Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Public Organization Review 2/2015

01-06-2015

Is the NPT an Effective International Instrument to Stop Nuclear Proliferation Without the Establishment of an International Organisation to Supervise the Implementation of its Provision?

Author: Jorge Morales Pedraza

Published in: Public Organization Review | Issue 2/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The NPT is the cornerstone of the nuclear non-proliferation regime, which includes a group of regional and international agreements that have been used, with some success, to slow down the spread of nuclear weapons during the past 43 years, but it has been incapable to completely stop the proliferation of such weapons. This dangerous situation is affecting international peace, security and stability. The paper presents several proposals that could change this situation, if are adopted by the international community.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
The NPT was open to signature on July 1, 1968 and entered into force on March 5, 1970.
 
2
Four States (South Africa, Byelorussia (now Belarus), Kazakhstan and Ukraine) destroyed or transferred to Russia all their nuclear weapons in the 1990s.
 
3
This type of actions was also used by other nuclear-weapons States to reduce their nuclear-weapon arsenals.
 
4
The SALT II Treaty signed by the USA and the former USSR in 1978 was abandoned because the Treaty was not ratified by any of their legislatives bodies.
 
5
The START III Treaty was signed on April 2010. The US Congress approved the Treaty in 2010 and the Russia’s DUMA on January 2011.
 
6
It is important to highlight the following: Some Western powers, notably the USA, appear increasingly comfortable with the acquisition of nuclear-weapon arsenals by Israel, India and Pakistan—at least provided they remain allies in the war on terrorism and their nuclear ambitions stay within certain qualitative and quantitative limits. The rest of the world is less sanguine, concerned about regional instability and porous boundaries. (Johnson 2004)
 
7
For additional information on the establishment of the Non-Proliferation Committee see Morales Pedraza (2009).
 
8
These countries are Iraq, Iran, the DPRK and Libya.
 
Literature
go back to reference Elbaradei, M. (2004). Speech pronounced by the Director General of the IAEA in a meeting on nuclear non-proliferation: global security in a rapidly changing world, International Carnegie non-proliferation Conference, held on 21 June 2004 in Washington D.C., USA p 1. Elbaradei, M. (2004). Speech pronounced by the Director General of the IAEA in a meeting on nuclear non-proliferation: global security in a rapidly changing world, International Carnegie non-proliferation Conference, held on 21 June 2004 in Washington D.C., USA p 1.
go back to reference Goldblat, J. (2009). Amending the non-proliferation regime. Ideas for peace and security; Disarmament forum; United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, UNIDIR. No 1 and 2, pp 37 and 38. Goldblat, J. (2009). Amending the non-proliferation regime. Ideas for peace and security; Disarmament forum; United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, UNIDIR. No 1 and 2, pp 37 and 38.
go back to reference Johnson, R. (2004). Is the NPT up to the challenge of proliferation? The 2005 NPT Review Conference; Disarmament Forum (p. 10). Geneva: UNIDIR. Johnson, R. (2004). Is the NPT up to the challenge of proliferation? The 2005 NPT Review Conference; Disarmament Forum (p. 10). Geneva: UNIDIR.
go back to reference Morales Pedraza, J. (2009). Nuclear disarmament: Concepts, principles and actions for strengthening the non-proliferation regimes (pp. 32–42 and 211-254). New York: Nova Science. Morales Pedraza, J. (2009). Nuclear disarmament: Concepts, principles and actions for strengthening the non-proliferation regimes (pp. 32–42 and 211-254). New York: Nova Science.
go back to reference Morales Pedraza, J. (2013). The proliferation of nuclear weapons: How to Stop It? (pp 29-43 and 66-224). Lampert Academic Publishing. Morales Pedraza, J. (2013). The proliferation of nuclear weapons: How to Stop It? (pp 29-43 and 66-224). Lampert Academic Publishing.
go back to reference The Canberra Commission on the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons. (1995). The Canberra Commission’s report, November 1995, pp 1. The Canberra Commission on the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons. (1995). The Canberra Commission’s report, November 1995, pp 1.
go back to reference Treaty on Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons-Article VI (NPT). (1968). Department for Disarmament Affairs, United Nations. Treaty on Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons-Article VI (NPT). (1968). Department for Disarmament Affairs, United Nations.
go back to reference Weapons of Terror: Freeing the World of Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Arms. (2006). Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, final report; Stockholm, Sweden, 1 June 2006; p 60. Weapons of Terror: Freeing the World of Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Arms. (2006). Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, final report; Stockholm, Sweden, 1 June 2006; p 60.
Metadata
Title
Is the NPT an Effective International Instrument to Stop Nuclear Proliferation Without the Establishment of an International Organisation to Supervise the Implementation of its Provision?
Author
Jorge Morales Pedraza
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Public Organization Review / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1566-7170
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7098
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0269-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Public Organization Review 2/2015 Go to the issue