Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 1/2019

01-12-2019 | Short Communication

Optimization of Geotechnical parameters using Taguchi’s design of experiment (DOE), RSM and desirability function

Authors: Brahim Lafifi, Ammar Rouaiguia, Nassira Boumazza

Published in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions | Issue 1/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The use of finite element analyses in the design of geotechnical problems is mainly related to the choice of mechanical characteristics (parameters) of soil. Therefore, the optimization of these parameters is considered as the most important step in geotechnics. The main objective of this work is to identify the mechanical parameters based on Mohr–Coulomb model, by conducting pressuremeter tests on synthetic clayey soil, using Taguchi’s experimental design method. The Taguchi L16 orthogonal array is widely adopted as a modeling support for the simulation of the pressuremeter test, using the finite element software Plaxis. Then, a statistical treatment of the obtained results is carried out based on the concept of the analysis of variance and the development of a mathematical model based on the response surface methodology, in order to identify the significant factors of the model and their interactions. Finally, the optimal values of factors might be chosen using result analysis of Taguchi’s experimental design method, combined with the desirability function approach. This study has shown that the proposed approach is an efficient and effective tool for the identification of soil parameters.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Xiang Z, Swoboda G, Cen Z (2002) Identification of damage parameters for jointed rock. Comput Struct 80:1429–1440CrossRef Xiang Z, Swoboda G, Cen Z (2002) Identification of damage parameters for jointed rock. Comput Struct 80:1429–1440CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gioda G, Maier G (1980) Direct search solution of an inverse problem in elastoplasticity: identification of cohesion, friction angle and in situ stress by pressure tunnel tests. Int J Numer Methods Eng 15:1823–1848CrossRef Gioda G, Maier G (1980) Direct search solution of an inverse problem in elastoplasticity: identification of cohesion, friction angle and in situ stress by pressure tunnel tests. Int J Numer Methods Eng 15:1823–1848CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cividini A, Jurina L, Gioda G (1981) Some aspects of characterization problems in geomechanics. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 18:487–503CrossRef Cividini A, Jurina L, Gioda G (1981) Some aspects of characterization problems in geomechanics. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 18:487–503CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sakurai S, Takeuchi K (1983) Back analysis of measured displacements of tunnels. Rock Mech Rock Eng 16:173–180CrossRef Sakurai S, Takeuchi K (1983) Back analysis of measured displacements of tunnels. Rock Mech Rock Eng 16:173–180CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Anandarajah A, Agarwal D (1991) Computer-aided calibration of soil plasticity model. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 15:835–856CrossRef Anandarajah A, Agarwal D (1991) Computer-aided calibration of soil plasticity model. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 15:835–856CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pal S, Wathugala GW, Kundu S (1996) Calibration of constitutive model using genetic algorithms. Comput Geotech 19(4):325–348CrossRef Pal S, Wathugala GW, Kundu S (1996) Calibration of constitutive model using genetic algorithms. Comput Geotech 19(4):325–348CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zentar R, Hicher PY, Moulin G (2001) Identification of soil parameters by inverse analysis. Comput Geotech 28:129–144CrossRef Zentar R, Hicher PY, Moulin G (2001) Identification of soil parameters by inverse analysis. Comput Geotech 28:129–144CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Samarajiva P, Macari EJ, Wathugala W (2005) Genetic algorithms for the calibration of constitutive models of soils. Int J Geomech 5(3):206–217CrossRef Samarajiva P, Macari EJ, Wathugala W (2005) Genetic algorithms for the calibration of constitutive models of soils. Int J Geomech 5(3):206–217CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ou CY, Tang YG (1994) Soil parameter determination for deep excavation analysis by optimization. J Chin Inst Eng 17(5):671–688CrossRef Ou CY, Tang YG (1994) Soil parameter determination for deep excavation analysis by optimization. J Chin Inst Eng 17(5):671–688CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Calvello M, Finno RJ (2004) Selecting parameters to optimize in model calibration by inverse analysis. Comput Geotech 31(5):411–425CrossRef Calvello M, Finno RJ (2004) Selecting parameters to optimize in model calibration by inverse analysis. Comput Geotech 31(5):411–425CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Finno RJ, Calvello M (2005) Supported excavations: observational method and inverse modeling. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(7):826–836CrossRef Finno RJ, Calvello M (2005) Supported excavations: observational method and inverse modeling. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(7):826–836CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Levasseur S, Malécot Y, Boulon M, Flavigny E (2008) Soil parameter identification using a genetic algorithm. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32:189–213CrossRef Levasseur S, Malécot Y, Boulon M, Flavigny E (2008) Soil parameter identification using a genetic algorithm. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32:189–213CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sakurai S, Takeuchi K (1983) Back analysis of measured displacements of tunnels. Rock Mech Rock Eng 16:173–180CrossRef Sakurai S, Takeuchi K (1983) Back analysis of measured displacements of tunnels. Rock Mech Rock Eng 16:173–180CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ledesma A, Gens A, Alonso EE (1996) Estimation of parameters in geotechnical backanalysis. I—maximum likelihood approach. Comput Geotech 18(1):1–27CrossRef Ledesma A, Gens A, Alonso EE (1996) Estimation of parameters in geotechnical backanalysis. I—maximum likelihood approach. Comput Geotech 18(1):1–27CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gens A, Ledesma A, Alonso EE (1996) Estimation of parameters in geotechnical backanalysis. 2: application to a tunnel excavation problem. Comput Geotech 18(1):29–46CrossRef Gens A, Ledesma A, Alonso EE (1996) Estimation of parameters in geotechnical backanalysis. 2: application to a tunnel excavation problem. Comput Geotech 18(1):29–46CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gioda G, Locatelli L (1999) Back analysis of the measurements performed during the excavation of a shallow tunnel in sand. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 23:1407–1425CrossRef Gioda G, Locatelli L (1999) Back analysis of the measurements performed during the excavation of a shallow tunnel in sand. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 23:1407–1425CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lecampion B, Constantinescu A, Nguyen Minh D (2002) Parameter identification for lined tunnels in viscoplastic medium. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 26(1):191–211 Lecampion B, Constantinescu A, Nguyen Minh D (2002) Parameter identification for lined tunnels in viscoplastic medium. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 26(1):191–211
18.
go back to reference Lecampion B, Contantinescu A (2005) Sensitivity analysis for parameter identification in quasi-static poroelasticity. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 29:163–185CrossRef Lecampion B, Contantinescu A (2005) Sensitivity analysis for parameter identification in quasi-static poroelasticity. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 29:163–185CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Levasseur S, Malecot Y, Boulon M, Flavigny E (2008) Soil parameter identification using a genetic algorithm. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32(2):189–213CrossRef Levasseur S, Malecot Y, Boulon M, Flavigny E (2008) Soil parameter identification using a genetic algorithm. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32(2):189–213CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fisher RA (1935) The design of experiments. Oliver and Rod, London Fisher RA (1935) The design of experiments. Oliver and Rod, London
21.
go back to reference Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experimenters. Wiley, New York Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experimenters. Wiley, New York
22.
go back to reference Taguchi G (1987) System of experimental design. Unipub/Kraus International Publication, Dearborn Taguchi G (1987) System of experimental design. Unipub/Kraus International Publication, Dearborn
23.
go back to reference Roy RK (1990) A primer on the Taguchi method. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York Roy RK (1990) A primer on the Taguchi method. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
24.
go back to reference Taguchi G, Konishi S (1987) Taguchi methods: orthogonal arrays and linear graphs-tools for quality engineering. American Supplier Institute, Center for Taguchi Methods, New York Taguchi G, Konishi S (1987) Taguchi methods: orthogonal arrays and linear graphs-tools for quality engineering. American Supplier Institute, Center for Taguchi Methods, New York
25.
go back to reference Rao RS, Kumar CG, Prakasham RS, Hobbs PJ (2008) The Taguchi methodology as a statistical tool for biotechnological applications: a critical appraisal. Biotechnol J 3:510–523CrossRef Rao RS, Kumar CG, Prakasham RS, Hobbs PJ (2008) The Taguchi methodology as a statistical tool for biotechnological applications: a critical appraisal. Biotechnol J 3:510–523CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kolivand F, Rahmannejad R (2018) Estimation of geotechnical parameters using Taguchi’s design of experiment (DOE) and back analysis methods based on field measurement data. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77:1763–1779CrossRef Kolivand F, Rahmannejad R (2018) Estimation of geotechnical parameters using Taguchi’s design of experiment (DOE) and back analysis methods based on field measurement data. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77:1763–1779CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Patil AN, Kadlag VL (2016) Blanking process optimization using finite element analysis and Taguchi method. Int J Sci Technol Eng 2(12):553–562 Patil AN, Kadlag VL (2016) Blanking process optimization using finite element analysis and Taguchi method. Int J Sci Technol Eng 2(12):553–562
28.
go back to reference Yazdani M, Darbayari A, Farshi A, Talatahari S (2013) Application of Taguchi method and Genetic algorithm for calibration of soil constitutive models. J Appl Math 2013(4):1–11 Yazdani M, Darbayari A, Farshi A, Talatahari S (2013) Application of Taguchi method and Genetic algorithm for calibration of soil constitutive models. J Appl Math 2013(4):1–11
29.
go back to reference Al Hussein M (2001) Etude du comportement différé des sols et des ouvrages géotechniques. Thèse de doctorat, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France Al Hussein M (2001) Etude du comportement différé des sols et des ouvrages géotechniques. Thèse de doctorat, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France
30.
go back to reference Yin Z, Jin Y, Shen J, Hicher P (2018) Optimization techniques for identifying soil parameters in geotechnical engineering: comparative study and enhancement. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 42(1):70–94CrossRef Yin Z, Jin Y, Shen J, Hicher P (2018) Optimization techniques for identifying soil parameters in geotechnical engineering: comparative study and enhancement. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 42(1):70–94CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Singh H (2012) Taguchi optimization of process parameters: a review and case study. Int J Adv Eng Res Stud 1:39–41 Singh H (2012) Taguchi optimization of process parameters: a review and case study. Int J Adv Eng Res Stud 1:39–41
32.
go back to reference Bouzid L, Boutabba S, Yallese MA, Belhadi S (2012) François Girardin. Simultaneous optimization of surface roughness and material removal rate for turning of X20Cr13 stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:879–891CrossRef Bouzid L, Boutabba S, Yallese MA, Belhadi S (2012) François Girardin. Simultaneous optimization of surface roughness and material removal rate for turning of X20Cr13 stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:879–891CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Chabbi A, Yallese MA, Meddour I (2017) Predictive modeling and multi-response optimization of technological parameters in turning of polyoxymethylene polymer (POM C) using RSM and desirability function. Measurement 95:99–115CrossRef Chabbi A, Yallese MA, Meddour I (2017) Predictive modeling and multi-response optimization of technological parameters in turning of polyoxymethylene polymer (POM C) using RSM and desirability function. Measurement 95:99–115CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Meddour I, Yallese MA, Khattabi R, Elbah M, Boulanouar L (2014) Investigation and modeling of cutting forces and surface roughness when hard turning of AISI 52100 steel with mixed ceramic tool: cutting condition optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:1387–1399CrossRef Meddour I, Yallese MA, Khattabi R, Elbah M, Boulanouar L (2014) Investigation and modeling of cutting forces and surface roughness when hard turning of AISI 52100 steel with mixed ceramic tool: cutting condition optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:1387–1399CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Pourjafar S, Jahanshahi M, Rahimpour A (2013) Optimization of TiO2 modified poly(vinyl alcohol) thin film composite nanofiltration membranes using Taguchi method. Desalination 315:107–114CrossRef Pourjafar S, Jahanshahi M, Rahimpour A (2013) Optimization of TiO2 modified poly(vinyl alcohol) thin film composite nanofiltration membranes using Taguchi method. Desalination 315:107–114CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Roy RK (2010) A primer on the Taguchi Method, 2nd edn. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn Roy RK (2010) A primer on the Taguchi Method, 2nd edn. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn
37.
go back to reference Sadrzadeh M, Mohammadi T (2008) Sea water desalination using electrodialysis. Desalination 221(1–3):440–447CrossRef Sadrzadeh M, Mohammadi T (2008) Sea water desalination using electrodialysis. Desalination 221(1–3):440–447CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Idris A, Ismail AF, Noordin M, Shilton SJ (2002) Optimization of cellulose acetate hollow fiber reverse osmosis membrane production using Taguchi method. J Memb Sci 205(1):223–237CrossRef Idris A, Ismail AF, Noordin M, Shilton SJ (2002) Optimization of cellulose acetate hollow fiber reverse osmosis membrane production using Taguchi method. J Memb Sci 205(1):223–237CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Barua MK, Rao JS (2010) Measurement surface roughness through RSM: effect of coated carbide tool on 6061-t4 aluminum. Int J Enterp Netw Manag (IJENM) 4(2):136–153 Barua MK, Rao JS (2010) Measurement surface roughness through RSM: effect of coated carbide tool on 6061-t4 aluminum. Int J Enterp Netw Manag (IJENM) 4(2):136–153
40.
go back to reference Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219CrossRef Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Bouzid L, Berkani S, Yallese MA, Girardin F, Mabrouki T (2018) Estimation and optimization of flank wear and tool lifespan in finish turning of AISI 304 stainless steel using desirability function approach. Int J Ind Eng Comput 9:349–368 Bouzid L, Berkani S, Yallese MA, Girardin F, Mabrouki T (2018) Estimation and optimization of flank wear and tool lifespan in finish turning of AISI 304 stainless steel using desirability function approach. Int J Ind Eng Comput 9:349–368
42.
go back to reference Sahoo AK, Mishra PC (2014) A response surface methodology and desirability approach for predictive modeling and optimization of cutting temperature in machining hardened steel. Int J Ind Eng Comput 5(3):407–416 Sahoo AK, Mishra PC (2014) A response surface methodology and desirability approach for predictive modeling and optimization of cutting temperature in machining hardened steel. Int J Ind Eng Comput 5(3):407–416
43.
go back to reference Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM (2016) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, New York Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM (2016) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, New York
44.
go back to reference Tebassi H, Yallese MA, Belhadi S, Girardin F, Mabrouki T (2017) Quality-productivity decision making when turning of Inconel 718 aerospace alloy: a response surface methodology approach. Int J Ind Eng Comput 8:347–362 Tebassi H, Yallese MA, Belhadi S, Girardin F, Mabrouki T (2017) Quality-productivity decision making when turning of Inconel 718 aerospace alloy: a response surface methodology approach. Int J Ind Eng Comput 8:347–362
45.
go back to reference Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
46.
go back to reference Hessainia Z, Belbah A, Yallese MA, Mabrouki T, Rigal JF (2013) On the prediction of surface roughness in the hard turning based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations. Measurement 46(5):1671–1681CrossRef Hessainia Z, Belbah A, Yallese MA, Mabrouki T, Rigal JF (2013) On the prediction of surface roughness in the hard turning based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations. Measurement 46(5):1671–1681CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Optimization of Geotechnical parameters using Taguchi’s design of experiment (DOE), RSM and desirability function
Authors
Brahim Lafifi
Ammar Rouaiguia
Nassira Boumazza
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 2364-4176
Electronic ISSN: 2364-4184
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-019-0218-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 1/2019 Go to the issue