Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

9. Multi-objective Optimization for Differential-Based PSD Based on Surrogate Model

Authors : Xiaohua Zeng, Jixin Wang

Published in: Analysis and Design of the Power-Split Device for Hybrid Systems

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In chapter 8, engineering analysis has been carried out by finite element model of DPSD.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Yao MY. Gear optimization of power split device for hybrid electric vehicle. Changchun: Jilin University; 2014. Yao MY. Gear optimization of power split device for hybrid electric vehicle. Changchun: Jilin University; 2014.
2.
go back to reference Shen WH. Surrogate model based optimization design method research for gear transmission components of HEV. Changchun: Jilin University; 2014. Shen WH. Surrogate model based optimization design method research for gear transmission components of HEV. Changchun: Jilin University; 2014.
3.
go back to reference Jafari S, Hojjati MH, Fathi A. Classical and modern optimization methods in minimum weight design of elastic rotating disk with variable thickness and density. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 2012;92:41–7.CrossRef Jafari S, Hojjati MH, Fathi A. Classical and modern optimization methods in minimum weight design of elastic rotating disk with variable thickness and density. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 2012;92:41–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hare W, Nutini J, Tesfamariam S. A survey of non-gradient optimization methods in structural engineering. Adv Eng Softw. 2013;59:19–28.CrossRef Hare W, Nutini J, Tesfamariam S. A survey of non-gradient optimization methods in structural engineering. Adv Eng Softw. 2013;59:19–28.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Montazeri-Gh M, Poursamad A, Ghlichi B. Application of genetic algorithm for optimization of control strategy in parallel hybrid electric vehicle. J Franklin Inst. 2006;343(4):420–35.CrossRefMATH Montazeri-Gh M, Poursamad A, Ghlichi B. Application of genetic algorithm for optimization of control strategy in parallel hybrid electric vehicle. J Franklin Inst. 2006;343(4):420–35.CrossRefMATH
6.
go back to reference Navalertporn T, Afzulpurkar NV. Optimization of tile manufacturing process using particle swarm optimization. Swarm Evol Comput. 2011;1(2):97–109.CrossRef Navalertporn T, Afzulpurkar NV. Optimization of tile manufacturing process using particle swarm optimization. Swarm Evol Comput. 2011;1(2):97–109.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wang GG, Shan S. Review of metamodelling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mech Des. 2007;129(4):370–80.CrossRef Wang GG, Shan S. Review of metamodelling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mech Des. 2007;129(4):370–80.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Park HS, Dang XP. Structural optimization based on CAD-CAE integration and metamodeling techniques. Comput Aided Des. 2010;42(10):889–902.CrossRef Park HS, Dang XP. Structural optimization based on CAD-CAE integration and metamodeling techniques. Comput Aided Des. 2010;42(10):889–902.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Montgomery DC, Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments [M]. New York: Wiley; 1997.MATH Montgomery DC, Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments [M]. New York: Wiley; 1997.MATH
10.
go back to reference Bement TR. Taguchi techniques for quality engineering. Technometrics. 1989;31(2):253–5.CrossRef Bement TR. Taguchi techniques for quality engineering. Technometrics. 1989;31(2):253–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ursache NM, Bressloff NW, Keane AJ. Aircraft roll enhancement via mutli-objective optimization using surrogate modeling. AIAA J. 2011;49(7):1525–41.CrossRef Ursache NM, Bressloff NW, Keane AJ. Aircraft roll enhancement via mutli-objective optimization using surrogate modeling. AIAA J. 2011;49(7):1525–41.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Li M, Li G, Azarm S. A Kriging metamodel assisted multi-objective genetic algorithm for design optimization. J Mech Des. 2008;130(3):030401.CrossRef Li M, Li G, Azarm S. A Kriging metamodel assisted multi-objective genetic algorithm for design optimization. J Mech Des. 2008;130(3):030401.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chen Y, Zou X, Xie W. How can surrogates influence the convergence of evolutionary algorithm. Swarm Evol Comput. 2013;12:18–23.CrossRef Chen Y, Zou X, Xie W. How can surrogates influence the convergence of evolutionary algorithm. Swarm Evol Comput. 2013;12:18–23.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Forrester AIJ, Keane AJ. Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2009;45(1):50–79.CrossRef Forrester AIJ, Keane AJ. Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2009;45(1):50–79.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Krisch U, Papalambros PY. Structural reanalysis for topological modifications–a unified approach. Structural and multidisciplinary Optimization. 2001;21(5):333–44.CrossRef Krisch U, Papalambros PY. Structural reanalysis for topological modifications–a unified approach. Structural and multidisciplinary Optimization. 2001;21(5):333–44.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. New York: Wiley; 1995. Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. New York: Wiley; 1995.
17.
go back to reference Broomhead DS, Loewe D. Multivariable function interpolation and adaptive networks. Complex Syst. 1988;2:321–55.MATH Broomhead DS, Loewe D. Multivariable function interpolation and adaptive networks. Complex Syst. 1988;2:321–55.MATH
18.
go back to reference Forrester A, Sobester A, Keane A. Engineering design via surrogate modeling: a practical guide. Chichester: Wiley; 2008.CrossRef Forrester A, Sobester A, Keane A. Engineering design via surrogate modeling: a practical guide. Chichester: Wiley; 2008.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Makadia AJ, Nanavati JI. Optimization of machining parameters for turning operations based on response surface methodology. Measurement. 2013;46(4):1521–9.CrossRef Makadia AJ, Nanavati JI. Optimization of machining parameters for turning operations based on response surface methodology. Measurement. 2013;46(4):1521–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dai HZ, Zhao W, Wang W, Gao ZG. An improved radial basis function network for structure reliability analysis. J Mech Sci Technol. 2011;25(9):2151–9.CrossRef Dai HZ, Zhao W, Wang W, Gao ZG. An improved radial basis function network for structure reliability analysis. J Mech Sci Technol. 2011;25(9):2151–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Jin R. Chen.W. Simpson T W. Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2001;23(1):1–13.MathSciNetCrossRef Jin R. Chen.W. Simpson T W. Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2001;23(1):1–13.MathSciNetCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Soudergaard J. Aspects of the matlab toolbox DACE. Report IMM-REP2002-12, Informatics and Mathematical Modeling [DB/OL]. Denmark: Technical University of Denmark; 2002. Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Soudergaard J. Aspects of the matlab toolbox DACE. Report IMM-REP2002-12, Informatics and Mathematical Modeling [DB/OL]. Denmark: Technical University of Denmark; 2002.
23.
go back to reference Sakata S, Ashida F, Tanaka H. Stabilization of parameter estimation for Kriging-based approximate with empirical semivariogram. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2010;199(25):1710–21.CrossRefMATH Sakata S, Ashida F, Tanaka H. Stabilization of parameter estimation for Kriging-based approximate with empirical semivariogram. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2010;199(25):1710–21.CrossRefMATH
24.
go back to reference Liu CL. Dynamic analysis and braking performance optimization of drum brake. Changchun: Jilin University; 2011. Liu CL. Dynamic analysis and braking performance optimization of drum brake. Changchun: Jilin University; 2011.
25.
go back to reference Srinivas N, Deb K. Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol Comput. 1994. Srinivas N, Deb K. Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol Comput. 1994.
26.
go back to reference Li HY, Ma MX, Jing YW. A new method based on LPP and NSGA-II for multiobjective robust collaborative optimization. J Mech Sci Technol. 2011;25(5):1071–9.CrossRef Li HY, Ma MX, Jing YW. A new method based on LPP and NSGA-II for multiobjective robust collaborative optimization. J Mech Sci Technol. 2011;25(5):1071–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wang JH, Yin ZY. Multi-objective optimization algorithm based on the combination of NSGA-II and MOPSO. J Comput Appl. 2007;27(11): 2817–21. Wang JH, Yin ZY. Multi-objective optimization algorithm based on the combination of NSGA-II and MOPSO. J Comput Appl. 2007;27(11): 2817–21.
28.
go back to reference Savani V, Rao RV, Vakharia DP. Optimal weight design of a gear train using particle swarm optimization and simulation and simulated annealing algorithms. Mech Mach Theory. 2010;45(3):531–41.CrossRefMATH Savani V, Rao RV, Vakharia DP. Optimal weight design of a gear train using particle swarm optimization and simulation and simulated annealing algorithms. Mech Mach Theory. 2010;45(3):531–41.CrossRefMATH
29.
go back to reference Reyes-Sierra M, Coello CAC. Multi-objective particle swarm optimizers: a survey of the sate-of-the-art. Int J Comput Intell Res. 2006;2(3):287–308.MathSciNet Reyes-Sierra M, Coello CAC. Multi-objective particle swarm optimizers: a survey of the sate-of-the-art. Int J Comput Intell Res. 2006;2(3):287–308.MathSciNet
30.
go back to reference Li F, Qin YM, Pang Z, et al. Design and optimization of PSD housing using a MIGA-NLPQL hybrid strategy based on a surrogate model. Strojniski vestink-J Mech Eng. 2014;60(7–8):525–35.CrossRef Li F, Qin YM, Pang Z, et al. Design and optimization of PSD housing using a MIGA-NLPQL hybrid strategy based on a surrogate model. Strojniski vestink-J Mech Eng. 2014;60(7–8):525–35.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wang JX, Shen WH, Wang Z, et al. Multi-objective optimization of drive gears for power split device using surrogate models. J Mech Sci Technol. 2014;28(6):2205–14.CrossRef Wang JX, Shen WH, Wang Z, et al. Multi-objective optimization of drive gears for power split device using surrogate models. J Mech Sci Technol. 2014;28(6):2205–14.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Chen B. Modeling, programming and solving strategies in multidisciplinary optimization design. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology; 2000. Chen B. Modeling, programming and solving strategies in multidisciplinary optimization design. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology; 2000.
Metadata
Title
Multi-objective Optimization for Differential-Based PSD Based on Surrogate Model
Authors
Xiaohua Zeng
Jixin Wang
Copyright Year
2018
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4272-0_9

Premium Partner