). The relationship between ‘systems thinking’ to action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(4), 269–284.CrossRef
go back to reference Flood, R. L., & Ulrich, W. (1990). Testament to conversations on critical systems thinking between two systems practioners. Systems Practice, 3(1), 7–29.CrossRef Flood, R. L., & Ulrich, W. (1990). Testament to conversations on critical systems thinking between two systems practioners. Systems Practice, 3(1), 7–29.CrossRef
go back to reference Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2009). Clever. Leading your smartest, most creative people. Boston: Havard Business. Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2009). Clever. Leading your smartest, most creative people. Boston: Havard Business.
go back to reference Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2013). Primal leadership. Unleashing the power of emotional intelligence. Boston Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2013). Primal leadership. Unleashing the power of emotional intelligence. Boston Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.
go back to reference Greve, C. (2015). Ideas in public management reform for the 2010s. Digitalization, value creation and involvement. Public Organization Review, 15, 49–65.CrossRef Greve, C. (2015). Ideas in public management reform for the 2010s. Digitalization, value creation and involvement. Public Organization Review, 15, 49–65.CrossRef
go back to reference Hackman, J. R. (2011). Collaborative intelligence: using teams to solve hard problems. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Hackman, J. R. (2011). Collaborative intelligence: using teams to solve hard problems. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
go back to reference Harrison, M. I., & Shirom, A. (1999). Organizational diagnosis and assessment. Bridging theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Harrison, M. I., & Shirom, A. (1999). Organizational diagnosis and assessment. Bridging theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations. Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival: software of the mind. London: Profile Books. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations. Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival: software of the mind. London: Profile Books.
go back to reference Hsieh, Y. H., Lin, Y. T., & Yuan, S. T. (2013). Expectation-based co-operation? Approach to service experience design. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 34, 64–85.CrossRef Hsieh, Y. H., Lin, Y. T., & Yuan, S. T. (2013). Expectation-based co-operation? Approach to service experience design. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 34, 64–85.CrossRef
go back to reference Joas, H., & Knöbl, W. (2011). Social theory. Twenty introductory lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Joas, H., & Knöbl, W. (2011). Social theory. Twenty introductory lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin Books. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin Books.
go back to reference Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard. Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard. Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy-focused organization. How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy-focused organization. How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Karasek, R. (1979). Job demand, job decision latitude and mental strain. Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308.CrossRef Karasek, R. (1979). Job demand, job decision latitude and mental strain. Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308.CrossRef
go back to reference Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1972). General systems theory: applications for organizations and management. Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), 447–465.CrossRef Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1972). General systems theory: applications for organizations and management. Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), 447–465.CrossRef
go back to reference Klijn, E.-H. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe. An assessment of ten years of research on theme. Public Management Review, 10(4), 505–525.CrossRef Klijn, E.-H. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe. An assessment of ten years of research on theme. Public Management Review, 10(4), 505–525.CrossRef
go back to reference Lan, C., & Rainey, H. (1992). Goals, rules, and effectiveness in public, private, and hybrid organizations: more evidence on frequent assertions about differences. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(1), 5–28. Lan, C., & Rainey, H. (1992). Goals, rules, and effectiveness in public, private, and hybrid organizations: more evidence on frequent assertions about differences. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(1), 5–28.
go back to reference Lane, J. E. (Ed.) (1997). Public sector reform: rationale, trends and problems. London: Sage Publications. Lane, J. E. (Ed.) (1997). Public sector reform: rationale, trends and problems. London: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Launonen, M., & Viitanen, J. (2011). Hubconcepts. The global best practice for managing innovation ecosystems and hubs. Oulu: Hubconcepts Inc.. Launonen, M., & Viitanen, J. (2011). Hubconcepts. The global best practice for managing innovation ecosystems and hubs. Oulu: Hubconcepts Inc..
go back to reference Lindblom, C. (1965). The intelligence of democracy: Decision making through mutual adjustment. New York: The Free Press. Lindblom, C. (1965). The intelligence of democracy: Decision making through mutual adjustment. New York: The Free Press.
go back to reference Luhmann, N. (1984). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Luhmann, N. (1984). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
go back to reference MacIntosh, R., Maclean, D., Stacey, R. D., & Griffin, D. (Eds.) (2013). Complexity and organization. New York: Routledge. MacIntosh, R., Maclean, D., Stacey, R. D., & Griffin, D. (Eds.) (2013). Complexity and organization. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference McElroy, M. W. (2000). Integrating complexity theory, knowledge management and organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3), 195.CrossRef McElroy, M. W. (2000). Integrating complexity theory, knowledge management and organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3), 195.CrossRef
go back to reference Meier, K.J., O’Toole Jr., L.J. (2013), Comparing public and private management: theoretical expectations. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, doi:10.1093/jopart/mur027 First Published Online: June 1, 2011. Meier, K.J., O’Toole Jr., L.J. (2013), Comparing public and private management: theoretical expectations. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, doi:10.​1093/​jopart/​mur027 First Published Online: June 1, 2011.
go back to reference Michel, L. (2013). The performance triangle. Diagnostic mentoring to manage organizations and people for superior performance in turbulent times. London: BPR. Michel, L. (2013). The performance triangle. Diagnostic mentoring to manage organizations and people for superior performance in turbulent times. London: BPR.
go back to reference Miles, I. (2005). Innovation in services. In J. Fagerberg et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 433–458). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Miles, I. (2005). Innovation in services. In J. Fagerberg et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 433–458). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference O’Mahoney, J., & Vincent, S. (2014). Critical realism as empirical project. In P. Edwards, J. O’Mahoney, & S. Vincent (Eds.), Studying organizations using critical realism. A Practical Guide (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press. O’Mahoney, J., & Vincent, S. (2014). Critical realism as empirical project. In P. Edwards, J. O’Mahoney, & S. Vincent (Eds.), Studying organizations using critical realism. A Practical Guide (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2005). How job characteristics theory happened? In K. G. Smith, & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management. The process of theory development (pp. 151–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2005). How job characteristics theory happened? In K. G. Smith, & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management. The process of theory development (pp. 151–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Osborne, S. P., & Brown, K. (2005). Managing change and innovation in public service organizations. London: Routledge.CrossRef Osborne, S. P., & Brown, K. (2005). Managing change and innovation in public service organizations. London: Routledge.CrossRef
go back to reference Osborne, S., Radnon, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Towards a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158.CrossRef Osborne, S., Radnon, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Towards a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158.CrossRef
go back to reference Øvretveit, J. (2005). Public service quality improvement. In E. Ferlie et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 51–71). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Øvretveit, J. (2005). Public service quality improvement. In E. Ferlie et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 51–71). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Pestoff, V. (2006). Citizens and co-production of welfare services. Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, 8(4), 503–519.CrossRef Pestoff, V. (2006). Citizens and co-production of welfare services. Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, 8(4), 503–519.CrossRef
go back to reference Pestoff, V., & Brandsen, T. (2010). Public governance and the third sector: Opportunities for co-production and innovation. In S. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance (pp. 223–236). London: Routledge. Pestoff, V., & Brandsen, T. (2010). Public governance and the third sector: Opportunities for co-production and innovation. In S. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance (pp. 223–236). London: Routledge.
go back to reference Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Popper, K. R. (1945). Open society and its enemies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Popper, K. R. (1945). Open society and its enemies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
go back to reference Porter, L. J., & Tanner, S. J. (2004). Assessing business excellence. A guide to business excellence and self-assessment. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Porter, L. J., & Tanner, S. J. (2004). Assessing business excellence. A guide to business excellence and self-assessment. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Roberts, J. (2004). The modern firm. Organizational design for performance and growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Roberts, J. (2004). The modern firm. Organizational design for performance and growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Schwaninger, M. (2001). Intelligent organizations: an integrative framework. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 18(2001), 137–158.CrossRef Schwaninger, M. (2001). Intelligent organizations: an integrative framework. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 18(2001), 137–158.CrossRef
go back to reference Senge, P. M. (1997). The fith discipline. Measuring Business Excellence, 1(3), 46–51.CrossRef Senge, P. M. (1997). The fith discipline. Measuring Business Excellence, 1(3), 46–51.CrossRef
go back to reference Senge, P. M., & Sterman, J. D. (1992). Systems thinking and organizational learning: acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 59(1), 137–150.CrossRef Senge, P. M., & Sterman, J. D. (1992). Systems thinking and organizational learning: acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 59(1), 137–150.CrossRef
go back to reference Shostak, G. L. (1977). Breaking free from product marketing. Journal of Marketing, 41(2), 73–80.CrossRef Shostak, G. L. (1977). Breaking free from product marketing. Journal of Marketing, 41(2), 73–80.CrossRef
go back to reference Stacey, R. D. (1992). Managing the unknowable. Strategic boundaries between order and chaos in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Stacey, R. D. (1992). Managing the unknowable. Strategic boundaries between order and chaos in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
go back to reference Stacey, R. D. (1995). The science of complexity: an alternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 477–495.CrossRef Stacey, R. D. (1995). The science of complexity: an alternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 477–495.CrossRef
go back to reference Stacey, R. D. (2007). Strategic management and organizational dynamics. The challenge of complexity. Harlow: Prentice-Hall. Stacey, R. D. (2007). Strategic management and organizational dynamics. The challenge of complexity. Harlow: Prentice-Hall.
go back to reference Stacey, R. D. (2012). Tools and techniques of leadership and management. Meeting the challenge of complexity. New York: Routledge. Stacey, R. D. (2012). Tools and techniques of leadership and management. Meeting the challenge of complexity. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Stenvall, J., Virtanen, P. (2012). Sosiaali- ja terveyspalvelujen uudistaminen. Reforming Social Welfare and Health Care Services, Helsinki: Tietosanoma. Stenvall, J., Virtanen, P. (2012). Sosiaali- ja terveyspalvelujen uudistaminen. Reforming Social Welfare and Health Care Services, Helsinki: Tietosanoma.
go back to reference Sullivan, H., & Skelcher, C. (2002). Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Sullivan, H., & Skelcher, C. (2002). Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Sutton, R. I., & Rao, H. (2014). Scaling up the excellence. Getting to more without settling for less. New York: Random House. Sutton, R. I., & Rao, H. (2014). Scaling up the excellence. Getting to more without settling for less. New York: Random House.
go back to reference Sveiby, K.-E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Sveiby, K.-E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
go back to reference Sveiby, K.-E. (2001). A knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(4), 344–358.CrossRef Sveiby, K.-E. (2001). A knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(4), 344–358.CrossRef
go back to reference Sydänmaalakka, P. (2002). An intelligent organization. London: Capstone. Sydänmaalakka, P. (2002). An intelligent organization. London: Capstone.
go back to reference Tsoukas, H. (2005). Complex knowledege. Studies in organizational epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tsoukas, H. (2005). Complex knowledege. Studies in organizational epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Living systems theory as a paradigm for organizational behavior: understanding humans, organizations, and social processes. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 41(3), 165–204.CrossRef Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Living systems theory as a paradigm for organizational behavior: understanding humans, organizations, and social processes. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 41(3), 165–204.CrossRef
go back to reference Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A. (2009). Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: clarifications. Service Science, 1(1), 32–41.CrossRef Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A. (2009). Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: clarifications. Service Science, 1(1), 32–41.CrossRef
go back to reference Vargo, S., Maglio, P., & Akaka, M. (2008). On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26, 145–152.CrossRef Vargo, S., Maglio, P., & Akaka, M. (2008). On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26, 145–152.CrossRef
go back to reference Virtanen, P., Stenvall, J. (2014). Älykäs julkinen organisaatio. An Intelligent Public Organisation, Helsinki: Tietosanoma. Virtanen, P., Stenvall, J. (2014). Älykäs julkinen organisaatio. An Intelligent Public Organisation, Helsinki: Tietosanoma.
go back to reference Virtanen, P., Vakkuri, J. (2015). Searching for organizational intelligence in the evolution of public sector performance management, article manuscript. Journal of Public Administration and Policy (forthcoming). Virtanen, P., Vakkuri, J. (2015). Searching for organizational intelligence in the evolution of public sector performance management, article manuscript. Journal of Public Administration and Policy (forthcoming).
go back to reference Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organisations. London: Sage Publications. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organisations. London: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. E., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.CrossRef Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. E., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intelligent Public Organisations
Authors
Jari Stenvall
Petri Virtanen
Publication date
02-12-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Public Organization Review / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1566-7170
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7098
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0331-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Public Organization Review 2/2017 Go to the issue