Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

6. Measuring ‘Well-Governed’ Migration: The IOM’s Migration Governance Indicators

Author : Corey Robinson

Published in: The International Organization for Migration

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter examines how the International Organization for Migration (IOM) intervenes in global migration governance through the production of knowledge and the deployment of technical expertise. It analyses the IOM’s Migration Governance Indicators, a migration governance benchmarking metric created to define well-governed migration, evaluate institutional capacity to manage migration and monitor state progress towards the implementation of the migration-related targets contained in the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. It argues that the Migration Governance Indicators translate the meaning of well-governed migration into material form and make it possible for the IOM to govern at a distance by issuing symbolic judgements regarding states’ institutional capacity to manage migration. While the IOM describes itself as a non-normative organisation acting in the service of states, the Migration Governance Indicators serve a social and political purpose. Far from being politically impartial, the Migration Governance Indicators empower the IOM by consolidating its expert authority, enrolling various actors into the agenda of well-governed migration and legitimising its newfound institutional identity as the UN migration agency.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
This chapter is a substantially revised version of a previously published article: Corey Robinson, ‘Making Migration Knowable and Governable: Benchmarking Practices as Technologies of Global Migration Governance’, International Political Sociology 12.4: 418–437. Note: the IOM changed the name of the Migration Governance Index to the Migration Governance Indicators in 2018 (see IOM 2017c, 6). This chapter uses materials produced by the IOM to study the organisation’s activities. Utilising the IOM materials to interrogate the organisation poses obvious difficulties for conducting empirical research since these documents are biased towards the IOM’s self-interest. For a discussion about the methodological perils of using information produced by intergovernmental organisations in critical research, particularly as this problem pertains to the analysis of benchmarking, see Davis et al. 2012, and Broome and Quirk 2015.
 
2
Barry distinguishes between a technical device—‘a material or immaterial artefact’—and a governing technology, which refers ‘not just to device in isolation but also to the forms of knowledge, skill, diagrams, charts, calculations and energy which make its use possible’ (2001, 9).
 
3
Following Corry, a governance-object is distinct, malleable and politically salient (2013, 87). The global dialogue on migration implies that migration has become a distinct entity in its own right. Migration has become more politically salient than ever before—the global dialogue on migration suggests the international community recognises the global implications of migration. Migration is malleable insofar as actors seek to ‘steer’ it through governing technologies. Finally, migration is a global governance-object not because governing technologies span literally the whole world; rather, governing technologies are premised on a specific problematisation of migration as a global reality to address through multilateral cooperation (Geiger and Pécoud 2012).
 
Literature
go back to reference Andrijasevic, R., and W. Walters. 2010. The International Organization for Migration and the International Government of Borders. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (6): 977–999.CrossRef Andrijasevic, R., and W. Walters. 2010. The International Organization for Migration and the International Government of Borders. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (6): 977–999.CrossRef
go back to reference Barnett, M., and M. Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Barnett, M., and M. Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference Barry, A. 2001. Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London: A&C Black. Barry, A. 2001. Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London: A&C Black.
go back to reference ———. 2013. The Translation Zone: Between Actor-Network Theory and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41 (3): 413–429.CrossRef ———. 2013. The Translation Zone: Between Actor-Network Theory and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41 (3): 413–429.CrossRef
go back to reference Betts, A. 2010. The Refugee Regime Complex. Refugee Survey Quarterly 29 (1): 12–37.CrossRef Betts, A. 2010. The Refugee Regime Complex. Refugee Survey Quarterly 29 (1): 12–37.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2011. Global Migration Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef ———. 2011. Global Migration Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Betts, A., and G. Loescher, eds. 2011. Refugees in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Betts, A., and G. Loescher, eds. 2011. Refugees in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Bhagwati, J. 2003. Borders Beyond Control. Foreign Affairs 82 (1): 98–104.CrossRef Bhagwati, J. 2003. Borders Beyond Control. Foreign Affairs 82 (1): 98–104.CrossRef
go back to reference Broome, A., and J. Quirk. 2015. Governing the World at a Distance: The Practice of Global Benchmarking. Review of International Studies 41 (5): 819–841.CrossRef Broome, A., and J. Quirk. 2015. Governing the World at a Distance: The Practice of Global Benchmarking. Review of International Studies 41 (5): 819–841.CrossRef
go back to reference Corry, O. 2013. Constructing a Global Polity: Theory, Discourse and Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Corry, O. 2013. Constructing a Global Polity: Theory, Discourse and Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Davis, K.E., B. Kingsbury, and S.E. Merry. 2012. Introduction: Global Governance by Indicators. In Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Quantification and Rankings, 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Davis, K.E., B. Kingsbury, and S.E. Merry. 2012. Introduction: Global Governance by Indicators. In Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Quantification and Rankings, 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Geiger, M., and A. Pécoud. 2012. The Politics of International Migration Management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Geiger, M., and A. Pécoud. 2012. The Politics of International Migration Management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Geiger, M., and A. Pécoud, eds. 2013. Disciplining the Transnational Mobility of People. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Geiger, M., and A. Pécoud, eds. 2013. Disciplining the Transnational Mobility of People. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference ———. 2014. International Organisations and the Politics of Migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (6): 865–887.CrossRef ———. 2014. International Organisations and the Politics of Migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (6): 865–887.CrossRef
go back to reference Hale, T., and D. Held, eds. 2011. Handbook of Transnational Governance. Cambridge: Polity. Hale, T., and D. Held, eds. 2011. Handbook of Transnational Governance. Cambridge: Polity.
go back to reference Hansen, R., J. Koehler, and J. Money. 2011. Migration, Nation States, and International Cooperation. London: Routledge. Hansen, R., J. Koehler, and J. Money. 2011. Migration, Nation States, and International Cooperation. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Kalm, S. 2012. Liberalizing Movements? The Political Rationality of Global Migration Management. In The Politics of International Migration Management, ed. M. Geiger and A. Pécoud, 21–44. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Kalm, S. 2012. Liberalizing Movements? The Political Rationality of Global Migration Management. In The Politics of International Migration Management, ed. M. Geiger and A. Pécoud, 21–44. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Koslowski, R., ed. 2011. Global Mobility Regimes. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Koslowski, R., ed. 2011. Global Mobility Regimes. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Kunz, R., S. Lavenex, and M. Panizzon. 2011. Multilayered Migration Governance: The Promise of Partnership. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.CrossRef Kunz, R., S. Lavenex, and M. Panizzon. 2011. Multilayered Migration Governance: The Promise of Partnership. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.CrossRef
go back to reference Lavenex, S. 2016. Multilevelling EU External Governance: The Role of International Organizations in the Diffusion of EU Migration Policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (4): 554–570.CrossRef Lavenex, S. 2016. Multilevelling EU External Governance: The Role of International Organizations in the Diffusion of EU Migration Policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (4): 554–570.CrossRef
go back to reference Martin, S.F. 2014. International Migration: Evolving Trends from the Early Twentieth Century to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Martin, S.F. 2014. International Migration: Evolving Trends from the Early Twentieth Century to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Pécoud, A. 2015. Depoliticising Migration: Global Governance and International Migration Narratives. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Pécoud, A. 2015. Depoliticising Migration: Global Governance and International Migration Narratives. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
go back to reference Sending, O.J., and J.H. Sande Lie. 2015. The Limits of Global Authority: World Bank Benchmarks in Ethiopia and Malawi. Review of International Studies 41 (5): 993–1010.CrossRef Sending, O.J., and J.H. Sande Lie. 2015. The Limits of Global Authority: World Bank Benchmarks in Ethiopia and Malawi. Review of International Studies 41 (5): 993–1010.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Measuring ‘Well-Governed’ Migration: The IOM’s Migration Governance Indicators
Author
Corey Robinson
Copyright Year
2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32976-1_6