Top

Published in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

9. Measuring, Modeling, Controlling the Climate? Numerical Expertise in U.S. Climate Engineering Politics

Author : Julia Schubert

Published in: Science, Numbers and Politics

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This contribution explores the role of quantified scientific expertise for U.S. geoengineering politics. Drawing on empirical evidence from federal proceedings, it assesses how climate measures, models, targets, and thresholds have shaped the trajectory of geoengineering within U.S. climate policy between 1990 and 2015. The analysis distinguishes three stages, in which this “career” of geoengineering has been advanced, each pointing to distinct capacities of quantified expertise: from contesting the “discernible human influence” on the climate, to quantifying the size of this challenge, all the way to devising an “emergency tool”. Going beyond the specific case of geoengineering, this contribution thus illuminates how context dependent not only our understanding of societal problems is, but also our comprehension of the kinds of responses we deem legitimate. Specifically, it demonstrates how numbers “work” in communicating global challenges, and how they guide the choices we make in seeking to address them.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Politics and Policies of Statistical Independence

next chapter What Counts in the Politics of Climate Change? Science, Scepticism and Emblematic Numbers

Hoffert in: United States of America (2006a, 94).

Royal Society (2009, 6); see also Keith (2000, 245) and Pachauri and Mayer (2015, 89).

Blackstock and Low in: Blackstock and Low (2018, 1).

See, e.g., Latham et al. (2012).

For an overview of the diverse SRM concepts, see, e.g., NRC (2015b).

For an overview of the diverse CDR concepts, see, e.g., NRC (2015a).

NRC (2015a, 5); see also 67f.

Ibid., 58.

See, e.g., Blackstock et al. (2009). For an overview of the various discursive frames of geoengineering, see particularly Kreuter (2015) and Luokkanen et al. (2014). For a critique of the “Plan B” framing in the context of geoengineering, see Fragniere and Gardiner (2016), Horton (2015), and Sillmann et al. (2015).

See, e.g., Baker (2017, 17), Fleming (2010, 169), and Edwards (2010).

See also, e.g., Hulme (2011, 249) and Taylor and Buttel (1992, 410). For a detailed account of this historical argument, see Schubert (2018).

This distinction of three stages builds on ongoing research on the U.S. political “career” of geoengineering by the author.

Baker (2017, 20). Ibid.

GPO (2018a).

The document matches were generated on the basis of automated searches (search string) within FDsys.

For a detailed account of the availability of all FDsys collections, see GPO (2018b). My analysis produced only one additional document match (from 1990), which predates the timeframe displayed here.

Pielke (2000a, 20).

Keller (2009, 219).

Pielke (2000a, 21).

Ibid., 23.

Pielke (2000b, 136).

Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate (1997, 3, 13, 15, 24, 26 etc.).

Ibid., 122f.

See particularly a report by the President’s Science Advisory Committee (PSAC) (1965).

Schneider (1996, 295).

Keith (2000, 248).

IPCC, UNEP, and Titus (1990, 108).

Schneider in: Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate (1997, 131).

National Science Foundation (2000, 21796).

Socolow in: United States of America (2006b, 149).

Fincham (2014).

Barrett in: United States of America (2007d, 111).

Fleming (2010, 253).

Keller (2009, 109).

Ibid.

See Fig. 3.1. in Stilgoe (2015, 186). See also Kintisch (2010, 12).

Crutzen (2006). See, e.g., Keith (2013, 92) and Morton (2016, 152f), or Stilgoe (2015, 133ff) for a critical perspective on this publication’s importance.

Keith (2013, 92).

United States of America (2006a, 46).

A common theme in this context is the contestation of the Bush administration’s climate change technology priorities, especially the Climate Change Technology Program (CCTP) (United States of America 2003, 2006a, b), and the DOE’s carbon sequestration programs (Department of Energy 2004; United States of America 2007a).

Hoffert in: United States of America (2006b, 124).

United States of America (2006b, 2).

Ibid., 1ff. Notably, the Climate Change Technology Program (CCTP), which was under criticism here, did include CDR measures.

Socolow in: United States of America (2006b, 149).

Hoffert in: United States of America (2006a, 58).

Vellinga and Swart (1991); see also Morseletto et al. (2016, 5).

Vellinga and Swart (1991, vii).

Royal Society (2009, 4). See Oppenheimer and Petsonk (2005, 205f.) for a detailed historical account of competing interpretations of “dangerous anthropogenic interference” with the climate.

Morseletto et al. (2016, 2).

United States of America (2007b, c).

United States of America (2003, 64).

Ibid., 26.

United States of America (2007c, 40).

See, e.g. Lenton (2011), Fleming (2010, 6), and Russill and Nyssa (2009), and Royal Society (2009, 4).

United States of America (2007b).

Schnare in: United States of America (2007d, 72).

Ibid., 68.

See, e.g., Inouye (2008), Mollohan (2009), and United States of America (2007b, 2009a).

United States of America (2007b, 12).

Inouye (2008).

Ibid., 1.

Ibid., 20ff.

United States of America (2009a, 265).

Mollohan (2009, 33).

United States of America (2009c, 4).

See, e.g., Committee on Science and Technology (2010), GAO (2010), and United States of America (2009).

United States of America (2009c). Interestingly, this Congressional effort in advancing the issue is continuing. Eight years later, on November 8th 2017, Subcommittees of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology (115th Congress) held a hearing addressing “Geoengineering: Innovation, Research, and Technology”.

Keller (2009, 95).

Ibid., 8.

Barrasso (2009, 2011) and EPA (2010).

United States of America (2009c, 4, emphasis added).

Hoffert in: United States of America (2006a, 94).

Rasch in: United States of America (2009c, 164).

United States of America (2009c, 4).

United States of America (2009c, 315).

Committe on Science and Technology (2010, 37ff).

Ibid., 40.

Lane in: United States of America (2009c, 36), see also: (2009c, 31), and particularly Lackner’s statement in 168f.

See Caldeira in: United States of America (2009c, 23) for a taxonomy of the various relevant CDR approaches.

See, e.g., United States of America (2009c, 31, 149f).

See particularly Robock in: United States of America (2009c, 48f).

United States of America (2009c, 158f).

Robock in: United States of America (2009c, 49).

Gramelsberger and Feichter (2011b, 19).

See, e.g., United States of America (2009c, 152, 300).

See, e.g., United States of America (2011, 1f.), Holdren in (2009b, 13f). Providing an opposing perspective, Green disqualifies climate models as being “little more predictive than computerized horoscopes” (Green in: United States of America 2010b, 58).

See, e.g., Committee on Science and Technology (2010).

Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate (1997, 3, 13, 15, 24, 26 etc.).

Socolow in: United States of America (2006b, 149).

United States of America (2009c, 4, emphasis added).

Baker (2017, 20).

For a critique of this “moral-technocratic formulation of global environmental problems,” see, e.g., Taylor and Buttel (1992).

Ibid., 410.

Gramelsberger and Feichter (2011b, 19).

Michaelson (1998, 84ff).

Morseletto et al. (2016, 3).

Pershing in: United States of America (2010b, 40).

Porter (2006, 1288).

Hulme (2014, 43).

100

Ibid., 40, 43.

101

See, e.g., Morseletto et al. (2016, 3).

102

United States of America (2009c, 4).

103

Heintz (2012, 7), translation J. S. See also Luhmann (1990, 75).

104

Ibid.

Baker, Zeke. 2017. “Climate State: Science-State Struggles and the Formation of Climate Science in the US from the 1930s to 1960s.” Social Studies of Science 47 (6): 861–887.CrossRef

Barrasso, John. 2009. Carbon Dioxide Capture Technology Act of 2009, as Introduced to the Senate November 5, 2009, One Hundred Eleventh Congress: S.2744. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Barrasso, John. 2011. Carbon Dioxide Capture Technology Prize Act of 2011, One Hundred Twelfth Congress: S.757. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Blackstock, Jason, and Sean Low, eds. 2018. Geoengineering Our Climate? Ethics, Politics, and Governance. New York: Routledge.

Blackstock, Jason, David S. Battisti, Ken Caldeira, Douglas M. Eardley, Jonathan I. Katz, David W. Keith, Aristides A. N. Patrinos, Daniel P. Schrag, Robert H. Socolow, and Steven E. Koonin. 2009. Climate Engineering Responses to Climate Emergencies. Santa Barbara, CA: Novim.

Committee on Science and Technology. 2010. “Engineering the Climate: Research Needs and Strategies for International Coordination, Committee Print by the Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, Second Session, October 2010.” Committee Print Serial No. 111-A. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Crutzen, Paul J. 2006. “Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma?” Climatic Change 77 (3): 211–220.CrossRef

Department of Energy. 2004. “69 FR 21514: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Implementation of the Carbon Sequestration Program.” U.S. Government Printing Office.

Edwards, Paul N. 2010. A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

EPA, Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. “75 FR 77229: Final Rule on Federal Requirements Under the Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program for Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) Geologic Sequestration (GS) Wells.” Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Fincham, Michael. 2014. “The Day Before Yesterday: When Abrupt Climate Change Came to the Chesapeake Bay.” NOAA—Climate.Gov (blog). March 7. https://www.climate.gov/print/181743. Last accessed December 11, 2017.

Fleming, James Roger. 1998. Historical Perspectives on Climate Change. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fleming, James Roger. 2010. Fixing the Sky: The Checkered History of Weather and Climate Control. New York: Columbia University Press.

Fragniere, Augustin, and Stephen Gardiner. 2016. “Why Geoengineering Is Not ‘Plan B’.” Justice and Geoengineering. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

GAO, U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2010. Climate Change: A Coordinated Strategy Could Focus Federal Geoengineering Research and Inform Governance Efforts: Report to the Chairman, Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Accountability Office.

GPO, Government Publishing Office. 2018a. About FDsys. U.S. Government Publishing Office. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsysgpopages/fdsysinfo/aboutfdsys.htm. Last accessed May 7, 2017.

GPO, Government Publishing Office. 2018b. FDsys: Collections. https://www.gpo.gov/help/index.html#what_s_available.htm. Last accessed May 7, 2017.

Gramelsberger, Gabriele, and Johann Feichter. 2011a. “Introduction to the Volume.” In Climate Change and Policy, edited by Gabriele Gramelsberger and Johann Feichter, 1–8. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.

Gramelsberger, Gabriele, and Johann Feichter. 2011b. “Modelling the Climate System: An Overview.” In Climate Change and Policy, edited by Gabriele Gramelsberger and Johann Feichter, 9–90. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef

Heintz, Bettina. 2012. “Welterzeugung durch Zahlen Modelle politischer Differenzierung in internationalen Statistiken, 1948–2010.” Soziale Systeme 18: 7–39.

Horton, Joshua B. 2015. “The Emergency Framing of Solar Geoengineering: Time for a Different Approach.” The Anthropocene Review 2 (2): 147–151.CrossRef

Hulme, Mike. 2011. “Reducing the Future to Climate: A Story of Climate Determinism and Reductionism.” Osiris 26 (1): 245–266.CrossRef

Hulme, Mike. 2014. Can Science Fix Climate Change? A Case Against Climate Engineering. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.

Inouye, Daniel. 2008. “S.2307 (110th): Global Change Research Improvement Act of 2007, as Reported by the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United Sates Senate, One Hundred Tenth Congress, May 22, 2008.” Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Keith, David W. 2000. “Geoengineering the Climate: History and Prospect.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25 (1): 245–284.CrossRef

Keith, David. 2013. A Case for Climate Engineering. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

Keller, Ann Campbell. 2009. Science in Environmental Policy: The Politics of Objective Advice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kintisch, Eli. 2010. Hack the Planet: Science’s Best Hope-Or Worst Nightmare-for Averting Climate Catastrophe. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Kreuter, Judith. 2015. “Technofix, Plan B or Ultima Ratio? A Review of the Social Science Literature on Climate Engineering Technologies.” Oxford University, Institute of Science, Innovation and Society (2). Occasional Paper Series.

Latham, John, Keith Bower, Tom Choularton, Hugh Coe, Paul Connolly, Gary Cooper, Tim Craft, et al. 2012. “Marine Cloud Brightening.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 370 (1974): 4217–4262.CrossRef

Lenton, Timothy M. 2011. “Early Warning of Climate Tipping Points.” Nature Climate Change 1 (4): 201–209.CrossRef

Luhmann, Niklas. 1990. Die Wissenschaft Der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Luokkanen, Matti, Suvi Huttunen, and Mikael Hildén. 2014. “Geoengineering, News Media and Metaphors: Framing the Controversial.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (8): 966–981.CrossRef

Michaelson, Jay. 1998. “Geoengineering: A Climate Change Manhattan Project.” Stanford Environmental Law Journal 17 (73): 74–140.

Mollohan, Alan. 2009. “Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, 2010: Report Together with Additional Views to Accompany H.R. 2847.” Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Morseletto, Piero, Frank Biermann, and Philipp Pattberg. 2016. “Governing by Targets: Reductio Ad Unum and Evolution of the Two-Degree Climate Target.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, October.

Morton, Oliver. 2016. The Planet Remade: How Geoengineering Could Change the World. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

NAS, ed. 1992. Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NSF, National Science Foundation. 2000. “65 FR 21795: Notice of the Availability of Draft Reports and Request for Comment.” U.S. Government Printing Office.

NRC, National Research Council. 2015a. Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC, National Research Council. 2015b. Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

Oldham, Paul, Bronislaw Szerszynski, Jack Stilgoe, Calum Brown, Bella Eacott, and Andy Yuille. 2014. “Mapping the Landscape of Climate Engineering.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 372 (2031): 20140065.CrossRef

Oppenheimer, Michael, and Annie Petsonk. 2005. “Article 2 of the UNFCCC: Historical Origins, Recent Interpretations.” Climatic Change 73 (3): 195–226.CrossRef

Pachauri, R. K., and Leo Mayer. 2015. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Edited by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC. Fifth Assessment Report. Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Pielke, Roger A. 2000a. “Policy History of the US Global Change Research Program: Part I. Administrative Development.” Global Environmental Change 10 (1): 9–25.CrossRef

Pielke, Roger A. 2000b. “Policy History of the US Global Change Research Program: Part II. Legislative Process.” Global Environmental Change 10 (2): 133–144.CrossRef

Porter, Theodore M. 2006. “Speaking Precision to Power: The Modern Political Role of Social Science.” Social Research: An International Quarterly 73 (4): 1273–1294.

PSAC, President’s Science Advisory Committee. 1965. “Restoring the Quality of Our Environment.” Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Royal Society. 2009. Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty. London: The Royal Society.

Russill, Chris, and Zoe Nyssa. 2009. “The Tipping Point Trend in Climate Change Communication.” Global Environmental Change 19 (3): 336–344.CrossRef

Schneider, Stephen H. 1996. “Geoengineering: Could? Or Should? We Do It?” Climatic Change 33 (3): 291–302.CrossRef

Schubert. 2018. “Engineering the Climate: Science, Politics, and the Historical Emergence of a Plan B.” Paper Presented at the Workshop The Politics of Grand Challenges. University of Bonn.

Sillmann, Jana, Timothy M. Lenton, Anders Levermann, Konrad Ott, Mike Hulme, François Benduhn, and Joshua B. Horton. 2015. “Climate Emergencies Do Not Justify Engineering the Climate.” Nature Climate Change 5 (4): 290–292.CrossRef

Stilgoe, Jack. 2015. Experiment Earth: Responsible Innovation in Geoengineering. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Taylor, Peter J., and Frederick H. Buttel. 1992. “How Do We Know We Have Global Environmental Problems? Science and the Globalization of Environmental Discourse.” Geoforum 23 (3): 405–416.CrossRef

Titus, James G. (Ed.). 1990. “Changing Climate and the Coast. Volume 2: Western Africa, the Americas, the Mediterranean Basin, and the Rest of Europe.” Washington, DC: GPO.

United States of America. 1997. Global Climate Change: Hearings Before the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, First Session on Reviewing the Effects of Greenhouse Gases on Global Weather Conditions and Assessing International Policy Options to Reduce the Negative Impacts of Climate Change, July 10 and 17, 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2003. What Are the Administration Priorities for Climate Change Technology? Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy, Committee on Science, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eighth Congress, November 6, 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2006a. Department of Energy’s Plan for Climate Change Technology Programs: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy, Committee on Science, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, September 20, 2006. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2006b. Climate Change Technology Research: Do We Need a “Manhattan Project” for the Environment? Hearing Before the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, September 21, 2006. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2007a. Future of Coal: Hearing Before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Tenth Congress, First Session to Receive Testimony on the “Future of Coal” Report Recently Published by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, March 22, 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2007b. Effects of Climate Change and Ocean Acidification on Living Marine Organisms: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Oceans, Atmosphere, Fisheries, and Coast Guard of the Commitee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, One Hundred Tenth Congress, May 10, 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2007c. Voluntary Carbon Offsets: Getting What You Pay For: Hearing Before the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, House of Representatives, One Hundred Tenth Congress, July 18, 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2007d. An Examination of the Impacts of Global Warming on the Chesapeake Bay: Hearing Before the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, One Hundred Tenth Congress, September 26, 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2009a. Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations for 2010: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, First Session, March 3, 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2009b. Climate Services: Solutions from Commerce to Communities: Hearing Before the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation; United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, July 30, 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2009c. Geoengineering: Parts I, II, and III: Hearing Before the Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, First and Second Session, November 5, 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2009d. Policy Options for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Hearing Before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, First Session to Receive Testimony on Policy Options for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions, December 2, 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2010a. Fiscal Year 2011 Research and Development Budget Proposals at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): Hearing Before the Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, Second Session, March 10, 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2010b. Combating Climate Change in Africa: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, Second Session, April 15, 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2011. Weathering Change: Need for Continued Innovation in Forecasting and Prediction: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Oceans, Atmosphere, Fisheries, and Coast Guard of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, One Hundred Twelveth Congress, First Session, November 16, 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

United States of America. 2014. Department of Energy Science and Technology Priorities: Hearing Before the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, Second Session, April 10, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Vellinga, Pier, and Rob Swart. 1991. “The Greenhouse Marathon: A Proposal for a Global Strategy: A Guest Editorial.” Climatic Change 18 (1): vii–xii.CrossRef

Title: Measuring, Modeling, Controlling the Climate? Numerical Expertise in U.S. Climate Engineering Politics
Author: Julia Schubert
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Science, Numbers and Politics
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11207-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-11208-0

Copyright Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11208-0_9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"