Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Information Systems Frontiers 4/2019

15-08-2017

Lack of Communication and Collaboration in Enterprise Architecture Development

Authors: Negin Banaeianjahromi, Kari Smolander

Published in: Information Systems Frontiers | Issue 4/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Enterprise architecture (EA) is widely employed to reduce complexity and to improve business–information technology (IT) alignment. Despite the efforts by practitioners and academics in proposing approaches to smoothen EA development, it is not easy to find a fully successful EA. Because EA development is a complex endeavour, it is important to understand the obstacles that practitioners face during EA development. With the grounded theory, we studied how obstacles during EA development emerged from practitioners’ point of view in 15 large enterprises. The study identifies lack of communication and collaboration as the core obstacle that can explain many other obstacles. Communication and collaboration were also harmed by other perceived EA development obstacles, including lack of knowledge and support inside organization and issues imposed by external parties, hesitation in training personnel, setting too ambitious goals, constant change of management, (lack of) clarity in EA development process, lack of budget, forcing personnel to adopt EA, lack of motivation, organizational culture, and organizational structure deficiencies. The lack of communication and collaboration caused several undesired effects to organizations, such as being unable to set common goals and achieve a shared understanding, personnel’s distrust, endangered EA governance, lack of innovation capability, lost competitive edge, and ineffective EA outputs. The study highlights that organisations should improve their communication and collaboration before embarking on EA to encounter fewer obstacles. We provide four recommendations for practitioners to improve communication and collaboration in EA development.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Abraham, R., Niemietz, H., De Kinderen, S., & Aier, S. (2013). Can Boundary Objects Mitigate Communication Defects in Enterprise Transformation? Findings from Expert Interviews.’ In EMISA (pp. 27–40). Abraham, R., Niemietz, H., De Kinderen, S., & Aier, S. (2013). Can Boundary Objects Mitigate Communication Defects in Enterprise Transformation? Findings from Expert Interviews.’ In EMISA (pp. 27–40).
go back to reference Abraham, D.-W.-I. R., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2015). Crossing the line: Overcoming knowledge boundaries in Enterprise transformation. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(1), 3–13.CrossRef Abraham, D.-W.-I. R., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2015). Crossing the line: Overcoming knowledge boundaries in Enterprise transformation. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(1), 3–13.CrossRef
go back to reference Alaeddini, M., & Salekfard, S. (2013). Investigating the role of an Enterprise architecture project in the business-IT alignment in Iran. Information Systems Frontiers, 15(1), 67–88.CrossRef Alaeddini, M., & Salekfard, S. (2013). Investigating the role of an Enterprise architecture project in the business-IT alignment in Iran. Information Systems Frontiers, 15(1), 67–88.CrossRef
go back to reference Armour, F., & Kaisler, S. (2001). Enterprise architecture: Agile transition and implementation. IT Professional, 3(6), 30–37.CrossRef Armour, F., & Kaisler, S. (2001). Enterprise architecture: Agile transition and implementation. IT Professional, 3(6), 30–37.CrossRef
go back to reference Armour, J., Kaisler, S. H., & Liu, S. Y. (1999). Building an Enterprise architecture step by step. IT Professional, 1(4), 31–39.CrossRef Armour, J., Kaisler, S. H., & Liu, S. Y. (1999). Building an Enterprise architecture step by step. IT Professional, 1(4), 31–39.CrossRef
go back to reference Bacon, C. J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2001). A systemic framework for the field of information systems. ACM Sigmis Database, 32(2), 46–67.CrossRef Bacon, C. J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2001). A systemic framework for the field of information systems. ACM Sigmis Database, 32(2), 46–67.CrossRef
go back to reference Banaeianjahromi, N., & Smolander, K. (2016a). Understanding obstacles in Enterprise architecture development. In ECIS 2016. Banaeianjahromi, N., & Smolander, K. (2016a). Understanding obstacles in Enterprise architecture development. In ECIS 2016.
go back to reference Banaeianjahromi, N., & Smolander, K. (2016b). What do we know about the role of Enterprise architecture in Enterprise integration? A systematic mapping study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(1), 140–164. doi:10.1108/JEIM-12-2014-0114.CrossRef Banaeianjahromi, N., & Smolander, K. (2016b). What do we know about the role of Enterprise architecture in Enterprise integration? A systematic mapping study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(1), 140–164. doi:10.​1108/​JEIM-12-2014-0114.CrossRef
go back to reference Bernaert, M., Poels, G., Snoeck, M., & De Backer, M. (2016). CHOOSE: Towards a Metamodel for Enterprise architecture in small and medium-sized enterprises. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(4), 781–818. doi:10.1007/s10796-015-9559-0.CrossRef Bernaert, M., Poels, G., Snoeck, M., & De Backer, M. (2016). CHOOSE: Towards a Metamodel for Enterprise architecture in small and medium-sized enterprises. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(4), 781–818. doi:10.​1007/​s10796-015-9559-0.CrossRef
go back to reference Bisel, Ryan S., and J. Kevin Barge. 2010. ‘Discursive Positioning and Planned Change in Organizations’. Human Relations, 0018726710375996. Bisel, Ryan S., and J. Kevin Barge. 2010. ‘Discursive Positioning and Planned Change in Organizations’. Human Relations, 0018726710375996.
go back to reference Boster, M., Liu, S., & Thomas, R. (2000). Getting the most from your Enterprise architecture. IT Professional, 2(4), 43–51.CrossRef Boster, M., Liu, S., & Thomas, R. (2000). Getting the most from your Enterprise architecture. IT Professional, 2(4), 43–51.CrossRef
go back to reference Boucharas, V., van Steenbergen, M., Jansen, S., & Brinkkemper, S. (2010). The contribution of Enterprise architecture to the achievement of organizational goals: A review of the evidence, In Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (Vol. 70, pp. 1–15). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. Boucharas, V., van Steenbergen, M., Jansen, S., & Brinkkemper, S. (2010). The contribution of Enterprise architecture to the achievement of organizational goals: A review of the evidence, In Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (Vol. 70, pp. 1–15). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
go back to reference Chen, D., Doumeingts, G., & Vernadat, F. (2008). Architectures for Enterprise integration and interoperability: Past, present and future. Computers in Industry, Enterprise Integration and Interoperability in Manufacturing Systems, 59(7), 647–659. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2007.12.016.CrossRef Chen, D., Doumeingts, G., & Vernadat, F. (2008). Architectures for Enterprise integration and interoperability: Past, present and future. Computers in Industry, Enterprise Integration and Interoperability in Manufacturing Systems, 59(7), 647–659. doi:10.​1016/​j.​compind.​2007.​12.​016.CrossRef
go back to reference Chuang, C.-H., & van Loggerenberg, J. (2010). Challenges facing Enterprise architects: A south African perspective. In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1–10). doi:10.1109/HICSS.2010.449. Chuang, C.-H., & van Loggerenberg, J. (2010). Challenges facing Enterprise architects: A south African perspective. In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1–10). doi:10.​1109/​HICSS.​2010.​449.
go back to reference Chung, L., Song, H.-K., Song, Y.-T., & Subramanian, N. (2009). Understanding the role of Enterprise architecture towards better institutionalization. In Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligences, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2009. SNPD’09. 10th ACIS International Conference On (pp. 316–320). IEEE. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5286648/. Chung, L., Song, H.-K., Song, Y.-T., & Subramanian, N. (2009). Understanding the role of Enterprise architecture towards better institutionalization. In Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligences, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2009. SNPD’09. 10th ACIS International Conference On (pp. 316–320). IEEE. http://​ieeexplore.​ieee.​org/​abstract/​document/​5286648/​.
go back to reference Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.CrossRef Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.CrossRef
go back to reference Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). London: Sage.CrossRef Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). London: Sage.CrossRef
go back to reference der Raadt, V., Bas, M. B., Schouten, S., & Van Vliet, H. (2010). The relation between EA effectiveness and stakeholder satisfaction. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(10), 1954–1969.CrossRef der Raadt, V., Bas, M. B., Schouten, S., & Van Vliet, H. (2010). The relation between EA effectiveness and stakeholder satisfaction. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(10), 1954–1969.CrossRef
go back to reference Erol, O., Sauser, B. J., & Mansouri, M. (2010). A framework for investigation into extended Enterprise resilience. Enterprise Information Systems, 4(2), 111–136.CrossRef Erol, O., Sauser, B. J., & Mansouri, M. (2010). A framework for investigation into extended Enterprise resilience. Enterprise Information Systems, 4(2), 111–136.CrossRef
go back to reference Evans, P., & Wolf, B. (2005). Collaboration rules. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 33(4), 50–57.CrossRef Evans, P., & Wolf, B. (2005). Collaboration rules. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 33(4), 50–57.CrossRef
go back to reference Fatolahi, A., Jalalinia, S., Dabestani, Z., & Eskandari, M. (2007). Extracting business process decomposition: A practical approach using the ISIran V methodology. Business Process Management Journal, 13(2), 214–222.CrossRef Fatolahi, A., Jalalinia, S., Dabestani, Z., & Eskandari, M. (2007). Extracting business process decomposition: A practical approach using the ISIran V methodology. Business Process Management Journal, 13(2), 214–222.CrossRef
go back to reference Foorthuis, Ralph, Marlies van Steenbergen, Sjaak Brinkkemper, and Wiel A. G. Bruls. 2016. ‘A theory building study of Enterprise architecture practices and benefits’. Information Systems Frontiers 18 (3): 541–564. doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9542-1. Foorthuis, Ralph, Marlies van Steenbergen, Sjaak Brinkkemper, and Wiel A. G. Bruls. 2016. ‘A theory building study of Enterprise architecture practices and benefits’. Information Systems Frontiers 18 (3): 541–564. doi:10.​1007/​s10796-014-9542-1.
go back to reference Goethals, F. G., Snoeck, M., Lemahieu, W., & Vandenbulcke, J. (2006). Management and Enterprise architecture click: The FAD(E)E framework. Information Systems Frontiers, 8(2), 67–79. doi:10.1007/s10796-006-7971-1.CrossRef Goethals, F. G., Snoeck, M., Lemahieu, W., & Vandenbulcke, J. (2006). Management and Enterprise architecture click: The FAD(E)E framework. Information Systems Frontiers, 8(2), 67–79. doi:10.​1007/​s10796-006-7971-1.CrossRef
go back to reference Guillemette, M. G., & Paré, G. (2012). Toward a new theory of the contribution of the IT function in organizations. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 529–551.CrossRef Guillemette, M. G., & Paré, G. (2012). Toward a new theory of the contribution of the IT function in organizations. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 529–551.CrossRef
go back to reference Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information Technology for Transforming Organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16.CrossRef Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information Technology for Transforming Organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoogervorst, J. (2004). Enterprise architecture: Enabling integration, agility and change. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 13(03), 213–233.CrossRef Hoogervorst, J. (2004). Enterprise architecture: Enabling integration, agility and change. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 13(03), 213–233.CrossRef
go back to reference Jahani, B., Javadein, S. R. S., & Jafari, H. A. (2010). Measurement of Enterprise architecture readiness within organizations. Business Strategy Series, 11(3), 177–191.CrossRef Jahani, B., Javadein, S. R. S., & Jafari, H. A. (2010). Measurement of Enterprise architecture readiness within organizations. Business Strategy Series, 11(3), 177–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Kähkönen, T., Smolander, K., & Maglyas, A. (2016). Lack of integration governance in ERP development: A case study on causes and effects. Enterprise Information Systems, 11(8), 1173-1206. doi:10.1080/17517575.2016.1179347. Kähkönen, T., Smolander, K., & Maglyas, A. (2016). Lack of integration governance in ERP development: A case study on causes and effects. Enterprise Information Systems, 11(8), 1173-1206. doi:10.​1080/​17517575.​2016.​1179347.
go back to reference Kamoun, F. (2013). Rethinking the role of Enterprise architecture during times of economic downturn: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Information Technology Management, 24(1), 26. Kamoun, F. (2013). Rethinking the role of Enterprise architecture during times of economic downturn: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Information Technology Management, 24(1), 26.
go back to reference Kappelman, L. A., & Zachman, J. A. (2013). The Enterprise and its architecture: Ontology & Challenges. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 53(4), 87–95.CrossRef Kappelman, L. A., & Zachman, J. A. (2013). The Enterprise and its architecture: Ontology & Challenges. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 53(4), 87–95.CrossRef
go back to reference Kim, J.-W., Kwon, J.-H., Kim, Y.-G., Song, C.-Y., Kim, H.-S., & Baik, D.-K. (2006). EAFoC: Enterprise architecture framework based on commonality. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 21(6), 952–964. doi:10.1007/s11390-006-0952-5.CrossRef Kim, J.-W., Kwon, J.-H., Kim, Y.-G., Song, C.-Y., Kim, H.-S., & Baik, D.-K. (2006). EAFoC: Enterprise architecture framework based on commonality. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 21(6), 952–964. doi:10.​1007/​s11390-006-0952-5.CrossRef
go back to reference Löhe, J., & Legner, C. (2014). Overcoming implementation challenges in Enterprise architecture management: A design theory for architecture-driven IT management (ADRIMA). Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(1), 101–137.CrossRef Löhe, J., & Legner, C. (2014). Overcoming implementation challenges in Enterprise architecture management: A design theory for architecture-driven IT management (ADRIMA). Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(1), 101–137.CrossRef
go back to reference Luftman, J., & Ben-Zvi, T. (2011). Key issues for IT executives 2011: Cautious optimism in uncertain economic times. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(4), 203–212. Luftman, J., & Ben-Zvi, T. (2011). Key issues for IT executives 2011: Cautious optimism in uncertain economic times. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(4), 203–212.
go back to reference Medini, K., & Bourey, J. P. (2012). SCOR-based Enterprise architecture methodology. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 25(7), 594–607.CrossRef Medini, K., & Bourey, J. P. (2012). SCOR-based Enterprise architecture methodology. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 25(7), 594–607.CrossRef
go back to reference Morganwalp, J. M., & Sage, A. P. (2004). Enterprise architecture measures of effectiveness. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 4(1), 81–94.CrossRef Morganwalp, J. M., & Sage, A. P. (2004). Enterprise architecture measures of effectiveness. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 4(1), 81–94.CrossRef
go back to reference Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), 147–149.CrossRef Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), 147–149.CrossRef
go back to reference Nicolini, D., Mengis, J., & Swan, J. (2012). Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612–629.CrossRef Nicolini, D., Mengis, J., & Swan, J. (2012). Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612–629.CrossRef
go back to reference Niemi, E. (2008). Enterprise architecture benefits: Perceptions from literature and practice. Evaluation of Enterprise and Software Architectures: Critical Issues, Metrics and Practices:[AISA Project 2005-2008]/Eetu Niemi, Tanja Ylimäki & Niina Hämäläinen (Eds.). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, Information Technology Research Institute, 2008.-(Tietotekniikan Tutkimusinstituutin Julkaisuja, ISSN 1236-1615; 18). ISBN 978-951-39-3108-7 (CD-ROM). https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/handle/123456789/41370. Niemi, E. (2008). Enterprise architecture benefits: Perceptions from literature and practice. Evaluation of Enterprise and Software Architectures: Critical Issues, Metrics and Practices:[AISA Project 2005-2008]/Eetu Niemi, Tanja Ylimäki & Niina Hämäläinen (Eds.). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, Information Technology Research Institute, 2008.-(Tietotekniikan Tutkimusinstituutin Julkaisuja, ISSN 1236-1615; 18). ISBN 978-951-39-3108-7 (CD-ROM). https://​jyx.​jyu.​fi/​dspace/​handle/​123456789/​41370.
go back to reference Niemi, E., & Pekkola, S. (2015). Using Enterprise architecture artefacts in an organisation. Enterprise Information Systems, 11(3), 313-338. doi:10.1080/17517575.2016.1179347. Niemi, E., & Pekkola, S. (2015). Using Enterprise architecture artefacts in an organisation. Enterprise Information Systems, 11(3), 313-338. doi:10.1080/17517575.2016.1179347.
go back to reference Nogueira, J. M., Romero, D., Espadas, J., & Molina, A. (2013). Leveraging the Zachman framework implementation using action–research methodology–a case study: Aligning the Enterprise architecture and the business goals. Enterprise Information Systems, 7(1), 100–132.CrossRef Nogueira, J. M., Romero, D., Espadas, J., & Molina, A. (2013). Leveraging the Zachman framework implementation using action–research methodology–a case study: Aligning the Enterprise architecture and the business goals. Enterprise Information Systems, 7(1), 100–132.CrossRef
go back to reference Pandit, N. (1996). The creation of theory: A recent application of the grounded theory method. The Qualitative Report, 2(4), 1–15. Pandit, N. (1996). The creation of theory: A recent application of the grounded theory method. The Qualitative Report, 2(4), 1–15.
go back to reference Rohloff, M. (2005). Enterprise architecture-framework and methodology for the Design of Architectures in the large. ECIS 2005 Proceedings (p. 113). Rohloff, M. (2005). Enterprise architecture-framework and methodology for the Design of Architectures in the large. ECIS 2005 Proceedings (p. 113).
go back to reference Rouhani, B. D., Mahrin, M. N., Nikpay, F., & Rouhani, B. D. (2014). Current issues on Enterprise architecture implementation methodology, In New Perspectives in Information Systems and Technologies (Vol. 2, pp. 239–46). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05948-8_23.CrossRef Rouhani, B. D., Mahrin, M. N., Nikpay, F., & Rouhani, B. D. (2014). Current issues on Enterprise architecture implementation methodology, In New Perspectives in Information Systems and Technologies (Vol. 2, pp. 239–46). Cham: Springer. doi:10.​1007/​978-3-319-05948-8_​23.CrossRef
go back to reference Saarelainen, M.-M., & Hotti, V. (2011). Does Enterprise architecture form the ground for group decisions in EGovernment Programme? Qualitative study of the Finnish National Project for IT in social services. In Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), 2011 15th IEEE International (pp. 11–17). doi:10.1109/EDOCW.2011.26. Saarelainen, M.-M., & Hotti, V. (2011). Does Enterprise architecture form the ground for group decisions in EGovernment Programme? Qualitative study of the Finnish National Project for IT in social services. In Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), 2011 15th IEEE International (pp. 11–17). doi:10.​1109/​EDOCW.​2011.​26.
go back to reference Schmidt, C., & Buxmann, P. (2011). Outcomes and success factors of Enterprise IT architecture management: Empirical insight from the international financial services industry. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(2), 168–185.CrossRef Schmidt, C., & Buxmann, P. (2011). Outcomes and success factors of Enterprise IT architecture management: Empirical insight from the international financial services industry. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(2), 168–185.CrossRef
go back to reference Simon, D., Fischbach, K., & Schoder, D. (2014). Enterprise architecture management and its role in corporate strategic management. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(1), 5–42. doi:10.1007/s10257-013-0213-4.CrossRef Simon, D., Fischbach, K., & Schoder, D. (2014). Enterprise architecture management and its role in corporate strategic management. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(1), 5–42. doi:10.​1007/​s10257-013-0213-4.CrossRef
go back to reference Sowa, J. F., & Zachman, J. A. (1992). Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 31(3), 590–616.CrossRef Sowa, J. F., & Zachman, J. A. (1992). Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 31(3), 590–616.CrossRef
go back to reference Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.
go back to reference Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). The basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1st ed.). London: Sage. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). The basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1st ed.). London: Sage.
go back to reference Tamm, T., Seddon, P. B., Shanks, G., & Reynolds, P. (2011). How does Enterprise architecture add value to Organisations? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28(1), 141–168. Tamm, T., Seddon, P. B., Shanks, G., & Reynolds, P. (2011). How does Enterprise architecture add value to Organisations? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28(1), 141–168.
go back to reference Valtonen, K., Mäntynen, S., Leppänen, M., & Pulkkinen, M. (2011). Enterprise architecture descriptions for enhancing local government transformation and coherency management: Case study. In Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), 2011 15th IEEE International (pp. 360–69). doi:10.1109/EDOCW.2011.39. Valtonen, K., Mäntynen, S., Leppänen, M., & Pulkkinen, M. (2011). Enterprise architecture descriptions for enhancing local government transformation and coherency management: Case study. In Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), 2011 15th IEEE International (pp. 360–69). doi:10.​1109/​EDOCW.​2011.​39.
go back to reference Vargas, A., Cuenca, L., Boza, A., Sacala, I., Moisescu, M. (2014). Towards the development of the framework for inter sensing Enterprise architecture. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(1), 55-72. doi:10.1007/s10845-014-0901-z. Vargas, A., Cuenca, L., Boza, A., Sacala, I., Moisescu, M. (2014). Towards the development of the framework for inter sensing Enterprise architecture. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(1), 55-72. doi:10.​1007/​s10845-014-0901-z.
go back to reference Wan, H., Luo, X., Johansson, B., & Chen, H. (2013). Enterprise architecture benefits. ICISO 2013 (p. 62). Wan, H., Luo, X., Johansson, B., & Chen, H. (2013). Enterprise architecture benefits. ICISO 2013 (p. 62).
go back to reference Ylimäki, T. (2008). Potential critical success factors for Enterprise architecture. Evaluation of Enterprise and Software Architectures: Critical Issues, Metrics and Practices:[AISA Project 2005-2008]/Eetu Niemi, Tanja Ylimäki & Niina Hämäläinen (Eds.). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, Information Technology Research Institute, 2008.-(Tietotekniikan Tutkimusinstituutin Julkaisuja, ISSN 1236-1615; 18). ISBN 978-951-39-3108-7 (CD-ROM). https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/handle/123456789/41369. Ylimäki, T. (2008). Potential critical success factors for Enterprise architecture. Evaluation of Enterprise and Software Architectures: Critical Issues, Metrics and Practices:[AISA Project 2005-2008]/Eetu Niemi, Tanja Ylimäki & Niina Hämäläinen (Eds.). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, Information Technology Research Institute, 2008.-(Tietotekniikan Tutkimusinstituutin Julkaisuja, ISSN 1236-1615; 18). ISBN 978-951-39-3108-7 (CD-ROM). https://​jyx.​jyu.​fi/​dspace/​handle/​123456789/​41369.
go back to reference Yuhashi, H., & Iijima, J. (2010). The power to activate a creative Core in Enterprise. Power, 6, 1–2010. Yuhashi, H., & Iijima, J. (2010). The power to activate a creative Core in Enterprise. Power, 6, 1–2010.
go back to reference Yuhashi, H., & Ijima, J. (2009). How can we manipulate a communication network to create collaboration? AMCIS 2009 Proceedings (p. 97). Yuhashi, H., & Ijima, J. (2009). How can we manipulate a communication network to create collaboration? AMCIS 2009 Proceedings (p. 97).
go back to reference Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276–292.CrossRef Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276–292.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Lack of Communication and Collaboration in Enterprise Architecture Development
Authors
Negin Banaeianjahromi
Kari Smolander
Publication date
15-08-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Information Systems Frontiers / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Electronic ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9779-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Information Systems Frontiers 4/2019 Go to the issue

Premium Partner