Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Environmental Earth Sciences 2/2013

01-09-2013 | Original Article

Modeling hydrological ecosystem services and tradeoffs: a case study in Baiyangdian watershed, China

Authors: Yang Bai, Hua Zheng, Zhiyun Ouyang, Changwei Zhuang, Bo Jiang

Published in: Environmental Earth Sciences | Issue 2/2013

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Policy makers and scientists consider that land use strategies are designed to provide direct benefits to people by protecting vital ecosystem services. However, due to lack of information and evaluation methods, there is no effective and systematic tool for assessing tradeoffs between direct human benefits and ecosystem services. Land use changes influence ecosystem properties, processes and components, which are the basis for providing services. Five alternative land use scenarios (no conversion of agricultural lands, no urban expansion, agricultural expansion, forestry expansion, and riparian reforestation) were modeled for the Baiyangdian watershed, China, a densely populated, highly modified watershed with serious water shortage and pollution problems. The model InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs) is designed to inform decisions about natural resource management, with an aim to align economic forces with conservation. Three ecosystem services (agricultural production, hydropower production, and water quality) were modeled to balance direct benefits and hydrological ecosystem services using InVEST. The results showed that: hydropower production was the greatest in the forestry expansion, but the lowest in agricultural expansion; agricultural production was reduced the most in forestry expansion, while retained the most in riparian reforestation. Riparian reforestation also provided the highest N and P retention and lowest N and P exportation. Riparian reforestation was the optimal land use strategy, since it protected and enhanced the vital ecosystem services without undermining direct human benefits. This research presents an initial analytical framework for integrating direct human benefits and ecosystem services in policy planning and illustrates its application. Although there are important potential tradeoffs between ecosystem services, this systematic planning framework offers a means for identifying valuable synergies between conservation and development.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Balvanera P, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Ricketts TH, Bailey SA, Kark S, Kremen C, Pereira H (2001) Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services. Science 291:2047CrossRef Balvanera P, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Ricketts TH, Bailey SA, Kark S, Kremen C, Pereira H (2001) Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services. Science 291:2047CrossRef
go back to reference Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Levitt EA (2005) Looking to the future ecosystem services. Ecosystems 8:125–132CrossRef Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Levitt EA (2005) Looking to the future ecosystem services. Ecosystems 8:125–132CrossRef
go back to reference Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1394–1404CrossRef Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1394–1404CrossRef
go back to reference Blashke T (2005) The role of the spatial dimension within the framework of sustainable landscapes and natural capital. Landsc Urban Plan 75(3–4):198–226 Blashke T (2005) The role of the spatial dimension within the framework of sustainable landscapes and natural capital. Landsc Urban Plan 75(3–4):198–226
go back to reference Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC (2006) Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol 4:e379CrossRef Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC (2006) Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol 4:e379CrossRef
go back to reference Chen NW, Li HC, Wang LH (2009) A GIS-based approach for mapping direct use value of ecosystem services at a county scale: management implications. Ecol Econ 68:2768–2776CrossRef Chen NW, Li HC, Wang LH (2009) A GIS-based approach for mapping direct use value of ecosystem services at a county scale: management implications. Ecol Econ 68:2768–2776CrossRef
go back to reference Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253–260CrossRef Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253–260CrossRef
go back to reference Daily GC, Soderqvist T, Aniyar S, Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Ehrlich PR, Folke C, Jansson A, Jansson BO, Kautsky N, Levin S, Lubchenco J, Maler KG, Simpson D, Starrett D, Tilman D, Walker B (2000) Ecology—the value of nature and the nature of value. Science 289(5478):395–396CrossRef Daily GC, Soderqvist T, Aniyar S, Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Ehrlich PR, Folke C, Jansson A, Jansson BO, Kautsky N, Levin S, Lubchenco J, Maler KG, Simpson D, Starrett D, Tilman D, Walker B (2000) Ecology—the value of nature and the nature of value. Science 289(5478):395–396CrossRef
go back to reference Daily G, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R (2009) Ecosystem services in decision-making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7(1):21–28CrossRef Daily G, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R (2009) Ecosystem services in decision-making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7(1):21–28CrossRef
go back to reference de Groot R, Wilson MA, Boumans MR (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408CrossRef de Groot R, Wilson MA, Boumans MR (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408CrossRef
go back to reference de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7(3):260–272CrossRef de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7(3):260–272CrossRef
go back to reference Dolinar N, Rudolf M, Sraj N, Gaberscik A (2010) Environmental changes affect ecosystem services of the intermittent Lake Cerknica. Ecol Complex 7(3):403–409CrossRef Dolinar N, Rudolf M, Sraj N, Gaberscik A (2010) Environmental changes affect ecosystem services of the intermittent Lake Cerknica. Ecol Complex 7(3):403–409CrossRef
go back to reference Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, van Jaarsveld AS (2008) Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127:135–140CrossRef Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, van Jaarsveld AS (2008) Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127:135–140CrossRef
go back to reference Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Bode M, Richardson DM (2009) Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa. Biol Conserv 142:553–562CrossRef Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Bode M, Richardson DM (2009) Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa. Biol Conserv 142:553–562CrossRef
go back to reference Gimona A, Van der Horst D (2007) Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland. Landsc Ecol 22:1255–1264CrossRef Gimona A, Van der Horst D (2007) Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland. Landsc Ecol 22:1255–1264CrossRef
go back to reference Gordon CLJ, Max F, Malin F (2010) Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agric Water Manag 97:512–519CrossRef Gordon CLJ, Max F, Malin F (2010) Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agric Water Manag 97:512–519CrossRef
go back to reference Grêt-Regamey A, Bebi P, Bishop ID, Schmid W (2008) Linking GIS-based models to value ecosystem services in an Alpine region. J Environ Manag 89(3):197–208CrossRef Grêt-Regamey A, Bebi P, Bishop ID, Schmid W (2008) Linking GIS-based models to value ecosystem services in an Alpine region. J Environ Manag 89(3):197–208CrossRef
go back to reference Haines-Young R, Watkins C, Wale C, Murdock A (2006) Modelling natural capital: the case of landscape restoration on the South Downs, England. Landsc Urban Plan 75:244–264CrossRef Haines-Young R, Watkins C, Wale C, Murdock A (2006) Modelling natural capital: the case of landscape restoration on the South Downs, England. Landsc Urban Plan 75:244–264CrossRef
go back to reference Jackson RB, Carpenter SR, Dahm CN, McKnight DM, Naiman RJ, Postel SL, Running SW (2001) Water in a changing world. Ecol Appl 11:1027–1045CrossRef Jackson RB, Carpenter SR, Dahm CN, McKnight DM, Naiman RJ, Postel SL, Running SW (2001) Water in a changing world. Ecol Appl 11:1027–1045CrossRef
go back to reference Krishnaswamy J, Bawa KS, Ganeshaiah KN, Kiran MC (2009) Quantifying and mapping biodiversity and ecosystem services: utility of a multi-season NDVI based Mahalanobis distance surrogate. Remote Sens Environ 113:857–867CrossRef Krishnaswamy J, Bawa KS, Ganeshaiah KN, Kiran MC (2009) Quantifying and mapping biodiversity and ecosystem services: utility of a multi-season NDVI based Mahalanobis distance surrogate. Remote Sens Environ 113:857–867CrossRef
go back to reference Lant CL, Ruhl JB, Kraft SE (2008) The tragedy of ecosystem services. Bioscience 58(10):969–974CrossRef Lant CL, Ruhl JB, Kraft SE (2008) The tragedy of ecosystem services. Bioscience 58(10):969–974CrossRef
go back to reference Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253CrossRef Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253CrossRef
go back to reference Menon S, Bawa KS (1997) Applications of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), remote-sensing, and a landscape ecology approach to biodiversity conservation in the Western Ghats. Curr Sci 73:134–145 Menon S, Bawa KS (1997) Applications of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), remote-sensing, and a landscape ecology approach to biodiversity conservation in the Western Ghats. Curr Sci 73:134–145
go back to reference Meyer BC, Grabaum R (2008) MULBO—model framework for multi criteria landscape assessment and optimisation. A support system for spatial land use decisions. Landsc Res 33:155–179CrossRef Meyer BC, Grabaum R (2008) MULBO—model framework for multi criteria landscape assessment and optimisation. A support system for spatial land use decisions. Landsc Res 33:155–179CrossRef
go back to reference Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC
go back to reference Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. World Resource Institute Island Press, Washington, DC Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. World Resource Institute Island Press, Washington, DC
go back to reference Naidoo R, Ricketts TH (2006) Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation. PLoS Biol 4:e360CrossRef Naidoo R, Ricketts TH (2006) Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation. PLoS Biol 4:e360CrossRef
go back to reference Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, Fisher B, Green RE, Lehner B, Malcolm TR, Ricketts TH (2008) Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(28):9495–9500CrossRef Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, Fisher B, Green RE, Lehner B, Malcolm TR, Ricketts TH (2008) Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(28):9495–9500CrossRef
go back to reference Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron DR, Chan KMA, Daily G, Goldstein J, Kareiva P, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw MR (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7(1):4–11CrossRef Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron DR, Chan KMA, Daily G, Goldstein J, Kareiva P, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw MR (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7(1):4–11CrossRef
go back to reference Ramesh BR, Menon S (1997) Map of Biligiri Rangaswamy Temple Wildlife Sanctuary, vegetation types and land use. French Institute, Pondicherry Ramesh BR, Menon S (1997) Map of Biligiri Rangaswamy Temple Wildlife Sanctuary, vegetation types and land use. French Institute, Pondicherry
go back to reference Raymond CM, Bryan BA, MacDonald DH, Cast A, Strathearn S, Grandgirard A, Kalivas T (2009) Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 68:1301–1315CrossRef Raymond CM, Bryan BA, MacDonald DH, Cast A, Strathearn S, Grandgirard A, Kalivas T (2009) Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 68:1301–1315CrossRef
go back to reference Stork NE, Samways MJ (1995) Inventorying and monitoring. In: Heyward VH (ed) Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge Press, New York, pp 453–543 Stork NE, Samways MJ (1995) Inventorying and monitoring. In: Heyward VH (ed) Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge Press, New York, pp 453–543
go back to reference Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Ennaanay D, Nelson E, Vigerstol K, Mendoza G, Wolny S, Olwero N, Aukema J, Foster J, Forrest J, Cameron D (2008) InVEST 1.003 beta User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Ennaanay D, Nelson E, Vigerstol K, Mendoza G, Wolny S, Olwero N, Aukema J, Foster J, Forrest J, Cameron D (2008) InVEST 1.003 beta User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford
go back to reference Tilman D (1999) Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5995–6000CrossRef Tilman D (1999) Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5995–6000CrossRef
go back to reference Vitousek PM, Monney HA, Lubchenco J, Melilo J (1997) Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499CrossRef Vitousek PM, Monney HA, Lubchenco J, Melilo J (1997) Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499CrossRef
go back to reference Yang WH, Brett AB, Darla HM, John RW, Geoff W, Neville DC, Jeffrey DC (2010) A conservation industry for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Econ 69:680–689CrossRef Yang WH, Brett AB, Darla HM, John RW, Geoff W, Neville DC, Jeffrey DC (2010) A conservation industry for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Econ 69:680–689CrossRef
go back to reference Yapp G, Walker J, Thackway R (2010) Linking vegetation type and condition to ecosystem goods and services. Ecol Complex 7(3):292–301CrossRef Yapp G, Walker J, Thackway R (2010) Linking vegetation type and condition to ecosystem goods and services. Ecol Complex 7(3):292–301CrossRef
go back to reference Zhang B, Li W, Xie GD (2010) Ecosystem services research in China: progress and perspective. Ecol Econ 69(7):1389–1395CrossRef Zhang B, Li W, Xie GD (2010) Ecosystem services research in China: progress and perspective. Ecol Econ 69(7):1389–1395CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Modeling hydrological ecosystem services and tradeoffs: a case study in Baiyangdian watershed, China
Authors
Yang Bai
Hua Zheng
Zhiyun Ouyang
Changwei Zhuang
Bo Jiang
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Environmental Earth Sciences / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1866-6280
Electronic ISSN: 1866-6299
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2154-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Environmental Earth Sciences 2/2013 Go to the issue