Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Management and Governance 4/2018

19-02-2018

Ownership structure, investors’ protection and corporate valuation: the effect of judicial system efficiency in family and non-family firms

Authors: Luigi Lepore, Francesco Paolone, Domenico Rocco Cambrea

Published in: Journal of Management and Governance | Issue 4/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Research on the effect of ownership structure on firm performance shows no convergent evidence concerning the sign and form of the above-mentioned relationship. Similarly, there is no homogeneous evidence documenting family ownership concentration is always positively or negatively correlated with firm value, or irrelevant. This paper analyses whether and how the de facto investor protection provided by the judicial system affects the relationship between corporate performance and ownership structure in 1314 firms operating in four European countries (Germany, France, Italy, and Spain) over a five-year period, 2010–2014. Moreover, we analyse whether judicial system efficiency influences if and how family firms in the controlling coalition collude for expropriating minority shareholders. Our findings show that the level of shareholder protection, derived from judicial efficiency, is relevant to the relationship between ownership structure and firm performance, thus corroborating literature in that institutional contexts matter in explaining such relations. The results suggest the need for more efficient external mechanisms of corporate governance to facilitate investment in equity capital, thus decreasing the country risk perceived by investors.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Testparm is a joint test to determine whether the dummies for all years are equal to zero.
 
Literature
go back to reference Agrawal, A., & Mandelker, G. (1990). Large and the monitoring of managers: The case of antitakeover charter amendments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25, 143–161. Agrawal, A., & Mandelker, G. (1990). Large and the monitoring of managers: The case of antitakeover charter amendments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25, 143–161.
go back to reference Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Anderson, A., & Gupta, P. P. (2009). A cross-country comparison of corporate governance and firm performance: Do financial structure and the legal system matter? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 5(2), 61–79. Anderson, A., & Gupta, P. P. (2009). A cross-country comparison of corporate governance and firm performance: Do financial structure and the legal system matter? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 5(2), 61–79.
go back to reference Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and Firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and Firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328.
go back to reference Bainbridge, S. M. (2003). The Business Judgment Rule as Abstention Doctrine. Research Paper No. 03-18, UCLA, School of Law, Law and Economics. Bainbridge, S. M. (2003). The Business Judgment Rule as Abstention Doctrine. Research Paper No. 03-18, UCLA, School of Law, Law and Economics.
go back to reference Banalieva, E. R., Eddleston, K. A., & Zellweger, T. M. (2015). When do family firms have an advantage in transitioning economies? Toward a dynamic institution-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1358–1377. Banalieva, E. R., Eddleston, K. A., & Zellweger, T. M. (2015). When do family firms have an advantage in transitioning economies? Toward a dynamic institution-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1358–1377.
go back to reference Barclay, M. J., & Holderness, C. G. (1989). Private benefits from control of public corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(2), 371–395. Barclay, M. J., & Holderness, C. G. (1989). Private benefits from control of public corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(2), 371–395.
go back to reference Bebchuk, L. A. (1999). A rent-protection theory of corporate ownership and control (No. w7203). National Bureau of Economic Research. Bebchuk, L. A. (1999). A rent-protection theory of corporate ownership and control (No. w7203). National Bureau of Economic Research.
go back to reference Bennedsen, M., & Wolfenzon, D. (2000). The balance of power in closely held corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 113–139. Bennedsen, M., & Wolfenzon, D. (2000). The balance of power in closely held corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 113–139.
go back to reference Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan. Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.
go back to reference Block, F., & Hege, U. (2001). Multiple Shareholders and Control Contests, Working Paper, Aix-Marseille, University. Block, F., & Hege, U. (2001). Multiple Shareholders and Control Contests, Working Paper, Aix-Marseille, University.
go back to reference Bolton, P., & Von Thadden, E. (1998). Blocks, liquidity, and corporate control. Journal of Finance, 53(1), 1–25. Bolton, P., & Von Thadden, E. (1998). Blocks, liquidity, and corporate control. Journal of Finance, 53(1), 1–25.
go back to reference Boubaker, S., Mansali, H., & Rjiba, H. (2014). Large controlling shareholders and stock price synchronicity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 40, 80–96. Boubaker, S., Mansali, H., & Rjiba, H. (2014). Large controlling shareholders and stock price synchronicity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 40, 80–96.
go back to reference Boubakri, N., Cosset, J., & Guedhami, O. (2005). Post-privatization corporate governance: The role of ownership structure and investor protection. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2), 369–399. Boubakri, N., Cosset, J., & Guedhami, O. (2005). Post-privatization corporate governance: The role of ownership structure and investor protection. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2), 369–399.
go back to reference Brown, P., Preiato, J., & Tarca, A. (2014). Measuring country differences in enforcement of accounting standards: An audit and enforcement proxy. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(1–2), 1–52. Brown, P., Preiato, J., & Tarca, A. (2014). Measuring country differences in enforcement of accounting standards: An audit and enforcement proxy. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(1–2), 1–52.
go back to reference Burkart, M., Panunzi, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Family firms. Journal of Finance, 58(5), 2167–2201. Burkart, M., Panunzi, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Family firms. Journal of Finance, 58(5), 2167–2201.
go back to reference Bushee, B. J. (2001). Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value? Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(2), 207–246. Bushee, B. J. (2001). Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value? Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(2), 207–246.
go back to reference Busta, I., Sinani, E., & Thomsen, S. (2014). Ownership concentration and market value of European banks. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(1), 159–183. Busta, I., Sinani, E., & Thomsen, S. (2014). Ownership concentration and market value of European banks. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(1), 159–183.
go back to reference Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Steier, L. P., & Rau, S. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1103–1113. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Steier, L. P., & Rau, S. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1103–1113.
go back to reference Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771.
go back to reference Connelly, B. L., Hoskisson, R. E., Tihanyi, L., & Certo, S. T. (2010). Ownership as a form of corporate governance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1561–1589. Connelly, B. L., Hoskisson, R. E., Tihanyi, L., & Certo, S. T. (2010). Ownership as a form of corporate governance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1561–1589.
go back to reference Courteau, L., Di Pietra, R., Giudici, P., & Melis, A. (2017). The role and effect of controlling shareholders in corporate governance. Journal of Management & Governance, 21, 1–12. Courteau, L., Di Pietra, R., Giudici, P., & Melis, A. (2017). The role and effect of controlling shareholders in corporate governance. Journal of Management & Governance, 21, 1–12.
go back to reference Dahya, J., Dimitrov, O., & McConnell, J. J. (2008). Dominant shareholders, corporate boards, and corporate value: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 73–100. Dahya, J., Dimitrov, O., & McConnell, J. J. (2008). Dominant shareholders, corporate boards, and corporate value: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 73–100.
go back to reference Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1992). Financial performance of founder-managed versus professionally managed corporations. Journal of Small Business Management, 30, 25–34. Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1992). Financial performance of founder-managed versus professionally managed corporations. Journal of Small Business Management, 30, 25–34.
go back to reference de Miguel, A., Pindado, J., & de la Torre, C. (2004). Ownership structure and firm value: new evidence from Spain. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1199–1207. de Miguel, A., Pindado, J., & de la Torre, C. (2004). Ownership structure and firm value: new evidence from Spain. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1199–1207.
go back to reference Demsetz, H. (1983). The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 375–390. Demsetz, H. (1983). The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 375–390.
go back to reference Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155–1177. Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155–1177.
go back to reference Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), 209–233. Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), 209–233.
go back to reference Driffield, N., Mahambare, V., & Pal, S. (2007). How does ownership structure affect capital structure and firm value? Recent evidence from East Asia. Economics of Transition, 15(3), 535–573. Driffield, N., Mahambare, V., & Pal, S. (2007). How does ownership structure affect capital structure and firm value? Recent evidence from East Asia. Economics of Transition, 15(3), 535–573.
go back to reference Eddelston, K., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A steward theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 545–565. Eddelston, K., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A steward theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 545–565.
go back to reference Faccio, M., Lang, L. H., & Young, L. (2001). Dividends and expropriation. American Economic Review, 91, 54–78. Faccio, M., Lang, L. H., & Young, L. (2001). Dividends and expropriation. American Economic Review, 91, 54–78.
go back to reference García-Meca, E., & Sánchez-Ballesta, J. P. (2010). The association of board independence and ownership concentration with voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis. European Accounting Review, 19, 603–627. García-Meca, E., & Sánchez-Ballesta, J. P. (2010). The association of board independence and ownership concentration with voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis. European Accounting Review, 19, 603–627.
go back to reference Gedajlovic, E., & Carney, M. (2010). Markets, hierarchies, and families: Toward a transaction cost theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 1145–1172. Gedajlovic, E., & Carney, M. (2010). Markets, hierarchies, and families: Toward a transaction cost theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 1145–1172.
go back to reference Gedajlovic, E., Carney, M., Chrisman, J., & Kellermanns, F. (2012). The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management, 38, 1010–1037. Gedajlovic, E., Carney, M., Chrisman, J., & Kellermanns, F. (2012). The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management, 38, 1010–1037.
go back to reference Giovannini, R. (2010). Corporate governance, family ownership and performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 14(2), 145–166. Giovannini, R. (2010). Corporate governance, family ownership and performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 14(2), 145–166.
go back to reference Gomes, A. R., & Novaes, W. (2005). Sharing of control as a corporate governance mechanism. Working paper No. 01-029, University of Pennsylvania, Institute for Law & Economic Research. Gomes, A. R., & Novaes, W. (2005). Sharing of control as a corporate governance mechanism. Working paper No. 01-029, University of Pennsylvania, Institute for Law & Economic Research.
go back to reference Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Makri, M., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Diversification decisions in family controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 223–252. Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Makri, M., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Diversification decisions in family controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 223–252.
go back to reference Gompers, P. A., & Metrick, A. (2001). Institutional investors and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 229–259. Gompers, P. A., & Metrick, A. (2001). Institutional investors and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 229–259.
go back to reference Gorton, G., & Schmidt, F. (2000). Class struggle inside the firm: a study of German codetermination. Center for Financial Institutions Working Paper 00-36, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania. Gorton, G., & Schmidt, F. (2000). Class struggle inside the firm: a study of German codetermination. Center for Financial Institutions Working Paper 00-36, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
go back to reference Guillen, M., & Capron, L. (2016). State capacity, minority shareholder protections, and stock market development. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61, 125–160. Guillen, M., & Capron, L. (2016). State capacity, minority shareholder protections, and stock market development. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61, 125–160.
go back to reference Habbershon, T., & Williams, M. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantage of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1–25. Habbershon, T., & Williams, M. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantage of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1–25.
go back to reference Holmstrom, B., & Tirole, J. (1993). Market liquidity and performance monitoring. The Journal of Political Economy, 101(4), 678–709. Holmstrom, B., & Tirole, J. (1993). Market liquidity and performance monitoring. The Journal of Political Economy, 101(4), 678–709.
go back to reference Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting voices: the effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 697–716. Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting voices: the effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 697–716.
go back to reference Jackson, H. E., & Roe, M. J. (2009). Public and private enforcement of securities laws: Resource-based evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 207–238. Jackson, H. E., & Roe, M. J. (2009). Public and private enforcement of securities laws: Resource-based evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 207–238.
go back to reference Jara-Bertin, M., López-Iturriaga, F. J., & Lòpez-de-Foronda, Ó. (2008). The contest to control in European family firms: how other shareholders affect firm value. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), 146–159. Jara-Bertin, M., López-Iturriaga, F. J., & Lòpez-de-Foronda, Ó. (2008). The contest to control in European family firms: how other shareholders affect firm value. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), 146–159.
go back to reference Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
go back to reference Jiang, Y., & Peng, M. W. (2011). Are family ownership and control in large firms good, bad, or irrelevant? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(1), 15–39. Jiang, Y., & Peng, M. W. (2011). Are family ownership and control in large firms good, bad, or irrelevant? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(1), 15–39.
go back to reference Kaplan, S., & Minton, B. (1994). Appointments of outsiders to Japanese boards. Determinants and implications for managers. Journal of Financial Economics, 23, 225–258. Kaplan, S., & Minton, B. (1994). Appointments of outsiders to Japanese boards. Determinants and implications for managers. Journal of Financial Economics, 23, 225–258.
go back to reference Krivogorsky, V., & Grundnitsky, G. (2010). Country-specific institutional effects on ownership: concentration and performance of continental European firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 14, 167–193. Krivogorsky, V., & Grundnitsky, G. (2010). Country-specific institutional effects on ownership: concentration and performance of continental European firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 14, 167–193.
go back to reference La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.
go back to reference La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1131–1150. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1131–1150.
go back to reference La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.
go back to reference La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 3–27. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 3–27.
go back to reference La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1147–1170. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1147–1170.
go back to reference Laeven, L., & Majnoni, G. (2005). Does judicial efficiency lower the cost of credit? Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1791–1812. Laeven, L., & Majnoni, G. (2005). Does judicial efficiency lower the cost of credit? Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1791–1812.
go back to reference Leech, D., & Leahy, J. (1991). Ownership structure, control type classifications and the performance of large British companies. Economic Journal, 101(409), 1418–1437. Leech, D., & Leahy, J. (1991). Ownership structure, control type classifications and the performance of large British companies. Economic Journal, 101(409), 1418–1437.
go back to reference Lehmann, E., & Weigand, J. (2000). Does the governed corporation perform better? Governance structures and corporate performance in Germany. Review of Finance, 4(2), 157–195. Lehmann, E., & Weigand, J. (2000). Does the governed corporation perform better? Governance structures and corporate performance in Germany. Review of Finance, 4(2), 157–195.
go back to reference Lepore, L., Paolone, F., Pisano, S., & Alvino, F. (2017). A cross-country comparison of the relationship between ownership concentration and firm performance: Does judicial system efficiency matter? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(2), 321–340. Lepore, L., Paolone, F., Pisano, S., & Alvino, F. (2017). A cross-country comparison of the relationship between ownership concentration and firm performance: Does judicial system efficiency matter? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(2), 321–340.
go back to reference Li, H., Wang, Z., & Deng, X. (2008). Ownership, independent directors, agency costs and financial distress: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Corporate Governance: the International Journal of Business in Society, 8(5), 622–636. Li, H., Wang, Z., & Deng, X. (2008). Ownership, independent directors, agency costs and financial distress: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Corporate Governance: the International Journal of Business in Society, 8(5), 622–636.
go back to reference Liu, W., Yang, H., & Zhang, G. (2012). Does family firm excel in firm performance? An institution-based view. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 965–987. Liu, W., Yang, H., & Zhang, G. (2012). Does family firm excel in firm performance? An institution-based view. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 965–987.
go back to reference Maury, B. (2006). Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 321–341. Maury, B. (2006). Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 321–341.
go back to reference Maury, B., & Pajuste, A. (2005). Multiple large shareholders and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1813–1834. Maury, B., & Pajuste, A. (2005). Multiple large shareholders and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1813–1834.
go back to reference Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19, 73–86. Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19, 73–86.
go back to reference Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 829–858. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 829–858.
go back to reference Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. Stagnation. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 50–78. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. Stagnation. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 50–78.
go back to reference Miller, D., Minichilli, A., & Corbetta, G. (2013). Is family leadership always beneficial? Strategic Management Journal, 34, 553–571. Miller, D., Minichilli, A., & Corbetta, G. (2013). Is family leadership always beneficial? Strategic Management Journal, 34, 553–571.
go back to reference Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2012). Board task performance: An exploration of micro-and macro-level determinants of board effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 193–215. Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2012). Board task performance: An exploration of micro-and macro-level determinants of board effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 193–215.
go back to reference Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., & Zona, F. (2009). Making boards effective: An empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 55–74. Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., & Zona, F. (2009). Making boards effective: An empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 55–74.
go back to reference Morck, R., Stangeland, D., & Yeung, B. (1998). Inherited wealth, corporate control, and economic growth: The Canadian disease, in concentrated corporate ownership (NBER Working Paper 6814). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Morck, R., Stangeland, D., & Yeung, B. (1998). Inherited wealth, corporate control, and economic growth: The Canadian disease, in concentrated corporate ownership (NBER Working Paper 6814). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
go back to reference Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D., & Yeung, B. (2005). Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 63, 655–720. Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D., & Yeung, B. (2005). Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 63, 655–720.
go back to reference Mudambi, R., & Nicosia, C. (1998). Ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from the UK financial services industry. Applied Financial Economics, 8(2), 175–180. Mudambi, R., & Nicosia, C. (1998). Ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from the UK financial services industry. Applied Financial Economics, 8(2), 175–180.
go back to reference Ocasio, W. (1994). Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in U.S. industrial corporations, 1960–1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 285–312. Ocasio, W. (1994). Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in U.S. industrial corporations, 1960–1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 285–312.
go back to reference Pagano, M., & Röell, A. (1998). The choice of stock ownership structure: agency costs, monitoring, and the decision to go public. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 187–225. Pagano, M., & Röell, A. (1998). The choice of stock ownership structure: agency costs, monitoring, and the decision to go public. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 187–225.
go back to reference Pedersen, T., & Thomsen, S. (2003). Ownership structure and value of the largest European firms: The importance of owner identity. Journal of Management and Governance, 7(1), 27–55. Pedersen, T., & Thomsen, S. (2003). Ownership structure and value of the largest European firms: The importance of owner identity. Journal of Management and Governance, 7(1), 27–55.
go back to reference Peng, M. W., & Jiang, Y. (2010). Institutions behind family ownership and control in large firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 253–273. Peng, M. W., & Jiang, Y. (2010). Institutions behind family ownership and control in large firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 253–273.
go back to reference Peng, M. W., Sun, W., Vlas, C., Minichilli, A., & Corbetta, G. (2017). An institution-based view of large family firms: A recap and overview. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(2), 187–205. Peng, M. W., Sun, W., Vlas, C., Minichilli, A., & Corbetta, G. (2017). An institution-based view of large family firms: A recap and overview. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(2), 187–205.
go back to reference Pollack, R. A. (1985). A transaction cost approach to families and households. Journal of Economic Literature, 23, 581–608. Pollack, R. A. (1985). A transaction cost approach to families and households. Journal of Economic Literature, 23, 581–608.
go back to reference Prencipe, A., Bar-Yosef, S., Mazzola, P., & Pozza, L. (2011). Income smoothing in family-controlled companies: Evidence from Italy. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(6), 529–546. Prencipe, A., Bar-Yosef, S., Mazzola, P., & Pozza, L. (2011). Income smoothing in family-controlled companies: Evidence from Italy. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(6), 529–546.
go back to reference Santos, M. S., Moreira, A. C., & Vieira, E. S. (2014). Ownership concentration, contestability, family firms, and capital structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(4), 1063–1107. Santos, M. S., Moreira, A. C., & Vieira, E. S. (2014). Ownership concentration, contestability, family firms, and capital structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(4), 1063–1107.
go back to reference Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 473–490. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 473–490.
go back to reference Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Evanston, IL: Evanston, Row Peterson. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Evanston, IL: Evanston, Row Peterson.
go back to reference Setia-Atmaja, L. Y. (2009). Governance mechanisms and firm value: The impact of ownership concentration and dividends. Corporate Goverance: An International Review, 17(6), 694–709. Setia-Atmaja, L. Y. (2009). Governance mechanisms and firm value: The impact of ownership concentration and dividends. Corporate Goverance: An International Review, 17(6), 694–709.
go back to reference Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461–488. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461–488.
go back to reference Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.
go back to reference Steier, L. (2003). Variants of agency contracts in family-financed ventures as a continuum of familial altruistic and market rationalities. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 597–618. Steier, L. (2003). Variants of agency contracts in family-financed ventures as a continuum of familial altruistic and market rationalities. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 597–618.
go back to reference Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional Logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional Logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843.
go back to reference Van Ees, H., Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2009). Toward a behavioral theory of boards and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 307–319. Van Ees, H., Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2009). Toward a behavioral theory of boards and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 307–319.
go back to reference Van Ees, H., Postma, T. J., & Sterken, E. (2003). Board characteristics and corporate performance in the Netherlands. Eastern Economic Journal, 29(1), 41–58. Van Ees, H., Postma, T. J., & Sterken, E. (2003). Board characteristics and corporate performance in the Netherlands. Eastern Economic Journal, 29(1), 41–58.
go back to reference Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. (2010). Transaction cost economics (TCE) and the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 1173–1182. Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. (2010). Transaction cost economics (TCE) and the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 1173–1182.
go back to reference Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417. Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417.
go back to reference Volpin, P. F. (2002). Governance with poor investor protection: Evidence from top executive turnover in Italy. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(1), 61–90. Volpin, P. F. (2002). Governance with poor investor protection: Evidence from top executive turnover in Italy. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(1), 61–90.
go back to reference Wang, Z. (2017). Turf War or Collusion: An Empirical Investigation of Conflict of interest between large shareholders. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 25(5), 358–380. Wang, Z. (2017). Turf War or Collusion: An Empirical Investigation of Conflict of interest between large shareholders. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 25(5), 358–380.
go back to reference Weiss, C., & Hilger, S. (2012). Ownership concentration beyond good and evil: is there an effect on corporate performance? Journal of Management and Governance, 16(4), 727–752. Weiss, C., & Hilger, S. (2012). Ownership concentration beyond good and evil: is there an effect on corporate performance? Journal of Management and Governance, 16(4), 727–752.
go back to reference Winton, A. (1993). Limitation of liability and the ownership structure of the firm. Journal of Finance, 48(2), 487–512. Winton, A. (1993). Limitation of liability and the ownership structure of the firm. Journal of Finance, 48(2), 487–512.
go back to reference Wu, C. P., & Wu, S. N. (2005). Study on financial situation analysis and prediction model based on value creating and corporate governance. Economic Review, 11, 99–110. Wu, C. P., & Wu, S. N. (2005). Study on financial situation analysis and prediction model based on value creating and corporate governance. Economic Review, 11, 99–110.
go back to reference Xu, X. N., & Wang, Y. (1997). Ownership structure, corporate governance and firm’s performance. Working Paper, World Bank, Washington, DC. Xu, X. N., & Wang, Y. (1997). Ownership structure, corporate governance and firm’s performance. Working Paper, World Bank, Washington, DC.
go back to reference Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). Governing the corporation in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 196–220. Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). Governing the corporation in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 196–220.
go back to reference Zattoni, A. (1999). The structure of corporate groups: The Italian case. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7(1), 38–48. Zattoni, A. (1999). The structure of corporate groups: The Italian case. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7(1), 38–48.
go back to reference Zattoni, Z., & Minichilli, A. (2009). Stock incentive plans in italian listed companies. Diffusion and characteristics in 2000 and 2006. Corporate Governance An International Review, 17(2), 224–237. Zattoni, Z., & Minichilli, A. (2009). Stock incentive plans in italian listed companies. Diffusion and characteristics in 2000 and 2006. Corporate Governance An International Review, 17(2), 224–237.
go back to reference Zhong, N., Wang, S., & Yang, R. (2017). Does corporate governance enhance common interests of shareholders and primary stakeholders? Journal of Business Ethics, 141(2), 411–431. Zhong, N., Wang, S., & Yang, R. (2017). Does corporate governance enhance common interests of shareholders and primary stakeholders? Journal of Business Ethics, 141(2), 411–431.
go back to reference Zwiebel, J. (1995). Block investment and partial benefits of corporate control. The Review of Economic Studies, 62(2), 161–185. Zwiebel, J. (1995). Block investment and partial benefits of corporate control. The Review of Economic Studies, 62(2), 161–185.
Metadata
Title
Ownership structure, investors’ protection and corporate valuation: the effect of judicial system efficiency in family and non-family firms
Authors
Luigi Lepore
Francesco Paolone
Domenico Rocco Cambrea
Publication date
19-02-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Management and Governance / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1385-3457
Electronic ISSN: 1572-963X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9405-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Journal of Management and Governance 4/2018 Go to the issue

Premium Partner