Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics 1/2017

07-08-2015

Organizational Citizenship Behaviors of Directors: An Integrated Framework of Director Role-Identity and Boardroom Structure

Authors: Toru Yoshikawa, Helen Wei Hu

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 1/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

While directors’ task boundaries are usually ambiguous, some of their activities or behaviors clearly constitute their formal duties, whereas others are usually perceived as organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Applying identity theory, we present a theoretical model that demonstrates one of the key drivers for directors to engage in OCB with a focus on their role identity. We argue that an individual director’s role identity is one of the key factors that motivate directors to engage in OCB. Furthermore, we propose that two board-level contingencies, board capital, and informal board hierarchy order, can moderate the effect of directors’ role-identity salience on their OCB. That is, low levels of board capital and directors’ higher positions in a board’s informal hierarchy enhance directors’ motivation to engage in OCB.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
See recent job descriptions for non-executive directors advertised on Financial Times and Indeed for companies such as InCommunities and the International Women’s Development Agency (IWDA) (accessed on 5 June 2015).
 
2
While the board literature (e.g., Yoshikawa et al., 2014; Zajac and Westphal, 1996) commonly uses the term ‘outside directors’, Higgs Review (2003, p. 6.19) notes that “‘Outside director’ is a term used in the US and elsewhere but it is not widely recognized in the UK”. For the sake of convenience, this study considers outside directors to be both non-executive directors and independent non-executive directors because they are appointed to perform the same director duties.
 
3
For instance, according to the UK’s Corporate Governance Code (2014) and Companies Act (2006, Clauses 170–177), the general duties of a director include “to act within powers; to promote the success of the company; to exercise independent judgment; to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence; to avoid conflicts of interest; not to accept benefits from third parties; and to declare interest in proposed transaction or arrangement”.
 
Literature
go back to reference AICD. (2011). Position description for a non-executive director. New South Wales, AU: Australian Institute of Company Directors. AICD. (2011). Position description for a non-executive director. New South Wales, AU: Australian Institute of Company Directors.
go back to reference Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 247–260.CrossRef Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 247–260.CrossRef
go back to reference Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374.CrossRef Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374.CrossRef
go back to reference Bell, P. D. (1993). Fulfilling the public trust: Ten ways to help nonprofit boards maintain accountability. Washington, DC: National center for Nonprofit Boards. Bell, P. D. (1993). Fulfilling the public trust: Ten ways to help nonprofit boards maintain accountability. Washington, DC: National center for Nonprofit Boards.
go back to reference Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
go back to reference Boyd, B. K., Haynes, K. T., & Zona, F. (2011). Dimensions of CEO-board relations. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1892–1923.CrossRef Boyd, B. K., Haynes, K. T., & Zona, F. (2011). Dimensions of CEO-board relations. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1892–1923.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, W. O., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(5), 855–877.CrossRef Brown, W. O., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(5), 855–877.CrossRef
go back to reference Capezio, A., Cui, L., Hu, H. W., & Shields, J. (2014). What governs directors’ monitoring behavior in China? The influence of director social identification, learning goal orientation, and avoidance orientation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(4), 899–924.CrossRef Capezio, A., Cui, L., Hu, H. W., & Shields, J. (2014). What governs directors’ monitoring behavior in China? The influence of director social identification, learning goal orientation, and avoidance orientation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(4), 899–924.CrossRef
go back to reference Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2011). Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 202–237.CrossRef Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2011). Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 202–237.CrossRef
go back to reference Coca-Cola. (2013). Board of directors guidelines on significant corporate governance issues. Atlanta, GA: Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. Coca-Cola. (2013). Board of directors guidelines on significant corporate governance issues. Atlanta, GA: Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.
go back to reference Coffey, B. S., & Wang, J. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(14), 1595–1603.CrossRef Coffey, B. S., & Wang, J. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(14), 1595–1603.CrossRef
go back to reference Cole, S. (2012). Mind the expectation gap: The role of a company director. New South Wales, AU: Australian Institute of Company Directors White paper. Cole, S. (2012). Mind the expectation gap: The role of a company director. New South Wales, AU: Australian Institute of Company Directors White paper.
go back to reference Corporate Governance Code. (2014). The UK corporate governance code. London, UK: Financial Reporting Council. Corporate Governance Code. (2014). The UK corporate governance code. London, UK: Financial Reporting Council.
go back to reference Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). Integration of micro- and macro-studies in governance research: CEO duality, board composition, and financial performance. Journal of Management, 37(2), 404–411.CrossRef Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). Integration of micro- and macro-studies in governance research: CEO duality, board composition, and financial performance. Journal of Management, 37(2), 404–411.CrossRef
go back to reference Del Brio, E. B., Yoshikawa, T., Connelly, C. E., & Tan, W. L. (2013). The effects of CEO trustworthiness on directors’ monitoring and resource provision. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 155–169.CrossRef Del Brio, E. B., Yoshikawa, T., Connelly, C. E., & Tan, W. L. (2013). The effects of CEO trustworthiness on directors’ monitoring and resource provision. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 155–169.CrossRef
go back to reference Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2007). The new deal at the top. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 98–104. Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2007). The new deal at the top. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 98–104.
go back to reference Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2003). Not the usual suspects: how to use board process to make boards better. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 101–113.CrossRef Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2003). Not the usual suspects: how to use board process to make boards better. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 101–113.CrossRef
go back to reference Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.
go back to reference George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310–329.CrossRef George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310–329.CrossRef
go back to reference Golden-Biddle, K., & Rao, H. (1997). Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a non-profit organization. Organization Science, 8, 593–611.CrossRef Golden-Biddle, K., & Rao, H. (1997). Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a non-profit organization. Organization Science, 8, 593–611.CrossRef
go back to reference Hambrick, D. C., von Werder, A. V., & Zajac, E. J. (2008). New directions in corporate governance research. Organization Science, 19(3), 381–385.CrossRef Hambrick, D. C., von Werder, A. V., & Zajac, E. J. (2008). New directions in corporate governance research. Organization Science, 19(3), 381–385.CrossRef
go back to reference Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1145–1163.CrossRef Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1145–1163.CrossRef
go back to reference He, J., & Huang, Z. (2011). Board informal hierarchy and firm financial performance: Exploring a tacit structure guiding boardroom interactions. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1119–1139.CrossRef He, J., & Huang, Z. (2011). Board informal hierarchy and firm financial performance: Exploring a tacit structure guiding boardroom interactions. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1119–1139.CrossRef
go back to reference Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. London, UK: The Department of Trade and Industry. Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. London, UK: The Department of Trade and Industry.
go back to reference Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.
go back to reference Hillman, A. J., Nicholson, G., & Shropshire, C. (2008). Multiple identities, identification and board monitoring and resource provision. Organization Science, 19(3), 441–456.CrossRef Hillman, A. J., Nicholson, G., & Shropshire, C. (2008). Multiple identities, identification and board monitoring and resource provision. Organization Science, 19(3), 441–456.CrossRef
go back to reference Huse, M. (2005). Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management, 16(S1), S65–S79.CrossRef Huse, M. (2005). Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management, 16(S1), S65–S79.CrossRef
go back to reference IWDA. (2015). Position description: Non-executive director. Melbourne, VIC: International Women’s Development Agency. IWDA. (2015). Position description: Non-executive director. Melbourne, VIC: International Women’s Development Agency.
go back to reference Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262.CrossRef Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262.CrossRef
go back to reference Koys, D. J. (2001). The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit-level, longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 54(1), 101–114.CrossRef Koys, D. J. (2001). The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit-level, longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 54(1), 101–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Kroll, M., Walters, B. A., & Wright, P. (2008). Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 363–382.CrossRef Kroll, M., Walters, B. A., & Wright, P. (2008). Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 363–382.CrossRef
go back to reference Lin, C. (2008). Clarifying the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviors, gender, and knowledge sharing in workplace organizations in Taiwan. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(3), 241–250.CrossRef Lin, C. (2008). Clarifying the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviors, gender, and knowledge sharing in workplace organizations in Taiwan. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(3), 241–250.CrossRef
go back to reference Lin, C. C., & Peng, T. K. (2010). From organizational citizenship behaviour to team performance: The mediation of group cohesion and collective efficacy. Management and Organization Review, 6(1), 55–75.CrossRef Lin, C. C., & Peng, T. K. (2010). From organizational citizenship behaviour to team performance: The mediation of group cohesion and collective efficacy. Management and Organization Review, 6(1), 55–75.CrossRef
go back to reference Lorsch, J. W., & MacIver, E. (1989). Pawns or potentates: The reality of America’s corporate boards. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Lorsch, J. W., & MacIver, E. (1989). Pawns or potentates: The reality of America’s corporate boards. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Lynch, K. D. (2007). Modeling role enactment: Linking role theory and social cognition. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37(4), 379–399.CrossRef Lynch, K. D. (2007). Modeling role enactment: Linking role theory and social cognition. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37(4), 379–399.CrossRef
go back to reference Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398.CrossRef Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398.CrossRef
go back to reference Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2012). Board task performance: An exploration of micro- and macro-level determinants of board effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 193–215.CrossRef Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2012). Board task performance: An exploration of micro- and macro-level determinants of board effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 193–215.CrossRef
go back to reference Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1543–1567.CrossRef Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1543–1567.CrossRef
go back to reference Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
go back to reference Organ, D. W. (1990). The subtle significance of job satisfaction. Clinical Laboratory Management Review, 4, 94–98. Organ, D. W. (1990). The subtle significance of job satisfaction. Clinical Laboratory Management Review, 4, 94–98.
go back to reference Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85–97.CrossRef Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85–97.CrossRef
go back to reference Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource-dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource-dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
go back to reference Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 262–270.CrossRef Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 262–270.CrossRef
go back to reference Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for further research. Human Performance, 10(2), 133–151.CrossRef Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for further research. Human Performance, 10(2), 133–151.CrossRef
go back to reference Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563.CrossRef Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563.CrossRef
go back to reference Preston, J. B., & Brown, W. A. (2004). Commitment and performance of nonprofit board members. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(2), 221–238.CrossRef Preston, J. B., & Brown, W. A. (2004). Commitment and performance of nonprofit board members. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(2), 221–238.CrossRef
go back to reference Rego, A., & Cunha, M. P. E. (2008). Organisational citizenship behaviours and effectiveness: An empirical study in two small insurance companies. The Service Industries Journal, 28(4), 541–554.CrossRef Rego, A., & Cunha, M. P. E. (2008). Organisational citizenship behaviours and effectiveness: An empirical study in two small insurance companies. The Service Industries Journal, 28(4), 541–554.CrossRef
go back to reference Roberts, J., McNulty, T., & Stiles, P. (2005). Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management, 16(s1), S5–S26.CrossRef Roberts, J., McNulty, T., & Stiles, P. (2005). Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management, 16(s1), S5–S26.CrossRef
go back to reference Ryan, J. J. (2002). Work values and organizational citizenship behavior: Values that work for employees and organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(1), 123–132.CrossRef Ryan, J. J. (2002). Work values and organizational citizenship behavior: Values that work for employees and organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(1), 123–132.CrossRef
go back to reference Serpe, R. T. (1987). Stability and change in self: A structural symbolic interactionist explanation. Social Psychology Quaterly, 50(1), 44–55.CrossRef Serpe, R. T. (1987). Stability and change in self: A structural symbolic interactionist explanation. Social Psychology Quaterly, 50(1), 44–55.CrossRef
go back to reference Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (1987). The construction of self and the reconstruction of social relationships. In E. J. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 4, pp. 41–66). Greenwich, CT: JAI and Publishing House. Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (1987). The construction of self and the reconstruction of social relationships. In E. J. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 4, pp. 41–66). Greenwich, CT: JAI and Publishing House.
go back to reference Tam, O. K., & Hu, H. W. (2006). Supervisory boards in Chinese corporate governance. In L. S. Ho & R. Ash (Eds.), China, Hong Kong and the world economy: Study on globalization (pp. 327–347). New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan. Tam, O. K., & Hu, H. W. (2006). Supervisory boards in Chinese corporate governance. In L. S. Ho & R. Ash (Eds.), China, Hong Kong and the world economy: Study on globalization (pp. 327–347). New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.
go back to reference Tang, Y., Qian, C., Chen, G., & Shen, R. (2015). How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir)responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1338–1357.CrossRef Tang, Y., Qian, C., Chen, G., & Shen, R. (2015). How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir)responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1338–1357.CrossRef
go back to reference Thoits, P. A. (1991). On merging identity theory and stress research. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(2), 101–112.CrossRef Thoits, P. A. (1991). On merging identity theory and stress research. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(2), 101–112.CrossRef
go back to reference Thoits, P. A. (1992). Identity structures and psychological well-being: Gender and marital status comparisons. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(3), 236–256.CrossRef Thoits, P. A. (1992). Identity structures and psychological well-being: Gender and marital status comparisons. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(3), 236–256.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & Parks, J. M. (1995). Extra role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 215–285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & Parks, J. M. (1995). Extra role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 215–285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
go back to reference Wang, J., & Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778.CrossRef Wang, J., & Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778.CrossRef
go back to reference Wei, Y. (2014). The benefits of organizational citizenship behavior for job performance and the moderating role of human capital. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(7), 87–99.CrossRef Wei, Y. (2014). The benefits of organizational citizenship behavior for job performance and the moderating role of human capital. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(7), 87–99.CrossRef
go back to reference Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 540–555.CrossRef Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 540–555.CrossRef
go back to reference Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1–10.CrossRef Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1–10.CrossRef
go back to reference Withers, M. C., Corley, K. G., & Hillman, A. J. (2012). Stay or leave: Director identities and voluntary exit from the board during organizational crisis. Organization Science, 23(3), 835–850.CrossRef Withers, M. C., Corley, K. G., & Hillman, A. J. (2012). Stay or leave: Director identities and voluntary exit from the board during organizational crisis. Organization Science, 23(3), 835–850.CrossRef
go back to reference Yoshikawa, T., Zhu, H., & Wang, P. (2014). National governance system, corporate ownership, and roles of outside directors: A corporate governance bundle perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(3), 252–265.CrossRef Yoshikawa, T., Zhu, H., & Wang, P. (2014). National governance system, corporate ownership, and roles of outside directors: A corporate governance bundle perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(3), 252–265.CrossRef
go back to reference Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (1996). Director reputation, CEO-board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 507–529.CrossRef Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (1996). Director reputation, CEO-board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 507–529.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhu, H., & Yoshikawa, T. (2015). Contingent value of director identification: The role of government directors in monitoring and resource provision in an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal. doi:10.1002/smj.2408. Zhu, H., & Yoshikawa, T. (2015). Contingent value of director identification: The role of government directors in monitoring and resource provision in an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal. doi:10.​1002/​smj.​2408.
Metadata
Title
Organizational Citizenship Behaviors of Directors: An Integrated Framework of Director Role-Identity and Boardroom Structure
Authors
Toru Yoshikawa
Helen Wei Hu
Publication date
07-08-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2808-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Business Ethics 1/2017 Go to the issue