Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Measuring Venture Capital Sentiment in Europe

Authors : Walter Diegel, Alexandra Moritz, Joern H. Block, Antonia Botsari, Frank Lang, Helmut Krämer-Eis

Published in: Contemporary Developments in Entrepreneurial Finance

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Sentiment indices are widely used tools that are often used to predict market developments. However, only a few indices exist for venture capital (VC) markets, mostly specializing in certain regions or types of investors. This paper introduces a VC market sentiment index that is based on a survey of 379 European VC investors who are almost all decision-makers within their firms, such as partners or CEOs. Hence, it is possible to compare the expected VC market development across different European regions, as well as across industry focuses and investment stage focuses. Additionally, the introduced index allows for a separation between the perception of the market and the perception of the participants’ own funds and portfolios. This study aims to set the starting point for a sentiment index of the European VC market that will be repeated on a regular basis. The results of this index, or a modified version of it, will be published by the European Investment Fund’s Research & Market Analysis.
While overall European VC market sentiment is found to be very positive, investors consistently perceive their own businesses as more positive than the market. Later-stage investors perceive the market slightly more positively than seed/startup investors. Investors that focus on cleantech investments regard the market as worse than investors focusing on information and communications technology and Life Science but still relatively positive. VC investors that are located in the UK and Ireland show only a slightly positive sentiment. Their assessment of the market, especially compared to that of other European regions, is barely positive. On the other hand, they assess their own funds and portfolios comparatively positively.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
More information about the EIF can be found on the EIF website www.​eif.​org
 
2
See Kraemer-Eis et al. (2018a, b) for more information about the EIF VC Survey. The second wave of the EIF VC Survey was launched in February 2019.
 
3
More information about EIF’s Research & Market Analysis (RMA) can be found here: http://​www.​eif.​org/​news_​centre/​research/​index.​htm
 
4
If all participants answered in a neutral way, the sentiment index could not be measured.
 
5
Please note that “current” refers to the year in which the survey was conducted, i.e., 2017.
 
6
Since the participants had the possibility to select multiple investment stage focuses, Table 6 only includes those that focus on seed stage, startup stage, or both of these stages (seed/startup stage) or that focus on later-stage investments (later stage). Altogether, the group of later-stage investors consists of 46 participants, whereas the seed/startup investors comprise the answers of 270 investors.
 
7
It must be noted that the latter two groups include, compared to the group of ICT investors, relatively few participants (Life Science with 81 participants and Cleantech with 21 participants).
 
8
There were 11 responses from Belgium, 9 responses from Luxembourg, and 44 responses from the Netherlands.
 
9
There were four responses from Bulgaria, three from Czech Republic, one from Estonia, five from Greece, three from Hungary, three from Latvia, one from Lithuania, six from Poland, two from Slovakia, and three from Turkey.
 
10
There were 7 respondents from Austria, 50 respondents from Germany, and 14 respondents from Switzerland.
 
11
In particular, 19 fund managers from Italy, 22 from Spain, and 9 from Portugal.
 
12
Answers were provided by 5 investors from Denmark, 12 investors from Finland, 9 investors from Norway, and 7 investors from Sweden.
 
13
In total, 9 respondents are headquartered in Ireland, and 72 are headquartered in the UK.
 
14
See Masiak et al. (2017) for an analysis of SME financing that provides, inter alia, an approach for categorizing European countries into country groups.
 
15
Some insights into the reasons for the differences in the index values by region (as well as by other categories) can be derived from the EIF VC Survey question about the biggest challenges for the VC business. See Kraemer-Eis et al. (2018a) for details. The 2019 EIF VC Survey wave includes a question about the most important drivers of expected changes in a firm’s state of business, investment activity, fundraising, and exits.
 
16
If it is not clear which weighting approach to apply, it can be a more reasonable approach to refrain from weighting and to simply apply a group-based analysis and demonstrate the group-specific differences or commonalities in the results (Jacob et al. 2011). This is exactly the approach of our paper, as well as the related papers that present the EIF VC Survey results, i.e., Kraemer-Eis et al. (2018a, b).
 
Literature
go back to reference Acs, Z. J., & Armington, C. (2006). Entrepreneurship, geography and American economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Acs, Z. J., & Armington, C. (2006). Entrepreneurship, geography and American economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Bowden, A., Harjoto, M., Paglia, J. K., & Tribitt, M. (2016). On venture capital fund returns: The impact of sector and geographic diversification. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 16(5), 85–104. Bowden, A., Harjoto, M., Paglia, J. K., & Tribitt, M. (2016). On venture capital fund returns: The impact of sector and geographic diversification. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 16(5), 85–104.
go back to reference Gompers, P. A. (1994). The rise and fall of venture capital. Business and Economic History, 23(2), 1–26. Gompers, P. A. (1994). The rise and fall of venture capital. Business and Economic History, 23(2), 1–26.
go back to reference Gompers, P. A., & Lerner, J. (2006). The venture capital cycle. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Gompers, P. A., & Lerner, J. (2006). The venture capital cycle. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
go back to reference Jacob, R., Heinz, A., Décieux, J. P., & Eirmbter, W. H. (2011). Umfrage: Einführung in die Methoden der Umfrageforschung (2nd ed.). München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.CrossRef Jacob, R., Heinz, A., Décieux, J. P., & Eirmbter, W. H. (2011). Umfrage: Einführung in die Methoden der Umfrageforschung (2nd ed.). München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.CrossRef
go back to reference Kraemer-Eis, H., & Lang, F. (2017, October). Access to funds: How could CMU support SME financing? In: Kotz, H.-H., & Schäfer, D. (Eds.). EU capital markets union – alluring opportunity or blind alley? DIW Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung (Quarterly Journal of Economic Research) Kraemer-Eis, H., & Lang, F. (2017, October). Access to funds: How could CMU support SME financing? In: Kotz, H.-H., & Schäfer, D. (Eds.). EU capital markets union – alluring opportunity or blind alley? DIW Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung (Quarterly Journal of Economic Research)
go back to reference Masiak, C., Moritz, A., & Lang, F. (2017, March). Financing patterns of European SMEs revisited: An updated empirical taxonomy and determinants of SME financing clusters. EIF working paper 2017/40. EIF Research & Market Analysis. Masiak, C., Moritz, A., & Lang, F. (2017, March). Financing patterns of European SMEs revisited: An updated empirical taxonomy and determinants of SME financing clusters. EIF working paper 2017/40. EIF Research & Market Analysis.
go back to reference Mueller, E. (1957). Effects of consumer attitudes on purchases. The American Economic Review, 47(6), 946–965. Mueller, E. (1957). Effects of consumer attitudes on purchases. The American Economic Review, 47(6), 946–965.
Metadata
Title
Measuring Venture Capital Sentiment in Europe
Authors
Walter Diegel
Alexandra Moritz
Joern H. Block
Antonia Botsari
Frank Lang
Helmut Krämer-Eis
Copyright Year
2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17612-9_6