Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments
Published in: Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments 4/2021

25-01-2021 | Original Article

Internet of things based intelligent accident avoidance system for adverse weather and road conditions

Authors: J. Andrew Onesimu, Abhishikt Kadam, K. Martin Sagayam, Ahmed A. Elngar

Published in: Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments | Issue 4/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Study shows that road accidents cause nearly 6,000 people to die and more than 400,000 people injured in the United States every year. Adverse weather and road conditions are some of the major reasons that contribute to 22% of accidents. People get injured and sometimes even lose their life due to road accidents that cause physical and mental instability. Regardless of the expertise of a good driver, at some point, an intelligent transportation system is necessary for the vehicle to make an immediate decision to avoid accidents. Road and weather-related mishap are those which occur due to adverse conditions like fog, winds, snow, rain, slick pavement, sleet, etc. Such accidents, though completely unavoidable, but can be reduced to some extent if proper measures are taken. Vehicle velocity, vehicle size, vehicle weight, momentum are a few of the reasons for a vehicle to go out of control. An intelligent accident avoidance system can predict the safe speed of a vehicle according to its size, weight, and momentum in different weather and road conditions. It can reduce the likelihood of accidents related to weather and road conditions. In this paper, we propose an Internet of Things (IoT) based intelligent accident avoidance system for adverse weather and road conditions. The proposed system comprises of an IoT system that perceives the environment for different weather and road conditions and a machine learning-based intelligent system that learns the adverse conditions that influence an accident to predict and suggest safe speed to the driver. The proposed system is experimented with real-time datasets and simulated using the Blynk application.
previous article Formal modelling and verification of a multi-agent negotiation approach for airline operations control
next article Elephant–railway conflict minimisation using real-time video data and machine learning

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
2.
3.
Bucsuházy K, Matuchová E, Zůvala R, Moravcová P, Kostíková M, Mikulec R (2020) Human factors contributing to the road traffic accident occurrence. Trans Res Proc 45:555–561
4.
Corno F, Guercio E, De Russis L, Gargiulo E (2015) Designing for user confidence in intelligent environments. J Reliab Intell Environ 1(1):11–21CrossRef
5.
Schmidtke HR (2018) A survey on verification strategies for intelligent transportation systems. J Reliab Intell Environ 4(4):211–224CrossRef
6.
Aloqaily M, Otoum S, Al Ridhawi I, Jararweh Y (2019) An intrusion detection system for connected vehicles in smart cities. Ad Hoc Netw 90:1–16CrossRef
7.
Butt TA, Iqbal R, Shah SC, Umar T (2018) Social internet of vehicles: architecture and enabling technologies. Comput Electr Eng 69:68–84CrossRef
8.
Chowdhury DN, Agarwal N, Laha AB, Mukherjee A (2018) A vehicle-to-vehicle communication system using Iot approach. Electron Commun Aerosp Technol ICECA 1:915–919
9.
Gipps PG (1981) A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transp Res Part B Methodol 15(2):105–111CrossRef
10.
Ge HX, Dai SQ, Dong LY (2006) An extended car-following model based on intelligent transportation system application. Phys A Stat Mech its Appl 365(2):543–548CrossRef
11.
Askari H, Khajepour A, Khamesee MB, Wang ZL (2019) Embedded self-powered sensing systems for smart vehicles and intelligent transportation. Nano Energy 66:104103CrossRef
12.
Cao BG (2020) A car-following dynamic model with headway memory and evolution trend. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 539:122903MathSciNetCrossRef
13.
S. Tsugawa, T. Yatabe, T. Hirose, and S. Matsumoto, “An automobile with artificial intelligence,” in Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence-Volume 2, 1979, pp. 893–895.
14.
Star SL (1989) The structure of Ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. Distributed artificial intelligence. Elsevier, London, pp 37–54
15.
Lloyd S, Mohseni M, Rebentrost P (2013) Quantum algorithms for supervised and unsupervised machine learning. arXiv Preprint arxiv3:13070411
16.
Chui M, Löffler M, Roberts R (2010) The internet of things. McKinsey Q 2(2010):1–9
17.
Sadiku MNO, Tembely M, Musa SM (2018) Internet of vehicles: an introduction. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Softw Eng 8(1):11CrossRef
18.
Nikhat I, Shilpa M (2016) Road accidents: overview of its causes, avoidance scheme and a new proposed technique for avoidance. IEEE 3805:497–499
19.
Jagannathan R, Petrovic S, Powell G, Roberts M (2013) Predicting road accidents based on current and historical spatio-temporal traffic flow data. Lect Notes Comput Sci including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics 8197:83–97
20.
N. Kattukkaran, A. George, and T. P. M. Haridas, “Intelligent accident detection and alert system for emergency medical assistance,” in 2017 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics, ICCCI 2017, 2017.
21.
Hjelkrem OA, Ryeng EO (2017) Driver behaviour data linked with vehicle, weather, road surface, and daylight data. Data Br 10:511–514CrossRef
22.
Kadam A, Andrew J, Martin Sagayam K, Hien DT (2020) Vehicle automation and car-following models for accident avoidance. Prz Elektrotechniczny 96(1):118–123
23.
Karaduman M, Eren H (2017) Smart driving in smart city. Int Istanbul Smart Grids Cities Congr Fair 2:115–119
24.
Singh SK (2017) Road traffic accidents in india: issues and challenges. Transp Res Procedia 25:4708–4719CrossRef
25.
Nwizege KS, Bottero M, Mmeah S, Nwiwure ED (2014) Vehicles-to-infrastructure communication safety messaging in DSRC. Procedia Comput Sci 34:59–564CrossRef
26.
Yang D, Zhu L, Liu Y, Wu D, Ran B (2019) A Novel car-following control model combining machine learning and kinematics models for automated vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 20(6):1991–2000CrossRef
27.
Andrew J, Karthikeyan J (2019) Privacy-preserving internet of things: techniques and applications. Int J Eng Adv Technol 8(6):3229–3234CrossRef
28.
Singh D, Singh M (2016) Internet of vehicles for smart and safe driving. Int Conf Connect Veh Expo ICCVE Proc 1:328–329
29.
Sarikan SS, Ozbayoglu AM (2018) Anomaly detection in vehicle traffic with image processing and machine learning. Procedia Comput Sci 140:64–69CrossRef
30.
V. Nyamati, T. Chaudhuri, and K. Jayavel, “Intelligent collision avoidance and safety warning system for car driving,” Proc. 2017 Int. Conf. Intell. Comput. Control Syst. ICICCS 2017, vol. 2018-Janua, pp. 791–796, 2018.
31.
Eshghi M, Schmidtke HR (2018) An approach for safer navigation under severe hurricane damage. J Reliab Intell Environ 4(3):161–185CrossRef
32.
Kumar SAP, Madhumathi R, Chelliah PR, Tao L, Wang S (2018) A novel digital twin-centric approach for driver intention prediction and traffic congestion avoidance. J Reliab Intell Environ 4(4):199–209CrossRef
33.
Pal M (2005) Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. Int J Remote Sens 26(1):217–222CrossRef
34.
Jia D, Ngoduy D (2016) Enhanced cooperative car-following traffic model with the combination of V2V and V2I communication. Transp Res Part B Methodol 90:172–191CrossRef
35.
Hecht-Nielsen R (1992) Theory of the backpropagation neural network in Neural networks for perception. Elsevier, London, pp 65–93CrossRef
36.
Chen C, Xiang H, Qiu T, Wang C, Zhou Y, Chang V (2018) A rear-end collision prediction scheme based on deep learning in the Internet of Vehicles. J Parallel Distrib Comput 117:192–204CrossRef
37.
Czubenko M, Kowalczuk Z, Ordys A (2015) Autonomous driver based on an intelligent system of decision-making. Cognit Comput 7(5):569–581CrossRef
38.
Guo Y, Sun Q, Fu R, Wang C (2019) Improved car-following strategy based on merging behavior prediction of adjacent vehicle from naturalistic driving data. IEEE Access 7:44258–44268CrossRef
39.
Ateeq Alanezi M (2018) A proposed system for vehicle-to-vehicle communication: low cost and network free approach. Indian J Sci Technol 11(12):1–10CrossRef
40.
Hjelkrem OA, Ryeng EO (2016) Chosen risk level during car-following in adverse weather conditions. Accid Anal Prev 95:227–235CrossRef
41.
Cheng L, Zhang X, Shen J (2019) Road surface condition classification using deep learning. J Vis Commun Image Represent 64:102638CrossRef
42.
Mondal P, Sharma N, Kumar A, Bhangale UD, Tyagi D, Singh R (2011) Effect of rainfall and wet road condition on road crashes: A critical analysis. SAE Tech Paper 10:123
43.
Zhao YQ, Li HQ, Lin F, Wang J, Ji XW (2017) Estimation of road friction coefficient in different road conditions based on vehicle braking dynamics. Chinese J Mech Eng 30(4):982–990CrossRef
44.
Xu D, Zhao H, Guillemard F, Geronimi S, Aioun F (2019) Aware of scene vehicles - probabilistic modeling of car-following behaviors in real-world traffic. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 20(6):2136–2148CrossRef
45.
Galanis I, Gurunathan P, Burkard D, Anagnostopoulos I (2018) Weather-based road condition estimation in the era of Internet-of-Vehicles (IoV). Proc - IEEE Int Symp Circuits Syst 10:19–16
46.
Zhai X, Huang H, Sze NN, Song Z, Hon KK (2019) Diagnostic analysis of the effects of weather condition on pedestrian crash severity. Accid Anal Prev 122:318–324CrossRef
47.
Wang Y, Liang L, Evans L (2017) Fatal crashes involving large numbers of vehicles and weather. J Safety Res 63:1–7CrossRef
48.
Punzo V, Borzacchiello MT, Ciuffo B (2011) On the assessment of vehicle trajectory data accuracy and application to the next generation simulation (NGSIM) program data. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 19(6):1243–1262CrossRef
49.
Tkachenko R, Izonin I, Kryvinska N, Dronyuk I, Zub K (2020) An approach towards increasing prediction accuracy for the recovery of missing IoT data based on the GRNN-SGTM ensemble. Sensors 20(9):2625CrossRef
50.
E. Ogasawara, L. C. Martinez, D. De Oliveira, G. Zimbrão, G. L. Pappa, and M. Mattoso, “Adaptive Normalization: A novel data normalization approach for non-stationary time series,” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2010.
51.
Azar J, Makhoul A, Barhamgi M, Couturier R (2019) An energy efficient IoT data compression approach for edge machine learning. Futur Gener Comput Syst 96:168–175CrossRef
52.
Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons, NewyorkMATHCrossRef
53.
Rish I et al (2001) An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier in IJCAI 200 workshop on empirical methods in artificial intelligence. Nat Intel 3(22):41–46
54.
Denœux T (2008) A k-nearest neighbor classification rule based on Dempster-Shafer theory. Stud Fuzziness Soft Comput 219:737–760CrossRef
55.
Ke G et al (2017) LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Adv Neural Inform Proc Syst 19:10
56.
Widodo A, Yang BS (2007) Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. Academic Press, London
57.
Izonin I, Trostianchyn A, Duriagina Z, Tkachenko R, Tepla T, Lotoshynska N (2018) The combined use of the wiener polynomial and SVM for material classification task in medical implants production. Int J Intell Syst Appl 10(9):40–47
58.
Yuan Z, Zhou X, Yang T, Tamerius J, Mantilla R (2017) Predicting traffic accidents through heterogeneous urban data : a case study. Urban Comput 3:1–9
59.
Metadata
Title
Internet of things based intelligent accident avoidance system for adverse weather and road conditions
Authors
J. Andrew Onesimu
Abhishikt Kadam
K. Martin Sagayam
Ahmed A. Elngar
Publication date
25-01-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 2199-4668
Electronic ISSN: 2199-4676
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-021-00132-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments 4/2021 Go to the issue

Original Article

Formal modelling and verification of a multi-agent negotiation approach for airline operations control

Original Article

A cost-effective alertness-rating tool to enable situational awareness among on-duty static security guards in Covid-19 pandemic

Editorial

Editorial

Original Article

CAFOR: congestion avoidance using fuzzy logic to find an optimal routing path in 6LoWPAN networks

Review

Examining the usability of touchscreen gestures for adults with DS

Correction

Correction to: Examining the usability of touchscreen gestures for adults with DS

Premium Partner

    Image Credits