Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
AMR Enabled Quadtree Discretization of Incompressible Navier–Stokes Equations with Moving Boundaries Read chapter Read first chapter

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Magnetohydrodynamics Adaptive Solvers in the AMROC Framework for Space Plasma Applications

Authors : Müller Moreira Lopes, Margarete Oliveira Domingues, Ralf Deiterding, Odim Mendes

Published in: Cartesian CFD Methods for Complex Applications

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Plasma disturbances affect satellites and spacecraft and can cause serious problems to telecommunications and sensitive sensor systems on Earth. Considering the huge scale of the plasma phenomena, data collection at individual locations is not sufficient to cover this entire relevant environment. Therefore, computational plasma modelling has become a significant issue for space sciences, particularly for the near-Earth magnetosphere. However, the simulations of these disturbances present many physical as well as numerical and computational challenges. In this work, we discuss our recent magnetohydrodynamic solver, realised within the MPI-parallel AMROC (Adaptive Mesh Refinement in Object-oriented C++) framework, in which particular physical models and automatic mesh generation procedures have been implemented. A performance analysis using a selection of significant space applications validates the solvers capabilities and confirms the technical importance of our approach.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter An Immersed Boundary Method on Cartesian Adaptive Grids for the Simulation of Compressible Flows
next chapter Verification of the WALE Large Eddy Simulation Model for Adaptive Lattice Boltzmann Methods Implemented in the AMROC Framework
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
Literature
1.
Ahrens, J., Geveci, B., Law, C.: ParaView. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos (2005)
2.
Bell, J., Berger, M.J., Saltzmann, J., Welcome, M.: Three-dimensional adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 15, 127–138 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRef
3.
Berger, M.J.: Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford (1982)
4.
Berger, M.J., Colella, P.: Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 82(1), 64–84 (1989)CrossRef
5.
Berger, M.J., Oliger, J.: Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 53, 484–512 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRef
6.
Bittencourt, J.A.: Fundamentals of Plasma Physics, 3rd edn. Springer, New York (2004)CrossRef
7.
Brackbill, J.U., Barnes, D.C.: The effect of nonzero ∇⋅ B on the numerical solution of the magnetohydrodynamic equations. J. Comput. Phys. 35(3), 426–430 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRef
8.
Chapman, S., Ferraro, V.C.A.: A new theory of magnetic storms. Nature 126(3169), 129–130 (1930)CrossRef
9.
Chapman, S., Ferraro, V.C.A.: A new theory of magnetic storms. Terr. Magn. Atmos. Electr. 36, 171–186 (1931)CrossRef
10.
Childs, H., Brugger, E., Whitlock, B., Meredith, J., Ahern, S., Pugmire, D., Biagas, K., Miller, M., Harrison, C., Weber, G.H., Krishnan, H., Fogal, T., Sanderson, A., Garth, C., Bethel, E.W., Camp, D., Rübel, O., Durant, M., Favre, J.M., Navrátil, P.: VisIt: an end-user tool for visualizing and analyzing very large data. In: Bethel, E.W., Childs, H., Hansen, C. (eds.) High Performance Visualization–Enabling Extreme-Scale Scientific Insight, 1st edn., Chapter 16, pp. 357–372. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York (2012)
11.
Cohen, A.: Wavelet methods in numerical analysis. In: Ciarlet, P.G., Lions, J.L. (eds.), Handbook of Numerical Analysis, vol. VII. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2000)
12.
Dedner, A., Kemm, F., Kröner, D., Munz, C.-D., Schnitzer, T., Wesenberg, M.: Hyperbolic divergence cleaning for the MHD equations. J. Comput. Phys. 175(2), 645–673 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRef
13.
Deiterding, R.: Parallel adaptive simulation of multi-dimensional detonation structures. Ph.D. Thesis, Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus (2003)
14.
Deiterding, R.: Construction and application of an AMR algorithm for distributed memory computers. In: Plewa, T., Linde, T., Weirs, V.G. (eds.), Adaptive Mesh Refinement – Theory and Applications, pp. 361–372. Springer, Berlin (2005)CrossRef
15.
Deiterding, R.: Block-structured adaptive mesh refinement – theory, implementation and application. ESAIM: Proc. 34, 97–150 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRef
16.
Deiterding, R., Domingues, M.O.: Evaluation of multiresolution mesh adaptation criteria in the AMROC framework. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, Grid and Cloud Computing for Engineering, vol. 111. Civil Comp Press (2017)
17.
Deiterding, R., Domingues, M.O., Gomes, S.M., Roussel, O., Schneider, K.: Adaptive multiresolution or adaptive mesh refinement: a case study for 2D Euler equations. ESAIM Proc. 29, 28–42 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRef
18.
Deiterding, R., Domingues, M.O., Schneider, K.: Multiresolution analysis as a criterion for effective dynamic mesh adaptation – a case study for Euler equations in the SAMR framework AMROC. Comput. Fluids 205, 104583 (2020)MathSciNetCrossRef
19.
Domingues, M.O., Deiterding, R., Moreira Lopes, M., Gomes, A.K.F., Mendes, O., Schneider, K.: Wavelet-based parallel dynamic mesh adaptation for magnetohydrodynamics in the AMROC framework. Comput. Fluids 190, 374–381 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRef
20.
Domingues, M.O., Gomes, S.M., Roussel, O., Schneider, K.: Adaptive multiresolution methods. ESAIM Proc. 34, 1–96 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRef
21.
Eastwood, J.P., Biffis, E., Hapgood, M.A., Green, L., Bisi, M.M., Bentley, R.D., Wicks, R., McKinnell, L.A., Gibbs, M., Burnett, C.: The economic impact of space weather: where do we stand? Risk Anal. 37(2) (2017)
22.
Feng, X.: Magnetohydrodynamic Modeling of the Solar Corona and Heliosphere. Springer, Singapore (2020)CrossRef
23.
Fromang, S., Hennebelle, P., Teyssier, R.: A high order Godunov scheme with constrained transport and adaptive mesh refinement for astrophysical MHD. Astron. Astrophys. 457(2), 371–384 (2006)CrossRef
24.
25.
26.
Hargreaves, J.K.: The Solar-Terrestrial Environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)CrossRef
27.
Harten, A.: Multiresolution algorithms for the numerical solution of hyperbolic conservation laws. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 48(12), 1305–1342 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRef
28.
Harten, A., Lax, P.D., van Leer, B.: On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Rev. 25(1), 35–61 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRef
29.
Hopkins, P.F.: A constrained-gradient method to control divergence errors in numerical MHD. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 462, 576–587 (2016)CrossRef
30.
Jiang, R.-L., Fang, C., Chen, P.-F.: A new MHD code with adaptive mesh refinement and parallelization for astrophysics. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183(8), 1617–1633 (2012)CrossRef
31.
Koren, B.: A robust upwind discretization method for advection, diffusion and source terms. In: Vreugdenhil, C.B., Koren, B. (eds.), Numerical Methods for Advection-Diffusion Problems. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, pp. 117–138. Vieweg, Germany (1993)
32.
Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.M., Pitaevskii, L.P.: Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, vol. 8. Course of Theoretical Physics S, Pergamon, 2nd edn. (2004)
33.
LeVeque, R.J.: Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel (1990)CrossRef
34.
Mignone, A., Tzeferacos, P., Bodo, G.: High-order conservative finite difference GLM–MHD schemes for cell-centered MHD. J. Comput. Phys. 229(17), 5896–5920 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRef
35.
Miyoshi, T., Kusano, K.A.: A multi-state HLL approximate Riemann solver for ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 208, 315–344 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRef
36.
Moreira Lopes, M., Deiterding, R., Gomes, A.K.F., Mendes, O., Domingues, M.: An ideal compressible magnetohydrodynamic solver with parallel block-structured adaptive mesh refinement. Comput. Fluids 173, 293–298 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRef
37.
Müller, S.: Adaptive Multiscale Schemes for Conservation Laws, vol. 27. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
38.
Ogino, T.: A Three-Dimensional MHD simulation of the interaction of the Solar Wind with the Earth’s Magnetosphere: the generation of field-aligned currents. J. Geophys. Res. 91(A6), 6791–6806 (1986)CrossRef
39.
Ogino, T.: Two-dimensional MHD code. In: Omura, Y., Matsumoto, H. (ed.), Computer Space Plasma Physics: Simulations and Software, pp. 161–191. Terra Scientific Publishing, Tokyo (1993)
40.
Ogino, T., Walker, R.J., Ashour-Abdalla, M.: A global magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the magnetosheath and magnetosphere when the interplanetary magnetic field is northward. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 20(6), 817–828 (1992)CrossRef
41.
42.
Russell, C.T., Luhmann, J.G., Strangeway, R.J.: Space Physics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)
43.
Schrijver, C.J., Kauristie, K., Aylward, A.D., Denardini, C.M., Gibson, S.E., Glover, A., Gopalswamy, N., Grande, M., Hapgood, M., Heynderickx, D., Jakowski, N., Kalegaev, V.V., Lapenta, G., Linker, J.A., Liu, S., Mandrini, C.H., Mann, I.R., Nagatsuma, T., Nandy, D., Obara, T., O’Brien, T.P., Onsager, T., Opgenoorth, H.J., Terkildsen, M., Valladares, C.E., Vilmer, N.: Understanding space weather to shield society: A global road map for 2015–2025 commissioned by COSPAR and ILWS. Adv. Space Res. 55(12), 2745–2807 (2015)
44.
Stone, J.M., Gardiner, T.A., Teuben, P., Hawley, J.F., Simon, J.B.: Athena: a new code for astrophysical MHD. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 178(1), 137–177 (2008)CrossRef
45.
Toro, E.F.: Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Introduction. Springer, Berlin (1999)CrossRef
46.
Tóth, G.: The ∇⋅ B constraint in shock-capturing magnetohydrodynamics codes. J. Comput. Phys. 161, 605–652 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRef
47.
Tóth, G., van der Holst, B., Sokolov, I.V., De Zeeuw, D.L., Gombosi, T.I., Fang, F., Manchester, W.B., Meng, X., Najib, D., Powell, K.G., Stout, Q.F., Glocer, A., Ma, Y.-J., Opher, M.: Adaptive numerical algorithms in space weather modeling. J. Comput. Phys. 231, 870–903 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRef
48.
van Leer, B.: Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 14(4), 361–370 (1974)MATH
49.
van Leer, B.: Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme III. Upstream-centered finite-difference schemes for ideal compressible flow. J. Comput. Phys. 23(3), 263–275 (1977)MATH
50.
van Leer, B.: Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method. J. Comput. Phys. 32(1), 101–136 (1979)MATH
51.
van Albada, G.D., van Leer, B., Roberts, W.W.: A comparative study of computational methods in cosmic gas dynamics. In: Hussaini, M.Y., van Leer, B., van Rosendale, J. (eds.), Upwind and High-Resolution Schemes, pp. 95–103. Springer, Berlin (1997)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Magnetohydrodynamics Adaptive Solvers in the AMROC Framework for Space Plasma Applications
Authors
Müller Moreira Lopes
Margarete Oliveira Domingues
Ralf Deiterding
Odim Mendes
Copyright Year
2021
Book
Cartesian CFD Methods for Complex Applications

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61760-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-61761-5

Copyright Year: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61761-5_5

Premium Partner

    Image Credits