Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Decisions in Economics and Finance 1-2/2017

23-10-2017

Iterated Kalai–Smorodinsky–Nash compromise

Author: Ismail Saglam

Published in: Decisions in Economics and Finance | Issue 1-2/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a new two-person bargaining solution, which we call iterated Kalai–Smorodinsky–Nash compromise (IKSNC). For its characterization, we present an axiom called \(\varGamma \)-Decomposability which is satisfied by any solution that is decomposable with respect to a given reference solution \(\varGamma \). We show that the IKSNC solution is uniquely characterized by \(\varGamma \)-Decomposability whenever \(\varGamma \) satisfies the standard axioms of Independence of Equivalent Utility Representations and Symmetry, along with three additional axioms, namely Restricted Monotonicity of Individually Best Extensions, Weak Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives, and Weak Pareto Optimality under Symmetry.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
The results of Rachmilevitch (2014) are independent from the previous characterization results since KSNR neither implies nor is implied by the set of standard axioms, involving IEUR, SY, and WPO.
 
2
This axiom of Kalai (1977) requires that for any two 0-normalized bargaining problems S and \(S'\) with \(S'\supseteq S\), the solution on \(S'\) can be obtained by first calculating the solution on S and then taking it to be the starting point for the distribution of the utilities in \(S'\) to calculate the solution on this normalized set.
 
3
Various forms of decomposability axioms were earlier used by Salonen (1988), Rachmilevitch (2012), Saglam (2014), and Trockel (2014, 2015), among others.
 
4
Given two vectors x and y in \({\mathbb {R}}^2_+\), \(x > y\) means \(x_i > y_i\) for \(i=1,2\) and \(x \ge y\) means \(x_i \ge y_i\) for \(i=1,2\).
 
5
Any game \((S,d) \in \Sigma ^2\) is said to be a hyperplane game if the Pareto frontier of the set \(IR(S,d)=\{x\in S|x\ge d\}\) is a line segment in \(\mathfrak {R}^2_+\).
 
6
Thomson (1983) showed that in the n-person case the Kalai–Smorodinsky solution turns out to be the only solution that possesses Anonymity (AN), Continuity (CONT), IEUR, Monotonicity With Respect to Changes in the Number of Agents (MON), and WPO. Of these axioms, IEUR and WPO are generalizations of the former conditions used by Kalai and Smorodinsky (1975) for the two-person case. The axiom AN is a strengthening of SY, and it requires that not only the names of the agents in a given group do not matter but also that any other group of agents of the same size would reach the same bargaining outcome. CONT implores that a small change in the bargaining set causes only a small change in the bargaining outcome. Finally, MON says that if the expansion of a group of agents requires a sacrifice to support the entrants, then every incumbent must contribute. The Nash solution satisfies AN, CONT, IEUR, and WPO; but it does not satisfy MON as directly shown by Thomson and Lensberg (1989, pp. 41–42).
 
Literature
go back to reference Kalai, E., Smorodinsky, M.: Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43, 513–518 (1975)CrossRef Kalai, E., Smorodinsky, M.: Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43, 513–518 (1975)CrossRef
go back to reference Kalai, E.: Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: interpersonal utility comparisons. Econometrica 45, 1623–1630 (1977)CrossRef Kalai, E.: Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: interpersonal utility comparisons. Econometrica 45, 1623–1630 (1977)CrossRef
go back to reference Rachmilevitch, S.: Gradual negotiations and proportional solutions. Oper. Res. Lett. 40, 459–461 (2012)CrossRef Rachmilevitch, S.: Gradual negotiations and proportional solutions. Oper. Res. Lett. 40, 459–461 (2012)CrossRef
go back to reference Rachmilevitch, S.: Bridging the gap between the Nash and Kalai–Smorodinsky bargaining solutions. In: Petrosyan, L., Zenkevich, N. (eds.) Contributions to Game Theory and Management, vol. 7, pp. 300–312. St. Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg (2014) Rachmilevitch, S.: Bridging the gap between the Nash and Kalai–Smorodinsky bargaining solutions. In: Petrosyan, L., Zenkevich, N. (eds.) Contributions to Game Theory and Management, vol. 7, pp. 300–312. St. Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg (2014)
go back to reference Raiffa, H.: Arbitration schemes for generalized two-person games. In: Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games II, Annals of Mathematics Studies, No. 28, pp. 361–387. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1953) Raiffa, H.: Arbitration schemes for generalized two-person games. In: Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games II, Annals of Mathematics Studies, No. 28, pp. 361–387. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1953)
go back to reference Roth, A.E.: An impossibility result concerning n-person bargaining games. Int. J. Game Theory 8, 129–132 (1979)CrossRef Roth, A.E.: An impossibility result concerning n-person bargaining games. Int. J. Game Theory 8, 129–132 (1979)CrossRef
go back to reference Saglam, I.: A simple axiomatization of the egalitarian solution. Int. Game Theory Rev. 16, 1450008-1 (2014)CrossRef Saglam, I.: A simple axiomatization of the egalitarian solution. Int. Game Theory Rev. 16, 1450008-1 (2014)CrossRef
go back to reference Salonen, H.: Decomposable solutions for n-person bargaining games. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 4, 333–347 (1988)CrossRef Salonen, H.: Decomposable solutions for n-person bargaining games. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 4, 333–347 (1988)CrossRef
go back to reference Thomson, W.: The fair division of a fixed supply among a growing population. Math. Oper. Res. 8, 319–326 (1983)CrossRef Thomson, W.: The fair division of a fixed supply among a growing population. Math. Oper. Res. 8, 319–326 (1983)CrossRef
go back to reference Thomson, W., Lensberg, T.: Axiomatic Theory of Bargaining with a Variable Number of Agents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)CrossRef Thomson, W., Lensberg, T.: Axiomatic Theory of Bargaining with a Variable Number of Agents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)CrossRef
go back to reference Trockel, W.: Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution. Games Econ. Behav. 85, 32–36 (2014)CrossRef Trockel, W.: Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution. Games Econ. Behav. 85, 32–36 (2014)CrossRef
go back to reference Trockel, W.: Axiomatization of the discrete Raiffa solution. Econ. Theory Bull. 3, 9–17 (2015)CrossRef Trockel, W.: Axiomatization of the discrete Raiffa solution. Econ. Theory Bull. 3, 9–17 (2015)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Iterated Kalai–Smorodinsky–Nash compromise
Author
Ismail Saglam
Publication date
23-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Decisions in Economics and Finance / Issue 1-2/2017
Print ISSN: 1593-8883
Electronic ISSN: 1129-6569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-017-0203-y

Other articles of this Issue 1-2/2017

Decisions in Economics and Finance 1-2/2017 Go to the issue