Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Metabolic Pathways as Temporal Logic Programs Read chapter Read first chapter

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Opposition Frameworks

Authors : Cosmina Croitoru, Kurt Mehlhorn

Published in: Logics in Artificial Intelligence

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper we introduce opposition frameworks, a generalization of Dung’s argumentation frameworks.
While keeping the attack relation as the sole type of interaction between nodes and the abstract level of argumentation frameworks, opposition networks add more flexibility, reducing the gap between structured and abstract argumentation. A guarded attack calculus is developed in order to obtain proper generalizations of Dung’s admissibility-based semantics. The high modeling capabilities of our new setting offer an alternative instantiation solution (of other existing argumentation frameworks) for arguments evaluation.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Introducing Role Defeasibility in Description Logics
next chapter Prompt Interval Temporal Logic
Footnotes
Literature
1.
2.
Baroni, P., Romano, M., Toni, F., Aurisicchio, M., Bertanza, G.: Automatic evaluation of design alternatives with quantitative argumentation. Argum. Comput. 6, 24–49 (2015)CrossRefMATH
3.
Bench-Capon, T.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Logic Comput. 13, 429–448 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
4.
Besnard, P., Doutre, S.: Checking the acceptability of a set of arguments. In: Proceedings of NMR, pp. 59–64 (2004)
5.
Bourguet, J.-R., Amgoud, L., Thomopoulos, R.: Towards a unified model of preference-based argumentation. In: Link, S., Prade, H. (eds.) FoIKS 2010. LNCS, vol. 5956, pp. 326–344. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-11829-6_​21 CrossRef
6.
7.
Brewka, G., Polberg, S., Woltran, S.: Generalizations of dung frameworks and their role in formal argumentation. IEEE Intell. Syst. 29, 30 (2014)
8.
Brewka, G., Woltran, S.: Abstract dialectical frameworks. In: Proceedings of KR 2010, pp. 102–111 (2010)
9.
Brewka, G., Woltran, S.: GRAPPA: a semantical framework for graph-based argument processing. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2014, pp. 153–158 (2014)
10.
Brochenin, R., Linsbichler, B., Wallner, J.P., Woltran, S.: Abstract solvers for dung’s argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of TAFA (2015)
11.
12.
Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Marquis, P.: Symmetric argumentation frameworks. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 317–328. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.​1007/​11518655_​28 CrossRef
13.
14.
Dimopoulos, Y., Torres, A.: Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories. Theor. Comput. Sci. 170, 209–244 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
15.
Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77, 321–357 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
16.
17.
Dunne, P.E., Hunter, A., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M.: Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results. Artif. Intell. 175, 457–486 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
18.
Finegan-Dollak, C., Radev, D.R.: Sentence simplification, compression, and disaggregation for summarization of sophisticated documents. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67, 2437 (2015)CrossRef
19.
Hunter, A., Gorogiannis, N.: Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties. Artif. Intell. 175, 1479–1497 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
20.
Leite, J., Martins, J.: Social abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of IJCAI (2011)
21.
22.
Modgil, S., Caminada, M.: Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Simari, G., Rahwan, I. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 105–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.​1007/​978-0-387-98197-0_​6 CrossRef
23.
Nielson, S., Parsons, S.: A generalization of dung’s abstract framework for argumentation: arguing with sets of attacking arguments. In: Proceedings of ArgMAS 2006, pp. 54–73 (2006)
24.
Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Tinelli, C.: Solving SAT and SAT modulo theories: from an abstract Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland procedure to DPLL(T). J. ACM 53, 937–977 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
25.
Nofal, S., Atkinson, K., Dunne, P.: Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics. Artif. Intell. 207, 23–51 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
26.
Prakken, H.: An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argum. Comput. 1, 93–124 (2010)CrossRef
27.
Rahwan, I., Zablith, F., Reed, C.: Laying the foundations for a world wide argument web. Artif. Intell. 171, 897–921 (2007)CrossRef
28.
Villata, S., Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Attack semantics for abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2011, pp. 406–413 (2011)
29.
Wang, B., Luo, G.: Extend argumentation frameworks based on degree of attack. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics, ICCI 2010, pp. 771–776 (2010)
Metadata
Title
Opposition Frameworks
Authors
Cosmina Croitoru
Kurt Mehlhorn
Copyright Year
2016
Book
Logics in Artificial Intelligence

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48757-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-48758-8

Copyright Year: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48758-8_13

Premium Partner

    Image Credits