Top

Published in:

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

4. Overcoming the Innovation Barrier: A Search-Selection Model of Breakthrough Innovation in Large Firms

Authors : Simon J. Ford, Simone Ferriani, David R. Probert

Published in: Strategy and Communication for Innovation

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Breakthrough innovations are important to the firm. They enable firms to challenge the existing technological order and shape new paths, allowing them to engage in corporate reinvention, growth and new business development. They represent rare, valuable and inimitable sources of competitive advantage for firms. Yet most established firms have too many obligations and too much to lose to justify the obvious risks of chasing radical possibilities. There are a number of causes for this risk averseness: under-investment in radical innovation, falling into competency traps, being constrained by core rigidities, and remaining overly committed to their main customers. Drawing on previous research in the field, we suggest that two fundamental enabling conditions can be identified for an established firm wishing to engage in breakthrough innovation. First, it must create an environment conducive to idea generation. Second, it must have the fortitude and risk tolerance to persevere and allow the most promising ideas to have a fair chance to succeed. Focusing on the latter topic, three types of organizational selection regimes are highlighted that have proven particularly effective to this purpose. These regimes are characterized as (1) individual driven, (2) lead user driven, and (3) application domain driven, with illustrative case examples provided from BAE Systems, Rolls-Royce and ARM respectively. While there is no single best way through which breakthrough innovation can be successfully pursued, given the multifaceted nature of the environment we suggest that the domain driven approach is the one that is most likely to be conducive to successful breakthrough innovations. High technology domains are subject to incredible uncertainty and offer some of the richest opportunities for experience based learning. In such settings the use of variegated feedback from multiple facets of the application environment may serve as superior selection mechanisms to the judgment of corporate headquarters.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Open Innovation: Strategic Options, Actors, Tools and Tensions

next chapter Harnessing the Innovation Potential of Citizens: How Open Innovation Can be Used to Co-develop Political Strategies

A more detailed account of this case can be found in Ferriani et al. (2012).

Achilladelis, B., Schwarzkopf, A., & Cines, M. (1990). The dynamics of technological innovation: The case of the chemical industry. Research Policy, 19, 1–34.CrossRef

Adner, R., & Levinthal, D. A. (2002). The emergence of emerging technologies. California Management Review, 45, 50–66.CrossRef

Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 521–543.CrossRef

Baden-Fuller, C. (1995). Strategic innovation, corporate entrepreneurship and matching outside-into inside-out approaches to strategy research. British Journal of Management, 6, 3–16.CrossRef

Baden-Fuller, C., & Pitt, M. (1996). Strategic innovation. London: Routledge.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRef

Bessant, J. (2003). High-involvement innovation: Building and sustaining competitive advantage through continuous change. Chichester: Wiley.

Birkinshaw, J. (1997). Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 207–229.CrossRef

Burgelman, R. A. (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 223–245.CrossRef

Cattani, G. (2006). Technological pre-adaptation, speciation, and emergence of new technologies: How Corning invented and developed fiber optics. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 285–318.CrossRef

Chandy, R. J., & Tellis, G. J. (1998). Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 474–487.CrossRef

Chandy, R. J., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64, 1–17.CrossRef

Chesbrough, H. (2002). Graceful exits and foregone opportunities: Xerox’s management of its technology spinoff organizations. Business History Review, 76, 803–838.CrossRef

Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 529–555.CrossRef

Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 197–218.CrossRef

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRef

Cook, S. N., & Yanow, D. (1993). Culture and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2, 373–390.CrossRef

Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm (1st ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1095–1121.CrossRef

Danneels, E. (2004). Disruptive technology reconsidered: A critique and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 246–258.CrossRef

Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3, 179–203.CrossRef

Ferriani, S., Garnsey, E. W., & Lorenzoni, G. (2012). Continuity and change in a spin-off venture: The process of reimprinting. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21, 1011–1048.CrossRef

Fleming, L. (2001). Finding the organizational sources of technological breakthroughs: The story of Hewlett Packard’s thermal ink-jet. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 1059–1084.CrossRef

Ford, S. J., Garnsey, E. W., & Probert, D. R. (2010). Evolving corporate entrepreneurship strategy: Technology incubation at Philips. R&D Management, 40, 81–90.CrossRef

Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 110–132.CrossRef

Garnsey, E. W., & Wright, S. (1990). Technical innovation and organizational opportunity. International Journal of Technology Management, 5, 267–291.

Garud, R., & Nayyar, P. (1994). Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by inter-temporal technology transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 365–385.CrossRef

Gwynne, P. (1997). Skunk works, 1990’s style. Research-Technology Management, 40, 18–23.

Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.CrossRef

Hargadon, A. (2003). How breakthroughs happen. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Henderson, R. M. (1993). Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation; evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND Journal of Economics, 24, 248–270.CrossRef

Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9–30.CrossRef

Humble, J., & Jones, G. (1989). Creating a climate for innovation. Long Range Planning, 22, 46–51.CrossRef

Klepper, S., & Simons, K. (2000). Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. Television receiver industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 997–1016.CrossRef

Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125.CrossRef

Levinthal, D. A. (1998). The slow pace of rapid technological change: Gradualism and punctuation in technological change. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7, 217–247.CrossRef

Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.CrossRef

Lynn, G. S., & Morone, J. G. (1996). Marketing and discontinuous innovation: The probe and learn process. California Management Review, 38, 8–37.CrossRef

Macher, J., & Richman, B. D. (2004). Organizational responses to discontinuous innovation: A case study approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7, 87–114.CrossRef

Maine, E., & Garnsey, E. W. (2006). Commercializing generic technology: The case of advanced materials ventures. Research Policy, 35, 375–393.CrossRef

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.CrossRef

McGahan, A., Vadasz, L., & Yoffie, Y. (1997). Creating value and setting standards: The lessons of consumer electronics for personal digital assistants. In D. Yoffie (Ed.), Competing in the age of digital convergence (pp. 227–264). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Methe, D. T., Swaminathan, A., Mitchell, W., & Toyama, R. (1997). The underemphasized role of diversifying entrants and industry incumbents as the sources of major innovations. In H. Thomas & D. O’Neal (Eds.), Strategy discovery: Competing in new areas (pp. 99–116). New York: Wiley.

Nelson, R. (1991). Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12, 61–74.CrossRef

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

O’Connor, G. C., & Rice, M. P. (2000). Opportunity recognition and breakthrough innovation in large established firms. California Management Review, 43, 95–117.CrossRef

Orr, J. (1990). Sharing knowledge celebrating identity: War stories and community memory in a service culture. In D. S. Middleton & D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective remembering: Memory in society (pp. 169–189). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

Rice, M. P., O’Connor, G. C., Peters, L., & Morone, J. (1998). Managing discontinuous innovation. Research-Technology management, 41, 52–58.

Rice, M. P., O’Connor, G. C., Leifer, R., McDermott, C. A., & Standish-Kuon, T. (2000). Corporate venture capital models for promoting radical innovation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 8, 1–11.

Rosenbloom, R. S. (2000). Leadership, capabilities, and technological change: The transformation of NCR in the electronic era. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1083–1104.CrossRef

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sharma, A. (1999). Central dilemmas of managing innovation in large firms. California Management Review, 41, 146–164.CrossRef

Simonton, D. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.

Stefik, M., & Stefik, B. (2004). Breakthrough: Stories and strategies of radical innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Stopford, J. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1994). Creating corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 521–536.CrossRef

Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285–305.CrossRef

Tripsas, M. (1997). Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 119–142.CrossRef

Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 8–30.CrossRef

Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.CrossRef

Utterback, J. M. (1994). Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Vanhaverbeke, W., Berends, H., Kirschbaum, R., & de Brabander, W. (2003). Knowledge management challenges in corporate venturing and technological capability building through radical innovations. Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies Working Paper 03.16. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.

von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

von Hippel, E., Thomke, S., & Sonnack, M. (1999). Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Business Review, 77, 47–57.

Yamanouchi, T. (1989). Breakthrough: The development of the Canon personal copier. Long Range Planning, 22, 11–21.CrossRef

Title: Overcoming the Innovation Barrier: A Search-Selection Model of Breakthrough Innovation in Large Firms
Authors: Simon J. Ford
Simone Ferriani
David R. Probert
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Book: Strategy and Communication for Innovation
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41478-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-41479-4

Copyright Year: 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41479-4_4