Skip to main content
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

1. Introduction: Multipolarity and Unipolarity after the Cold War

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

After the Cold War there has been a contradiction between multipolar and unipolar interpretations of the new international system after the end of bipolarity. In this book, we explore this contradiction. Because neorealism and neoclassical realism see polarity as a central structuring element in international relations, one has to agree on whether a particular period is unipolar, bipolar or multipolar. Moreover, multipolarity is often used in official statements by the BRICs countries or the European Union (EU). We address this contradiction by first applying the concept of polarity to the Cold War, the nineteenth century (and the post-Cold War). We further compare the polarity discourse in France and the USA with the historical balance of power tradition.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Calleo, D. P. (2009). Follies of Power: America’s Unipolar Fantasy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Calleo, D. P. (2009). Follies of Power: America’s Unipolar Fantasy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Elman, M. F., & Elman, C. (Eds.) (2000). Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists and the Study of International Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Elman, M. F., & Elman, C. (Eds.) (2000). Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists and the Study of International Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
go back to reference Giddens, A. (1987). Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Giddens, A. (1987). Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
go back to reference Levy, J. S. (2000). Explaining events and developing theories: History, political science and the analysis of international relations. In M. F. Elman & C. Elman (Eds.), 39–84. Levy, J. S. (2000). Explaining events and developing theories: History, political science and the analysis of international relations. In M. F. Elman & C. Elman (Eds.), 39–84.
go back to reference Schroeder, P. W. (1994a). Historical reality versus neorealist theory. International Security, 19(1), 108–148. Schroeder, P. W. (1994a). Historical reality versus neorealist theory. International Security, 19(1), 108–148.
go back to reference Waltz, K. N. (1964). The stability of a bipolar world. Daedalus, 93(3), 881–909. Waltz, K. N. (1964). The stability of a bipolar world. Daedalus, 93(3), 881–909.
go back to reference Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Waltz, K. N. (1997). Evaluating theories. American Political Science Review, 91(4), 913–917.CrossRef Waltz, K. N. (1997). Evaluating theories. American Political Science Review, 91(4), 913–917.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Introduction: Multipolarity and Unipolarity after the Cold War
Author
Goedele De Keersmaeker
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42652-5_1