Top

Published in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

13. International Relations and Migration: Mobility as Norm Rather Than Exception

Authors : Kiran Banerjee, Craig Damian Smith

Published in: Nomad-State Relationships in International Relations

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This chapter engages the theoretical core of the volume from a critical perspective, aiming to problematize and complicate its underlying assumptions. While acknowledging the value of the “nomad-state” relationship as a subject of study in International Relations, we draw this emerging research agenda into conversation with work on the history, politics, and sociology of human mobility. As emphasized in the volume, nomadic groups, cultures, and peoples remain largely neglected in IR. However, we argue that this is an instance of the field’s broader inattention to migration, which until recently was consigned to the domain of “low politics” and area studies. Despite its important contribution, a focus on “nomads as the state’s other” leaves unchallenged the dominant paradigm of a world of stationary people within bounded states. We complicate (and perhaps upend) this view of mobility as exception by historicizing the relationship between states and human mobility. In particular, we draw attention to the contingency of borders and migration controls, emphasizing the recent institutional and technological developments which reified and naturalized static, territorialized populations. In doing so, we advance the provocative claim that for much of history this view of the state’s relationship to human mobility has been more myth than reality.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter From Gypsies to Romanies: Identity, Cultural Autonomy, Political Sovereignty and (the Search for a) Trans-territorial State

As Beck (2006) notes, methodological nationalism tends to assume the naturalness of a world of “mutually delimiting national societies”—largely neglecting both the historical contingency of such conditions and how this model remains at odds with the realities of our transnational present (p. 24). In general, this is the outlook—common among both social theorists and ordinary citizens—that assumes a “container model” of exclusively bounded national communities under which migration is treated as the exception, and that endorses the descriptive and normative claim that a fundamental aspect of state sovereignty concerns the right of states to control entrance and immigration.

Despite this broader neglect in the discipline, it is important to note that migration has a special place in critical IR. It was an early concern for constructivist scholars, particularly the influential Copenhagen School, whose early work looked at the effects of migration on national identity, and at the securitization of migration as a threat to societal security (Buzan, Wæver, & de Wilde, 1997; Wæver, 1993). From a more regional perspective, scholars of the EU have long been concerned with the interactions between borders, migration, and regional integration. And while IR might have been late to the game in terms of studying migration, entire fields of study (i.e. Refugee Studies and Migration Studies) are devoted to the politics of human mobility. One of the central concerns of all of these veins of literature is the relationship between the fixity of borders and the desire for control. In this sense IR’s “discovery” of migration as a novel issue area seems somewhat surprising.

Migrant remittance rates to low- and medium-income countries have grown exponentially since the end of the Cold War, from US $29 billion in 1990, to $74 billion in 2000, to $429 billion in 2016. Migrant sending states thus accrue the benefits of human development at lower costs. This relationship is not about states or even state-led institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank Group, or International Labour Organization, but rather the financial flows derived from dynamic and complex sociological phenomena, of which some can be described as “nomadic” behavior.

Adamson, F. B. (2006). Crossing borders: International migration and national security. International Security, 31(1), 165–199.CrossRef

Arendt, H. (1943). “We Refugees.” Menorah Journal, 31(1), 69–77.

Atzili, B. (2011). Good fences, bad neighbors: Border fixity and international conflict. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef

Bade, K. J. (2003). Migration in European history. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRef

Beck, U. (2006). The cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1997). Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner Publishers.

Castles, S., de Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2014). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world (5th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.CrossRef

Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., & Garrett, G. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1), 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.090106.142507CrossRef

Dowty, A. (1987). Closed borders: The contemporary assault on freedom of movement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (1996). Explaining interethnic cooperation. The American Political Science Review, 90(4), 715–733.CrossRef

Greenhill, K. M. (2008). Strategic engineered migration as a weapon of war. Civil Wars, 10(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698240701835425CrossRef

Groebner, V. (2007). Who are you?: Identification, deception, and surveillance in early modern Europe. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.

Hoerder, D. (2002). Cultures in contact: World migrations in the second millennium. Duke University Press.

Hollifield, J. F. (2004). The emerging migration state. The International Migration Review, 38(3), 885–912.CrossRef

IOM. (2019). World migration report 2018. International Organization for Migration. Retrieved from https://www.iom.int/wmr/world-migration-report-2018.

Kaufmann, C. D. (1998). When all else fails: Ethnic population transfers and partitions in the twentieth century. International Security, 23(2), 120–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539381CrossRef

Koslowski, R. (2002). Human migration and the conceptualization of pre–modern world politics. International Studies Quarterly, 46(3), 375–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00238CrossRef

Krasner, S. D. (Ed.). (2001). Problematic sovereignty: Contested rules and political possibilities. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/kras12178CrossRef

Levin, J., & Mackay, J. (2020). Introduction. In Nomad-state relationships in international relations. Palgrave.

Lucassen, L. (1998). The great war and the origins of migration control in western Europe and the United States (1880–1920). In A. Böcker (Ed.), Regulation of migration: International experiences (pp. 45–73). Amsterdam, NL: Aksant.

Manning, P. (2005). Migration in world history. New York and London: Routledge.

Moch, L. P. (2003). Moving Europeans: Migration in western Europe since 1650 (2nd ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

North, D. C., & Thomas. R. P. (1973). The rise of the Western world: A new economic history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

Salehyan, I. (2008). The externalities of civil strife: Refugees as a source of international conflict. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00343.xCrossRef

Salehyan, I., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2006). Refugees and the spread of civil war. International Organization, 60(2), 335–366. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060103CrossRef

Salter, M. B. (2003). Rights of passage: The passport in international relations. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Sassen, S. (1999). Guests and aliens. New York, NY: New Press.

Schmidt, S. (2011). To order the minds of scholars: The discourse of the peace of Westphalia in international relations literature. International Studies Quarterly, 55(3), 601–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00667.xCrossRef

Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.

Scott, J. C. (2009). The art of not being governed. London, UK: Yale University Press.

Talaga, T. (2018). All our relations: Finding the path forward. Toronto, ON: House of Anansi Press.

Torpey, J. (2000). The invention of the passport: Surveillance, citizenship, and the state. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Triadafilopoulos, T. (Ed.). (2013). Wanted and welcome?: Policies for highly skilled immigrants in comparative perspective. New York, NY: Springer.

UNHCR. (2018). UNHCR statistical yearbooks. United Nations High Commission for Refugees. Retrieved from https://www.unhcr.org/statistical-yearbooks.html.

Wæver, O. (1993). Identity, migration, and the new security agenda in Europe. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics (1st ed.). New York, NY: Random House.

World Bank. (2019). Migration and remittances data. The World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/migrationremittancesdiasporaissues/brief/migration-remittances-data.

Zacher, M. W. (2001). The territorial integrity norm: International boundaries and the use of force. International Organization, 55(2), 215–250. https://doi.org/10.1162/00208180151140568CrossRef

Zolberg, A. R. (1983). The formation of new states as a refugee-generating process. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 467(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716283467001003CrossRef

Title: International Relations and Migration: Mobility as Norm Rather Than Exception
Authors: Kiran Banerjee
Craig Damian Smith
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Nomad-State Relationships in International Relations
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28052-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-28053-6

Copyright Year: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28053-6_13

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner