Skip to main content
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Policy Space in Intellectual Property Rights and Technology Transfer: A New Economic Research Agenda

Author : Keith E. Maskus

Published in: Intellectual Property and Development: Understanding the Interfaces

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

My purpose in writing this chapter is to pose a number of questions that have not been satisfactorily addressed, if at all, by economists working in the area of intellectual property rights (IPRs), trade, foreign direct investment, and technology diffusion. There is always a basic tradeoff between fundamental gains and losses from protecting IPRs, or rather reforming them in a manner that offers more certainty and exclusivity to rights holders. On the one hand, such reforms may be expected to improve the functioning of formal markets in which technologies are traded across borders, at least in recipient emerging countries with supportive economic and policy frameworks. On the other hand, those reforms raise the costs of technology imitation by local firms and impose administrative burdens on domestic authorities. They may also limit the policy flexibility those authorities have to regulate the use of exclusive rights and encourage broad adoption and diffusion of incoming technical knowledge. In this chapter I offer some thoughts on these questions, with a particular emphasis on policy issues surrounding international technology transfer and IPRs. In the second section I discuss available evidence on how patent reforms seem to affect flows of technology through formal markets. Following that is a review of various policy flexibilities that matter in this context, considering the limited evidence about how well they work. In the last substantive section I address some of the broader policy questions that affect technology diffusion, most of which have not been studied systematically by empirical economists. In that context, the section sets out an agenda for economic research that would focus on understanding how broader policies and conditions could improve access to global technologies, even in the presence of IPRs reforms. That analysis is partly speculative, attempting to envision how to peel back the veil of ignorance covering key issues in this area of inquiry.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Odagiri et al. (2010).
 
2
Keller (2004), Hoekman et al. (2005).
 
3
Markusen (2002).
 
4
Hovhanissyan and Keller (2015).
 
5
Blalock and Gertler (2008), Keller (2010).
 
6
Yang and Maskus (2001), Markusen (2001), Hoekman et al. (2005).
 
7
Arora et al. (2001), Maskus (2012a, b).
 
8
The definition of “excessive” scope has long been a contentious issue in innovation economics, even within countries. It is yet more complicated in the international arena. Grossman and Lai (2004), Scotchmer (2004).
 
9
Keller (2010).
 
10
Hoekman et al. (2005), Branstetter et al. (2011).
 
11
Aitken and Harrison (1999).
 
12
Eaton and Kortum (1996).
 
13
Hu and Jaffe (2003).
 
14
Hu (2009).
 
15
Ivus (2010).
 
16
Maskus and Yang (2018).
 
17
Nunnenkamp and Spatz (2004).
 
18
Javorcik (2004).
 
19
Du et al. (2008).
 
20
Branstetter et al. (2006).
 
21
Branstetter et al. (2011).
 
22
Lai et al. (2017).
 
23
Odagiri et al. (2010).
 
24
Goeschl and Swanson (2000).
 
25
Qian (2008).
 
26
Hoekman et al. (2005), Maskus and Saggi (2014) offer full discussions.
 
27
Hausmann and Rodrik (2003), Foray (2012).
 
28
Correa (1999), Maskus and Reichman (2004), Maskus (2012a).
 
29
Maskus (2012b).
 
30
Maskus and Okediji (2010).
 
31
Palangkaraya et al. (2017).
 
32
Xue and Liang (2010), Suttmeier and Yao (2011).
 
33
Maskus (2012a).
 
Literature
go back to reference Aitken, B. J., & Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89, 605–618.CrossRef Aitken, B. J., & Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89, 605–618.CrossRef
go back to reference Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for technology: The economics of innovation and corporate strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for technology: The economics of innovation and corporate strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Blalock, G., & Gertler, P. J. (2008). Welfare gains from foreign direct investment through technology transfer to local suppliers. Journal of International Economics, 74, 402–421.CrossRef Blalock, G., & Gertler, P. J. (2008). Welfare gains from foreign direct investment through technology transfer to local suppliers. Journal of International Economics, 74, 402–421.CrossRef
go back to reference Branstetter, L., Fisman, R., & Fritz Foley, C. (2006). Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from U.S. firm-level panel data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 321–349.CrossRef Branstetter, L., Fisman, R., & Fritz Foley, C. (2006). Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from U.S. firm-level panel data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 321–349.CrossRef
go back to reference Branstetter, L., Fisman, R., Fritz Foley, C., & Saggi, K. (2011). Does intellectual property rights reform spur industrial development? Journal of International Economics, 83, 27–36.CrossRef Branstetter, L., Fisman, R., Fritz Foley, C., & Saggi, K. (2011). Does intellectual property rights reform spur industrial development? Journal of International Economics, 83, 27–36.CrossRef
go back to reference Correa, C. M. (1999). Reviewing the TRIPS agreement: Fostering technology transfer to developing countries. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2, 939–960.CrossRef Correa, C. M. (1999). Reviewing the TRIPS agreement: Fostering technology transfer to developing countries. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2, 939–960.CrossRef
go back to reference Du, J., Lu, Y., & Tao, Z. (2008). Economic institutions and FDI location choice: Evidence from US multinationals in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, 412–429.CrossRef Du, J., Lu, Y., & Tao, Z. (2008). Economic institutions and FDI location choice: Evidence from US multinationals in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, 412–429.CrossRef
go back to reference Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (1996). Trade in ideas: Patenting and productivity in the OECD. Journal of International Economics, 40, 251–278.CrossRef Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (1996). Trade in ideas: Patenting and productivity in the OECD. Journal of International Economics, 40, 251–278.CrossRef
go back to reference Foray, D. (2012). Smart specialization and the new industrial policy agenda. European Commission, Innovation for Growth, Policy Brief No. 8. Foray, D. (2012). Smart specialization and the new industrial policy agenda. European Commission, Innovation for Growth, Policy Brief No. 8.
go back to reference Goeschl, T., & Swanson, T. (2000). Genetic use restriction technologies and the diffusion of yield gains to developing countries. Journal of International Development, 12, 1159–1178.CrossRef Goeschl, T., & Swanson, T. (2000). Genetic use restriction technologies and the diffusion of yield gains to developing countries. Journal of International Development, 12, 1159–1178.CrossRef
go back to reference Grossman, G. M., & Lai, E. L.-C. (2004). International protection of intellectual property. American Economic Review, 94, 1635–1653.CrossRef Grossman, G. M., & Lai, E. L.-C. (2004). International protection of intellectual property. American Economic Review, 94, 1635–1653.CrossRef
go back to reference Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003). Economic development as self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72, 603–633.CrossRef Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003). Economic development as self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72, 603–633.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoekman, B. M., Maskus, K. E., & Saggi, K. (2005). Transfer of technology to developing countries: Unilateral and multilateral policy options. World Development, 33, 1587–1602.CrossRef Hoekman, B. M., Maskus, K. E., & Saggi, K. (2005). Transfer of technology to developing countries: Unilateral and multilateral policy options. World Development, 33, 1587–1602.CrossRef
go back to reference Hovhanissyan, N., & Keller, W. (2015). International business travel: An engine of innovation? Journal of Economic Growth, 20, 75–104.CrossRef Hovhanissyan, N., & Keller, W. (2015). International business travel: An engine of innovation? Journal of Economic Growth, 20, 75–104.CrossRef
go back to reference Hu, A. G. (2009). The regionalization of knowledge flows in East Asia: Evidence from patent citations data. World Development, 37, 1465–1477.CrossRef Hu, A. G. (2009). The regionalization of knowledge flows in East Asia: Evidence from patent citations data. World Development, 37, 1465–1477.CrossRef
go back to reference Hu, A. G., & Jaffe, A. B. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: The cases of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 849–880.CrossRef Hu, A. G., & Jaffe, A. B. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: The cases of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 849–880.CrossRef
go back to reference Ivus, O. (2010). Do stronger patent rights raise high-tech exports to the developing world? Journal of International Economics, 81, 38–47.CrossRef Ivus, O. (2010). Do stronger patent rights raise high-tech exports to the developing world? Journal of International Economics, 81, 38–47.CrossRef
go back to reference Javorcik, B. S. (2004). The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies. European Economic Review, 48, 39–62.CrossRef Javorcik, B. S. (2004). The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies. European Economic Review, 48, 39–62.CrossRef
go back to reference Keller, W. (2004). International technology diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 752–782.CrossRef Keller, W. (2004). International technology diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 752–782.CrossRef
go back to reference Keller, W. (2010). International trade, foreign direct investment, and technology spillovers. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 793–829). Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland.CrossRef Keller, W. (2010). International trade, foreign direct investment, and technology spillovers. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 793–829). Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland.CrossRef
go back to reference Lai, H., Maskus, K. E. & Yang, L. (2017). Patent reform, exports, and productivity of heterogeneous firms in developing countries: Evidence from China. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Working Paper. Lai, H., Maskus, K. E. & Yang, L. (2017). Patent reform, exports, and productivity of heterogeneous firms in developing countries: Evidence from China. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Working Paper.
go back to reference Markusen, J. R. (2001). Contracts, intellectual property rights and multinational investment in developing countries. Journal of International Economics, 53, 189–204.CrossRef Markusen, J. R. (2001). Contracts, intellectual property rights and multinational investment in developing countries. Journal of International Economics, 53, 189–204.CrossRef
go back to reference Markusen, J. R. (2002). Multinational firms and the theory of international trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRef Markusen, J. R. (2002). Multinational firms and the theory of international trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Maskus, K. E. (2012a). Private rights and public problems: The global economics of intellectual property in the 21st century. Washington DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics. Maskus, K. E. (2012a). Private rights and public problems: The global economics of intellectual property in the 21st century. Washington DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
go back to reference Maskus, K. E. (2012b). Intellectual property rights, technology transfer and development: The case of compulsory licensing. In H. H. Lidgard, et al. (Eds.), Sustainable technology transfer: A guide to global aid and trade development (pp. 89–120). The Hague: Kluwer Law International. Maskus, K. E. (2012b). Intellectual property rights, technology transfer and development: The case of compulsory licensing. In H. H. Lidgard, et al. (Eds.), Sustainable technology transfer: A guide to global aid and trade development (pp. 89–120). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
go back to reference Maskus, K. E. & Okediji, R. L. (2010). Intellectual property rights and international technology transfer to address climate change: Risks, opportunities and policy options. International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development, Program on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No. 32. Maskus, K. E. & Okediji, R. L. (2010). Intellectual property rights and international technology transfer to address climate change: Risks, opportunities and policy options. International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development, Program on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No. 32.
go back to reference Maskus, K. E., & Reichman, J. H. (2004). The globalization of private knowledge goods and the privatization of global public goods. Journal of International Economic Law, 7, 279–320.CrossRef Maskus, K. E., & Reichman, J. H. (2004). The globalization of private knowledge goods and the privatization of global public goods. Journal of International Economic Law, 7, 279–320.CrossRef
go back to reference Maskus, K.E. and Saggi, K. (2014). International technology transfer: An analysis from the perspective of developing countries. World Intellectual Property Organization, Committee on Development and Intellectual Property. Maskus, K.E. and Saggi, K. (2014). International technology transfer: An analysis from the perspective of developing countries. World Intellectual Property Organization, Committee on Development and Intellectual Property.
go back to reference Maskus, K. E. & Yang, L. (2018). Domestic patent rights, access to technologies, and the structure of exports. Canadian Journal of Economics, 51, 483–509.CrossRef Maskus, K. E. & Yang, L. (2018). Domestic patent rights, access to technologies, and the structure of exports. Canadian Journal of Economics, 51, 483–509.CrossRef
go back to reference Nunnenkamp, P., & Spatz, J. (2004). Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment: A disaggregated analysis. Review of World Economy, 140, 393–414.CrossRef Nunnenkamp, P., & Spatz, J. (2004). Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment: A disaggregated analysis. Review of World Economy, 140, 393–414.CrossRef
go back to reference Odagiri, H., Goto, A., Sunami, A., & Nelson, R. R. (Eds.). (2010). Intellectual property rights, development, and catch-up. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Odagiri, H., Goto, A., Sunami, A., & Nelson, R. R. (Eds.). (2010). Intellectual property rights, development, and catch-up. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Palangkaraya, A., Jensen, P., & Webster, E. (2017). The effect of patents on trade. Journal of International Economics, 105, 1–9.CrossRef Palangkaraya, A., Jensen, P., & Webster, E. (2017). The effect of patents on trade. Journal of International Economics, 105, 1–9.CrossRef
go back to reference Qian, Y. (2008). Impacts of entry by counterfeiters. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 1577–1609.CrossRef Qian, Y. (2008). Impacts of entry by counterfeiters. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 1577–1609.CrossRef
go back to reference Scotchmer, S. (2004). Innovation and incentives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Scotchmer, S. (2004). Innovation and incentives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Suttmeier, R. P., & Yao, X. (2011). China’s IP transition: Rethinking intellectual property rights in a rising China. Special Report No 29: The National Bureau of Asian Research. Suttmeier, R. P., & Yao, X. (2011). China’s IP transition: Rethinking intellectual property rights in a rising China. Special Report No 29: The National Bureau of Asian Research.
go back to reference Xue, L., & Liang, Z. (2010). Relationships between IPR and technology catch-up: Some evidence from China. In H. Odagiri, et al. (Eds.), Intellectual property rights, development, and catch-up (pp. 317–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Xue, L., & Liang, Z. (2010). Relationships between IPR and technology catch-up: Some evidence from China. In H. Odagiri, et al. (Eds.), Intellectual property rights, development, and catch-up (pp. 317–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Yang, G., & Maskus, K. E. (2001). Intellectual property rights, licensing, and innovation in an endogenous product cycle model. Journal of International Economics, 53, 169–187.CrossRef Yang, G., & Maskus, K. E. (2001). Intellectual property rights, licensing, and innovation in an endogenous product cycle model. Journal of International Economics, 53, 169–187.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Policy Space in Intellectual Property Rights and Technology Transfer: A New Economic Research Agenda
Author
Keith E. Maskus
Copyright Year
2019
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2856-5_1