Skip to main content
Top

2023 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Mapping the Project Complexity of Metro Rail Project Using DEMATEL Technique

Authors : Sruthilaya Dara, Aneetha Vilventhan, P R. C Gopal

Published in: Advances in Construction Materials and Management

Publisher: Springer Nature Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Metro rails are the most desired infrastructure for metropolitan cities. These projects are inter- organizational due to its involvement of numerous stakeholders, complex project objectives, and cultural diversity etc., As a result of these specific features, most metro rail projects are facing complexities, which have increased overall project complexity. The analysis of project complexity is a critical step in the project's execution. In this study, a novel assessment technique was developed with the specific goal of understanding complexity factors and their interdependency in metro rail projects. Semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire survey were conducted to identify the complexity and its factors. Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) a structured method is used to identify the interdependence among its factors. The analysis revealed that there are dynamic relationships between the complexity factors, with changes in one affecting the other. The complexity map and causal diagram are used in the study to represent the most significant complexity factors in terms of their overall relationship with the other factors. This research has practical implications so that practitioners can focus on complexity factors that have a significant interrelationship for effective management of complexities in metro rail projects. As a result, project owners, contractors, and consultants can use specific findings to create management plans and allocate resources.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Bakhshi, J., Ireland, V., & Gorod, A. (2016). Clarifying the project complexity construct: past, present and future. International Journal of Project Management, 34, 1199–1213.CrossRef Bakhshi, J., Ireland, V., & Gorod, A. (2016). Clarifying the project complexity construct: past, present and future. International Journal of Project Management, 34, 1199–1213.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kim, S. Y., Nguyen, M. V., & Dao, T. T. N. (2020). Prioritizing complexity using fuzzy DANP: Case study of international development projects. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 28, 1114–1133.CrossRef Kim, S. Y., Nguyen, M. V., & Dao, T. T. N. (2020). Prioritizing complexity using fuzzy DANP: Case study of international development projects. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 28, 1114–1133.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Luo, L., He, Q., Jaselskis, E.J., Xie, J. (2017) Construction project complexity: research trends and implications. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 143, 04017019 Luo, L., He, Q., Jaselskis, E.J., Xie, J. (2017) Construction project complexity: research trends and implications. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 143, 04017019
4.
go back to reference Browning, T. R. (2014). Managing complex project process models with a process architecture framework. International Journal of Project Management, 32, 229–241.CrossRef Browning, T. R. (2014). Managing complex project process models with a process architecture framework. International Journal of Project Management, 32, 229–241.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vidal, L. A., & Marle, F. (2008). Understanding project complexity: Implications on project management. Kybernetes, 37, 1094–1110.CrossRef Vidal, L. A., & Marle, F. (2008). Understanding project complexity: Implications on project management. Kybernetes, 37, 1094–1110.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Jongkind, Y., Mooi, H., Bakker, H., & Verbraeck, A. (2011). Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: the TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 728–739.CrossRef Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Jongkind, Y., Mooi, H., Bakker, H., & Verbraeck, A. (2011). Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: the TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 728–739.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of project complexity - a review. International Journal of Project Management, 14, 201–204.CrossRef Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of project complexity - a review. International Journal of Project Management, 14, 201–204.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. K. S., & Buhl, S. L. (2003). How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects? Transport Reviews, 23, 71–88.CrossRef Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. K. S., & Buhl, S. L. (2003). How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects? Transport Reviews, 23, 71–88.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge university press Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge university press
11.
go back to reference Nguyen, A.T., Nguyen, L.D., Long Le-Hoai, C.N.D. (2015). Quantifying the complexity of transportation projects using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Project Management 33, 1364–1376 Nguyen, A.T., Nguyen, L.D., Long Le-Hoai, C.N.D. (2015). Quantifying the complexity of transportation projects using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Project Management 33, 1364–1376
12.
go back to reference PMI. Assess and develop talent with a focus on fostering leadership skills. PMI’s Pulse of Profession In-Depth Report: Navigating Complexity, pp. 13–15 (2013) PMI. Assess and develop talent with a focus on fostering leadership skills. PMI’s Pulse of Profession In-Depth Report: Navigating Complexity, pp. 13–15 (2013)
13.
go back to reference Geraldi, J.G., Adlbrecht, G. (2007). On faith, fact and intercation in projects. Project Management Journal 38, 32–43 Geraldi, J.G., Adlbrecht, G. (2007). On faith, fact and intercation in projects. Project Management Journal 38, 32–43
14.
go back to reference Luo, J., & Wood, K. L. (2017). The growing complexity in invention process. Research in Engineering Design, 28, 421–435.CrossRef Luo, J., & Wood, K. L. (2017). The growing complexity in invention process. Research in Engineering Design, 28, 421–435.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sinha, S., Thomson, A.I., Kumar, B. (2001). A Complexity Index for the Design Process. WDK Publications, pp. 157–163 (2001) Sinha, S., Thomson, A.I., Kumar, B. (2001). A Complexity Index for the Design Process. WDK Publications, pp. 157–163 (2001)
16.
go back to reference Williams, T. (1999). Modelling Complex Projects. Wiley, Hoboken Williams, T. (1999). Modelling Complex Projects. Wiley, Hoboken
17.
go back to reference Parwani, R.R. (2022). Complexity: an introduction. arXiv preprint physics/0201055 Parwani, R.R. (2022). Complexity: an introduction. arXiv preprint physics/0201055
18.
go back to reference Cicmil, S., Cooke-Davies, T., Crawford, L., Richardson, K. (2017). Exploring the complexity of projects: Implications of complexity theory for project management practice. in (Project Management Institute) Cicmil, S., Cooke-Davies, T., Crawford, L., Richardson, K. (2017). Exploring the complexity of projects: Implications of complexity theory for project management practice. in (Project Management Institute)
19.
go back to reference Vidal, L.-A., Marle, F., & Bocquet, J.-C. (2011). Using a delphi process and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 5388–5405.CrossRef Vidal, L.-A., Marle, F., & Bocquet, J.-C. (2011). Using a delphi process and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 5388–5405.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Xia, W., & Lee, G. (2005). Complexity of information systems development projects: Conceptualization and measurement development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 45–83.CrossRef Xia, W., & Lee, G. (2005). Complexity of information systems development projects: Conceptualization and measurement development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 45–83.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cicmil, S., & Marshall, D. (2005). Insights into collaboration at the project level: Complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms. Building Research Information, 33, 523–535.CrossRef Cicmil, S., & Marshall, D. (2005). Insights into collaboration at the project level: Complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms. Building Research Information, 33, 523–535.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference He, Q., Luo, L., Hu, Y., & Chan, A. P. C. (2015). Measuring the complexity of mega construction projects in China-a fuzzy analytic network process analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 549–563.CrossRef He, Q., Luo, L., Hu, Y., & Chan, A. P. C. (2015). Measuring the complexity of mega construction projects in China-a fuzzy analytic network process analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 549–563.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kiani Mavi, R., Standing, C. (2018). Critical success factors of sustainable project management in construction: A fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP approach. J Cleaner Production 194, 751–765 Kiani Mavi, R., Standing, C. (2018). Critical success factors of sustainable project management in construction: A fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP approach. J Cleaner Production 194, 751–765
24.
go back to reference Ahsan, K., Ph, D., Paul, S. K., & Ph, D. (2018). Procurement issues in donor-funded international development projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34, 1–13.CrossRef Ahsan, K., Ph, D., Paul, S. K., & Ph, D. (2018). Procurement issues in donor-funded international development projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34, 1–13.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Si, S., You, X., Liu, H., Zhang, P. (2018). DEMATEL technique : a systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on methodologies and applications. 2018, 1–33 Si, S., You, X., Liu, H., Zhang, P. (2018). DEMATEL technique : a systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on methodologies and applications. 2018, 1–33
Metadata
Title
Mapping the Project Complexity of Metro Rail Project Using DEMATEL Technique
Authors
Sruthilaya Dara
Aneetha Vilventhan
P R. C Gopal
Copyright Year
2023
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2552-0_2