Skip to main content
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2012 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Models of Strategic Bidding in Electricity Markets Under Network Constraints

Authors : Ettore Bompard, Yuchao Ma

Published in: Handbook of Networks in Power Systems I

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Starting from the nineties of the last century, competition has been introduced in the electricity industry around the world, as a tool to increase market efficiency and decrease prices. Electricity is a commodity that needs to be traded over a physical network with strict physical and operational constraints that cannot be found in other commodity markets. Present electricity markets may be better described in terms of oligopoly than of perfect competition from which they may be rather far. In an oligopoly market, the producer is a market player that shows strategic behavior, submitting offers higher than the marginal costs, as they under perfect competition, with the aim to maximize its individual surpluses. The market clearing price, quantities and the market efficiency depending on the strategic interactions among producers must be taken into account in modeling competitive electricity markets. The network constraints provide very specific opportunities of exercising strategic behaviors to the market participants. Game theory provides a conceptual framework and analytical tool to model such a context. The modeling of electricity markets will be presented by discussing the traditional Game Theory models, such as bertrand, cournot, conjecture supply function, supply function equilibrium, adapted to be able to capture, in determining the Nash equilibrium, the network structure of the system in which the market is implemented. A formalized representation and a comparison of some of the most common game theory models will be provided with some conceptual examples. In addition, some newly proposed approaches for strategic bidding modeling based on the complex systems techniques such as Multi Agent systems and Complex Networks will be mentioned and some related references provided.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
6.
go back to reference Ventosa M, Baillo A, Ramos A, Rivier M (2005) Electricity market modeling trends. Energ Policy 33(7):897–913CrossRef Ventosa M, Baillo A, Ramos A, Rivier M (2005) Electricity market modeling trends. Energ Policy 33(7):897–913CrossRef
7.
go back to reference David AK, Wen F (2002) Strategic bidding in competitive electricity markets: a literature survey. In: Power engineering society summer meeting, 2000. IEEE Seattle, WA, USA, vol 4, pp 2168–2173 David AK, Wen F (2002) Strategic bidding in competitive electricity markets: a literature survey. In: Power engineering society summer meeting, 2000. IEEE Seattle, WA, USA, vol 4, pp 2168–2173
8.
go back to reference Bompard E, Carpaneto E, Ciwei G, Napoli R, Benini M, Gallanti M, Migliavacca G (2005) A game theory simulator for assessing the performances of competitive electricity markets. In:Power tech, 27–30 June 2005 IEEE Russia, St. Petersburg pp 1–9 Bompard E, Carpaneto E, Ciwei G, Napoli R, Benini M, Gallanti M, Migliavacca G (2005) A game theory simulator for assessing the performances of competitive electricity markets. In:Power tech, 27–30 June 2005 IEEE Russia, St. Petersburg pp 1–9
9.
go back to reference Lee K-H, Baldick R (2003) Solving three-player games by the matrix approach with application to an electric power market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(4):1573–1580CrossRef Lee K-H, Baldick R (2003) Solving three-player games by the matrix approach with application to an electric power market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(4):1573–1580CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Neuhoff K, Barquin J, Boots MG (2005) Network-constrained cournot models of liberalized electricity markets: the devil is in the details. Energ Econ 27(3):495–525CrossRef Neuhoff K, Barquin J, Boots MG (2005) Network-constrained cournot models of liberalized electricity markets: the devil is in the details. Energ Econ 27(3):495–525CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hobbs BE (2001) Linear complementarity models of nash-cournot competition in bilateral and poolco power markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16(2):194–202CrossRef Hobbs BE (2001) Linear complementarity models of nash-cournot competition in bilateral and poolco power markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16(2):194–202CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Contreras J, Klusch M, Krawczyk JB (2004) Numerical solutions to nash-cournot equilibria in coupled constraint electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(1):195–206CrossRef Contreras J, Klusch M, Krawczyk JB (2004) Numerical solutions to nash-cournot equilibria in coupled constraint electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(1):195–206CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yu Z, Sparrow FT, Morin TL, Nderitu G (2000) A stackelberg price leadership model with application to deregulated electricity markets. In:Power engineering society winter meeting, 23–27 Jan 2000. IEEE, vol 3, pp 1814–1819 Yu Z, Sparrow FT, Morin TL, Nderitu G (2000) A stackelberg price leadership model with application to deregulated electricity markets. In:Power engineering society winter meeting, 23–27 Jan 2000. IEEE, vol 3, pp 1814–1819
14.
go back to reference de Lujan Latorre M, Granville S (2003) The stackelberg equilibrium applied to AC power systems-a noninterior point algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(2):611–618CrossRef de Lujan Latorre M, Granville S (2003) The stackelberg equilibrium applied to AC power systems-a noninterior point algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(2):611–618CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Baldick R, Grant R, Kahn E (2004) Theory and application of linear supply function equilibrium in electricity markets. J Regul Econ 25(2):143–167CrossRef Baldick R, Grant R, Kahn E (2004) Theory and application of linear supply function equilibrium in electricity markets. J Regul Econ 25(2):143–167CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Baldick R (2002) Electricity market equilibrium models: the effect of parameterization, power engineering review. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17(4):1170–1176CrossRef Baldick R (2002) Electricity market equilibrium models: the effect of parameterization, power engineering review. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17(4):1170–1176CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Petoussis SG, Zhang XP, Godfrey KR (2007) Electricity market equilibrium analysis based on nonlinear interior point algorithm with complementarity constraints. IET Gener Transm Distrib 1(4):603–612CrossRef Petoussis SG, Zhang XP, Godfrey KR (2007) Electricity market equilibrium analysis based on nonlinear interior point algorithm with complementarity constraints. IET Gener Transm Distrib 1(4):603–612CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hobbs BF, Rijkers FAM (2004) Strategic generation with conjectured transmission price responses in a mixed transmission pricing system-part I: formulation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(2):707–717CrossRef Hobbs BF, Rijkers FAM (2004) Strategic generation with conjectured transmission price responses in a mixed transmission pricing system-part I: formulation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(2):707–717CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Day CJ, Hobbs BF, Pang J-S (2002) Oligopolistic competition in power networks: a conjectured supply function approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17(3):597–607CrossRef Day CJ, Hobbs BF, Pang J-S (2002) Oligopolistic competition in power networks: a conjectured supply function approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17(3):597–607CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Luo ZQ, Pang JS, Ralph D (1996) Mathematical programming with equilibrium constraints. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Luo ZQ, Pang JS, Ralph D (1996) Mathematical programming with equilibrium constraints. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bompard E, Wene Lu, Napoli R (2006) Network constraint impacts on the competitive electricity markets under supply-side strategic bidding. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(1):160–170CrossRef Bompard E, Wene Lu, Napoli R (2006) Network constraint impacts on the competitive electricity markets under supply-side strategic bidding. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(1):160–170CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Liu YF, Wu FF (2007) Impacts of network constraints on electricity market equilibrium. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(1):126–135CrossRef Liu YF, Wu FF (2007) Impacts of network constraints on electricity market equilibrium. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(1):126–135CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fampa M, Barroso LA, Candal D, Simonetti L (2008) Bilevel optimization applied to strategic pricing in competitive electricity markets. Comput Optim Appl 39(2):121–142MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Fampa M, Barroso LA, Candal D, Simonetti L (2008) Bilevel optimization applied to strategic pricing in competitive electricity markets. Comput Optim Appl 39(2):121–142MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hobbs BF, Metzler CB, Pang J-S (2000) Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: an MPEC approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(2):638–645CrossRef Hobbs BF, Metzler CB, Pang J-S (2000) Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: an MPEC approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(2):638–645CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Li T, Shahidehpour M (2005) Strategic bidding of transmission-constrained GENCOs with incomplete information. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(1):437–447CrossRef Li T, Shahidehpour M (2005) Strategic bidding of transmission-constrained GENCOs with incomplete information. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(1):437–447CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yao J, Adler I, Shmuel SO (2008) Modeling and computing Two-settlement oligopolistic equilibrium in a congested electricity network. Oper Res 56(1):34–47MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Yao J, Adler I, Shmuel SO (2008) Modeling and computing Two-settlement oligopolistic equilibrium in a congested electricity network. Oper Res 56(1):34–47MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hu X, Ralph M (2004) Convergence of a penalty method for mathematical programming with complementarity constraints. J Optim Theory Appl 123(2):365–390MathSciNetCrossRef Hu X, Ralph M (2004) Convergence of a penalty method for mathematical programming with complementarity constraints. J Optim Theory Appl 123(2):365–390MathSciNetCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ralph D, Wright SJ (2004) Some properties of regularization and penalization schemes for MPECs. Optim Methods Softw 19(5):527–556MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Ralph D, Wright SJ (2004) Some properties of regularization and penalization schemes for MPECs. Optim Methods Softw 19(5):527–556MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Scheel H, Scholtes S (2000) Mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints: stationarity, optimality, and sensitivity. Math Oper Res 25(1):1–22MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Scheel H, Scholtes S (2000) Mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints: stationarity, optimality, and sensitivity. Math Oper Res 25(1):1–22MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Jean-Pierre D, Patrice M, Sebastien R, Gilles S (2006) A smoothing heuristic for a bilevel pricing problem. Eur J Oper Res 174(3):1396–1413MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Jean-Pierre D, Patrice M, Sebastien R, Gilles S (2006) A smoothing heuristic for a bilevel pricing problem. Eur J Oper Res 174(3):1396–1413MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ma YC, Jiang CW, Hou ZJ, Wang CM (2006) The formulation of the optimal strategies for the electricity producers based on the particle swarm optimization algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(4):1663–1671CrossRef Ma YC, Jiang CW, Hou ZJ, Wang CM (2006) The formulation of the optimal strategies for the electricity producers based on the particle swarm optimization algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(4):1663–1671CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Yu Nm, Liu CC (2008) Multi-agent systems and electricity markets: state-of-the-art and the future. In: Power and energy society general meeting - Conversion and delivery of electrical energy in the 21st century, 20–24 July 2008. IEEE, pp 1–2 Yu Nm, Liu CC (2008) Multi-agent systems and electricity markets: state-of-the-art and the future. In: Power and energy society general meeting - Conversion and delivery of electrical energy in the 21st century, 20–24 July 2008. IEEE, pp 1–2
34.
go back to reference Bagnall AJ, Smith GD (2005) A multiagent model of the UK market in electricity generation. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 9(5):522–536CrossRef Bagnall AJ, Smith GD (2005) A multiagent model of the UK market in electricity generation. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 9(5):522–536CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Tellidou AC, Bakirtzis AG (2007) Agent-based analysis of capacity withholding and tacit collusion in electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(4):1735–1742CrossRef Tellidou AC, Bakirtzis AG (2007) Agent-based analysis of capacity withholding and tacit collusion in electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(4):1735–1742CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Koritarov VS (2004) Real-world market representation with agents. IEEE Power Energy Mag 2(4):39–46CrossRef Koritarov VS (2004) Real-world market representation with agents. IEEE Power Energy Mag 2(4):39–46CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Praca I, Ramos C, Vale Z, Cordeiro M (2003) MASCEM: a multiagent system that simulates competitive electricity markets. IEEE Intell Syst 18(6):54–60CrossRef Praca I, Ramos C, Vale Z, Cordeiro M (2003) MASCEM: a multiagent system that simulates competitive electricity markets. IEEE Intell Syst 18(6):54–60CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Bompard E, Ma YC (2008) Modeling bilateral electricity markets: a complex network approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 23(4):1590–1660CrossRef Bompard E, Ma YC (2008) Modeling bilateral electricity markets: a complex network approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 23(4):1590–1660CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Elgerd OI (1983) Electric energy systems theory. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi Elgerd OI (1983) Electric energy systems theory. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi
40.
go back to reference Conejo AJ, Castillo E, Minguez R, Milano F (2005) Locational marginal price sensitivities. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(4):2026–2033CrossRef Conejo AJ, Castillo E, Minguez R, Milano F (2005) Locational marginal price sensitivities. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(4):2026–2033CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Ma XW, Sun DI, Ott A (2002) Implementation of the PJM financial transmission rights auction market system. In: Power engineering society summer meeting, 25–25 July 2002, vol 3. IEEE, pp 1360–1365 Ma XW, Sun DI, Ott A (2002) Implementation of the PJM financial transmission rights auction market system. In: Power engineering society summer meeting, 25–25 July 2002, vol 3. IEEE, pp 1360–1365
42.
go back to reference Shahidehpour M, Yamin H, Li Z (2002) Market operation in electric power systems, forecasting, scheduling and risk management. Wiley, New yorkCrossRef Shahidehpour M, Yamin H, Li Z (2002) Market operation in electric power systems, forecasting, scheduling and risk management. Wiley, New yorkCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Rothwell G, Gomez T (2003) Electricity economics: regulation and deregulation. Wiley, HobokenCrossRef Rothwell G, Gomez T (2003) Electricity economics: regulation and deregulation. Wiley, HobokenCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Lai LL (2001) Power system restructuring and deregulation. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef Lai LL (2001) Power system restructuring and deregulation. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Song HL, Liu CC, Lawarree J (2002) Nash equilibrium bidding strategies in a bilateral electricity market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17(1):73–79CrossRef Song HL, Liu CC, Lawarree J (2002) Nash equilibrium bidding strategies in a bilateral electricity market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17(1):73–79CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Vaisakh K, Rao GVS (2007) Determination of optimal bilateral power contracts with line flow constraints. In: 39th North American power symposium NAPS ’07, 30 Sept– 2 Oct 2007, pp 448–455 Vaisakh K, Rao GVS (2007) Determination of optimal bilateral power contracts with line flow constraints. In: 39th North American power symposium NAPS ’07, 30 Sept– 2 Oct 2007, pp 448–455
47.
go back to reference Borenstein S, Bushnell J, Knittel CR (1999) Market power in electricity markets: beyond concentration measures. PWP-059r, Feb. 1999, University of California Energy Institute, Berkeley, California Borenstein S, Bushnell J, Knittel CR (1999) Market power in electricity markets: beyond concentration measures. PWP-059r, Feb. 1999, University of California Energy Institute, Berkeley, California
48.
go back to reference Strbac G, Farmer ED, Cory BJ (1996) Framework for the incorporation of demand-side in a competitive electricity market. IET Gener Transm Distrib 143(3):232–237CrossRef Strbac G, Farmer ED, Cory BJ (1996) Framework for the incorporation of demand-side in a competitive electricity market. IET Gener Transm Distrib 143(3):232–237CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Bompard E, Ma Y, Napoli R, Abrate G (2007) The demand elasticity impacts on the strategic bidding behavior of the electricity producers. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(1):188–197CrossRef Bompard E, Ma Y, Napoli R, Abrate G (2007) The demand elasticity impacts on the strategic bidding behavior of the electricity producers. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(1):188–197CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Borenstein S (2000) Understanding competitive pricing and market power in wholesale electricity markets. Electr J 13(6):49–57CrossRef Borenstein S (2000) Understanding competitive pricing and market power in wholesale electricity markets. Electr J 13(6):49–57CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Berry C, Hobbs B (1999) Understanding how market power can arise in network competition: a game theoretic approach. Util. Pol. 8(3):139–158CrossRef Berry C, Hobbs B (1999) Understanding how market power can arise in network competition: a game theoretic approach. Util. Pol. 8(3):139–158CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Nicolaisen J, Petrov V, Tesfatsion L (2001) Market power and efficiency in a computational electricity market with discriminatory double-auction pricing. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 5(5):504–523CrossRef Nicolaisen J, Petrov V, Tesfatsion L (2001) Market power and efficiency in a computational electricity market with discriminatory double-auction pricing. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 5(5):504–523CrossRef
54.
55.
go back to reference Singh H (1999) Introduction to game theory and its applications in electric power markets. IEEE Comput Appl Power 12(2):18–20CrossRef Singh H (1999) Introduction to game theory and its applications in electric power markets. IEEE Comput Appl Power 12(2):18–20CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Valenzuela J, Mazumdar M (2005) A probability model for the electricity price duration curve under an oligopoly market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(3):1250–1256CrossRef Valenzuela J, Mazumdar M (2005) A probability model for the electricity price duration curve under an oligopoly market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(3):1250–1256CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Models of Strategic Bidding in Electricity Markets Under Network Constraints
Authors
Ettore Bompard
Yuchao Ma
Copyright Year
2012
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23193-3_1

Premium Partner