Skip to main content
Top

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

10. Intervention and Impact: Outcomes, Action and Evaluation

Authors : Ian Miles, Ozcan Saritas, Alexander Sokolov

Published in: Foresight for Science, Technology and Innovation

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The overall purpose of ForSTI is to provide input into policy and strategy planning and to mobilise collective strategic actions. In the Intervention phase we move on from the issue of formulating recommendations, to experience in following these through in the form of concrete action to implement structural and behavioural transformations. Actions suggested at this phase aim to give messages on the first and most immediate interventions to the existing systems. Operational level questions are asked for actions such as: ‘what and how’, ‘where and how’ and ‘who and how’. The actions for change are determined by considering the following capabilities of the system under investigation: (1) Adapting; (2) Influencing and shaping its context; (3) Finding a new milieu or modelling itself virtuously in its context; and (4) Adding value to the viability and development of wider wholes in which it is embedded. Action plans, Operational plans, Priority lists can be among the outputs produced at this phase, in addition to the outcomes achieved through ForSTI, such as networking, mutual learning and collective visioning, which are key enablers for follow up actions upon the completion of the exercise.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
There is a journal entitled Science Communication that covers developments in this field; and handbooks including Bucchi and Trench (2008) and Wilson (1998).
 
2
There is also much literature on this topic, for example Manson and O’Neill (2007).
 
3
In the third cycle of the UK’s TFP, it was common for a series of “state of the science” reviews to be published for expert reference, alongside the less technical documentation.
 
5
See Kahane (2012) for heartening accounts of the use of scenario analysis to facilitate disruptive change.
 
7
However, interviewees were all supplied with interview guides, derived from the logic chart (presented earlier in Fig. 10.1) in an effort to achieve more consistency and comparability across their responses, as well as helping ensure that the whole rage of topics was covered.
 
Literature
go back to reference Barre, R., & Keenan, M. (2008). Revisiting foresight rationales: What lessons from the social science and humanities? In C. Cagnin, M. Keenan, R. Johnston, F. Scapolo, & R. Barre (Eds.), Future-oriented technology analysis: Strategic intelligence for an innovative economy. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer. Barre, R., & Keenan, M. (2008). Revisiting foresight rationales: What lessons from the social science and humanities? In C. Cagnin, M. Keenan, R. Johnston, F. Scapolo, & R. Barre (Eds.), Future-oriented technology analysis: Strategic intelligence for an innovative economy. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.
go back to reference Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of public communication on science and technology. London: Routledge. Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of public communication on science and technology. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Cuhls, K., & Georghiou, L. (2004). Evaluating a participative foresight process: Futur—The German research dialogue. Research Evaluation, 13(3), 143–153.CrossRef Cuhls, K., & Georghiou, L. (2004). Evaluating a participative foresight process: Futur—The German research dialogue. Research Evaluation, 13(3), 143–153.CrossRef
go back to reference EFMN. (2009). Mapping foresight: Revealing how Europe and other world regions navigate into the future. Brussels: European Foresight Monitoring Network (EFMN), European Commission. EFMN. (2009). Mapping foresight: Revealing how Europe and other world regions navigate into the future. Brussels: European Foresight Monitoring Network (EFMN), European Commission.
go back to reference Georghiou, L. (1996). The UK technology foresight programme. Futures, 28(4), 359–337.CrossRef Georghiou, L. (1996). The UK technology foresight programme. Futures, 28(4), 359–337.CrossRef
go back to reference Georghiou, L., Cassingena Harper, J., Keenan, M., Miles, I., & Popper, R. (Eds.). (2008). The handbook of technology foresight. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Georghiou, L., Cassingena Harper, J., Keenan, M., Miles, I., & Popper, R. (Eds.). (2008). The handbook of technology foresight. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
go back to reference Georghiou, L., & Keenan, M. (2004). Towards a typology for evaluating foresight exercises. Paper presented at EU-US Seminar: New Technology Foresight, Forecasting and Assessment Methods, Seville, May 13–14. Georghiou, L., & Keenan, M. (2004). Towards a typology for evaluating foresight exercises. Paper presented at EU-US Seminar: New Technology Foresight, Forecasting and Assessment Methods, Seville, May 13–14.
go back to reference Georghiou, L., & Keenan, M. (2006). Evaluation of national foresight activities: Assessing rationale, process and impact. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 761–777.CrossRef Georghiou, L., & Keenan, M. (2006). Evaluation of national foresight activities: Assessing rationale, process and impact. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 761–777.CrossRef
go back to reference Georghiou, L., & Keenan, M. (2008). Evaluation and impact of foresight. In L. Georghiou et al. (Eds.), The handbook of technology foresight. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Georghiou, L., & Keenan, M. (2008). Evaluation and impact of foresight. In L. Georghiou et al. (Eds.), The handbook of technology foresight. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
go back to reference Georghiou, L., Keenan, M., Miles, I., Cameron, H., & Saritas, O. (2006). An evaluation of the UK Foresight Programme: Final report. UK Office of Science and Technology, Department of Trade and Industry, 92. Georghiou, L., Keenan, M., Miles, I., Cameron, H., & Saritas, O. (2006). An evaluation of the UK Foresight Programme: Final report. UK Office of Science and Technology, Department of Trade and Industry, 92.
go back to reference Harvey, D., Gregory, J., Hoffert, M., Jain, A., Lal, M., Leemans, R., et al. (1997). An introduction to simple climate models used in the IPCC second assessment report, in “An Introduction to Simple Climate Models Used in the IPCC Second Assessment Report”, IPCC Technical Paper II. In J. T. Houghton, L. G. M. Filho, D. J. Griggs, & K. Maskell (Eds.), Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: UNEP. Accessed July 27, 2016, from http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/technical-papers/paper-II-en.pdf Harvey, D., Gregory, J., Hoffert, M., Jain, A., Lal, M., Leemans, R., et al. (1997). An introduction to simple climate models used in the IPCC second assessment report, in “An Introduction to Simple Climate Models Used in the IPCC Second Assessment Report”, IPCC Technical Paper II. In J. T. Houghton, L. G. M. Filho, D. J. Griggs, & K. Maskell (Eds.), Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: UNEP. Accessed July 27, 2016, from http://​www.​ipcc.​ch/​pdf/​technical-papers/​paper-II-en.​pdf
go back to reference Kahane, A. (2012). Transformative scenario planning: Working together to change the future. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Kahane, A. (2012). Transformative scenario planning: Working together to change the future. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
go back to reference Keenan, M. (2000). An evaluation of the implementation of the UK Technology Foresight Programme (Doctoral Thesis). The University of Manchester, Manchester. Keenan, M. (2000). An evaluation of the implementation of the UK Technology Foresight Programme (Doctoral Thesis). The University of Manchester, Manchester.
go back to reference Manson, N. C., & O’Neill, O. (2007). Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Manson, N. C., & O’Neill, O. (2007). Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference OECD. (2006). Government RTD funding and company behaviour: Measuring behavioural additionality. Paris: OECD. OECD. (2006). Government RTD funding and company behaviour: Measuring behavioural additionality. Paris: OECD.
go back to reference POST. (1997). Science shaping the future: Technology foresight and its impacts. London: POST (United Kingdom Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology). POST. (1997). Science shaping the future: Technology foresight and its impacts. London: POST (United Kingdom Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology).
go back to reference Wilson, A. (1998). Handbook of science communication. Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing.CrossRef Wilson, A. (1998). Handbook of science communication. Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intervention and Impact: Outcomes, Action and Evaluation
Authors
Ian Miles
Ozcan Saritas
Alexander Sokolov
Copyright Year
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32574-3_10

Premium Partners