Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

41. Models in Geosciences

Authors : Alisa Bokulich, Naomi Oreskes

Published in: Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The geosciences include a wide spectrum of disciplines ranging from paleontology to climate science, and involve studies of a vast range of spatial and temporal scales, from the deep-time history of microbial life to the future of a system no less immense and complex than the entire Earth. Modeling is thus a central and indispensable tool across the geosciences. Here, we review both the history and current state of model-based inquiry in the geosciences. Research in these fields makes use of a wide variety of models, such as conceptual, physical, and numerical models, and more specifically cellular automata, artificial neural networks, agent-based models, coupled models, and hierarchical models. We note the increasing demands to incorporate biological and social systems into geoscience modeling, challenging the traditional boundaries of these fields. Understanding and articulating the many different sources of scientific uncertainty – and finding tools and methods to address them – has been at the forefront of most research in geoscience modeling. We discuss not only structural model uncertainties, parameter uncertainties, and solution uncertainties, but also the diverse sources of uncertainty arising from the complex nature of geoscience systems themselves. Without an examination of the geosciences, our philosophies of science and our understanding of the nature of model-based science are incomplete.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference N. Oreskes: How earth science has become a social science. In: Special Issue: Climate and Beyond: The Production of Knowledge about the Earth as a Signpost of Social Change, ed. by A. Westermann, C. Rohr, Historical Soc. Res. 40 (2015) 246--270 N. Oreskes: How earth science has become a social science. In: Special Issue: Climate and Beyond: The Production of Knowledge about the Earth as a Signpost of Social Change, ed. by A. Westermann, C. Rohr, Historical Soc. Res. 40 (2015) 246--270
2.
go back to reference M. Kleinhans, C. Buskes, H. de Regt: Terra incognita: Explanation and reduction in earth science, Int. Stud. Phil. Sci. 19(3), 289–317 (2005)CrossRef M. Kleinhans, C. Buskes, H. de Regt: Terra incognita: Explanation and reduction in earth science, Int. Stud. Phil. Sci. 19(3), 289–317 (2005)CrossRef
3.
go back to reference G.K. Gilbert: Report on the Geology of the Henry Mountains (Government Printing Office, Washington 1877)CrossRef G.K. Gilbert: Report on the Geology of the Henry Mountains (Government Printing Office, Washington 1877)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference G.E. Grant, J.E. O’Connor, M.G. Wolman: A river runs through it: Conceptual models in fluvial geomorphology. In: Treatise on Geomorphology, Vol. 9, ed. by J.F. Shroder (Academic, San Diego 2013) pp. 6–21CrossRef G.E. Grant, J.E. O’Connor, M.G. Wolman: A river runs through it: Conceptual models in fluvial geomorphology. In: Treatise on Geomorphology, Vol. 9, ed. by J.F. Shroder (Academic, San Diego 2013) pp. 6–21CrossRef
5.
go back to reference W.M. Davis: The systematic description of land forms, Geogr. J. 34, 300–318 (1909)CrossRef W.M. Davis: The systematic description of land forms, Geogr. J. 34, 300–318 (1909)CrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference I. Kant: Universal natural history and theory of the heavens or essay on the constitution and the mechanical origin of the whole universe according to Newtonian principles. In: Kant: Natural Science, ed. by E. Watkins (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2012), transl. by O. Reinhardt, originally published in 1755CrossRef I. Kant: Universal natural history and theory of the heavens or essay on the constitution and the mechanical origin of the whole universe according to Newtonian principles. In: Kant: Natural Science, ed. by E. Watkins (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2012), transl. by O. Reinhardt, originally published in 1755CrossRef
8.
go back to reference P.-S. Laplace: Exposition du Système du Monde (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2009), originally published in 1796CrossRefMATH P.-S. Laplace: Exposition du Système du Monde (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2009), originally published in 1796CrossRefMATH
9.
go back to reference N. Oreskes: From scaling to simulation: Changing meanings and ambitions of models in the earth sciences. In: Science without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, and Exemplary Narratives, ed. by A. Creager, E. Lunbeck, M.N. Wise (Duke Univ. Press, Durham 2007) pp. 93–124CrossRef N. Oreskes: From scaling to simulation: Changing meanings and ambitions of models in the earth sciences. In: Science without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, and Exemplary Narratives, ed. by A. Creager, E. Lunbeck, M.N. Wise (Duke Univ. Press, Durham 2007) pp. 93–124CrossRef
10.
go back to reference A. Daubrée: Études Synthétiques de Géologie Expérimentale (Dunod, Paris 1879), in French A. Daubrée: Études Synthétiques de Géologie Expérimentale (Dunod, Paris 1879), in French
11.
go back to reference A. Bokulich: How the tiger bush got its stripes: How possibly versus how actually model explanations, Monist 97(3), 321–338 (2014)CrossRef A. Bokulich: How the tiger bush got its stripes: How possibly versus how actually model explanations, Monist 97(3), 321–338 (2014)CrossRef
12.
go back to reference M.K. Hubbert: Strength of the earth, Bull. Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geol. 29(11), 1630–1653 (1945) M.K. Hubbert: Strength of the earth, Bull. Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geol. 29(11), 1630–1653 (1945)
13.
go back to reference R. Bagnold: The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes (Dover, Mineola 2005), originally published in 1941 R. Bagnold: The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes (Dover, Mineola 2005), originally published in 1941
14.
go back to reference D. Green: Modelling geomorphic systems: Scaled physical models. In: Geomorphological Techniques (Online Edition), ed. by S.J. Cook, L.E. Clarke, J.M. Nield (British Society for Geomorphology, London 2014), Chap. 5, Sect. 3 D. Green: Modelling geomorphic systems: Scaled physical models. In: Geomorphological Techniques (Online Edition), ed. by S.J. Cook, L.E. Clarke, J.M. Nield (British Society for Geomorphology, London 2014), Chap. 5, Sect. 3
15.
17.
go back to reference M. Kirkby, P. Naden, T. Burt, D. Butcher: Computer Simulation in Physical Geography (Wiley, New York 1987) M. Kirkby, P. Naden, T. Burt, D. Butcher: Computer Simulation in Physical Geography (Wiley, New York 1987)
18.
go back to reference G. Tucker: Models. In: Encyclopedia of Geomorphology, Vol. 2, ed. by A. Goudie (Routledge, London 2004) pp. 687–691 G. Tucker: Models. In: Encyclopedia of Geomorphology, Vol. 2, ed. by A. Goudie (Routledge, London 2004) pp. 687–691
19.
go back to reference G. Tucker, S. Lancaster, N. Gasparini, R. Bras: The channel-hillslope integrated landscape development model (CHILD). In: Landscape Erosion and Evolution Modeling, ed. by H. Doe (Kluwer Acadmic/Plenum, New York 2001) G. Tucker, S. Lancaster, N. Gasparini, R. Bras: The channel-hillslope integrated landscape development model (CHILD). In: Landscape Erosion and Evolution Modeling, ed. by H. Doe (Kluwer Acadmic/Plenum, New York 2001)
20.
go back to reference T. Coulthard, M. Macklin, M. Kirkby: A cellular model of holocene upland river basin and alluvial fan evolution, Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 27(3), 268–288 (2002)CrossRef T. Coulthard, M. Macklin, M. Kirkby: A cellular model of holocene upland river basin and alluvial fan evolution, Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 27(3), 268–288 (2002)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference A. Rowan: Modeling geomorphic systems: Glacial. In: Geomorphological Techniques, ed. by L.E. Clark, J.M. Nield (British Society for Geomorphology, London 2011), Sect. 5, Chap. 5.6.5 (Online Version) A. Rowan: Modeling geomorphic systems: Glacial. In: Geomorphological Techniques, ed. by L.E. Clark, J.M. Nield (British Society for Geomorphology, London 2011), Sect. 5, Chap. 5.6.5 (Online Version)
23.
go back to reference J. Katzav, W. Parker: The future of climate modeling, Clim. Change 132, 475–487 (2015)CrossRef J. Katzav, W. Parker: The future of climate modeling, Clim. Change 132, 475–487 (2015)CrossRef
24.
go back to reference N. Oreskes: The role of quantitative models in science. In: Models in Ecosystem Science, ed. by C. Canham, J. Cole, W. Lauenroth (Princeton UP, Princeton 2003) N. Oreskes: The role of quantitative models in science. In: Models in Ecosystem Science, ed. by C. Canham, J. Cole, W. Lauenroth (Princeton UP, Princeton 2003)
25.
go back to reference A. Nicholas, T. Quine: Crossing the divide: Representation of channels and processes in reduced-complexity river models at reach and landscape scales, Geomorphology 90, 318–339 (2007)CrossRef A. Nicholas, T. Quine: Crossing the divide: Representation of channels and processes in reduced-complexity river models at reach and landscape scales, Geomorphology 90, 318–339 (2007)CrossRef
26.
go back to reference A.B. Murray, C. Paola: A cellular model of braided rivers, Nature 371, 54–57 (1994)CrossRef A.B. Murray, C. Paola: A cellular model of braided rivers, Nature 371, 54–57 (1994)CrossRef
27.
go back to reference T. Coulthard, D. Hicks, M. Van De Wiel: Cellular modeling of river catchments and reaches: Advantages, limitations, and prospects, Geomorphology 90, 192–207 (2007)CrossRef T. Coulthard, D. Hicks, M. Van De Wiel: Cellular modeling of river catchments and reaches: Advantages, limitations, and prospects, Geomorphology 90, 192–207 (2007)CrossRef
28.
go back to reference A.B. Murray: Contrasting the goals, strategies, and predictions associated with simplified numerical models and detailed simulations. In: Prediction in Geomorphology, ed. by P. Wilcock, R. Iverson (American Geophysical Union, Washington 2003) pp. 151–165 A.B. Murray: Contrasting the goals, strategies, and predictions associated with simplified numerical models and detailed simulations. In: Prediction in Geomorphology, ed. by P. Wilcock, R. Iverson (American Geophysical Union, Washington 2003) pp. 151–165
29.
go back to reference B.T. Werner: Complexity in natural landform patterns, Science 284, 102–104 (1999)CrossRef B.T. Werner: Complexity in natural landform patterns, Science 284, 102–104 (1999)CrossRef
30.
go back to reference A. Bokulich: Explanatory models versus predictive models: Reduced complexity modeling in geomorphology, Proc. Eur. Philos. Sci. Assoc.: EPSA11 Perspect. Found. Probl. Philos. Sci., ed. by V. Karakostas, D. Dieks (Springer, Cham 2013) A. Bokulich: Explanatory models versus predictive models: Reduced complexity modeling in geomorphology, Proc. Eur. Philos. Sci. Assoc.: EPSA11 Perspect. Found. Probl. Philos. Sci., ed. by V. Karakostas, D. Dieks (Springer, Cham 2013)
31.
go back to reference A.B. Murray: Reducing model complexity for explanation and prediction, Geomorphology 90, 178–191 (2007)CrossRef A.B. Murray: Reducing model complexity for explanation and prediction, Geomorphology 90, 178–191 (2007)CrossRef
33.
go back to reference J. Wainwright, M. Mulligan: Mind, the gap in landscape evolution modelling, Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 35, 842–855 (2010)CrossRef J. Wainwright, M. Mulligan: Mind, the gap in landscape evolution modelling, Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 35, 842–855 (2010)CrossRef
34.
go back to reference T. Kuhn: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago 2012), [1962]CrossRef T. Kuhn: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago 2012), [1962]CrossRef
35.
go back to reference P. Suppes: Models of data, Proc. Int. Congr. Logic, Methodol. Philos. Sci., ed. by E. Nagel, P. Suppes, A. Tarski (Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford 1962) pp. 251–261 P. Suppes: Models of data, Proc. Int. Congr. Logic, Methodol. Philos. Sci., ed. by E. Nagel, P. Suppes, A. Tarski (Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford 1962) pp. 251–261
36.
go back to reference I. Lakatos: Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes, Proc. Int. Colloquium Phil. Sci.: Crit. Growth Knowl., Vol. 4, ed. by I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1970), London, 1965CrossRef I. Lakatos: Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes, Proc. Int. Colloquium Phil. Sci.: Crit. Growth Knowl., Vol. 4, ed. by I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1970), London, 1965CrossRef
37.
go back to reference E. Rykiel: Testing ecological models: The meaning of validation, Ecol. Model. 90, 229–244 (1996)CrossRef E. Rykiel: Testing ecological models: The meaning of validation, Ecol. Model. 90, 229–244 (1996)CrossRef
38.
go back to reference P. Edwards: Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming (MIT Press, Cambrindge 2010) P. Edwards: Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming (MIT Press, Cambrindge 2010)
39.
go back to reference E. Lloyd: The role of complex empiricism in the debates about satellite data and climate models, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 43, 390–401 (2012)CrossRef E. Lloyd: The role of complex empiricism in the debates about satellite data and climate models, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 43, 390–401 (2012)CrossRef
40.
go back to reference R. Benson, P. Mannion: Multi-variate models are essential for understanding vertebrate diversification in deep time, Biol. Lett. 8(1), 127–130 (2012)CrossRef R. Benson, P. Mannion: Multi-variate models are essential for understanding vertebrate diversification in deep time, Biol. Lett. 8(1), 127–130 (2012)CrossRef
41.
go back to reference A. Mc Gowan, A. Smith (Eds.): Comparing the Geological and Fossil Records: Implications for Biodiversity Studies (Geological Society, London 2011), No. 358. The Geological Society Special Publication A. Mc Gowan, A. Smith (Eds.): Comparing the Geological and Fossil Records: Implications for Biodiversity Studies (Geological Society, London 2011), No. 358. The Geological Society Special Publication
42.
go back to reference R. Giere: Using models to represent reality. In: Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery, ed. by L. Magnani, N. Nersessian, P. Hagard (Springer, New York 1999) R. Giere: Using models to represent reality. In: Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery, ed. by L. Magnani, N. Nersessian, P. Hagard (Springer, New York 1999)
43.
go back to reference S. Norton, F. Suppe: Why atmospheric modeling is good science. In: Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, ed. by C. Miller, P. Edwards (MIT Press, Cambridge 2001) pp. 67–106 S. Norton, F. Suppe: Why atmospheric modeling is good science. In: Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, ed. by C. Miller, P. Edwards (MIT Press, Cambridge 2001) pp. 67–106
44.
go back to reference N. Oreskes: Models all the way down (review of Edwards A Vast Machine), Metascience 21, 99–104 (2012)CrossRef N. Oreskes: Models all the way down (review of Edwards A Vast Machine), Metascience 21, 99–104 (2012)CrossRef
45.
go back to reference K. Beven: Environmental Modelling: An Uncertain Future? An Introduction to Techniques for Uncertainty Estimation in Environmental Prediction (Routledge, New York 2009) K. Beven: Environmental Modelling: An Uncertain Future? An Introduction to Techniques for Uncertainty Estimation in Environmental Prediction (Routledge, New York 2009)
46.
go back to reference H. Chang: Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 2004)CrossRef H. Chang: Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 2004)CrossRef
47.
go back to reference N.K.S. Oreskes: Frechette, K. Belitz: Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences, Science 263, 641–646 (1994)CrossRef N.K.S. Oreskes: Frechette, K. Belitz: Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences, Science 263, 641–646 (1994)CrossRef
48.
go back to reference N. Oreskes, K. Belitz: Philosophical issues in model assessment. In: Model Validation: Perspectives in Hydrological Science, ed. by M. Anderson, P. Bates (Wiley, West Sussex 2001) pp. 23–42 N. Oreskes, K. Belitz: Philosophical issues in model assessment. In: Model Validation: Perspectives in Hydrological Science, ed. by M. Anderson, P. Bates (Wiley, West Sussex 2001) pp. 23–42
49.
go back to reference N. Oreskes: Evaluation (not validation) of quantitative models, Environ. Health Perspect. 106(supp. 6), 1453–1460 (1998)CrossRef N. Oreskes: Evaluation (not validation) of quantitative models, Environ. Health Perspect. 106(supp. 6), 1453–1460 (1998)CrossRef
50.
go back to reference G. Lauder: On the inference of function from structure. In: Functional Morphology in Vertebrate Paleontology, ed. by J. Thomason (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1995) pp. 1–18 G. Lauder: On the inference of function from structure. In: Functional Morphology in Vertebrate Paleontology, ed. by J. Thomason (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1995) pp. 1–18
51.
go back to reference J. Hutchinson, M. Garcia: Tyrannosaurus was not a fast runner, Nature 415, 1018–1021 (2002)CrossRef J. Hutchinson, M. Garcia: Tyrannosaurus was not a fast runner, Nature 415, 1018–1021 (2002)CrossRef
53.
go back to reference B. Calcott: Wimsatt and the robustness family: Review of Wimsatt’s re-engineering philosophy for limited beings, Biol. Phil. 26, 281–293 (2011)CrossRef B. Calcott: Wimsatt and the robustness family: Review of Wimsatt’s re-engineering philosophy for limited beings, Biol. Phil. 26, 281–293 (2011)CrossRef
54.
go back to reference A. Saltelli, K. Chan, M. Scott: Sensitivity Analysis (Wiley, West Sussex 2009)MATH A. Saltelli, K. Chan, M. Scott: Sensitivity Analysis (Wiley, West Sussex 2009)MATH
55.
go back to reference J. Hutchinson: On the inference of structure using biomechanical modelling and simulation of extinct organisms, Biol. Lett. 8(1), 115–118 (2012)CrossRef J. Hutchinson: On the inference of structure using biomechanical modelling and simulation of extinct organisms, Biol. Lett. 8(1), 115–118 (2012)CrossRef
56.
go back to reference D. Hamby: A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models, Environ. Monit. Assess. 32, 135–154 (1994)CrossRef D. Hamby: A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models, Environ. Monit. Assess. 32, 135–154 (1994)CrossRef
57.
go back to reference A. Saltelli, M. Ratto, T. Andres, F. Campologno, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana, S. Tarantola: Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer (Wiley, West Sussex 2008)MATH A. Saltelli, M. Ratto, T. Andres, F. Campologno, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana, S. Tarantola: Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer (Wiley, West Sussex 2008)MATH
58.
go back to reference R. Snieder, J. Trampert: Inverse problems in geophysics. In: Wavefield Inversion, ed. by A. Wirgin (Springer, New York 1999) pp. 119–190 R. Snieder, J. Trampert: Inverse problems in geophysics. In: Wavefield Inversion, ed. by A. Wirgin (Springer, New York 1999) pp. 119–190
59.
go back to reference G. Backus, J. Gilbert: Numerical applications of a formalism for geophysical inverse problems, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 13, 247–276 (1967)CrossRef G. Backus, J. Gilbert: Numerical applications of a formalism for geophysical inverse problems, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 13, 247–276 (1967)CrossRef
60.
go back to reference M. Sen, P. Stoffa: Inverse theory, global optimization. In: Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics, Vol. 1, ed. by H. Gupta (Springer, Dordrecht 2011) M. Sen, P. Stoffa: Inverse theory, global optimization. In: Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics, Vol. 1, ed. by H. Gupta (Springer, Dordrecht 2011)
61.
go back to reference W. Sandham, D. Hamilton: Inverse theory, artificial neural networks. In: Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics, ed. by H. Gupta (Springer, Dordrecht 2011) pp. 618–625CrossRef W. Sandham, D. Hamilton: Inverse theory, artificial neural networks. In: Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics, ed. by H. Gupta (Springer, Dordrecht 2011) pp. 618–625CrossRef
62.
go back to reference G. Belot: Down to earth underdetermination, Phil. Phenomenol. Res. XCI 2, 456–464 (2015)CrossRef G. Belot: Down to earth underdetermination, Phil. Phenomenol. Res. XCI 2, 456–464 (2015)CrossRef
63.
go back to reference T. Miyake: Uncertainty and modeling in seismology. In: Reasoning in Measurement, ed. by N. Mössner, A. Nordmann (Taylor Francis, London 2017) T. Miyake: Uncertainty and modeling in seismology. In: Reasoning in Measurement, ed. by N. Mössner, A. Nordmann (Taylor Francis, London 2017)
64.
go back to reference E. Tal: The Epistemology of Measurement: A Model-Based Account, Ph.D. Thesis (Univ. Toronto, London 2012) E. Tal: The Epistemology of Measurement: A Model-Based Account, Ph.D. Thesis (Univ. Toronto, London 2012)
65.
go back to reference S. Schumm: To Interpret the Earth: Ten Ways to be Wrong (Cambridge UP, Cambridge 1998) S. Schumm: To Interpret the Earth: Ten Ways to be Wrong (Cambridge UP, Cambridge 1998)
66.
go back to reference S. Lane: Numerical modelling: Understanding explanation and prediction in physical geography. In: Key Methods in Geography, 2nd edn., ed. by N. Clifford, S. French, G. Valentine (Sage, Los Angeles 2010) pp. 274–298, 2003 S. Lane: Numerical modelling: Understanding explanation and prediction in physical geography. In: Key Methods in Geography, 2nd edn., ed. by N. Clifford, S. French, G. Valentine (Sage, Los Angeles 2010) pp. 274–298, 2003
67.
go back to reference J. O’Reilly, K. Brysse, M. Oppenheimer, N. Oreskes: Characterizing uncertainty in expert assessments: Ozone depletion and the west antarctic ice sheet, WIREs Clim. Change 2(5), 728–743 (2011)CrossRef J. O’Reilly, K. Brysse, M. Oppenheimer, N. Oreskes: Characterizing uncertainty in expert assessments: Ozone depletion and the west antarctic ice sheet, WIREs Clim. Change 2(5), 728–743 (2011)CrossRef
68.
go back to reference W. Parker: Predicting weather and climate: Uncertainty, ensembles, and climate, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 41, 263–272 (2010)CrossRef W. Parker: Predicting weather and climate: Uncertainty, ensembles, and climate, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 41, 263–272 (2010)CrossRef
69.
go back to reference R. Frigg, S. Bradley, H. Du, L. Smith: Laplace’s demon and the adventures of his apprentices, Phil. Sci. 81, 31–59 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRef R. Frigg, S. Bradley, H. Du, L. Smith: Laplace’s demon and the adventures of his apprentices, Phil. Sci. 81, 31–59 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRef
70.
go back to reference E.L. Thompson: Modelling North Atlantic Storms in a Changing Climate, Ph.D. Thesis (Imperial College, London 2013) E.L. Thompson: Modelling North Atlantic Storms in a Changing Climate, Ph.D. Thesis (Imperial College, London 2013)
71.
go back to reference N. Odoni, S. Lane: The significance of models in geomorphology: From concepts to experiments. In: The SAGE Handbook of Geomorphology, ed. by K. Gregory, A. Goudie (SAGE, London 2011) N. Odoni, S. Lane: The significance of models in geomorphology: From concepts to experiments. In: The SAGE Handbook of Geomorphology, ed. by K. Gregory, A. Goudie (SAGE, London 2011)
72.
go back to reference G. Sella, S. Stein, T. Dixon, M. Craymer, T. James, S. Mazzotti, R. Dokka: Observation of glacial isostatic adjustment in stable North America with GPS, Geophys. Res. Lett. 34(2), 1–6 (2007), L02306CrossRef G. Sella, S. Stein, T. Dixon, M. Craymer, T. James, S. Mazzotti, R. Dokka: Observation of glacial isostatic adjustment in stable North America with GPS, Geophys. Res. Lett. 34(2), 1–6 (2007), L02306CrossRef
73.
go back to reference T. Chamberlin: The method of multiple working hypotheses, Science 15(366), 92–96 (1890) T. Chamberlin: The method of multiple working hypotheses, Science 15(366), 92–96 (1890)
74.
go back to reference R. Laudan: The method of multiple working hypotheses and the development of plate tectonic theory. In: Scientific Discovery: Case Studies, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 60, ed. by T. Nickles (Springer, Dordrecht 1980) pp. 331–343CrossRef R. Laudan: The method of multiple working hypotheses and the development of plate tectonic theory. In: Scientific Discovery: Case Studies, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 60, ed. by T. Nickles (Springer, Dordrecht 1980) pp. 331–343CrossRef
76.
go back to reference C. Cleland: Prediction and explanation in historical natural science, Br. J. Phil. Sci. 62, 551–582 (2011)CrossRef C. Cleland: Prediction and explanation in historical natural science, Br. J. Phil. Sci. 62, 551–582 (2011)CrossRef
77.
go back to reference A.B. Murray: Cause and effect in geomorphic systems: Complex systems perspectives, Geomorphology 214, 1–9 (2014)CrossRef A.B. Murray: Cause and effect in geomorphic systems: Complex systems perspectives, Geomorphology 214, 1–9 (2014)CrossRef
78.
go back to reference C. Paola, K. Straub, D. Mohrig, L. Reinhardt: The unreasonable effectiveness of stratigraphic and geomorphic experiments, Earth Sci. Rev. 97(1–4), 1–43 (2009)CrossRef C. Paola, K. Straub, D. Mohrig, L. Reinhardt: The unreasonable effectiveness of stratigraphic and geomorphic experiments, Earth Sci. Rev. 97(1–4), 1–43 (2009)CrossRef
79.
go back to reference P. Duhem: The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton 1954), trans. P. Weiner, 1906MATH P. Duhem: The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton 1954), trans. P. Weiner, 1906MATH
81.
go back to reference K. Beven: Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling, Adv. Water Resour. 16(1), 41–51 (1993)CrossRef K. Beven: Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling, Adv. Water Resour. 16(1), 41–51 (1993)CrossRef
82.
go back to reference K. Beven, J. Freer: Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol. 249(1–4), 11–29 (2001)CrossRef K. Beven, J. Freer: Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol. 249(1–4), 11–29 (2001)CrossRef
83.
go back to reference K. Beven: Equifinality and uncertainty in geomorphological modeling, Proc. 27th Binghampton symp. geomorphol.: Sci. Nat. Geomorphol., ed. by B. Rhoads, C. Thorn (Wiley, Hoboken 1996) pp. 289–313 K. Beven: Equifinality and uncertainty in geomorphological modeling, Proc. 27th Binghampton symp. geomorphol.: Sci. Nat. Geomorphol., ed. by B. Rhoads, C. Thorn (Wiley, Hoboken 1996) pp. 289–313
84.
go back to reference K. Beven, A. Binley: GLUE: 20 years on, Hydrol. Process. 28(24), 5897–5918 (2014)CrossRef K. Beven, A. Binley: GLUE: 20 years on, Hydrol. Process. 28(24), 5897–5918 (2014)CrossRef
85.
go back to reference J.P.C. Kleijnen: Experimental design for sensitivity analysis, optimization, and validation of simulation models. In: Handbook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice, ed. by J. Banks (Wiley, New York 1998) pp. 173–223CrossRef J.P.C. Kleijnen: Experimental design for sensitivity analysis, optimization, and validation of simulation models. In: Handbook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice, ed. by J. Banks (Wiley, New York 1998) pp. 173–223CrossRef
86.
go back to reference N. Odoni: Exploring Equifinality in a Landscape Evolution Model, Ph.D. Thesis (Univ. Southhampton, School of Geography, Southhampton 2007) N. Odoni: Exploring Equifinality in a Landscape Evolution Model, Ph.D. Thesis (Univ. Southhampton, School of Geography, Southhampton 2007)
87.
go back to reference R.L. Slingerland, G. Tucker: Erosional dynamics, flexural isostasy, and long-lived escarpments, J. Geophys. Res. 99, 229–243 (1994) R.L. Slingerland, G. Tucker: Erosional dynamics, flexural isostasy, and long-lived escarpments, J. Geophys. Res. 99, 229–243 (1994)
88.
go back to reference R. Knutti, J. Sedlácek: Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections, Nat. Clim. Change 3, 369–373 (2013)CrossRef R. Knutti, J. Sedlácek: Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections, Nat. Clim. Change 3, 369–373 (2013)CrossRef
89.
go back to reference E. Lloyd: Confirmation and robustness of climate models, Phil. Sci. 77, 971–984 (2010)CrossRef E. Lloyd: Confirmation and robustness of climate models, Phil. Sci. 77, 971–984 (2010)CrossRef
90.
go back to reference W. Parker: When climate models agree: The significance of robust model predictions, Phil. Sci. 78, 579–600 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRef W. Parker: When climate models agree: The significance of robust model predictions, Phil. Sci. 78, 579–600 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRef
91.
go back to reference W. Parker: Ensemble modeling, uncertainty, and robust predictions, WIREs Clim. Change 4, 213–223 (2013)CrossRef W. Parker: Ensemble modeling, uncertainty, and robust predictions, WIREs Clim. Change 4, 213–223 (2013)CrossRef
92.
go back to reference J. Lenhard, E. Winsberg: Holism, entrenchment, and the future of climate model pluralism, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 41, 253–262 (2010)CrossRef J. Lenhard, E. Winsberg: Holism, entrenchment, and the future of climate model pluralism, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 41, 253–262 (2010)CrossRef
93.
go back to reference D. Masson, R. Knutti: Climate model genealogy, Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L08703 (2011)CrossRef D. Masson, R. Knutti: Climate model genealogy, Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L08703 (2011)CrossRef
94.
go back to reference R. Knutti, R. Furrer, C. Tebaldi, J. Cermak, G. Meehl: Challenges in combining projections from multiple climate models, J. Clim. 23(10), 2739–2758 (2010)CrossRef R. Knutti, R. Furrer, C. Tebaldi, J. Cermak, G. Meehl: Challenges in combining projections from multiple climate models, J. Clim. 23(10), 2739–2758 (2010)CrossRef
95.
go back to reference A. Bokulich: How scientific models can explain, Synthese 180(1), 33–45 (2011)CrossRef A. Bokulich: How scientific models can explain, Synthese 180(1), 33–45 (2011)CrossRef
96.
go back to reference A. Bokulich: Models and explanation. In: Handbook of Model-Based Science, ed. by L. Magnani, T. Bertolotti (Springer, Dordrecht 2016) A. Bokulich: Models and explanation. In: Handbook of Model-Based Science, ed. by L. Magnani, T. Bertolotti (Springer, Dordrecht 2016)
Metadata
Title
Models in Geosciences
Authors
Alisa Bokulich
Naomi Oreskes
Copyright Year
2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_41

Premium Partner