Top

Published in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

10. Leistungsbeurteilung in Zeiten der Digitalisierung

Authors : Daniela Lohaus, Wolfgang Habermann

Published in: Digitale Personalauswahl und Eignungsdiagnostik

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Zusammenfassung

Leistungsbeurteilungen spielen auch im Zusammenhang mit Eignungsdiagnostik und Personalauswahl eine Rolle. Sie werden beispielsweise genutzt, um interne Bewerber/-innen zu bewerten oder um Auswahlentscheidungen zu validieren. In diesem Kapitel wird dargestellt, was als Arbeitsleistung verstanden wird und anhand welcher Art von Indikatoren und Methoden sie beurteilt wird und wer dafür zuständig ist. Neben der klassischen Vorgehensweise wird aufgezeigt, welches Potenzial die Digitalisierung im Rahmen der Leistungsbeurteilung bietet, welche Verfahren bereits eingesetzt werden und welche Wirkungen sie erzielen.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Künstliche Intelligenz in der Personalauswahl

next chapter Fazit – Aufgaben für die Forschung und Empfehlungen für die Praxis

Abraham, M., Niessen, C., Schnabel, C., Lorek, K., Grimm, V., Möslein, K., & Wrede, M. (2019). Electronic monitoring at work: The role of attitudes, functions, and perceived control for the acceptance of tracking technologies. Human Resource Management Journal, 29(4), 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12250CrossRef

Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.106CrossRef

Aguinis, H., & Burgi-Tian, J. (2021a). Measuring performance during crises and beyond: The performance promoter score. Business Horizons, 64(1), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.09.001CrossRef

Aguinis, H., & Burgi-Tian, J. (2021b). Talent management challenges during COVID-19 and beyond: Performance management to the rescue. Business Research Quarterly, 24(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211009528CrossRef

Aguinis, H., Joo, H., & Gottfredson, R. K. (2013). What monetary rewards can and cannot do: How to show employees the money. Business Horizons, 56(2), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.11.007CrossRef

Alge, B. J., & Hansen, S. D. (2014). Workplace monitoring and surveillance research since “1984”: A review and agenda. In M. D. Coovert & L. F. Thompson (Hrsg.), The Psychology of Workplace Technology (S. 209–237). Routledge.

Allen, K., van Someren, G., & Gutierrez, S. (2020). What’s age got to do with it? You may be surprised! Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13(3), 403–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2020.68CrossRef

Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. (1999). Construct-oriented biodata: capturing change-related and contextually relevant future performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessmen, 7(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00110CrossRef

Bernauer, V. S., & Kornau, A. (2022). E-voice in the digitalised workplace. Insights from an alternative organisation. Human Resource Management Journal, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12460

Bhave, D. P. (2014). The invisible eye? Electronic performance monitoring and employee job performance. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 605–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12046CrossRef

Bilotta, I., Cheng, S., Ng, L., Corrington, A., Watson, I., Paoletti, J., et al. (2021). Remote communication amid the coronavirus pandemic: Optimizing interpersonal dynamics and team performance. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 14(1–2), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2021.10CrossRef

Blume, B. D., Rubin, R. S., & Baldwin, T. T. (2013). Who is attracted to an organisation using a forced distribution performance management system? Human Resource Management Journal, 23(4), 360–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12016CrossRef

Bondarouk, T. V., & Ruël, H. J. M. (2009). Electronic Human Resource Management: challenges in the digital era. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(3), 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802707235CrossRef

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3CrossRef

Buckingham, M., & Goodall, A. (2015). Reinventing performance management. Harvard Business Review, 93(4), 40–50.

Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The modeling and assessment of work performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111427CrossRef

Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M., & Odman, R. B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 225–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01207.xCrossRef

Campion, M. C., Campion, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (2015). Improvements in performance management through the use of 360 feedback. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.3CrossRef

Cardador, M. T., Northcraft, G. B., & Whicker, J. (2017). A theory of work gamification: Something old, something new, something borrowed, something cool? Human Resource Management Review, 27(2), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.014CrossRef

Cardy, R., & Munjal, D. (2016). Beyond performance ratings: The long road to effective performance management. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2016.18CrossRef

Carver, S., Goffin, R., & Factor, R. (2021). Relative and absolute self-ratings of work performance: Does social comparison lead to an enhanced thought process in self-evaluations? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 29(3–4), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12351CrossRef

Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352CrossRef

Cenciotti, R., Alessandri, G., Borgogni, L., & Consiglio, C. (2022). Agentic capabilities as predictors of psychological capital, job performance, and social capital over time. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 30(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12357CrossRef

Church, A., Ginther, N., Levine, R., & Rotolo, C. (2015). Going beyond the fix: Taking performance management to the next level. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.10CrossRef

Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.130CrossRef

Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241–1255. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1241CrossRefPubMed

Dalal, R. S., Bhave, D. P., & Fiset, J. (2014). Within-person variability in job performance: A theoretical review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1396–1436.CrossRef

Dalal, R. S., Alaybek, B., & Lievens, F. (2020). Within-person job performance variability over short timeframes: Theory, empirical research, and practice. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045350CrossRef

Darr, W., Borman, W. C., St-Pierre, L., Kubisiak, C., & Grossman, M. (2017). An applied examination of the computerized adaptive rating scale for assessing performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(2), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12167CrossRef

DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000085CrossRefPubMed

Farr, J. L., Fairchild, J., & Cassidy, S. E. (2014). Technology and performance appraisal. In M. D. Coovert & L. F. Thompson (Hrsg.), The psychology of workplace technology (S. 77–98). Routledge.

Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2015). Pay, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, performance, and creativity in the workplace: Revisiting long-held beliefs. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 489–521. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111418CrossRef

Geshkov, M. (2021). Application of digital technologies in performance appraisal. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 19(Suppl. 1), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.15547/tjs.2021.s.01.016CrossRef

Giessner, S. R., Stam, D., Kerschreiter, R., Verboon, D., & Salama, I. (2020). Goal-setting reloaded: The influence of minimal and maximal goal standards on task satisfaction and goal striving after performance feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161(C), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.08.004CrossRef

Goffin, R. D., & Olson, J. M. (2011). Is it all relative? Comparative judgments and the possible improvement of self-ratings and ratings of others. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393521CrossRefPubMed

Goldberg, E. L. (2015). Leveraging technology to improve social dynamics. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 100–102. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.5CrossRef

Gorman, C. A., Meriac, J. P., Roch, S. G., Ray, J. L., & Gamble, J. S. (2017). An exploratory study of current performance management practices: Human resource executives’ perspectives. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12172CrossRef

Grant, A. M., & Shandell, M. S. (2022). Social otivation at work: The organizational sychology of effort for, against, and with others. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 301–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-060321-033406CrossRefPubMed

Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014, January 6–9). Does gamification work? – A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE.

Hu, X., Barber, L., Park, Y., & Day, A. (2021). Defrag and reboot? Consolidating information and communication technology research in I-O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 14(3), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2021.3CrossRef

Jelley, R. B. (2016) Working With Social Comparisons in the Appraisal and Management of Performance Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 288–296 https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2016.13

Katz, I. M., Rauvola, R. S., & Rudolph, C. W. (2021). Feedback environment: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 29(4), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12350CrossRef

Keegan, A., & Den Hartog, D. (2019). Doing it for themselves? Performance appraisal in project-based organisations, the role of employees, and challenges to theory. Human Resource Management Journal, 29(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12216CrossRef

Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (2000). Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling, and method bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 708–723. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.708CrossRefPubMed

Klehe, U.-C., & Anderson, N. (2007). Working hard and working smart: Motivation and ability during typical and maximum performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 978–992. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.978CrossRefPubMed

Knies, E., Borst, R. T., Leisink, P., & Farndale, E. (2022). The distinctiveness of public sector HRM: A fourwave trend analysis. Human Resource Management Journal, 32(4), 799–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12440CrossRef

Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet Henrica, C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763CrossRefPubMed

Landers, R. N., & Marin, S. (2021). Theory and technology in organizational psychology: A review of technology integration paradigms and their effects on the validity of theory. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-060843CrossRef

Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1983). The measurement of work performance. Methods, theory, and applications. Academic Press.

Latham, G. P. (2017). Motivate employee performance through oal Sestting. In E. A. Locke (Hrsg.), The Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behaviour (S. 109–124). Wiley.CrossRef

Ledford, G., Benson, G., & Lawler, E. (2016). Aligning research and the current practice of performance management. Industrial and organizational psychology, 9(2), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2016.7CrossRef

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2013). Goal setting theory, 1990. In E. A. Locke & G. P. Latham (Hrsg.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (S. 3–15). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.CrossRef

Lohaus, D. (2009). Leistungsbeurteilung. Hogrefe.

Lohaus, D., & Kleinmann, M. (2002). Analysis of performance potential. In S. Sonnentag (Hrsg.), Psychological management of individual performance (S. 155–178). Wiley.CrossRef

Lohaus, D., & Schuler, H. (2014). Leistungsbeurteilung. In H. Schuler & U. Kanning (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (3. Aufl., S. 357–411). Hogrefe.

Lohaus, D., Bronner, U., Müller, P., Baumann, A., & Wallemann, A. (2018). Die Zukunft des Personalmarketings in Deutschland – Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Studie (2. Aufl.). Hochschule Darmstadt.

McClendon, J. A., Deckop, J. R., Han, S., & Petrucci, T. (2017). A study of system execution of performance appraisal. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 28(3), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12289CrossRef

McCormick, B. W., Reeves, C. J., Downes, P. E., Li, N., & Ilies, R. (2020). Scientific contributions of within-person research in management: Making the juice worth the squeeze. Journal of Management, 46(2), 321–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318788435CrossRef

Mercer. (2019). Performance transformation in the future of work. https://www.mercer.us/content/dam/mercer/attachments/private/us-2019-performance-transformation-in-the-future-of-work.pdf. Zugegriffen am 29.11.2022.

Mitchell, R., Schuster, L., & Jin, H. S. (2020). Gamification and the impact of extrinsic motivation on needs satisfaction: Making work fun? Journal of Business Research, 106, 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.022CrossRef

Müller, P., & Lohaus, D. (2018). Talent Analytics – Chancen und Risiken eines datenbasierten Talent Managements aus wirtschaftspsychologischer Sicht. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 20(3), 34–42.

Murphy, K., Cleveland, J., & Hanscom, M. (2019). Performance appraisal and management. Sage.CrossRef

Murphy, K. R. (2020). Performance evaluation will not die, but it should. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12259CrossRef

Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2013). How do within-person changes due to aging affect job performance? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 500–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.07.007CrossRef

Nixon, A. E., & Spector, P. E. (2014). The impact of technology on employee stress, health, and well-being. In M. D. Coovert & L. F. Thompson (Hrsg.), The psychology of workplace technology (S. 238–260). Routledge.

O’Boyle, E., Jr., & Aguinis, H. (2012). The best and the rest: Revisiting the norm of normality of individual performance. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 79–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01239.xCrossRef

Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrom. Lexington.

Parry, E. (2014). e-HRM: A catalyst for changing the HR function? In F. J. Martinez-Lopez (Hrsg.), Handbook of strategic e-business management (S. 589–604). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39747-9CrossRef

Payne, S. C., Horner, M. T., Boswell, W. R., Schroeder, A. N., & Stine-Cheyne, K. J. (2009). Comparison of online and traditional performance appraisal systems. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(6), 526–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910974116CrossRef

Perryer, C., Celestine, N. A., Scott-Ladd, B., & Leighton, C. (2016). Enhancing workplace motivation through gamification: Transferrable lessons from pedagogy. The International Journal of Management Education, 14(3), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2016.07.001CrossRef

Pilcher, S. (2012). The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management, 51(5), 709–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21499CrossRef

Podsakoff, N. P., Spoelma, T. M., Chawla, N., & Gabriel, A. S. (2019). What predicts within-person variance in applied psychology constructs? An empirical examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(6), 727–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000374CrossRefPubMed

Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612CrossRefPubMed

Pulakos, E. D., Mueller Hanson, R., Arad, S., & Moye, N. (2015). Performance management can be fixed: An on-the-job experiential learning approach for complex behaviour change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2014.2CrossRef

Pulakos, E. D., Muller-Hanson, R., & Arad, S. (2019). The evolution of performance management: Searching for value. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015009CrossRef

Ravid, D. M., Tomczak, D. L., White, J. C., & Behrend, T. S. (2020). EPM 20/20: A review, framework, and research agenda for electronic performance monitoring. Journal of Management, 46(1), 100–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319869435CrossRef

Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1CrossRefPubMed

Rondeau, K. V. (2018). e-Performance and reward management. In M. Thite (Hrsg.), e-HRM: Digital approaches, directions & applications (S. 196–213). Routledge.CrossRef

Ruël, H., & Bondarouk, T. (2014). e-HRM research and practice: Facing the challenges ahead. In F. J. Martinez-Lopez (Hrsg.), Handbook of strategic e-business management (S. 633–653). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39747-9CrossRef

Sanchez, J. I., & Levine, E. L. (2012). The rise and fall of job analysis and the future of work analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 397–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100401CrossRefPubMed

Schleicher, D. J., Bull, R. A., & Green, S. G. (2009). Rater reactions to forced distribution rating systems. Journal of Management, 35(4), 899–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307312514CrossRef

Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., Levy, P. E., Hargrove, D. C., & Barros-Rivera, B. A. (2018). Putting the system into performance management systems: A review and agenda for performance management research. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2209–2245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318755303CrossRef

Schuler, H. (2004). Beurteilung und Förderung beruflicher Leistung (2. Aufl.). Hogrefe.

Schuler, H. (2014). Psychologische Personalauswahl. Eignungsdiagnostik für Personalentscheidungen und Berufsberatung (4., vollst. überarb. Aufl.). Hogrefe.

Silic, M., Marzi, G., Caputo, A., & Bal, P. M. (2020). The effects of a gamified human resource management system on job satisfaction and engagement. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(2), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12272CrossRef

Stone, D. L., Deadrick, D. L., Lukaszewski, K. M., & Johnson, R. (2015). The influence of technology on the future of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.002CrossRef

Thiel, C. E., Prince, N., & Sahatjian, Z. (2022). The (electronic) walls between us: How employee monitoring undermines ethical leadership. Human Resource Management Journal, 32(4), 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12462CrossRef

Thomason, S., Brownlee, A., Beekman, A., & Rustogi, H. (2018). Forced distribution systems and attracting top talent. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(7), 1171–1191. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2017-0141CrossRef

Trevor, C. O., & Piyanontalee, R. (2020). Discharges, poor-performer quits, and layoffs as valued exits: Is it really addition by subtraction? Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045343CrossRef

Tziner, A., & Rabenu, E. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic: A challenge to performance appraisal. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 14(1–2), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2021.24CrossRef

Ullah, Z., Ahmad, N., Scholz, M., Ahmed, B., Ahmad, I., & Usman, M. (2021). Perceived accuracy of electronic performance appraisal systems: The case of a non-for-profit organization from an emerging economy. Sustainability, 13(4), 2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042109CrossRef

Van Lill, X., Roodt, G., & De Bruin, G. P. (2020). The relationship between managers’ goal-setting styles and subordinates’ goal commitment. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 23(1), a3601. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v23i1.3601

Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00151CrossRef

Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L., & Ones, D. S. (2005). Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 108–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.108CrossRefPubMed

Welsh, D. T., Baer, M. D., Sessions, H., & Garud, N. (2020). Motivated to disengage: The ethical consequences of goal commitment and moral disengagement in goal setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(7), 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2467CrossRef

Wilkie, D. (2015, October). Is the annual performance review dead? HR Magazine, 11–12.

Woods, S. A. (2022). Where I am and who I am with: Contextual dynamics of personality in the prediction of work performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 30(2), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12355CrossRef

Zhou, Y., Cheng, Y., Zou, Y., & Liu, G. (2022). e-HRM: A meta-analysis of the antecedents, consequences, and cross-national moderators. Human Resource Management Review, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100862

Title: Leistungsbeurteilung in Zeiten der Digitalisierung
Authors: Daniela Lohaus
Wolfgang Habermann
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Book: Digitale Personalauswahl und Eignungsdiagnostik
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-68210-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-68211-1

Copyright Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-68211-1_10

Springer Professional

Zusammenfassung

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner