Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

15. Law of Succession in the New Romanian Civil Code

Author : János Székely

Published in: New Civil Codes in Hungary and Romania

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study outlines several novel elements of the law of succession, which were introduced by the new Civil Code of Romania, and compares them to earlier rules set forth by the Romanian Civil Code of 1864. A brief historical overview of Romanian civil law in general, and the law of succession in particular, is provided. Subsequently some of the issues raised by the legal literature relating to this field are examined. Among them are the opening of the estate, the prerequisites for succession, and disqualifying factors, such as unworthiness. Representation per stirpes, the rights of the surviving spouse over the estate, and the partially repealed prohibition of fideicommissary substitution are examined in more detail. For the sake of comparison, reference is made to the rules of succession contained in the new Hungarian Civil Code (as the Hungarian recodification of civil law largely coincided with that of Romanian civil law), in order to elicit the common concerns of the two legislators.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Other codes of civil law were taken into consideration during its codification, primarily the codes of Belgium and the Swiss Canton of Geneva, but some influences from the—then ongoing—Italian codification can also be discovered.
 
2
The Romanian legislator strayed from the French model under two other aspects. The “poor widow” was instituted as a usufructuary for a share of the estate equal to that of the descendants. If there was only one descendant, the widow’s share would be 1/3 parts. If only collateral relatives inherited the deceased, the widow would in turn inherit 1/4 of the estate as property. A right to alimony, for the duration of one year, to the benefit of the widow was also instituted. Both provisions had their roots in the code of Calimach, adopted in the mid-19th century.
 
3
This provision was repealed by Act 3581/1921 which instituted the progressive inheritance tax. According to the new rules only inheritors of the fourth degree at most, or the surviving spouse could inherit, the latter considered by judicial practice as an inheritor of the fifth degree.
 
4
This order of topics differs from that the Civil Code of Québec, because—perhaps out of fidelity to the former institutio system—the Romanian legislator opted to place provisions of property law into “Book III” (as opposed to Book IV) of the Code, thereby inverting the order used in the Québec model, and more closely following the previous order of topics.
 
5
The term “inheritance” is used deliberately in this context instead of “succession” due to the language employed by the new Civil Code.
 
6
Such a context exists when referring to successive owners of an item which was resold several times, the current owner being defined in Romanian legal jargon as the “successor” of the previous one.
 
7
The obligation to return what they inherited is however limited to the amount by which the assets exceeded the liabilities in the inheritance which they collected from the first de cuius by virtue of representation.
 
8
This right carried a minimal duration of one year unless the other heirs provided the spouse with an equivalent and suitable residence or the surviving spouse remarried. The residence could not be partitioned before the expiration of this period.
 
Literature
go back to reference Alexandresco, Dimitrie. 1926. Principiile dreptului civil român. Vol. II. Bucharest: Atelierele Socec & Co. Societate Anonimă. Alexandresco, Dimitrie. 1926. Principiile dreptului civil român. Vol. II. Bucharest: Atelierele Socec & Co. Societate Anonimă.
go back to reference Bardoczi, Irina. 2013. Marchează Codul Civil din 1864 o evoluţie în materia drepturilor succesorale ab intestato ale soţului supravieţuitor? SUBB Jurisprudentia 1: 5–34. Bardoczi, Irina. 2013. Marchează Codul Civil din 1864 o evoluţie în materia drepturilor succesorale ab intestato ale soţului supravieţuitor? SUBB Jurisprudentia 1: 5–34.
go back to reference Bob, Mircea Dan. 2010. Propter veteris iuris imitationem: Nou şi vechi în materie succesorală (I). SUBB Jurisprudentia 4: 53–73. Bob, Mircea Dan. 2010. Propter veteris iuris imitationem: Nou şi vechi în materie succesorală (I). SUBB Jurisprudentia 4: 53–73.
go back to reference Bob, Mircea Dan. 2011a. Consideraţii asupra reglementării reprezentării succesorale în noul Cod civil. Romanian Rev. Priv. L. 1: 33–48. Bob, Mircea Dan. 2011a. Consideraţii asupra reglementării reprezentării succesorale în noul Cod civil. Romanian Rev. Priv. L. 1: 33–48.
go back to reference Bob, Mircea Dan. 2011b. Propter veteris iuris imitationem: Nou şi vechi în materie succesorală (II). SUBB Jurisprudentia 4: 34–62. Bob, Mircea Dan. 2011b. Propter veteris iuris imitationem: Nou şi vechi în materie succesorală (II). SUBB Jurisprudentia 4: 34–62.
go back to reference Boţi, Iolanda, and Victor Boţi. 2011. Codul civil din Quebec: sursă de inspiraţie în procesul de recodificare a Dreptului Civil Român. SUBB Jurisprudentia 1: 5–19. Boţi, Iolanda, and Victor Boţi. 2011. Codul civil din Quebec: sursă de inspiraţie în procesul de recodificare a Dreptului Civil Român. SUBB Jurisprudentia 1: 5–19.
go back to reference Chirică, Dan. 2003. Drept civil. Succesiuni şi testamente. Bucharest: Editura Rosetti. Chirică, Dan. 2003. Drept civil. Succesiuni şi testamente. Bucharest: Editura Rosetti.
go back to reference Deak, Francisc. 2001. Tratat de drept succesoral – Ediţia a II-a actualizată şi completată. Bucharest: Universul Juridic. Deak, Francisc. 2001. Tratat de drept succesoral – Ediţia a II-a actualizată şi completată. Bucharest: Universul Juridic.
go back to reference Eliescu, Mihail. 1966. Moştenirea şi devoluţiunea ei în dreptul Republicii Socialiste România. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România. Eliescu, Mihail. 1966. Moştenirea şi devoluţiunea ei în dreptul Republicii Socialiste România. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România.
go back to reference Genoiu, Ilioara. 2012a. Renunciation of Inheritance According to the Regulations of the New Romanian Civil Code and of French Law. AGORA Int’l J. Jurid. Sci. 1: 44–53. Genoiu, Ilioara. 2012a. Renunciation of Inheritance According to the Regulations of the New Romanian Civil Code and of French Law. AGORA Int’l J. Jurid. Sci. 1: 44–53.
go back to reference Genoiu, Ilioara. 2012b. Substituţiile fideicomisare şi liberalităţile reziduale în reglementarea noului Cod Civil. Romanian Rev. Priv. L. 3: 147–163. Genoiu, Ilioara. 2012b. Substituţiile fideicomisare şi liberalităţile reziduale în reglementarea noului Cod Civil. Romanian Rev. Priv. L. 3: 147–163.
go back to reference Hamza, Gábor. 2002. Az európai magánjog fejlődése – A modern magánjogi rendszerek kialakulása a római jogi hagyományok alapján. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó Rt. Hamza, Gábor. 2002. Az európai magánjog fejlődése – A modern magánjogi rendszerek kialakulása a római jogi hagyományok alapján. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó Rt.
go back to reference Hamza, Gábor. 2009. Entstehung und Entwicklung der modernen Privatrechtsordnungen und die römischrechtliche Tradition. Budapest: Eötvös Univ. Verlag. Hamza, Gábor. 2009. Entstehung und Entwicklung der modernen Privatrechtsordnungen und die römischrechtliche Tradition. Budapest: Eötvös Univ. Verlag.
go back to reference Hunter, William Alexander. 1903. A Systematic and Historical Exposition of Roman Law in the Order of a Code. (4th). London: Sweet & Maxwell Limited. Hunter, William Alexander. 1903. A Systematic and Historical Exposition of Roman Law in the Order of a Code. (4th). London: Sweet & Maxwell Limited.
go back to reference Lupan, Ernest. 2011. Căile grunzuroase ale Codului civil român. Scientia Juris – Revistă româno-maghiară de ştiinţe juridice 1: 5–10. Lupan, Ernest. 2011. Căile grunzuroase ale Codului civil român. Scientia Juris – Revistă româno-maghiară de ştiinţe juridice 1: 5–10.
go back to reference Macovei, Codrin, and Mirela Carmen Dobrilă. 2012. Cartea a IV-a – Despre moştenire şi liberalităţi. In Noul Cod civil – Comentariu pe articole, ed. Flavius-Antoniu Baias, Eugen Chelaru, Rodica Constantinovici and Ioan Macovei, 997–1214. Bucharest: Editura C. H. Beck. Macovei, Codrin, and Mirela Carmen Dobrilă. 2012. Cartea a IV-a – Despre moştenire şi liberalităţi. In Noul Cod civil – Comentariu pe articole, ed. Flavius-Antoniu Baias, Eugen Chelaru, Rodica Constantinovici and Ioan Macovei, 997–1214. Bucharest: Editura C. H. Beck.
go back to reference Pelletier, George A. Jr., and Michael Roy Sonnenreich. 1966. A Comparative Analysis of Civil Law Succession. Villanova Law Review 11: 323–356. Pelletier, George A. Jr., and Michael Roy Sonnenreich. 1966. A Comparative Analysis of Civil Law Succession. Villanova Law Review 11: 323–356.
go back to reference Poenar, Florina. 2013. Eternizarea voinţei lui de cuius prin intermediul substituţiilor fideicomisare. SUBB Jurisprudentia 3: 5–66. Poenar, Florina. 2013. Eternizarea voinţei lui de cuius prin intermediul substituţiilor fideicomisare. SUBB Jurisprudentia 3: 5–66.
go back to reference Popa, Ioan. 2015. Instituții juridice controversate de drept succesoral menținute sau existente în noul Cod civil român. Dreptul 7: 26–51. Popa, Ioan. 2015. Instituții juridice controversate de drept succesoral menținute sau existente în noul Cod civil român. Dreptul 7: 26–51.
go back to reference Popescu, Radu-Romeo. 2015. Substituțiile fideicomisare în noul Cod Civil. Analele Universității București – Seria Drept: 94–109. Popescu, Radu-Romeo. 2015. Substituțiile fideicomisare în noul Cod Civil. Analele Universității București – Seria Drept: 94–109.
go back to reference Stanković, Emilija. 2005. The Influence of Roman Law on Napoleon’s Code Civil. In Ex Iusta Causa Traditum: Essays in Honour of Eric H. Pool, ed. Rena Van den Bergh and Eric H. Pool, 310–315. Pretoria: University of South Africa. Stanković, Emilija. 2005. The Influence of Roman Law on Napoleon’s Code Civil. In Ex Iusta Causa Traditum: Essays in Honour of Eric H. Pool, ed. Rena Van den Bergh and Eric H. Pool, 310–315. Pretoria: University of South Africa.
go back to reference Ticu, Mădălin Savu. 2006. Fundamentele filosofice ale Codului Civil român. Revista de Ştiinţe Juridice 2: 81–88. Ticu, Mădălin Savu. 2006. Fundamentele filosofice ale Codului Civil român. Revista de Ştiinţe Juridice 2: 81–88.
go back to reference Vékás, Lajos, and Péter Gárdos. 2013. A Polgári Törvénykönyv magyarázatokkal. Budapest: CompLex Kiadó Jogi és Üzleti Tartalomszolgáltató Kft. Vékás, Lajos, and Péter Gárdos. 2013. A Polgári Törvénykönyv magyarázatokkal. Budapest: CompLex Kiadó Jogi és Üzleti Tartalomszolgáltató Kft.
go back to reference Veress, Emőd. 2012. Drept civil. Moştenirea. Liberalităţile conform Noului Cod civil. Bucharest: Editura C. H. Beck. Veress, Emőd. 2012. Drept civil. Moştenirea. Liberalităţile conform Noului Cod civil. Bucharest: Editura C. H. Beck.
Metadata
Title
Law of Succession in the New Romanian Civil Code
Author
János Székely
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63327-5_15