Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 2/2016

01-06-2016

Open business models in entrepreneurial stages: evidence from young Spanish firms during expansionary and recessionary periods

Authors: Henar Alcalde, Maribel Guerrero

Published in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal | Issue 2/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study examines the effect of open business models on the innovation performance of young firms during expansionary and recessionary periods. Founded on previous studies regarding innovation and business models, evidence shows that open business models developed by young firms will increase their innovation performance independently of economic conditions. Moreover, the theoretical effect of different types of collaborations (science-based, commercial, and diverse collaborations) adopted by young firms could differ during diverse economic periods. We tested this theoretical development using a Tobit analysis with firm level data collected from the Spanish Technological Innovation Panel (PITEC). The total number of observations corresponds to 318 young Spanish firms in 2005 (expansionary period) that remained active in 2011 (recessionary period). Our results indicate that in expansionary periods, young Spanish firms benefit from open business models oriented toward diverse types of cooperation (even though commercial collaboration harms innovation performance), whereas in recessionary periods, commercial and diverse technological collaborations encourage young Spanish firms to exploit innovation benefits.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
FECYT is the Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology (http://​www.​fecyt.​es) and Cotec is a Foundation for Technological Innovation (http://​www.​cotec.​es/​).
 
2
According to the Central Business Register (CBR) provided by the Spanish Institute of Statistics (INE), 374094 new businesses were registered in Spain during 2004. More concretely, by legal condition, 156,224 were associated with new firms and 213,640 with self-employment. In this sense, if the population size is 156,224 new Spanish firms with a confidence level of 95 % and a margin of error of 5 %, an estimated recommended sample size will be 384 new Spanish firms. Therefore, our sample of 318 new young firms is representative of the total population at a confidence level of 95 % and a margin of error of 5.49 %. In addition, based on a sample size of 2,000 surveys administered to the Spanish adult population (18–64 years old), the total entrepreneurial activity (TEA) estimated in 2004 by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) was 5 % (approximately 100 working age adults involved in starting or running a business under 42 months old). Based on these arguments, our sample is representative for Spanish young firms.
 
Literature
go back to reference Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 197–220.CrossRef Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 197–220.CrossRef
go back to reference Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey. Technovation, 25(3), 245–259.CrossRef Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey. Technovation, 25(3), 245–259.CrossRef
go back to reference Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 493–520.CrossRef Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 493–520.CrossRef
go back to reference Barroso, A., & Giarratana, M. S. (2013). Product proliferation strategies and firm performance: the moderating role of product space complexity. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1435–1452.CrossRef Barroso, A., & Giarratana, M. S. (2013). Product proliferation strategies and firm performance: the moderating role of product space complexity. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1435–1452.CrossRef
go back to reference Basalla, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Basalla, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
go back to reference Bayona, C., García-Marco, T., & Huerta, E. (2001). Firms’ motivations for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy, 30, 1289–1307.CrossRef Bayona, C., García-Marco, T., & Huerta, E. (2001). Firms’ motivations for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy, 30, 1289–1307.CrossRef
go back to reference Bayona, C., Garcia-Marco, T., & Huerta, E. (2003). Cooperar en I + D? Con quién y para qué. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 31(11), 103–134. Bayona, C., Garcia-Marco, T., & Huerta, E. (2003). Cooperar en I + D? Con quién y para qué. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 31(11), 103–134.
go back to reference Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209–223.CrossRef Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209–223.CrossRef
go back to reference Beers, C., & Zand, F. (2014). R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: an empirical analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 292–312.CrossRef Beers, C., & Zand, F. (2014). R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: an empirical analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 292–312.CrossRef
go back to reference Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004a). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33(10), 1477–1492.CrossRef Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004a). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33(10), 1477–1492.CrossRef
go back to reference Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004b). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(8), 1237–1263.CrossRef Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004b). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(8), 1237–1263.CrossRef
go back to reference Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.CrossRef Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.CrossRef
go back to reference Boschma, R., & Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85, 289–311.CrossRef Boschma, R., & Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85, 289–311.CrossRef
go back to reference Capelleras, J. L., & Greene, F. J. (2008). The determinants and growth implications of venture creation speed. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20(4), 317–343.CrossRef Capelleras, J. L., & Greene, F. J. (2008). The determinants and growth implications of venture creation speed. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20(4), 317–343.CrossRef
go back to reference Capelleras, J. L., Mole, K. F., Greene, F. J., & Storey, D. J. (2008). Do more heavily regulated economies have poorer performing new ventures? Evidence from Britain and Spain. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 688–704.CrossRef Capelleras, J. L., Mole, K. F., Greene, F. J., & Storey, D. J. (2008). Do more heavily regulated economies have poorer performing new ventures? Evidence from Britain and Spain. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 688–704.CrossRef
go back to reference Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium. The American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169–1184.CrossRef Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium. The American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169–1184.CrossRef
go back to reference Cesaroni, F. (2004). Technological outsourcing and product diversification: do markets for technology affect firms’ strategies? Research Policy, 33(10), 1547–1564.CrossRef Cesaroni, F. (2004). Technological outsourcing and product diversification: do markets for technology affect firms’ strategies? Research Policy, 33(10), 1547–1564.CrossRef
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Watertown: Harvard Business School Press. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Watertown: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43, 354–363.CrossRef Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43, 354–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. (2012). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 21–28. Chesbrough, H. (2012). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 21–28.
go back to reference Chung, J. W., Bae, Z. T., & Kim, J. S. (2003). Changing patterns of technological cooperation activities of innovative small firms along technological development stages in the Korean telecommunication sector. Technovation, 23(2), 163–173.CrossRef Chung, J. W., Bae, Z. T., & Kim, J. S. (2003). Changing patterns of technological cooperation activities of innovative small firms along technological development stages in the Korean telecommunication sector. Technovation, 23(2), 163–173.CrossRef
go back to reference Churchill, N. C., & Lewis, V. L. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30–50. Churchill, N. C., & Lewis, V. L. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30–50.
go back to reference Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128–152. Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128–152.
go back to reference Drejer, A. (2000). Organisational learning and competence development. Learning Organization, 7(4), 206–220.CrossRef Drejer, A. (2000). Organisational learning and competence development. Learning Organization, 7(4), 206–220.CrossRef
go back to reference Drejer, I., & Jørgensen, B. H. (2005). The dynamic creation of knowledge: analysing public–private collaborations. Technovation, 25(2), 83–94.CrossRef Drejer, I., & Jørgensen, B. H. (2005). The dynamic creation of knowledge: analysing public–private collaborations. Technovation, 25(2), 83–94.CrossRef
go back to reference Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39, 311–316.CrossRef Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39, 311–316.CrossRef
go back to reference Fernandes, C., Ferreira, J., & Raposo, M. (2013). Drivers to firm innovation and their effects on performance: an international comparison. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9, 557–580.CrossRef Fernandes, C., Ferreira, J., & Raposo, M. (2013). Drivers to firm innovation and their effects on performance: an international comparison. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9, 557–580.CrossRef
go back to reference Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 42(1), 128–138.CrossRef Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 42(1), 128–138.CrossRef
go back to reference Frenz, M., & Ietto-Gillies, G. (2009). The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: evidence from the UK community innovation survey. Research Policy, 38(7), 1125–1135.CrossRef Frenz, M., & Ietto-Gillies, G. (2009). The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: evidence from the UK community innovation survey. Research Policy, 38(7), 1125–1135.CrossRef
go back to reference Fritsch, M., & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30(2), 297–312.CrossRef Fritsch, M., & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30(2), 297–312.CrossRef
go back to reference Fundación para la Innovación Tecnológica (1999). Informes sobre el sistema español de innovación: relaciones de la empresa con el sistema público de I+D. Madrid: Fundación COTEC. Fundación para la Innovación Tecnológica (1999). Informes sobre el sistema español de innovación: relaciones de la empresa con el sistema público de I+D. Madrid: Fundación COTEC.
go back to reference Galende, J., & de la Fuente, J. M. (2003). Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour. Research Policy, 32(5), 715–736.CrossRef Galende, J., & de la Fuente, J. M. (2003). Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour. Research Policy, 32(5), 715–736.CrossRef
go back to reference Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40, 213–221.CrossRef Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40, 213–221.CrossRef
go back to reference George, G., & Bock, A. J. (2011). The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(1), 83–111. George, G., & Bock, A. J. (2011). The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(1), 83–111.
go back to reference Gooding, R. Z., & Wagner III, J. A. (1985). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between size and performance: The productivity and efficiency of organizations and their subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 462–481. Gooding, R. Z., & Wagner III, J. A. (1985). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between size and performance: The productivity and efficiency of organizations and their subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 462–481.
go back to reference Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
go back to reference Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectorial differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371–385.CrossRef Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectorial differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371–385.CrossRef
go back to reference Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). National culture and entrepreneurship: a review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 26, 33–52. Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). National culture and entrepreneurship: a review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 26, 33–52.
go back to reference Hennart, J.-F. (1988). A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 361–374.CrossRef Hennart, J.-F. (1988). A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 361–374.CrossRef
go back to reference Herskovits, R., Grijalbo, M., & Tafur, J. (2013). Understanding the main drivers of value creation in an open innovation program. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. doi:10.1007/s11365-013-0267-2. Herskovits, R., Grijalbo, M., & Tafur, J. (2013). Understanding the main drivers of value creation in an open innovation program. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. doi:10.​1007/​s11365-013-0267-2.
go back to reference Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2011). Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2–9.CrossRef Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2011). Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2–9.CrossRef
go back to reference INE. (2012). Spanish national statistics. Madrid: INE. INE. (2012). Spanish national statistics. Madrid: INE.
go back to reference INNO-Grips. (2011). Policies in support of high-growth innovative SMEs- INNO-grips policy. Bonn: Empirica Communication and Technology Research. INNO-Grips. (2011). Policies in support of high-growth innovative SMEs- INNO-grips policy. Bonn: Empirica Communication and Technology Research.
go back to reference Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 33(1), 19–46. Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 33(1), 19–46.
go back to reference Kazanjian, R. K., & Drazin, R. (1989). An empirical test of a stage of growth progression model. Management Science, 35, 1489–1503.CrossRef Kazanjian, R. K., & Drazin, R. (1989). An empirical test of a stage of growth progression model. Management Science, 35, 1489–1503.CrossRef
go back to reference Koen, P. A., Bertels, H. M., & Elsum, I. R. (2011). The three faces of business model innovation: challenges for established firms. Research-Technology Management, 54(3), 52–59.CrossRef Koen, P. A., Bertels, H. M., & Elsum, I. R. (2011). The three faces of business model innovation: challenges for established firms. Research-Technology Management, 54(3), 52–59.CrossRef
go back to reference Kogut, B. (1988). Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 319–332.CrossRef Kogut, B. (1988). Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 319–332.CrossRef
go back to reference Landström, H., Åström, F., & Harirchi, G. (2013). Innovation and entrepreneurship studies: one or two fields of research? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. doi:10.1007/s11365-013-0282-3. Landström, H., Åström, F., & Harirchi, G. (2013). Innovation and entrepreneurship studies: one or two fields of research? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. doi:10.​1007/​s11365-013-0282-3.
go back to reference Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.CrossRef Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.CrossRef
go back to reference Lundvall, B. A. (1992). User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalisation. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (pp. 45–67). London: Pinter Publishers. Lundvall, B. A. (1992). User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalisation. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (pp. 45–67). London: Pinter Publishers.
go back to reference Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2002). The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and planning A, 34(3), 429–450.CrossRef Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2002). The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and planning A, 34(3), 429–450.CrossRef
go back to reference Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481–1499.CrossRef Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481–1499.CrossRef
go back to reference Mishkin, F. S. (2006). The next great globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Mishkin, F. S. (2006). The next great globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Nanda, R. & Rhodes-Kropf, M. (2012) Investment cycles and startup innovation. Available at SSRN 2024401. Nanda, R. & Rhodes-Kropf, M. (2012) Investment cycles and startup innovation. Available at SSRN 2024401.
go back to reference Nieto, M. J., & Santamaria, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6), 367–377.CrossRef Nieto, M. J., & Santamaria, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6), 367–377.CrossRef
go back to reference OECD. (2005). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris: OECD. OECD. (2005). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris: OECD.
go back to reference Ouyang, M. (2011). Cyclical persistence and the cyclicality of R&D (No. 101104). Irvine: University of California Irvine. Ouyang, M. (2011). Cyclical persistence and the cyclicality of R&D (No. 101104). Irvine: University of California Irvine.
go back to reference Parker, S. C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Parker, S. C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Parker, S. (2011a). Intrapreneurship or entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 19–34.CrossRef Parker, S. (2011a). Intrapreneurship or entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 19–34.CrossRef
go back to reference Parker, S. (2011b). Recession, business cycles and entrepreneurship. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. Parker, S. (2011b). Recession, business cycles and entrepreneurship. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
go back to reference Perlow, L. A., Okhuysen, G. A., & Repenning, N. P. (2002). The speed trap: exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 931–955.CrossRef Perlow, L. A., Okhuysen, G. A., & Repenning, N. P. (2002). The speed trap: exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 931–955.CrossRef
go back to reference Pisano, G. P. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 153–176.CrossRef Pisano, G. P. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 153–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Romijn, H., & Albaladejo, M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy, 31(7), 1053–1067.CrossRef Romijn, H., & Albaladejo, M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy, 31(7), 1053–1067.CrossRef
go back to reference Spencer, J. W. (2003). Firms’ knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 217–233.CrossRef Spencer, J. W. (2003). Firms’ knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 217–233.CrossRef
go back to reference Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Sridhar, S. (2011). Should firms spend more on research and development and advertising during recessions? Journal of Marketing, 75(3), 49–65.CrossRef Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Sridhar, S. (2011). Should firms spend more on research and development and advertising during recessions? Journal of Marketing, 75(3), 49–65.CrossRef
go back to reference Suárez, F. F., & Oliva, R. (2005). Environmental change and organizational transformation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 1017–1041.CrossRef Suárez, F. F., & Oliva, R. (2005). Environmental change and organizational transformation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 1017–1041.CrossRef
go back to reference Teece, D. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43, 172–194.CrossRef Teece, D. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43, 172–194.CrossRef
go back to reference Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967.CrossRef Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967.CrossRef
go back to reference Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2009). External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: an analysis based on the Taiwanese technological innovation survey. Research Policy, 38(3), 518–526.CrossRef Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2009). External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: an analysis based on the Taiwanese technological innovation survey. Research Policy, 38(3), 518–526.CrossRef
go back to reference Venkataraman, S. (1997) The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor’s perspective. In J. Katz and R. Brockhaus (Eds.). Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, vol. 3:119–138. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Venkataraman, S. (1997) The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor’s perspective. In J. Katz and R. Brockhaus (Eds.). Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, vol. 3:119–138. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
go back to reference Wadhwa, A., Freitas, I. M. B., & Sarkar, M. B. (2011, April). The paradox of being open: External technology sourcing and knowledge protection. In Paper presented at the DIME Final Conference (Vol. 6, p. 8). Wadhwa, A., Freitas, I. M. B., & Sarkar, M. B. (2011, April). The paradox of being open: External technology sourcing and knowledge protection. In Paper presented at the DIME Final Conference (Vol. 6, p. 8).
go back to reference Wasti, S. N., & Liker, J. K. (1999). Collaborating with suppliers in product development: a US–Japan comparative study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46, 444–460.CrossRef Wasti, S. N., & Liker, J. K. (1999). Collaborating with suppliers in product development: a US–Japan comparative study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46, 444–460.CrossRef
go back to reference Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13, 27–55.CrossRef Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13, 27–55.CrossRef
go back to reference Westhead, P. (1995). Survival and employment growth contrasts between types of owner-managed high-technology firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 20, 5–27. Westhead, P. (1995). Survival and employment growth contrasts between types of owner-managed high-technology firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 20, 5–27.
go back to reference Williamson, O. E. (1989). Transaction cost economics. Handbook of industrial organization, 1, 135–182.CrossRef Williamson, O. E. (1989). Transaction cost economics. Handbook of industrial organization, 1, 135–182.CrossRef
go back to reference Yamin, M., & Otto, J. (2004). Patterns of knowledge flows and MNE innovative performance. Journal of International Management, 10, 239–258.CrossRef Yamin, M., & Otto, J. (2004). Patterns of knowledge flows and MNE innovative performance. Journal of International Management, 10, 239–258.CrossRef
go back to reference Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2–22.CrossRef Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2–22.CrossRef
go back to reference Zheng, Y., Liu, J., & George, G. (2010). The dynamic impact of innovative capability and inter-firm network on firm valuation: a longitudinal study of biotechnology start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 593–609.CrossRef Zheng, Y., Liu, J., & George, G. (2010). The dynamic impact of innovative capability and inter-firm network on firm valuation: a longitudinal study of biotechnology start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 593–609.CrossRef
go back to reference Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), 181–199.CrossRef Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), 181–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.CrossRef Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Open business models in entrepreneurial stages: evidence from young Spanish firms during expansionary and recessionary periods
Authors
Henar Alcalde
Maribel Guerrero
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1554-7191
Electronic ISSN: 1555-1938
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0348-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 2/2016 Go to the issue

Premium Partner