Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Business Ethics
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics 4/2018

11-01-2017 | Original Paper

Multinational Tax Avoidance: Virtue Ethics and the Role of Accountants

Author: Andrew West

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 4/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The techniques that some large multinational corporations use to reduce their tax liability have come under increasing public scrutiny in recent years, alongside governmental investigations and international commitments aimed at curbing opportunities for tax avoidance. Although discussion of tax avoidance activities, and their regulatory responses, is often conducted with reference to moral concepts (such as ‘fairness’), philosophical analysis of the ethics of multinational tax avoidance remains limited. In particular, the virtue ethics tradition that emphasises the agent (and his/her character) and the performance of specific roles has not been considered in detail. This paper examines how the contemporary virtue ethics of Alasdair MacIntyre can be applied to the issue of multinational tax avoidance, and considers the role that accountants play in these activities. It argues, firstly, that MacIntyre’s approach provides a more useful philosophical analysis of the issue (when compared to utilitarian and deontological approaches for example) and, secondly, that the main parties involved (MNC accountants and regulators) are likely to agree with the main tenets of this approach. The paper also contributes by reconceptualising, using MacIntyre’s scheme, the issue of tax avoidance in relation to Donald Cressey’s ‘fraud triangle’.
previous article We Have Never Been Secular: Religious Identities, Duties, and Ethics in Audit Practice
next article Developing Ethical Confidence: The Impact of Action-Oriented Ethics Instruction in an Accounting Curriculum

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
Reference is sometimes made to ‘egregious tax avoidance’ as being of particular interest. However, this is not adopted as the term ‘egregious’ itself suggests a value judgement. Instead, the approach adopted in this paper is to review the issue of tax avoidance from different moral perspectives, such that any moral judgements would be the result of this review, rather than being pre-supposed.
 
2
Note that this remains the case even if the MNC is itself considered to be a moral agent [French (1979, 1995), but see Velasquez (2003) for an alternative view]. However, in so far as it is possible to examine and evaluate the activities of human agents acting in specific roles within the MNC, this is considered preferable (in terms of allowing for a more specific and nuanced analysis) to examining the MNC as a collective.
 
3
Such as through various stakeholder engagement initiatives and processes; see Jeffery (2009) for examples.
 
4
See also Xu’s (2004) study that highlights the role of non-pecuniary motivations in starting new businesses.
 
5
One could argue, however, that there may be some circumstances in which accountants, even having accepted the goal of fair presentation, would be justified in ignoring the concept of substance over form—such as when doing so would result in less tax being paid to an oppressive government (apartheid South Africa, for example). However, as such a choice is made qua accountant, the onus would be on him/her to justify why the pursuit of fair presentation (substance over form) ought to be overridden.
 
Literature
Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2000). Globalization, tax competition, and the fiscal crisis of the welfare state. Harvard Law Review, 113(7), 1573–1676.CrossRef
Avi-Yonah, R. S., Clausing, K. A., & Durst, M. C. (2009). Allocating business profits for tax purposes: A proposal to adopt a formulary profit split. Florida Tax Review, 9(5), 497–554.
Bentham, J. (1907, orig. 1789). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Christians, A. (2014). Avoidance, evasion and taxpayer morality. Washington University Journal of Law Policy, 44, 39–60.
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1994). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: The social psychology of embezzlement. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Davis, N. (1993). Contemporary deontology. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 205–218). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Dollar, D. (2005). Globalization, poverty, and inequality since 1980. The World Bank Research Observer, 20(2), 145–175.CrossRef
Donegan, J. J., & Ganon, M. W. (2008). Strain, differential association, and coercion: Insights from the criminology literature on causes of accountant’s misconduct. Accounting and the Public Interest, 8, 1–20.CrossRef
Dorminey, J., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M.-J., & Riley, R. A., Jr. (2012). The evolution of fraud theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 555–579.CrossRef
Durst, M. C. (2014). Beyond BEPS: A tax policy agenda for developing countries. Brighton: International Centre for Tax and Development.
Eden, L. (1998). Taxing multinationals: Transfer pricing and corporate income taxation in North America. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRef
Eden, L. (2012). Transfer price manipulation. In P. Reuter (Ed.), Draining Development? Controlling flows of illicit funds from developing countries (pp. 205–233). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Eden, L., & Smith, L. M. (2011). The ethics of transfer pricing. Paper presented at the Accounting, Organizations and Society Workshop on ‘Fraud in Accounting, Organizations and Society’, London, UK, April 1–2, 2011.
Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (3rd ed., pp. 97–106). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Feser, E. (2000). Taxation, forced labor, and theft. Independent Review, 5(2), 219.
Francis, J. R. (1990). After virtue? Accounting as a moral and discursive practice. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 3(3), 5–17.CrossRef
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
French, P. (1979). The corporation as a moral person. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16(3), 207–215.
French, P. (1995). Corporate ethics. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970, p. 33.
Goodin, R. E. (1993). Utility and the good. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 241–248). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Hales, S. D. (2013). This is philosophy: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hansen, D. R., Crosser, R. L., & Laufer, D. (1992). Moral ethics v. tax ethics: The case of transfer pricing among multinational corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(9), 679–686.CrossRef
Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2001). The end of history for corporate law. Georgetown Law Journal, 89(2), 439–468.
Holmes, R. L. (2007). Basic moral philosophy (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., Rajan, M. V., Wynder, M., Maguire, W., & Tan, R. (2014). Cost accounting: A managerial emphasis (2nd ed.). Frenchs Forest: Pearson Australia.
House of Commons, Committee of Public Accounts. (2013). Tax avoidance—Google. London: House of Commons.
Hurst, C. E. (2016). Social inequality: Forms, causes and consequences (8th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRef
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland. (2012). A professional judgement framework for financial reporting. Edinburgh: Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
International Accounting Standards Board. (2015). Exposure draft ED/2015/3 conceptual framework for financial reporting. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute Task Force on Illicit Financial Flows, Poverty and Human Rights. (2013). Tax abuses, poverty and human rights. London: International Bar Association.
Jeffery, N. (2009). Stakeholder engagement: A road map to meaningful engagement. Cranfield: The Doughty Centre for Corporate Responsibility, Cranfield School of Management.
Kant, I. (2002, orig. 1785). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals, (A. W. Wood, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kassem, R., & Higson, A. (2012). The new fraud triangle model. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(3), 191–195.
Kukathas, C., & Pettit, P. (1990). Rawls: A theory of justice and its critics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Lanis, R., & McClure, R. (2015). Explainer: The difference between tax avoidance and evasion. The Conversation, April 15, 2015.
Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Leite, C. A. (2012). The role of transfer pricing in illicit financial flows. In P. Reuter (Ed.), Draining development? Controlling flows of illicit funds from developing countries (pp. 235–264). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Machan, T. R. (2012). Taxation: The ethics of its avoidance or dodging. In R. W. McGee (Ed.), The ethics of tax evasion: Perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 73–82). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef
MacIntyre, A. (1994). A partial response to my critics. In J. Horton & S. Mendus (Eds.), After MacIntyre: Critical perspectives on the work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Polity Press.
MacIntyre, A. (Ed.). (2002). Three perspectives on Marxism: 1953, 1968, 1995. In Ethics and politics: Collected essays. West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.
MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. (2008). What more needs to be said? A beginning, although only a beginning, at saying it. Analyse und Kritik, 30, 261–276.CrossRef
McGee, R. W. (2006). Three views on the ethics of tax evasion. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(1), 15–35.CrossRef
McGee, R. W. (2012a). The ethics of tax evasion: Perspectives in theory and practice. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef
McGee, R. W. (2012b). Four views on the ethics of tax evasion. In R. W. McGee (Ed.), The ethics of tax evasion: Perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef
McLaren, J. (2008). The distinction between tax avoidance and tax evasion has become blurred in Australia: Why has it happened? Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association, 3(2), 141–163.
McMechan, R. (2013). Economic substance and tax avoidance: An international perspective. Toronto: Carswell.
Mele, D. (2005). Exploring the principle of subsidiarity in organisational forms. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 293–305.CrossRef
Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. London: Parker, Son and Bourn.
Murphy, R. (2012). Accounting for the missing billions. In P. Reuter (Ed.), Draining development? Controlling flows of illicit funds from developing countries (pp. 265–307). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Oakley, J., & Cocking, D. (2001). Virtue ethics and professional roles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
OECD. (2013). Action plan on base erosion and profit shifting. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2015a). Aligning transfer pricing outcomes with value creation, Actions 8-10—2015 Final Reports. Paris: OECD.CrossRef
OECD. (2015b). Limiting base erosion involving interest deductions and other financial payments, Action 4—2015 Final Report. Paris: OECD.CrossRef
O’Neill, O. (1993). Kantian ethics. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 175–185). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Pagan, J. C., & Wilkie, J. S. (1993). Transfer pricing strategy in a global economy. Amsterdam: IBFD Publications.
Preston, N. (2007). Understanding ethics (3rd ed.). Annandale: Federation Press.
Raiborn, C. A., Massoud, M. F., & Payne, D. M. (2015). Tax avoidance: The good, the bad, and the future. Journal of Business and Management, 21(1), 77–94.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Reuter, P. (Ed.). (2012). Draining development? Controlling flows of illicit funds from developing countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Rugman, A. M., & Eden, L. (Eds.). (1985). Multinationals and transfer pricing. Beckenham: Croom Helm.
Sikka, P., & Willmott, H. (2010). The dark side of transfer pricing: Its role in tax avoidance and wealth retentiveness. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(4), 342–356.CrossRef
The Senate, Economic References Committee. (2015). Corporate tax avoidance. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Thorndike, J. (2015). Tax avoidance or tax evasion? There is a difference. Forbes, March 12, 2015.
Tricker, R. I. (1990). The corporate concept: Redesigning a successful system. Human Systems Management, 9(2), 65–76.
Van Parijs, P. (2002). Difference principles. In S. Freeman (Ed.), Cambridge companion to rawls (pp. 200–240). West Nyack, NJ: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Velasquez, M. (2003). Debunking corporate moral responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 531–562.CrossRef
Waterman, R. H. (1994). Frontiers of excellence. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
Williams, O. F. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: The role of business in sustainable development. Abingdon: Routledge.
Xu, H., & Ruef, M. (2004). The myth of the risk-tolerant entrepreneur. Strategic Organization, 2(4), 331–355.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multinational Tax Avoidance: Virtue Ethics and the Role of Accountants
Author
Andrew West
Publication date
11-01-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3428-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Journal of Business Ethics 4/2018 Go to the issue

Original Paper

We Have Never Been Secular: Religious Identities, Duties, and Ethics in Audit Practice

Original Paper

The Evolution of Business Groups’ Corporate Social Responsibility

Original Paper

Public Professional Accountability: A Conditional Approach

Editorial Essay

Business Groups and Corporate Responsibility for the Public Good

Original Paper

An Exploration of the State of Ethics in UK Accounting Education

Original Paper

Business Groups and Tax Havens