Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Human Rights Review 2/2018

14-02-2018

Media Coverage of Human Rights in the USA and UK: The Violations Still Will Not Be Televised (or Published)

Author: Shawna M. Brandle

Published in: Human Rights Review | Issue 2/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article analyzes American television and American and British print news coverage of human rights using a combination of manual and machine coding. The data reveal that television and print news cover very few human rights stories, that these stories are mostly international and not domestic, that even when human rights are covered, they are not covered in detail, and that human rights issues are more likely to be covered when they are not framed as human rights. This suggests that human rights is simply not a frame that journalists employ and provides support for government-leading-media theories of newsworthiness.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
For recent scholarship on social media coverage of human rights-related topics, see Chiluwa and Ifukor’s (2015) tracing of #BringBackOurGirls; Freelon et al. (2016) and Bonilla and Rosa (2015) on #Ferguson and #BlackLivesMatter; Devriese (2013), Cattle (2016), and Joseph (2012) on media and social media during the Arab Spring; and Brooten et al. (2015) on print and Facebook group coverage of the Rohingya in Myanmar.
 
2
The early high hopes for Obama as a defender of human rights, exemplified by his second day Executive Order to close Guantanamo Bay or his receiving the Nobel Peace Prize during the first year of his presidency, are muddled by his actual record in office. For further details, see Brigitte Nacos and Yaeli Bloch-Elkon’s contribution to this issue on torture and drone usage as well as Roth, Kenneth. “Barack Obama’s Shaky Legacy on Human Rights.” Foreign Policy, January 4, 2017. http://​foreignpolicy.​com/​2017/​01/​04/​barack-obamas-shaky-legacy-on-human-rights/​
 
3
The October 17, 2013, story about a 15-year-old boy’s plea for a family to adopt him out of foster care that went viral was discarded because it did not fulfill the search parameters; it included the phrase “human’s right” instead of “human rights.” Even though it is not a human rights story as defined by this methodology, the story merits a brief discussion. The caseworker used something close to human rights language, as opposed to basic right, civil right, or right as an American to describe the desire for family, “I think it’s a human’s right to be loved and wanted. And when you don’t feel that you are, it’s hard to succeed in life.”
 
4
Examples of official titles include “Human Rights Watch issued the report, the State’s Office of Human Rights was attacked,” while examples of unofficial titles would include “Kerry Kennedy, human rights activist,” or “pressure from human rights groups.”
 
5
Coding sheet available from the author; it is largely duplicative of the methodology and coding sheets used in Brandle (2015).
 
6
The Times was selected for analysis because of its status as a high-circulation quality paper, and because the stories were available for research. Of the five quality British papers listed in Kuhn (2007), The Daily Telegraph, Financial Times, The Guardian, The Independent, and The Times, The Times was the top brand for weekly usage of the quality papers (Newman et al. 2017, p. 54) with the highest circulation in 2017 (Ponsford 2017).
 
7
There were four days that tied for the highest number of stories containing the phrase human right in the The Times for the first quarter of 2017: January 29, February 5, February 14, and February 25. To break the tie, the day that had the highest number of human rights-containing stories in The New York Times was selected.
 
8
Commonly used words (a, and, the, etc.) and words commonly used in news stories, such as anchor’s names and broadcast titles, were excluded from analysis to get a clearer picture of the content of the stories.
 
9
The treaties obtained were the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. A category was also added for LGBT rights, although no explicit human rights treaty exists to protect LGBT persons. Treaty texts obtained from http://​www.​ohchr.​org/​EN/​ProfessionalInte​rest/​Pages/​CoreInstruments.​aspx and the categorization keywords are listed in Appendix II of the Online Appendix at https://​goo.​gl/​2e4o1f.
 
10
The bar for categorization was lowered by eliminating the requirement that phrases or words with a case frequency of less than 2 be eliminated. It is maintained in all other dictionary categorizations in this article.
 
11
See Appendix I of the Online Appendix at https://​goo.​gl/​2e4o1f for the complete list of The New York Times sections for human rights stories from 2010 to 2016.
 
12
This is somewhat ironic, as leaving the EU would have no effect on the UK’s obligations as a Council of Europe member for the European Convention on Human Rights or its subjection to the European Court of Human Rights, which is what the HRA incorporated into domestic law; leaving the EU would only allow the UK to no longer be bound by the EU Charter of Fundamental Freedoms and the European Court of Justice.
 
Literature
go back to reference Bennett, W. Lance., Regina G. Lawrence, and Steven Livingston. 2008. When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina. University of Chicago Press: Chicago. Bennett, W. Lance., Regina G. Lawrence, and Steven Livingston. 2008. When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
go back to reference Blau, Judith. 2016. “Human Rights: What the United States Might Learn from the Rest of the World and, Yes, from American Sociology.” Sociological Forum 31 (4): 1126–39.CrossRef Blau, Judith. 2016. “Human Rights: What the United States Might Learn from the Rest of the World and, Yes, from American Sociology.” Sociological Forum 31 (4): 1126–39.CrossRef
go back to reference Bonilla, Yarimar, and Jonathan Rosa. 2015. “#Ferguson: Digital Protest, Hashtag Ethnography, and the Racial Politics of Social Media in the United States.” American Ethnologist 42 (1): 4–17.CrossRef Bonilla, Yarimar, and Jonathan Rosa. 2015. “#Ferguson: Digital Protest, Hashtag Ethnography, and the Racial Politics of Social Media in the United States.” American Ethnologist 42 (1): 4–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Brandle, S. M. (2015). Television News and Human Rights in the US & UK: The Violations Will Not Be Televised. New York: Routledge. Brandle, S. M. (2015). Television News and Human Rights in the US & UK: The Violations Will Not Be Televised. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Brooten, L., Ashraf, S. I., & Akinro, N. A. (2015). Traumatized victims and mutilated bodies: Human rights and the “politics of immediation” in the Rohingya crisis of Burma/Myanmar. The International Communication Gazette, 77(8), 717–734.CrossRef Brooten, L., Ashraf, S. I., & Akinro, N. A. (2015). Traumatized victims and mutilated bodies: Human rights and the “politics of immediation” in the Rohingya crisis of Burma/Myanmar. The International Communication Gazette, 77(8), 717–734.CrossRef
go back to reference Cattle, A. E. (2016). Digital Tahrir Square: an analysis of human rights and the internet examined through the lens of the Egyptian Arab spring. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 26, 417–449. Cattle, A. E. (2016). Digital Tahrir Square: an analysis of human rights and the internet examined through the lens of the Egyptian Arab spring. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 26, 417–449.
go back to reference Chiluwa, I., & Ifukor, P. (2015). “War against our Children”: Stance and evaluation in #BringBackOurGirls campaign discourse on Twitter and Facebook. Discourse & Society, 26(3), 267–296.CrossRef Chiluwa, I., & Ifukor, P. (2015). “War against our Children”: Stance and evaluation in #BringBackOurGirls campaign discourse on Twitter and Facebook. Discourse & Society, 26(3), 267–296.CrossRef
go back to reference Devriese, L. (2013). Paradox of Globalization: New Arab Publics? New Social Contract? BRILL PGDT, 12, 114–134. Devriese, L. (2013). Paradox of Globalization: New Arab Publics? New Social Contract? BRILL PGDT, 12, 114–134.
go back to reference Entman, Robert M. 2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. University of Chicago Press. Entman, Robert M. 2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Freelon, D., McIlwain, C. D., & Clark, M. D. (2016). Beyond The Hashtags: #Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the online struggle for offline justice, 5–92. Freelon, D., McIlwain, C. D., & Clark, M. D. (2016). Beyond The Hashtags: #Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the online struggle for offline justice, 5–92.
go back to reference Gilchrist, K. (2010). “Newsworthy” Victims?: Exploring differences in Canadian local press coverage of missing/murdered Aboriginal and White women. Feminist Media Studies, 10, 373–390.CrossRef Gilchrist, K. (2010). “Newsworthy” Victims?: Exploring differences in Canadian local press coverage of missing/murdered Aboriginal and White women. Feminist Media Studies, 10, 373–390.CrossRef
go back to reference Joseph, S. (2012). Social media, political change, and human rights. BC Int’l & Comp. L. Rev., 35(1), 145–188. Joseph, S. (2012). Social media, political change, and human rights. BC Int’l & Comp. L. Rev., 35(1), 145–188.
go back to reference Kuhn, Raymond. 2007. Politics and the Media in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan. Kuhn, Raymond. 2007. Politics and the Media in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference McNair, Brian. 2009. News and Journalism in the UK. Routledge. McNair, Brian. 2009. News and Journalism in the UK. Routledge.
go back to reference Pattinson, Shaun D. 2015. “The Human Rights Act and the Doctrine of Precedent.” Legal Studies 35 (1): Pattinson, Shaun D. 2015. “The Human Rights Act and the Doctrine of Precedent.” Legal Studies 35 (1):
go back to reference Petley, Julian. 2009. “What Rights? Whose Responsibilities?” Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture 43: 77–88.CrossRef Petley, Julian. 2009. “What Rights? Whose Responsibilities?” Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture 43: 77–88.CrossRef
go back to reference Powers, M. (2016). Opening the news gates? Humanitarian and human rights NGOs in the US news media, 1990–2010. Media, Culture & Society, 38(3), 315–331.CrossRef Powers, M. (2016). Opening the news gates? Humanitarian and human rights NGOs in the US news media, 1990–2010. Media, Culture & Society, 38(3), 315–331.CrossRef
go back to reference Thrall, A. T., Stecula, D., & Sweet, D. (2014). May We Have Your Attention Please? Human-Rights NGOs and the Problem of Global Communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(2), 135–159.CrossRef Thrall, A. T., Stecula, D., & Sweet, D. (2014). May We Have Your Attention Please? Human-Rights NGOs and the Problem of Global Communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(2), 135–159.CrossRef
go back to reference Whitten-Woodring, J. (2016). News about her: The effects of media freedom and internet access on women’s rights. Journal of Human Rights, 15(3), 383–407.CrossRef Whitten-Woodring, J. (2016). News about her: The effects of media freedom and internet access on women’s rights. Journal of Human Rights, 15(3), 383–407.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Media Coverage of Human Rights in the USA and UK: The Violations Still Will Not Be Televised (or Published)
Author
Shawna M. Brandle
Publication date
14-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Human Rights Review / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1524-8879
Electronic ISSN: 1874-6306
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-018-0495-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Human Rights Review 2/2018 Go to the issue

Premium Partner