Top

Transportation

Published in:

05-12-2019

Perceived importance of inclusive street dimensions: a public questionnaire survey from a vision(ing) perspective

Authors: Yongcheng Wang, Yiik Diew Wong, Kelvin Goh

Published in: Transportation | Issue 2/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The increasingly prevalent concept of inclusiveness in the public discourse is gaining a foothold in the paradigm shift of street design from a predominance of vehicular traffic towards a vision that caters to non-motorised modes and creates an urban setting conducive to non-mobile activities. This study aims to investigate perceived importance within a set of six dimensions of street design (i.e., accessibility, connectivity, streetscape, safety and security, urban vibrancy, and greenery), which is an inclusive street vision and can be contextualised in the act of visioning. A street-intercept questionnaire survey (n = 816) was conducted in Singapore, and gender, age and transport mode use information were also collected. Using a multivariate and graphical approach, a categorical canonical correlation analysis was performed that highlighted the elderly and motorcyclists as groups with potentially different perceptions. Then, univariate ordinal logistic regression models were fitted separately on the six dimensions; gender was non-significant, while age and certain transport modes were significant. In particular, in addition to age, the car passenger transport mode was significant in five dimensions. Recent developments in Singapore’s urban transport, which is undergoing rapid changes due to incremental improvement schemes and disruptive services, such as ride hailing and bicycle sharing, are further discussed. As mobility needs and desirable street qualities vary across transport modes, this study serves as a precursor of further research into specific inclusive street dimensions, such as streetscape and urban vibrancy. The results indicate that land use and transport systems should be planned or redeveloped collaboratively to incorporate users’ aspirations.

previous article Simulation-based joint optimization framework for congestion mitigation in multimodal urban network: a macroscopic approach

next article Consideration of different travel strategies and choice set sizes in transit path choice modelling

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Active Living Research. “Tools and Measures.” https://www.activelivingresearch.org/toolsandresources/toolsandmeasures.

Ache, P.: Vision and creativity—challenge for city regions. Futures 32(5), 435–449 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00085-3CrossRef

AMAP: Review of Active Mobility Regulations for Safer Path Sharing. Active Mobility Advisory Panel, Singapore (2018)

Arnstein, S.R.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Planners 35(4), 216–224 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225CrossRef

Arranz-López, A., Soria-Lara, J.A., López-Escolano, C., Pueyo Campos, Á.: Retail mobility environments: a methodological framework for integrating retail activity and non-motorised accessibility in Zaragoza, Spain. J. Transp. Geogr. 58, 92–103 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.11.010CrossRef

Bauman, A.E., Sallis, J.F., Dzewaltowski, D.A., Owen, N.: Toward a better understanding of the influences on physical activity: the role of determinants, correlates, causal variables, mediators, moderators, and confounders. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 23(2, Supplement 1), 5–14 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00469-5CrossRef

Ben-Akiva, M.E., Lerman, S.R.: Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, vol. MIT Press Series in Transportation Studies. MIT Press, Cambridge (1985)

Bertolini, L.: Evolutionary urban transportation planning: an exploration. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 39(8), 1998–2019 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1068/a38350CrossRef

Bickerstaff, K., Tolley, R., Walker, G.: Transport planning and participation: the rhetoric and realities of public involvement. J. Transp. Geogr. 10(1), 61–73 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00027-8CrossRef

Bickerstaff, K., Walker, G.: Shared visions, unholy alliances: Power, governance and deliberative processes in local transport planning. Urban Stud. 42(12), 2123–2144 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500332098CrossRef

Bjerkan, K.Y., Øvstedal, L.R.: Functional requirements for inclusive transport. Transportation (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9939-7CrossRef

Boarnet, M.G., Day, K., Alfonzo, M., Forsyth, A., Oakes, M.: The Irvine-Minnesota Inventory to measure built environments: reliability tests. Am. J. Prev. Med. 30(2), 153–159.e143 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.018CrossRef

Cain, K.L., Gavand, K.A., Conway, T.L., Geremia, C.M., Millstein, R.A., Frank, L.D., Saelens, B.E., Adams, M.A., Glanz, K., King, A.C., Sallis, J.F.: Developing and validating an abbreviated version of the Microscale Audit for Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS-Abbreviated). J. Transp. Health 5, 84–96 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.05.004CrossRef

Carlson, S.A., Paul, P., Kumar, G., Watson, K.B., Atherton, E., Fulton, J.E.: Prevalence of complete streets policies in US municipalities. J. Trans. Health 5, 142–150 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.11.003CrossRef

Chen, M., Wang, D., Sun, Y., Waygood, E.O.D., Yang, W.: A comparison of users’ characteristics between station-based bikesharing system and free-floating bikesharing system: case study in Hangzhou, China. Transportation (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9910-7CrossRef

CLC, SI: Walkable and Bikeable Cities: Lessons from Seoul and Singapore. Centre for Liveable Cities, Singapore and The Seoul Institute, Singapore (2016)

CLC, ULI: Creating Healthy Places through Active Mobility. Centre for Liveable Cities, Singapore and Urban Land Institute, Asia Pacific, Singapore (2014)

CLC, ULI: Creating Healthy Places through Car-Lite Mobility. Centre for Liveable Cities, Singapore and Urban Land Institute, Asia Pacific, Singapore (2016a)

CLC, ULI: Ten Ideas to Prepare Cities for a ‘Car-Lite’ Future. Creating Healthy Places Through Car-Lite Mobility, pp. 63–101. Centre for Liveable Cities, Singapore and Urban Land Institute, Asia Pacific, Singapore (2016b)

Cresswell, T.: Mobilities II: still. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 36(5), 645–653 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511423349CrossRef

Davies, A.R., Doyle, R., Pape, J.: Future visioning for sustainable household practices: spaces for sustainability learning? Area 44(1), 54–60 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01054.xCrossRef

Day, K., Boarnet, M., Alfonzo, M., Forsyth, A.: The Irvine-Minnesota Inventory to measure built environments: development. Am. J. Prev. Med. 30(2), 144–152 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017CrossRef

de Leeuw, J., Mair, P.: Gifi methods for optimal scaling in R: the package homals. J. Stat. Softw. 31(4), 1–21 (2009)CrossRef

Deutsch, N., Berényi, L.: Personal approach to sustainability of future decision makers: a Hungarian case. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 20(1), 271–303 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9881-9CrossRef

Doi, K., Sunagawa, T., Inoi, H., Yoh, K.: Transitioning to safer streets through an integrated and inclusive design. IATSS Res. 39(2), 87–94 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2016.03.001CrossRef

Dowling, R., Kent, J.: Practice and public-private partnerships in sustainable transport governance: the case of car sharing in Sydney, Australia. Transp. Policy 40, 58–64 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.02.007CrossRef

Eames, M., Egmose, J.: Community foresight for urban sustainability: Insights from the Citizens Science for Sustainability (SuScit) project. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 78(5), 769–784 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.002CrossRef

Eden, S., Tunstall, S.: Ecological versus social restoration? How urban river restoration challenges but also fails to challenge the science—policy nexus in the United Kingdom. Enviro. Plan. C Gov. Policy 24(5), 661–680 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1068/c0608jCrossRef

Gehl, J., Svarre, B.: How to Study Public Life. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, Washington, DC (2013)CrossRef

Geremia, C., Cain, K. (2016) Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) and Parks, Global Versions: Training Manual & Picture Guide. Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS). University of California, San Diego (2016)

Gifi, A.: Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis. Wiley, Chichester (1990)

Golob, T.F.: A nonlinear canonical correlation analysis of weekly trip chaining behaviour. Transp. Res. A Gen. 20(5), 385–399 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(86)90006-3CrossRef

Golob, T.F., Recker, W.W.: A method for relating type of crash to traffic flow characteristics on urban freeways. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 38(1), 53–80 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2003.08.002CrossRef

Gregory, C.E., Brierley, G.J.: Development and application of vision statements in river rehabilitation: the experience of Project Twin Streams, New Zealand. Area 42(4), 468–478 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00946.xCrossRef

Habermas, J.: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, vol. 1. The Theory of Communicative Action. Beacon Press, Boston (1984)

Hamilton-Baillie, B.: Shared space: reconciling people, places and traffic. Built Environ. 34(2), 161–181 (2008)CrossRef

Healey, P.: The pragmatic tradition in planning thought. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 28(3), 277–292 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08325175CrossRef

Hess, P.M.: Avenues or arterials: the struggle to change street building practices in Toronto, Canada. J. Urban Des. 14(1), 1–28 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802451049CrossRef

Ho, S.T., Chin, K.K.: Road safety. In: Fwa, T.F. (ed.) 50 Years of Transportation in Singapore: Achievements and Challenges, pp. 269–345. World Scientific, Singapore (2016)CrossRef

Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., Sturdivant, R.X.: Applied Logistic Regression, vol. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)CrossRef

Hui, N., Saxe, S., Roorda, M., Hess, P., Miller, E.J.: Measuring the completeness of complete streets. Transp. Rev. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1299815CrossRef

Jones, P., Boujenko, N., Marshall, S.: Link & Place: A Guide to Street Planning and Design. Landor, London (2007)

Kaparias, I., Bell, M.G.H., Biagioli, T., Bellezza, L., Mount, B.: Behavioural analysis of interactions between pedestrians and vehicles in street designs with elements of shared space. Transp. Res. F: Psychol. Behav. 30, 115–127 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.02.009CrossRef

Karndacharuk, A., Wilson, D.J., Dunn, R.: A review of the evolution of shared (street) space concepts in urban environments. Transp. Rev. 34(2), 190–220 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2014.893038CrossRef

Kingsbury, K., Lowry, M., Dixon, M.: What makes a “complete street” complete? Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2245, 103–110 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3141/2245-13CrossRef

Lamiquiz, P.J., Lopez-Dominguez, J.: Effects of built environment on walking at the neighbourhood scale. A new role for street networks by modelling their configurational accessibility? Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 74, 148–163 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.003CrossRef

Lew, Y.D., Choi, C.C.: Overview of Singapore’s land transport development 1965–2015. In: Fwa, T.F. (ed.) 50 Years of Transportation in Singapore: Achievements and Challenges, pp. 1–65. World Scientific, Singapore (2016)

Lianhe Zaobao: 许文远:目前约12%土地用于建公路若实现减少用车可腾出空间建公共设施. [Approximately 12% of Land Taken Up by Roads, Reduction in Car Usage May Make Room for Public Facilities: Khaw Boon Wan]. Lianhe Zaobao, Singapore (2018)

Lin, W.: Wasting time? The differentiation of travel time in urban transport. Environ. Plan. A 44(10), 2477–2492 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1068/a4525CrossRef

Lipsitz, S.R., Fitzmaurice, G.M., Molenberghs, G. (1996) Goodness-of-fit tests for ordinal response regression models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C Appl. Stat. 45(2), 175–190 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/2986153

Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L., Stoker, G.: Trends in public participation: part 1—local government perspectives. Public Adm. 79(1), 205–222 (2001a). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00253CrossRef

Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L., Stoker, G.: Trends in public participation: part 2—citizens’ perspectives. Public Adm. 79(2), 445–455 (2001b). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00264CrossRef

Lowry, M.B., Nyerges, T., Rutherford, G.S.: Internet portal for participation of large groups in transportation programming decisions. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2077(1), 156–165 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3141/2077-20CrossRef

LTA: A World Class Land Transport System: White paper. Land Transport Authority, Singapore (1996)

LTA: Land Transport Master Plan 2013. Land Transport Authority, Singapore (2013)

LTA: Safer Streets for Seniors at 50 Locations Island-Wide by End-2023: Marine Crescent Marks the Eighth Completed Silver Zone. Land Transport Authority, Singapore (2016)

LTA (2017) Overview of Road Safety Review. Safety News, vol. 34. Land Transport Authority, Singapore (2017)

LTA: Launch of the Land Transport Master Plan 2040 Conversation: Shaping the Future of Land Transport Together. Land Transport Authority, Singapore (2018a)

LTA: LTA Makes Bicycle Parking Neater and More Accessible. Land Transport Authority, Singapore (2018b)

LTA: LTA to Commence Licence Applications for Bicycle-Sharing Operators. Land Transport Authority, Singapore (2018c)

LTA: Over 5,000 Responses Received on the Land Transport Master Plan 2040. Land Transport Authority, Singapore (2018d)

Lyons, G., Davidson, C.: Guidance for transport planning and policymaking in the face of an uncertain future. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 88, 104–116 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.012CrossRef

Mahmoudi, M., Ahmad, F., Abbasi, B.: Livable streets: the effects of physical problems on the quality and livability of Kuala Lumpur streets. Cities 43, 104–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.016CrossRef

Marleau Donais, F., Abi-Zeid, I., Waygood, E.O.D., Lavoie, R.: Assessing and ranking the potential of a street to be redesigned as a Complete Street: a multi-criteria decision aiding approach. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 124, 1–19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.02.006CrossRef

Marshall, S.: Streets and Patterns, 1st edn. Routledge, London (2004)CrossRef

McCann, E.J.: Collaborative visioning or urban planning as therapy? The politics of public-private policy making. Prof. Geogr. 53(2), 207–218 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00280CrossRef

Mehta, V.: The street as ecology. In: Zavestoski, S., Agyeman, J. (eds.) Incomplete Streets: Processes, Practices, and Possibilities. Routledge, Abingdon (2014)

Millstein, R.A., Cain, K.L., Sallis, J.F., Conway, T.L., Geremia, C., Frank, L.D., Chapman, J., Van Dyck, D., Dipzinski, L.R., Kerr, J., Glanz, K., Saelens, B.E.: Development, scoring, and reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS). BMC Public Health 13(1), 1–15 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-403CrossRef

MOH: Action Plan for Successful Ageing. Ministry of Health, Singapore (2016)

Musselwhite, C., Haddad, H.: Mobility, accessibility and quality of later life. Qual. Ageing Older Adults 11(1), 25–37 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5042/qiaoa.2010.0153CrossRef

NACTO: Global Street Design Guide. Island Press, New York (2016)

Parker, G., Street, E., Wargent, M.: The rise of the private sector in fragmentary planning in England. Plan. Theory Pract. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1532529CrossRef

Pikora, T., Giles-Corti, B., Bull, F., Jamrozik, K., Donovan, R.: Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Soc. Sci. Med. 56(8), 1693–1703 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00163-6CrossRef

Richardson, A.J., Ampt, E.S., Meyburg, A.H.: Survey Methods for Transport Planning. Eucalyptus Press, Melbourne (1995)

Roy, P.: Collaborative planning—a neoliberal strategy? A study of the Atlanta BeltLine. Cities 43, 59–68 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.010CrossRef

Sallis, J.F., Cervero, R.B., Ascher, W., Henderson, K.A., Kraft, M.K., Kerr, J.: An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu. Rev. Public Health 27(1), 297–322 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100CrossRef

Sarkar, C., Webster, C., Pryor, M., Tang, D., Melbourne, S., Zhang, X.H., Liu, J.Z.: Exploring associations between urban green, street design and walking: results from the Greater London boroughs. Landsc. Urban Plan. 143, 112–125 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.013CrossRef

Savini, F., Bertolini, L.: Urban experimentation as a politics of niches. Environ. Plan. A 51(4), 831–848 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19826085CrossRef

Senge, P.M.: The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. Crown Business, New York (1990)

Sheller, M., Urry, J.: The new mobilities paradigm. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 38(2), 207–226 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268CrossRef

Shipley, R.: Visioning in planning: Is the practice based on sound theory? Environ. Plan. A Econ. and Space 34(1), 7–22 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1068/a3461CrossRef

Shipley, R., Newkirk, R.: Vision and visioning in planning: What do these terms really mean? Environ. Plan. 26(4), 573–591 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1068/b260573CrossRef

Sukaryavichute, E., Prytherch, D.L.: Transit planning, access, and justice: evolving visions of bus rapid transit and the Chicago street. J. Transp. Geogr. 69, 58–72 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.04.001CrossRef

Tàbara, J.D., St. Clair, A.L., Hermansen, E.A.T.: Transforming communication and knowledge production processes to address high-end climate change. Environ. Sci. Policy 70, 31–37 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.01.004CrossRef

Tewdwr-Jones, M., Allmendinger, P.: Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 30(11), 1975–1989 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1068/a301975CrossRef

TfL: Streetscape Guidance, 4th edn. Transport for London, London (2019)

Tight, M., Timms, P., Banister, D., Bowmaker, J., Copas, J., Day, A., Drinkwater, D., Givoni, M., Gühnemann, A., Lawler, M., Macmillen, J., Miles, A., Moore, N., Newton, R., Ngoduy, D., Ormerod, M., O’Sullivan, M., Watling, D.: Visions for a walking and cycling focussed urban transport system. J. Transp. Geogr. 19(6), 1580–1589 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.011CrossRef

TRB (2018) Research Report 885: guide to creating and sustaining a culture of innovation for departments of transportation. In: Lorenz, J., Rotert, D., Link, A., Crossett, J. (Eds.) National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (2018)

van de Velden, M. (2011) On generalized canonical correlation analysis. In: Proceedings of the 58th World Statistical Congress. International Statistical Institute, Dublin (2011)

van der Burg, E., de Leeuw, J., Dijksterhuis, G.: OVERALS: nonlinear canonical correlation with k sets of variables. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 18(1), 141–163 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9473(94)90136-8CrossRef

van der Helm, R.: The vision phenomenon: towards a theoretical underpinning of visions of the future and the process of envisioning. Futures 41(2), 96–104 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2008.07.036CrossRef

von Schönfeld, K.C., Bertolini, L.: Urban streets: epitomes of planning challenges and opportunities at the interface of public space and mobility. Cities 68, 48–55 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.012CrossRef

Wiek, A., Iwaniec, D.: Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustain. Sci. 9(4), 497–512 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0208-6CrossRef

Woodcock, I., Dovey, K., Davison, G.: Envisioning the compact city: resident responses to urban design imagery. Aust. Plan. 49(1), 65–78 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2011.595726CrossRef

Yeoh, B.S.A., Chang, T.C.: Globalising Singapore: debating transnational flows in the city. Urban Stud. 38(7), 1025–1044 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980123947CrossRef

Yusuf, J.-E., O’Connell, L., Rawat, P., Anuar, K.: Becoming more complete: the diffusion and evolution of state-level Complete Streets policies. Public Works Manag. Policy 21(3), 280–295 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x15624694CrossRef

Title: Perceived importance of inclusive street dimensions: a public questionnaire survey from a vision(ing) perspective
Authors: Yongcheng Wang
Yiik Diew Wong
Kelvin Goh
Publication date: 05-12-2019
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Transportation / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0049-4488
Electronic ISSN: 1572-9435
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10071-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Shopping trip mode choice of older adults: an application of activity space and hybrid choice models in understanding the effects of built environment and personal goals

Incentive measures to avoid the illegal parking of dockless shared bikes: the relationships among incentive forms, intensity and policy compliance

Modeling dynamics in household car ownership over life courses: a latent class competing risks model

Development of alternative stochastic frontier models for estimating time-space prism vertices

Accessibility in the regional CGE framework: the effects of major transport infrastructure investments in Poland

Hailing a change: comparing taxi and ridehail service quality in Los Angeles

Premium Partner