Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

10. Looking at Narrative as a Complex System: The Proteus Principle

Author : Federico Pianzola

Published in: Narrating Complexity

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

I am here proposing a strategy of consolidation for narrative studies. Disciplines and paradigms have their own specificities, which implicitly shape how we approach narrative phenomena. To make explicit such processes of selection and contextualization is an act of intellectual honesty and I suggest how to do it in three simple steps: (i) adopting a systemic perspective, (ii) distinguishing between logical levels, (iii) employing the Proteus Principle in the formation of theories. Narrative is seen and used in many different ways that can be conceived as systems, i.e. considering that the properties of narrative cannot be studied in isolation but are interconnected in a network of relations where all the components are influencing each other.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
In light of the interdisciplinary orientation of this volume, I am here focusing on scientific conceptions of complexity and system. Cf. Steiner (1984, pp. 99–137) for an historical overview of philosophical influences that led Russian formalists (especially Tynjanov) to develop a systemic view of literature and narrative. And cf. Pier (2017) for a more recent attempt at understanding narratology in terms of systems and complexity.
 
2
I am here assuming that the audience's experience of a discourse is always situated in a certain context, thus I use the term audience synecdochically, referring to a situated cognitive and aesthetic experience. Moreover, I would like to specify that I am using the terms audience and discourse—drawn from the rhetorical tradition—because I think they sound more familiar in the context of narrative studies. However, if narrative is conceived as a mode of cognition (Hutto 2008; Herman 2013) agent and stimuli might be more adequate terms, general enough to be used in every context, like, for instance, when I imagine a tiger jumping on my desk interrupting my writing (cf. Caracciolo 2014, pp. 93–109).
 
3
A similar attitude is shown by Gilbert Ryle (1949) and Ludwig Wittgenstein (1953) when they claim that the phrase “the meaning of something” is not referential and does not pick out any object as a meaning, it simply points out the way in which we use something (a term). The focus is upon our relationship to the term, upon our act of relating it to a state of the world, not on the state of the world itself. Referentiality is just one aspect of that relationship. In a similar way, a theory is just one way of knowing what a narrative is: unavoidably it is the most relevant in academia, but in other contexts we can claim to know what narrative is on the ground of some practice or beliefs that do not have a conceptual form (cf. Wittgenstein 1969).
 
4
Alternative schemes of concepts where a similar logical distinction is made are: “form–device–material” or “frame–device–form,” used respectively by the Russian Formalists and Skalin (2008, p. 209).
 
5
Other scholars who showed this epistemic attitude are, for instance, Francesco Orlando (1978) for literary theory, Darko Suvin (2010a, 1979) for theories of science fiction and utopia, and Nielsen et al. (2015a, b) for fictionality.
 
6
I subscribe to Wittgenstein's argument (1969, §204) that the epistemic regress problem is overcome by the assumption of transcendental conditions of experience that are reasonable—founded upon our forms of life—not logical. We do not doubt to know what narrative is—in Wittgenstein’s terms: we know how to use the word narrative—and this is a ground solid enough to support our theoretical activity.
 
7
As seen in Sect. 3.2, according to Sternberg, the representation of a sequence of events is only one among many other ways for generating suspense, curiosity or surprise.
 
8
A similar kind of scoping was done by Gérard Genette investigating the role of the tense imparfait in Marcel Proust's narrative, a research that brought him to readdress the issue of narrative sequentiality and to use the concept of syllepsis for those events whose order cannot be established (1980, p. 155).
 
9
Is there any event in the so-called “shortest story ever written:” “For sale: baby shoes, never worn”? (Wright 2014, p. 327). I guess this example is problematic because it requires at least Hühn's concept of “non-event” (2016) (a baby has not worn the shoes), and reference to some cognitive construction of hypothetical events that are not told. (A miscarriage? A stillborn baby? A shoemaker who ran out of business?) Perhaps we can consider events necessary for narrative organization, but we should acknowledge that events are not necessarily represented, they are constructs, whose source is not only discourse but also imagination, past experiences, etc. Thus, events too emerge from the audience–discourse interaction.
 
10
But not only cognitive approaches adopt the PP: see Skalin (2008) for an example of aesthetic perspective.
 
Literature
go back to reference Ballerio S (2010) Neuroscienze e teoria letteraria. I – Premesse teoriche e metodologiche. Enthymema 1:164–189 Ballerio S (2010) Neuroscienze e teoria letteraria. I – Premesse teoriche e metodologiche. Enthymema 1:164–189
go back to reference Bateson G (1979) Mind and nature: a necessary unity, Advances in systems theory, complexity, and the human sciences. Hampton Press, New York Bateson G (1979) Mind and nature: a necessary unity, Advances in systems theory, complexity, and the human sciences. Hampton Press, New York
go back to reference Bateson G (1987) Steps to an ecology of mind. In: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology [1972]. Aronson, Northvale Bateson G (1987) Steps to an ecology of mind. In: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology [1972]. Aronson, Northvale
go back to reference Beer S (1980) Preface to Autopoiesis and cognition. In: Maturana HR, Varela FJ (eds) The realization of the living. Reidel, Dordrecht Beer S (1980) Preface to Autopoiesis and cognition. In: Maturana HR, Varela FJ (eds) The realization of the living. Reidel, Dordrecht
go back to reference Bortolussi M, Dixon P (2003) Psychonarratology: foundations for the empirical study of literary response. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Bortolussi M, Dixon P (2003) Psychonarratology: foundations for the empirical study of literary response. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Bredo E (2009) Comments on howe: getting over the methodology wars. Educ Res 38(6):441–448CrossRef Bredo E (2009) Comments on howe: getting over the methodology wars. Educ Res 38(6):441–448CrossRef
go back to reference Bruner JS (1990) Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Bruner JS (1990) Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Caracciolo M (2014) The experientiality of narrative. An enactivist approach. De Gruyter, Berlin Caracciolo M (2014) The experientiality of narrative. An enactivist approach. De Gruyter, Berlin
go back to reference Dawson P (2013) Emerging vectors of narratology: toward consolidation or diversification? (A response). Enthymema 9:109–114 Dawson P (2013) Emerging vectors of narratology: toward consolidation or diversification? (A response). Enthymema 9:109–114
go back to reference Feyerabend PK (1975) Against method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. New Left Books, London Feyerabend PK (1975) Against method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. New Left Books, London
go back to reference Genette G (1980) Narrative discourse: an essay in method (trans: JE Lewin). Cornell University Press, Ithaca Genette G (1980) Narrative discourse: an essay in method (trans: JE Lewin). Cornell University Press, Ithaca
go back to reference Goodman N, Elgin CZ (1988) Reconceptions in philosophy and other arts and sciences. Hackett, Indianapolis Goodman N, Elgin CZ (1988) Reconceptions in philosophy and other arts and sciences. Hackett, Indianapolis
go back to reference Gramsci A (1975) Quaderni del carcere [1971] (trans: Q Hoare, G Nowell Smith). In: Gerratana V (ed) Selections from the prison notebooks. Einaudi\International Publishers, Torino\New York Gramsci A (1975) Quaderni del carcere [1971] (trans: Q Hoare, G Nowell Smith). In: Gerratana V (ed) Selections from the prison notebooks. Einaudi\International Publishers, Torino\New York
go back to reference Grayling AC (2010) Transcendental arguments. In: Dancy J, Sosa E, Steup M (eds) A companion to epistemology, 2nd edn. Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell, pp 768–771 Grayling AC (2010) Transcendental arguments. In: Dancy J, Sosa E, Steup M (eds) A companion to epistemology, 2nd edn. Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell, pp 768–771
go back to reference Grishakova M (2008) Literariness, fictionality and the theory of possible worlds. In: Skalin L-Å (ed) Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: the narrative turn and the study of literary fiction. Örebro University, Örebro, pp 57–76 Grishakova M (2008) Literariness, fictionality and the theory of possible worlds. In: Skalin L-Å (ed) Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: the narrative turn and the study of literary fiction. Örebro University, Örebro, pp 57–76
go back to reference Harrier-Jones P (2004) Revisiting angels fear: recursion, ecology and aesthetics. SEED J 4(1):143–165 Harrier-Jones P (2004) Revisiting angels fear: recursion, ecology and aesthetics. SEED J 4(1):143–165
go back to reference Herman D (2013) Storytelling and the sciences of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge Herman D (2013) Storytelling and the sciences of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Hühn P (2016) The eventfulness of non-events. In: Baroni R, Revaz F (eds) Narrative sequence in contemporary narratology. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, pp 37–47 Hühn P (2016) The eventfulness of non-events. In: Baroni R, Revaz F (eds) Narrative sequence in contemporary narratology. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, pp 37–47
go back to reference Hutto DD (2008) Folk psychological narratives: the sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. MIT Press, Cambridge Hutto DD (2008) Folk psychological narratives: the sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. MIT Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Kindt T (2009) Narratological expansionism and its discontents. In: Heinen S, Sommer R (eds) Narratology in the age of cross-disciplinary narrative research. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 35–47 Kindt T (2009) Narratological expansionism and its discontents. In: Heinen S, Sommer R (eds) Narratology in the age of cross-disciplinary narrative research. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 35–47
go back to reference Kitcher P (1982) Abusing science: the case against creationism. MIT Press, Cambridge Kitcher P (1982) Abusing science: the case against creationism. MIT Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Kuhn TS (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions [1962], 3rd edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRef Kuhn TS (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions [1962], 3rd edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRef
go back to reference Lakatos I (1990) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A (eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge [1970]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Lakatos I (1990) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A (eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge [1970]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. Reidel, DordrechtCrossRef Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. Reidel, DordrechtCrossRef
go back to reference Nielsen HS, Phelan J, Walsh R (2015a) Ten theses about fictionality. Narrative 23(1):61–73CrossRef Nielsen HS, Phelan J, Walsh R (2015a) Ten theses about fictionality. Narrative 23(1):61–73CrossRef
go back to reference Nielsen HS, Phelan J, Walsh R (2015b) Fictionality as rhetoric: a response to Paul Dawson. Narrative 23(1):101–111CrossRef Nielsen HS, Phelan J, Walsh R (2015b) Fictionality as rhetoric: a response to Paul Dawson. Narrative 23(1):101–111CrossRef
go back to reference Orlando F (1978) Toward a Freudian theory of literature, with an analysis of Racine’s ‘Phèdre’ [1973] (tran: C Lee [Italian]). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Orlando F (1978) Toward a Freudian theory of literature, with an analysis of Racine’s ‘Phèdre’ [1973] (tran: C Lee [Italian]). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
go back to reference Passalacqua F, Pianzola F (2016) Epistemological problems in narrative theory: constructivist vs. objectivist paradigm. In: Baroni R, Revaz F (eds) Narrative sequence in contemporary narratology. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, pp 195–217 Passalacqua F, Pianzola F (2016) Epistemological problems in narrative theory: constructivist vs. objectivist paradigm. In: Baroni R, Revaz F (eds) Narrative sequence in contemporary narratology. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, pp 195–217
go back to reference Pier J (2008) After this, therefore because of this. In: Pier J, Landa JÁG (eds) Theorizing narrativity. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 109–140CrossRef Pier J (2008) After this, therefore because of this. In: Pier J, Landa JÁG (eds) Theorizing narrativity. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 109–140CrossRef
go back to reference Pier J (2017) Complexity: a paradigm for narrative? In: Hansen PK, Pier J, Roussin P, Schmid W (eds) Emerging vectors of narratology. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 533–566 Pier J (2017) Complexity: a paradigm for narrative? In: Hansen PK, Pier J, Roussin P, Schmid W (eds) Emerging vectors of narratology. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 533–566
go back to reference Popper KR (1963) Conjectures and refutations. Routledge, London Popper KR (1963) Conjectures and refutations. Routledge, London
go back to reference Putnam H (1981) Reason, truth and history. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Putnam H (1981) Reason, truth and history. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
go back to reference Ryan A (2007) Emergence is coupled to scope, not level. Complexity 13(2):67–77CrossRef Ryan A (2007) Emergence is coupled to scope, not level. Complexity 13(2):67–77CrossRef
go back to reference Ryle G (1949) The concept of mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Ryle G (1949) The concept of mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
go back to reference Sini S (2010) L’intero irrequieto: sulla poligenesi dell’idea strutturale nel pensiero russo del primo Novecento. Enthymema 1:191–228 Sini S (2010) L’intero irrequieto: sulla poligenesi dell’idea strutturale nel pensiero russo del primo Novecento. Enthymema 1:191–228
go back to reference Skalin L-Å (2008) ‘Telling a story’. Reflections on fictional and non-fictional narratives. In: Skalin L-Å (ed) Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: the narrative turn and the study of literary fiction. Örebro University, Örebro, pp 201–260 Skalin L-Å (2008) ‘Telling a story’. Reflections on fictional and non-fictional narratives. In: Skalin L-Å (ed) Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: the narrative turn and the study of literary fiction. Örebro University, Örebro, pp 201–260
go back to reference Steiner P (1984) Russian formalism. A metapoetics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca Steiner P (1984) Russian formalism. A metapoetics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
go back to reference Sternberg M (1978) Expositional modes and temporal ordering in fiction. Indiana University Press, Bloomington Sternberg M (1978) Expositional modes and temporal ordering in fiction. Indiana University Press, Bloomington
go back to reference Sternberg M (1982) Proteus in quotation-land: mimesis and the forms of reported discourse. Poet Today 3(2):107–156CrossRef Sternberg M (1982) Proteus in quotation-land: mimesis and the forms of reported discourse. Poet Today 3(2):107–156CrossRef
go back to reference Sternberg M (1992) Telling in time (II): chronology, teleology, narrativity. Poet Today 13(3):463–541CrossRef Sternberg M (1992) Telling in time (II): chronology, teleology, narrativity. Poet Today 13(3):463–541CrossRef
go back to reference Sternberg M (2001) How narrativity makes a difference. Narrative 9:115–122 Sternberg M (2001) How narrativity makes a difference. Narrative 9:115–122
go back to reference Sternberg M (2010) Narrativity: from objectivist to functional paradigm. Poet Today 31:507–659CrossRef Sternberg M (2010) Narrativity: from objectivist to functional paradigm. Poet Today 31:507–659CrossRef
go back to reference Suvin D (1979) Metamorphoses of science fiction: on the poetics and history of a literary genre. Yale University Press, New Haven Suvin D (1979) Metamorphoses of science fiction: on the poetics and history of a literary genre. Yale University Press, New Haven
go back to reference Suvin D (2010a) Science fiction and the novum [1977]. In: Defined by a hollow: essays on Utopia, science fiction and political epistemology. Peter Lang, Bern Suvin D (2010a) Science fiction and the novum [1977]. In: Defined by a hollow: essays on Utopia, science fiction and political epistemology. Peter Lang, Bern
go back to reference Suvin D (2010b) On the horizons of epistemology and science. Crit Q 52(1):68–101CrossRef Suvin D (2010b) On the horizons of epistemology and science. Crit Q 52(1):68–101CrossRef
go back to reference Thompson E, Varela FJ (2001) Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends Cogn Sci 5(10):418–425CrossRef Thompson E, Varela FJ (2001) Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends Cogn Sci 5(10):418–425CrossRef
go back to reference Tosey P, Visser M, Saunders MNK (2012) The origins and conceptualizations of ‘triple-loop’ learning: a critical review. Manag Learn 43(3):291–307CrossRef Tosey P, Visser M, Saunders MNK (2012) The origins and conceptualizations of ‘triple-loop’ learning: a critical review. Manag Learn 43(3):291–307CrossRef
go back to reference van Ooijen E (2012) Notes on the conceptualization of style as embodied idiolect in French structuralism. In: Rossholm G, Johansson C (eds) Disputable core concepts of narrative theory. Peter Lang, Bern, pp 269–278 van Ooijen E (2012) Notes on the conceptualization of style as embodied idiolect in French structuralism. In: Rossholm G, Johansson C (eds) Disputable core concepts of narrative theory. Peter Lang, Bern, pp 269–278
go back to reference von Bertalanffy LK (1968) General system theory: foundations, development, applications. George Braziller, New York von Bertalanffy LK (1968) General system theory: foundations, development, applications. George Braziller, New York
go back to reference von Glaserfeld E (1990) An exposition of constructivism: why some like it radical. In: Davis RB, Maher CA, Noddings N (eds) Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, pp 19–29 von Glaserfeld E (1990) An exposition of constructivism: why some like it radical. In: Davis RB, Maher CA, Noddings N (eds) Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, pp 19–29
go back to reference Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical investigations. Blackwell, OxfordMATH Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical investigations. Blackwell, OxfordMATH
go back to reference Wittgenstein L (1969) On certainty. Blackwell, Oxford Wittgenstein L (1969) On certainty. Blackwell, Oxford
go back to reference Wright FA (2014) The short story just got shorter: Hemingway, narrative, and the six-word urban legend. J Pop Cult 47(2):327–340CrossRef Wright FA (2014) The short story just got shorter: Hemingway, narrative, and the six-word urban legend. J Pop Cult 47(2):327–340CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Looking at Narrative as a Complex System: The Proteus Principle
Author
Federico Pianzola
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64714-2_10

Premium Partner