Skip to main content
Top

2015 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

56. Managing Knowledge for Asset Management: Shifting from Process to Relational Frames

Authors : Anna Wiewiora, Kerry Brown, Subas P. Dhakal, Muhammad Nateque Mahmood

Published in: Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM 2012)

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review existing knowledge management (KM) practices within the field of asset management, identify gaps, and propose a new approach to managing knowledge for asset management. Existing approaches to KM in the field of asset management are incomplete with the focus primarily on the application of data and information systems, for example the use of an asset register. It is contended these approaches provide access to explicit knowledge and overlook the importance of tacit knowledge acquisition, sharing, and application. In doing so, current KM approaches within asset management tend to neglect the significance of relational factors; whereas studies in the KM field have showed that relational modes such as social capital is imperative for effective KM outcomes. In this paper, we argue that incorporating a relational approach to KM is more likely to contribute to the exchange of ideas and the development of creative responses necessary to improve decision making in asset management. This conceptual paper uses extant literature to explain KM antecedents and explore its outcomes in the context of asset management. KM is a component in the new integrated strategic asset management (ISAM) framework developed in conjunction with asset management industry associations (AAMCoG 2012) that improves asset management performance. In this paper, we use Nahapiet and Ghoshal’s [24] model to explain antecedents of relational approach to KM. Further, we develop an argument that relational KM is likely to contribute to the improvement of the ISAM framework components, such as organizational strategic management, service planning, and delivery. The main contribution of the paper is a novel and robust approach to managing knowledge that leads to the improvement of asset management outcomes.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Laue M, Brown KA, Keast R (2011) Strategic and human issues in asset management models: 6th world congress on engineering asset management, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Laue M, Brown KA, Keast R (2011) Strategic and human issues in asset management models: 6th world congress on engineering asset management, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
2.
go back to reference McGeoch M, Brunetto Y, Brown K (2011) Current issues in strategic asset management: world congress on engineering asset management (WCAEM), Cincinnati, USA McGeoch M, Brunetto Y, Brown K (2011) Current issues in strategic asset management: world congress on engineering asset management (WCAEM), Cincinnati, USA
3.
go back to reference Schuman CA, Brent AC (2005) Asset life cycle management: towards improving physical asset performance in the process industry. Int J Oper Prod Manage 25:566–579CrossRef Schuman CA, Brent AC (2005) Asset life cycle management: towards improving physical asset performance in the process industry. Int J Oper Prod Manage 25:566–579CrossRef
4.
go back to reference AAMCoG (2011) Guide to integrated strategic asset management: Australian Asset Management Collaborative Group (AAMCoG), Brisbane AAMCoG (2011) Guide to integrated strategic asset management: Australian Asset Management Collaborative Group (AAMCoG), Brisbane
5.
go back to reference Koronios A, Lin S, Gao J (2005) A data quality model for asset management in engineering organisations: In: Conference on information quality Cambridge, MA, USA Koronios A, Lin S, Gao J (2005) A data quality model for asset management in engineering organisations: In: Conference on information quality Cambridge, MA, USA
6.
go back to reference Alavi M, Leidner D (2001) Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q 25:107–136CrossRef Alavi M, Leidner D (2001) Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q 25:107–136CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Love P, Fong P, Irani Z (2005) Management of knowledge in project environments. Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford Love P, Fong P, Irani Z (2005) Management of knowledge in project environments. Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
8.
go back to reference Wiig K (1997) Knowledge management: where did it come from and where will it go? Expert Syst Appl 13:1–14CrossRef Wiig K (1997) Knowledge management: where did it come from and where will it go? Expert Syst Appl 13:1–14CrossRef
9.
go back to reference The Institute of Asset Management (2011) Asset management—an anatomy, vol 1. The Institute of Asset Management, Bristol, UK The Institute of Asset Management (2011) Asset management—an anatomy, vol 1. The Institute of Asset Management, Bristol, UK
10.
go back to reference New South Wales Treasury (2004) Asset information guideline New South Wales Treasury (2004) Asset information guideline
11.
go back to reference Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5:14–37 Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5:14–37
12.
go back to reference Davenport TH, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Harvard Davenport TH, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Harvard
13.
go back to reference James P (2005) Knowledge asset management: the strategic management and knowledge management nexus. In: DBA thesis, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, p 239 James P (2005) Knowledge asset management: the strategic management and knowledge management nexus. In: DBA thesis, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, p 239
14.
go back to reference Cook S, Brown J (1999) Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ Sci 10:381–400CrossRef Cook S, Brown J (1999) Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ Sci 10:381–400CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Foos T, Schum G, Rothenberg S (2006) Tacit knowledge transfer and the knowledge disconnect. J Knowl Manage 10:6–18CrossRef Foos T, Schum G, Rothenberg S (2006) Tacit knowledge transfer and the knowledge disconnect. J Knowl Manage 10:6–18CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Liebowitz J (2005) Conceptualizing and implementing knowledge management: management of knowledge in project environments In: Love P, Fong P, Irani Z (eds) Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 1–18 Liebowitz J (2005) Conceptualizing and implementing knowledge management: management of knowledge in project environments In: Love P, Fong P, Irani Z (eds) Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 1–18
17.
go back to reference Newell S, Bresnen M, Edelman L, Scarbrough H, Swan J (2006) Sharing knowledge across projects: limits to ICT-led project review practices. Manage Learn 37:167–185CrossRef Newell S, Bresnen M, Edelman L, Scarbrough H, Swan J (2006) Sharing knowledge across projects: limits to ICT-led project review practices. Manage Learn 37:167–185CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Abrams LC, Cross R, Lesser E, Levin DZ (2003) Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive 17:64–77CrossRef Abrams LC, Cross R, Lesser E, Levin DZ (2003) Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive 17:64–77CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mintzberg H (1973) The nature of managerial work. Harper & Row, New York Mintzberg H (1973) The nature of managerial work. Harper & Row, New York
20.
go back to reference Cross R, Parker A, Borgatti S (2000) A bird’s-eye view: using social network analysis to improve knowledge creation and sharing. Knowl Dir 2:48–61 Cross R, Parker A, Borgatti S (2000) A bird’s-eye view: using social network analysis to improve knowledge creation and sharing. Knowl Dir 2:48–61
21.
go back to reference Newell S, Goussevskaia A, Swan J, Bresnen M, Obembe A (2008) Interdependencies in complex project ecologies: the case of biomedical innovation. Long Range Plan 41:33–54CrossRef Newell S, Goussevskaia A, Swan J, Bresnen M, Obembe A (2008) Interdependencies in complex project ecologies: the case of biomedical innovation. Long Range Plan 41:33–54CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Burt RS (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Burt RS (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
23.
go back to reference Tsai W, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital and value creation: the role of intra firm networks. Acad Manag J 41:464–476CrossRef Tsai W, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital and value creation: the role of intra firm networks. Acad Manag J 41:464–476CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23:242–266 Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23:242–266
25.
go back to reference Inkpen AC, Tsang EWK (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad Manag Rev 30:146–165CrossRef Inkpen AC, Tsang EWK (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad Manag Rev 30:146–165CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Manage Sci 50:1477–1490CrossRef Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Manage Sci 50:1477–1490CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ding Z, Ng F, Cai Q (2007) Personal constructs affecting interpersonal trust and willingness to share knowledge between architects in project design teams. Constr Manag Econ 25:937–950CrossRef Ding Z, Ng F, Cai Q (2007) Personal constructs affecting interpersonal trust and willingness to share knowledge between architects in project design teams. Constr Manag Econ 25:937–950CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Koskinen KU, Pihlanto P, Vanharanta H (2003) Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context. Int J Project Manage 21:281–290CrossRef Koskinen KU, Pihlanto P, Vanharanta H (2003) Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context. Int J Project Manage 21:281–290CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Turoff M (2002) The policy Delphi: updated version of Turoff M. In: The design of a policy Delphi, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol 2(2) (1970) (ed) Turoff M (2002) The policy Delphi: updated version of Turoff M. In: The design of a policy Delphi, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol 2(2) (1970) (ed)
30.
go back to reference Althaus C, Bridgman P, Davis G (2007) The Australian policy handbook. Allen & Unwin, Sydney Althaus C, Bridgman P, Davis G (2007) The Australian policy handbook. Allen & Unwin, Sydney
31.
go back to reference Riege A, Lindsay N (2006) Knowledge management in the public sector: stakeholder partnerships in the public policy development. J Knowl Manage 10:24–39CrossRef Riege A, Lindsay N (2006) Knowledge management in the public sector: stakeholder partnerships in the public policy development. J Knowl Manage 10:24–39CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Huysman M, de Wit D (2004) Practices of managing knowledge sharing: towards a second wave of knowledge management. Knowl Process Manage 11:81–92CrossRef Huysman M, de Wit D (2004) Practices of managing knowledge sharing: towards a second wave of knowledge management. Knowl Process Manage 11:81–92CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Smith S (1998) How to create a plan to deliver great customer service: best practices in customer service. In: Zemke R, Woods JA (eds) AMACOM, New York Smith S (1998) How to create a plan to deliver great customer service: best practices in customer service. In: Zemke R, Woods JA (eds) AMACOM, New York
34.
go back to reference Dawson R (2007) Service delivery innovation, creating client value and enhancing profitability: SAP thought leadership SAP for professional services (ed) Dawson R (2007) Service delivery innovation, creating client value and enhancing profitability: SAP thought leadership SAP for professional services (ed)
35.
go back to reference Project Management Institute (2008) A guide to the project management body of knowledge: (PMBOK Guide), 4 edn. Project Management Institute Inc, USA Project Management Institute (2008) A guide to the project management body of knowledge: (PMBOK Guide), 4 edn. Project Management Institute Inc, USA
36.
go back to reference Dawson R, Horenkamp M (2007) Service delivery innovation, creating client value and enhancing profitability. In: SAP thought leadership SAP for professional services, SAP America Inc, Germany Dawson R, Horenkamp M (2007) Service delivery innovation, creating client value and enhancing profitability. In: SAP thought leadership SAP for professional services, SAP America Inc, Germany
37.
go back to reference Treasury HM (2000) Public private partnerships—the Government’s approach. HM Treasury, London Treasury HM (2000) Public private partnerships—the Government’s approach. HM Treasury, London
38.
go back to reference Friis CS (2002) Knowledge in public administration. In: Linz (ed) The 3rd international workshop by international federation for information processing Universitätsverlag Rudolf Trauner Copenhagen, pp 3–12 Friis CS (2002) Knowledge in public administration. In: Linz (ed) The 3rd international workshop by international federation for information processing Universitätsverlag Rudolf Trauner Copenhagen, pp 3–12
40.
go back to reference Pinto JK, Slevin DP, English B (2009) Trust in projects: an empirical assessment of owner/contractor relationships. Int J Project Manage 27:638–648CrossRef Pinto JK, Slevin DP, English B (2009) Trust in projects: an empirical assessment of owner/contractor relationships. Int J Project Manage 27:638–648CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Wiewiora A (2011) The role of organisational culture, trust and mechanisms in inter-project knowledge sharing. In: PhD thesis: faculty of built environment and engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia Wiewiora A (2011) The role of organisational culture, trust and mechanisms in inter-project knowledge sharing. In: PhD thesis: faculty of built environment and engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
42.
go back to reference Cooper LP (2003) A research agenda to reduce risk in new product development through knowledge management: a practitioner perspective. J Eng Tech Manage 20:117–140CrossRef Cooper LP (2003) A research agenda to reduce risk in new product development through knowledge management: a practitioner perspective. J Eng Tech Manage 20:117–140CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Managing Knowledge for Asset Management: Shifting from Process to Relational Frames
Authors
Anna Wiewiora
Kerry Brown
Subas P. Dhakal
Muhammad Nateque Mahmood
Copyright Year
2015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06966-1_56

Premium Partners