Skip to main content
Top

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

13. Linking Narrative Storylines and Quantitative Models to Combat Desertification in the Guadalentín Watershed (Spain)

Authors : Kasper Kok, Hedwig van Delden

Published in: Recent Developments in Foresight Methodologies

Publisher: Springer US

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Desertification in Spain is largely a society-driven problem, which can be effectively managed only through a thorough understanding of the principal ecological, sociocultural, and economic driving forces (UNCCD 1994). This calls for a more active role of decision-makers and other stakeholders. We present a promising approach, involving stakeholders in the scenario-development process and linking these narrative storylines with an integrated quantitative model. Within the framework of a larger EC-financed project, dealing with desertification in the Mediterranean region, multi-scale scenarios were developed for Europe, the Northern Mediterranean, and four local areas. In the same project, a policy-support system (PSS) was developed. The main objective of this exercise was to establish a link between the qualitative scenarios and the PSS for the watershed of the Guadalentín river in Spain. From the results of two scenario workshops, three scenarios were selected, all linked to the same Mediterranean scenario. Our selection aimed to maximize both the variety in the narrative storylines and the expected output of the PSS. The scenarios were subsequently formalized, ensuring that the same information was present for all three scenarios; semi-quantified (translated) by linking them to the main entry points of the PSS; and quantified by parameterizing the model. The results indicate the potential of the constructed quantitative scenarios. This chapter illustrates the practical potential and pitfalls of linking qualitative storylines and quantitative models. Future research should, however, also focus on the more fundamental theoretical obstacles that are easily overlooked.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Alcamo, J. (2008). The SAS approach: Combining qualitative and quantitative knowledge in environmental scenarios. In J. Alcamo (Ed.), Environmental futures: The practice of environmental scenario analysis (Developments in integrated environmental assessment, Vol. 2, pp. 123–150). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef Alcamo, J. (2008). The SAS approach: Combining qualitative and quantitative knowledge in environmental scenarios. In J. Alcamo (Ed.), Environmental futures: The practice of environmental scenario analysis (Developments in integrated environmental assessment, Vol. 2, pp. 123–150). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef
go back to reference De Groot, D., & Rotmans, J. (2004). MedAction, final report, submitted to the Research and Development Directorate, European Commission EVK2-2000-00085, Maastricht. De Groot, D., & Rotmans, J. (2004). MedAction, final report, submitted to the Research and Development Directorate, European Commission EVK2-2000-00085, Maastricht.
go back to reference Kasemir, B., Dahinden, U., Swartling, Å. G., Schüle, R., Tabara, D., & Jaeger, C. C. (2000). Citizens’ perspectives on climate change and energy use. Global Environmental Change, 10, 169–184.CrossRef Kasemir, B., Dahinden, U., Swartling, Å. G., Schüle, R., Tabara, D., & Jaeger, C. C. (2000). Citizens’ perspectives on climate change and energy use. Global Environmental Change, 10, 169–184.CrossRef
go back to reference Kok, K. (2009). The potential of Fuzzy cognitive maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil. Global Environmental Change, 19, 122–133.CrossRef Kok, K. (2009). The potential of Fuzzy cognitive maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil. Global Environmental Change, 19, 122–133.CrossRef
go back to reference Kok, K., & Van Delden, H. (2009). Combining two approaches of integrated scenario development to combat desertification in the Guadalentín watershed, Spain. Environment and Planning B, 36, 49–66.CrossRef Kok, K., & Van Delden, H. (2009). Combining two approaches of integrated scenario development to combat desertification in the Guadalentín watershed, Spain. Environment and Planning B, 36, 49–66.CrossRef
go back to reference Kok, K., Rothman, D. S., & Patel, M. (2006a). Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part I. European and Mediterranean scenario development. Futures, 38(3), 261–284.CrossRef Kok, K., Rothman, D. S., & Patel, M. (2006a). Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part I. European and Mediterranean scenario development. Futures, 38(3), 261–284.CrossRef
go back to reference Kok, K., Patel, M., Rothman, D. S., & Quaranta, G. (2006b). Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part II. Participatory local scenario development. Futures, 38(3), 285–311.CrossRef Kok, K., Patel, M., Rothman, D. S., & Quaranta, G. (2006b). Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part II. Participatory local scenario development. Futures, 38(3), 285–311.CrossRef
go back to reference Kok, K., van Vliet, M., Bärlund, I., Dubel, A., & Sendzimir, J. (2011). Combining participative backcasting and explorative scenario development: Experiences from the SCENES project. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(5), 835–851.CrossRef Kok, K., van Vliet, M., Bärlund, I., Dubel, A., & Sendzimir, J. (2011). Combining participative backcasting and explorative scenario development: Experiences from the SCENES project. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(5), 835–851.CrossRef
go back to reference Parker, D. C., Berger, T., Manson, S. M., & McConnell, W. J. (2002). Agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change. Proceedings of an International Workshop, 4–7 Oct 2001, Irvine. Report no. 6, LUCC report series, Focus 1 Office, Indiana University. Parker, D. C., Berger, T., Manson, S. M., & McConnell, W. J. (2002). Agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change. Proceedings of an International Workshop, 4–7 Oct 2001, Irvine. Report no. 6, LUCC report series, Focus 1 Office, Indiana University.
go back to reference Robinson, J. (2003). Future subjunctive: Backcasting as social learning. Futures, 35, 839–856.CrossRef Robinson, J. (2003). Future subjunctive: Backcasting as social learning. Futures, 35, 839–856.CrossRef
go back to reference Roeckner, E., Arpe, K., Bengtsson, L., Christoph, M., Claussen, M., Dümenil, L., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Schlese, U., & Schulzweida, U. (1996). The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-4: Model description and simulation of present-day climate, Report no. 218, Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg. Roeckner, E., Arpe, K., Bengtsson, L., Christoph, M., Claussen, M., Dümenil, L., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Schlese, U., & Schulzweida, U. (1996). The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-4: Model description and simulation of present-day climate, Report no. 218, Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg.
go back to reference Rotmans, J. (1998). Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead. Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 3, 155–179.CrossRef Rotmans, J. (1998). Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead. Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 3, 155–179.CrossRef
go back to reference Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M. B. A., Anastasi, S. C. H., Greeuw, S. C. H., Mellors, J., Peters, S., Rothman, D. S., & Rijkens, N. (2000). Visions for a sustainable Europe. Futures, 32(9/10), 809–831.CrossRef Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M. B. A., Anastasi, S. C. H., Greeuw, S. C. H., Mellors, J., Peters, S., Rothman, D. S., & Rijkens, N. (2000). Visions for a sustainable Europe. Futures, 32(9/10), 809–831.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Delden, H., Luja, P., & Engelen, G. (2007). Integration of multi-scale dynamic spatial models of socio-economic and physical processes for river basin management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 22, 223–238.CrossRef Van Delden, H., Luja, P., & Engelen, G. (2007). Integration of multi-scale dynamic spatial models of socio-economic and physical processes for river basin management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 22, 223–238.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Vliet, M., Kok, K., & Veldkamp, T. (2010). Linking stakeholders and modellers in scenario studies: The use of fuzzy cognitive maps as a communication and learning tool. Futures, 42(1), 1–14.CrossRef Van Vliet, M., Kok, K., & Veldkamp, T. (2010). Linking stakeholders and modellers in scenario studies: The use of fuzzy cognitive maps as a communication and learning tool. Futures, 42(1), 1–14.CrossRef
go back to reference Vennix, J. A. M. (1999). Group-model building: Tackling messy problems. System Dynamics Review, 15, 379–401.CrossRef Vennix, J. A. M. (1999). Group-model building: Tackling messy problems. System Dynamics Review, 15, 379–401.CrossRef
go back to reference White, R., Straatman, B., & Engelen, G. (2004). Planning scenario visualization and assessment: A cellular automata based integrated spatial decision support system. In M. F. Goodchild & D. Janelle (Eds.), Spatially integrated social science (pp. 420–442). New York: Oxford University Press. White, R., Straatman, B., & Engelen, G. (2004). Planning scenario visualization and assessment: A cellular automata based integrated spatial decision support system. In M. F. Goodchild & D. Janelle (Eds.), Spatially integrated social science (pp. 420–442). New York: Oxford University Press.
Metadata
Title
Linking Narrative Storylines and Quantitative Models to Combat Desertification in the Guadalentín Watershed (Spain)
Authors
Kasper Kok
Hedwig van Delden
Copyright Year
2013
Publisher
Springer US
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5215-7_13