Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. Modelling the Relations of Fundamental Institutions and International Organizations

Author : Cornelia Navari

Published in: International Organization in the Anarchical Society

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter models international society as a two-level structure, made up of primary or foundation institutions, as that term was understood by Hedley Bull, and international organizations. It suggests that the two sorts of institutions have a non-deterministic but probabilistic relationship in which primary institutions constrain international organizations, while international organizations introduce changes into primary institutions. The model is a construct out of intimations, suggestions and finally modelling stricto sensu contained in six key arguments concerning the relations of fundamental institutions and international organizations. It is a process model that outlines, in ideal form, how messages are conceived, the routes that they take, when they are likely to be frustrated and by what agency. It suggests both structure and agency and shows how they are related.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
In the theoretical sense, indicating significant generalizations that express underlying regularities.
 
2
The idea of a legal system was first theorized by John Austin (1832) and elaborated by H.L.A. Hart (1961), who argued that a legal system must not only have rules binding persons but also rules about rules. According to the idea, a complete legal order should consist of three forms of rules. First, constitutive principles, which create ‘legal facts’, such as the constitutive principles of a liberal democracy that give rise to, for example, the institutions of a representative democracy. Secondly, it will have procedural rules—with reference to liberal orders, for example, a bill of rights; and, thirdly, it will have instructions for the ‘rule carriers’ on how to perform their roles.
 
3
Krasner (1983, 2) defined principles as beliefs of fact, causation and rectitude; norms as standards of behaviour defined in terms of rights and obligations; and rules as specific prescriptions for actions, to which he added ‘decision-making procedures around which actor expectations converge in a given issue-area’.
 
4
Buzan’s Table 1 (2004, 174) indicates the various choices for ‘principal, or master or bedrock’ institutions.
 
5
Holsti follows Bull and the traditional English School approach in treating foundation institutions as identifying a genus: the institution of sovereignty serves in ‘markedly distinguishing’ the state system ‘from empires, migrant clans and lineages, the…medieval system… leagues of cities, suzerainty systems and other formats for organizing distinct political communities’ (Holsti 2004, 25).
 
6
Holst associated GPM with the formal arrangements of the Concert of Europe; Knudsen would argue that GPM as a principle is constantly recurring and takes different forms as a practice; see Chap. 2 above.
 
7
In ‘Of the Laws of Nations’, Chapter XI of ‘A Treatise of Human Nature’, Book III ‘Of Morals’.
 
8
For a discussion of the ‘many uses’ of the concept of interest, and of Hume’s, Bentham’s and Mill’s uses in particular, see Swedberg, 19–24. Legitimacy claims are spiritual benefits in the language of ‘interests’.
 
9
Macauley’s fierce criticism of James Mill’s Essay on Government, with its Benthamite claim that the government was established for the ‘happiness of the people’ was published in the Edinburgh Review of March 1829.
 
Literature
go back to reference Austin, John. 1995 (1832). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Austin, John. 1995 (1832). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books. Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
go back to reference Brütsch, Christian. 2014. Technocratic Manager, Imperial Agent, or Diplomatic Champion? The IMF in the Anarchical Society. Review of International Studies 40 (2): 207–226.CrossRef Brütsch, Christian. 2014. Technocratic Manager, Imperial Agent, or Diplomatic Champion? The IMF in the Anarchical Society. Review of International Studies 40 (2): 207–226.CrossRef
go back to reference Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Hart, H.L.C. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hart, H.L.C. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
go back to reference Hobbes, T. 2008 (1651). Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hobbes, T. 2008 (1651). Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Holsti, K.J. 2004. Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Holsti, K.J. 2004. Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2009. Theorising the Causes of Order: Hedley Bull’s Anarchical Society. In Theorising International Society, ed. Cornelia Navari, 125–147. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef ———. 2009. Theorising the Causes of Order: Hedley Bull’s Anarchical Society. In Theorising International Society, ed. Cornelia Navari, 125–147. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Jackson, Robert. 2000. The Global Covenant. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jackson, Robert. 2000. The Global Covenant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference James, Alan, ed. 1973. The Bases of International Order: Essays in the Honour of C.A.W. Manning. London: Oxford University. James, Alan, ed. 1973. The Bases of International Order: Essays in the Honour of C.A.W. Manning. London: Oxford University.
go back to reference Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference ———. 1988. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 379–396.CrossRef ———. 1988. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 379–396.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 1989. International Institutions and State Power. Boulder: Westview Press. ———. 1989. International Institutions and State Power. Boulder: Westview Press.
go back to reference Knudsen, Tonny Brems. 2013. Master Institutions of International Society: Theorizing Continuity and Change. Paper presented at the 8th Pan European Conference on International Relations, Warsaw, September 18–21. Knudsen, Tonny Brems. 2013. Master Institutions of International Society: Theorizing Continuity and Change. Paper presented at the 8th Pan European Conference on International Relations, Warsaw, September 18–21.
go back to reference ———. 2015. Fundamental Institutional Change at the UN and the ICC: Solidarist Practices of Law and War. Paper presented at ISA’s 56th Annual Convention, New Orleans, February 18–21. ———. 2015. Fundamental Institutional Change at the UN and the ICC: Solidarist Practices of Law and War. Paper presented at ISA’s 56th Annual Convention, New Orleans, February 18–21.
go back to reference Krasner, Stephen, ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Krasner, Stephen, ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference Navari, Cornelia. 2013. International Organisations in the Anarchical Society: Interim Report of an English School Research Project. Paper presented at the 8th Pan European International Studies Conference, Warsaw, September 18–21. Navari, Cornelia. 2013. International Organisations in the Anarchical Society: Interim Report of an English School Research Project. Paper presented at the 8th Pan European International Studies Conference, Warsaw, September 18–21.
go back to reference Reus-Smit, Chris. 1997. The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions. International Organization 51 (4): 555–589.CrossRef Reus-Smit, Chris. 1997. The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions. International Organization 51 (4): 555–589.CrossRef
go back to reference Searle, John R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Simon and Schuster. Searle, John R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Simon and Schuster.
go back to reference Sørensen, Georg. 1999. Sovereignty: Change and Continuity in a Fundamental Institution. Political Studies 47 (3): 590–604.CrossRef Sørensen, Georg. 1999. Sovereignty: Change and Continuity in a Fundamental Institution. Political Studies 47 (3): 590–604.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2015. The Political International Society: Change in Primary and Secondary Institutions. Review of International Studies 41 (3): 601–622.CrossRef ———. 2015. The Political International Society: Change in Primary and Secondary Institutions. Review of International Studies 41 (3): 601–622.CrossRef
go back to reference Swedberg, Richard. 2005. Interest. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Swedberg, Richard. 2005. Interest. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
go back to reference Thakur, Ramesh. 2013. A Balance of Interests. In The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, ed. A. Cooper, J. Heine, and R. Thakur, 70–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Thakur, Ramesh. 2013. A Balance of Interests. In The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, ed. A. Cooper, J. Heine, and R. Thakur, 70–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Wendt, Alexander, and Raymond Duvall. 1989. Institutions and International Order. In Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for 1990’s, ed. Ernst-Otto Czempiel and James N. Rosenau, 51–73. Lexington: Lexington Books. Wendt, Alexander, and Raymond Duvall. 1989. Institutions and International Order. In Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for 1990’s, ed. Ernst-Otto Czempiel and James N. Rosenau, 51–73. Lexington: Lexington Books.
go back to reference Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Modelling the Relations of Fundamental Institutions and International Organizations
Author
Cornelia Navari
Copyright Year
2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71622-0_3

Premium Partner