Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

Published in:

Read chapter Read first chapter

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

12. Polygeneration Systems in Fossil Fuel Power Plants: The Role of Power-to-X in CO₂ Mitigation

Authors : Amirhossein Khalili-Garakani, Leila Samiee, Kazem Kashefi

Published in: Whole Energy Systems

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Abstract

The current dependence on fossil fuel power generation and its developed infrastructure make fossil fuel still a crucial energy source. However, sustainable power generation is a critical need. The integrated power generation and CO₂ utilization process are a power-to-X system for simultaneous power and chemical production. The well-outlined benefits and the flexibility in energy and chemical conversion give this process an encouraging technical and theoretical perspective. This chapter tries to evaluate the concept of polygeneration operation for future power plants with the aim of not only minimizing emission but also sustaining profitability. It is illustrated that by applying a polygeneration configuration, developing the most efficient integration of off-gas pretreatment, utilization of electricity, and chemical production is achievable.

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

inform now

previous chapter Two-Stage Stochastic Market Clearing of Energy and Reserve in the Presence of Coupled Fuel Cell-Based Hydrogen Storage System with Renewable Resources

next chapter The Role of Distributed Multi-vector Energy Assets in Economic Decarbonisation: Early Findings of a UK Demonstrator

Khalili-Garakani A, Ghaseminezhad M., Davoudi, S. Applied processes to achieve optimal methods of manufacturing value added products from power plant flue gas. 2021.

Nazari, S., Shahhoseini, O., Davari, S., & Paydar, R. (2010). Experimental determination and analysis of CO2, SO2 and NOx emission factors in Iran’ s thermal power plants. Energy, 35, 2992–2998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.035 CrossRef

Yamasaki, A. (2003). An overview of CO2 mitigation options for global warming-emphasizing CO2 sequestration options. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 36, 361–375. CrossRef

Steinberg, M. (1978). Synthetic carbonaceous fuels and feedstocks from oxides of carbon and nuclear power. Fuel, 57, 460–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(78)90154-0 CrossRef

Olah, G. A., Prakash, G. K. S., & Goeppert, A. (2011). Anthropogenic chemical carbon cycle for a sustainable future. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 133, 12881–12898. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja202642y CrossRef

Olah, G. A., Goeppert, A., & Prakash, G. K. S. (2009). Beyond oil and gas: The methanol economy (2nd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527627806 CrossRef

Aresta, M., Dibenedetto, A., & Angelini, A. (2014). Catalysis for the valorization of exhaust carbon: From CO2 to chemicals, materials, and fuels. Technological use of CO2. Chemical Reviews, 114, 1709–1742. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr4002758 CrossRef

Thomas, J. M., & Harris, K. D. M. (2016). Some of tomorrow’s catalysts for processing renewable and non-renewable feedstocks, diminishing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and increasing the production of energy. Energy & Environmental Science, 9, 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE03461B CrossRef

Lefebvre, J., Friedemann, M., Manuel, G., Graf, F., Bajohr, S., Reimert, R., et al. (2016). Renewable power-to-gas : A technological and economic review. Renewable Energy, 85, 1371–1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.066 CrossRef

10.

Aresta, M., Dibenedetto, A., & Quaranta, E. (2016). State of the art and perspectives in catalytic processes for CO2 conversion into chemicals and fuels: The distinctive contribution of chemical catalysis and biotechnology. Journal of Catalysis, 343, 2–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2016.04.003 CrossRef

11.

Abanadesa, J. C., Rubinb, E. S., Mazzottic, M., & Herzog, H. J. (2017). On the climate change mitigation potential of CO2 conversion to fuels. Energy & Environmental Science, 10, 2491–2499. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE02819A CrossRef

12.

Agarwal, A. S., Rode, E., Sridhar, N., & Hill, D. (2015). Conversion of CO2 to value-added chemicals: Opportunities and challenges. Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and. Adaption, 1–40.

13.

Jana, K., Ray, A., Mansouri, M., Assadi, M., & De, S. (2017). Polygeneration as a future sustainable energy solution – A comprehensive review. Applied Energy, 202, 88–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.129 CrossRef

14.

Baliban, R. C., Elia, J. A., Weekman, V., & Floudas, C. A. (2012). Process synthesis of hybrid coal, biomass, and natural gas to liquids via Fischer – Tropsch synthesis, ZSM-5 catalytic conversion, methanol synthesis, methanol-to-gasoline, and methanol-to-olefins / distillate technologies. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 47, 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.032 CrossRef

15.

Adams, T. A., & Barton, P. I. (2011). Combining coal gasification and natural gas reforming for efficient polygeneration. Fuel Processing Technology, 92, 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.11.023 CrossRef

16.

Chen, Y., Adams, T. A., & Barton, P. I. (2011). Optimal design and operation of static energy Polygeneration systems. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 50, 5099–5113. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101568v CrossRef

17.

Chen, Y., Adams, T. A., & Barton, P. I. (2011). Optimal design and operation of flexible energy polygeneration systems. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 50, 4553–4566. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie1021267 CrossRef

18.

Khojasteh Salkuyeh, Y., & Adams, T. A. (2014). A new power, methanol, and DME polygeneration process using integrated chemical looping systems. Energy Conversion and Management, 88, 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.08.039 CrossRef

19.

Naqvi, M., Dahlquist, E., & Yan, J. (2017). Complementing existing CHP plants using biomass for production of hydrogen and burning the residual gas in a CHP boiler. Biofuels, 8, 675–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2016.1153362 CrossRef

20.

Galanti, L., Franzoni, A., Traverso, A., & Massardo, A. F. (2011). Existing large steam power plant upgraded for hydrogen production. Applied Energy, 88, 1510–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.033 CrossRef

21.

Gustavsson, C., & Hulteberg, C. (2016). Co-production of gasification based biofuels in existing combined heat and power plants – Analysis of production capacity and integration potential. Energy, 111, 830–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.027 CrossRef

22.

Salman, C. A., Naqvi, M., Thorin, E., & Yan, J. (2017). A polygeneration process for heat, power and DME production by integrating gasification with CHP plant: Modelling and simulation study. Energy Procedia, 142, 1749–1758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.559 CrossRef

23.

Li, S., Gao, L., & Jin, H. (2017). Realizing low life cycle energy use and GHG emissions in coal based polygeneration with CO2 capture. Applied Energy, 194, 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.021 CrossRef

24.

Jana, K., & De, S. (2017). Environmental impact of biomass based polygeneration – A case study through life cycle assessment. Bioresource Technology, 227, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.067 CrossRef

25.

Huang, H., & Yang, S. (2017). Design concept for coal-based polygeneration processes of chemicals and power with the lowest energy consumption for CO2 capture. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 44, 1381–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64241-7.50225-1 CrossRef

26.

Farooqui, A., Bose, A., Ferrero, D., Llorca, J., & Santarelli, M. (2018). Techno-economic and exergetic assessment of an oxy-fuel power plant fueled by syngas produced by chemical looping CO2 and H2O dissociation. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 27, 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.09.001 CrossRef

27.

Stanger, R., Wall, T., Spörl, R., Paneru, M., Grathwohl, S., Weidmann, M., et al. (2015). International journal of greenhouse gas control Oxyfuel combustion for CO2 capture in power plants. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40, 55–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.010 CrossRef

28.

Nguyen, V. N., & Blum, L. (2015). Syngas and synfuels from H2O and CO2: Current status. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 87, 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201400090 CrossRef

29.

Krenzke, P. T., Fosheim, J. R., & Davidson, J. H. (2017). Solar fuels via chemical-looping reforming. Solar Energy, 156, 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.05.095 CrossRef

30.

Yadav, D., & Banerjee, R. (2016). A review of solar thermochemical processes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 497–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.026 CrossRef

31.

Han, S., & Sik, C. (2014). Applicability of dimethyl ether (DME) in a compression ignition engine as an alternative fuel. Energy Conversion and Management, 86, 848–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.06.051 CrossRef

32.

Bakhtyari, A., & Rahimpour, M. R. (2018). Methanol to dimethyl ether. In D. ABF (Ed.), Methanol (1st ed.). Elsevier.

33.

Gądek, M., Kubica, R., & Jędrysik, E. (2013). Production of methanol and dimethyl ether from biomass derived syngas – A comparison of the different synthesis pathways by means of flowsheet simulation. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 32, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63234-0.50010-5 CrossRef

34.

Ren, F., Wang, J., & Li, H. (2006). Direct mass production technique of dimethyl ether from synthesis gas in a circulating slurry bed reactor. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 159, 489–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(06)81640-X CrossRef

35.

Hankin, A., & Shah, N. (2017). Process exploration and assessment for the production of methanol and dimethyl ether from carbon dioxide and water. Sustain Energy Fuels, 1, 1541–1556. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SE00206H CrossRef

36.

Farooqui, A., Di, F., Bose, A., Ferrero, D., Llorca, J., & Santarelli, M. (2019). Techno-economic and exergy analysis of polygeneration plant for power and DME production with the integration of chemical looping CO2/H2O splitting. Energy Conversion and Management, 186, 200–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.043 CrossRef

37.

Wolfersdorf, C., Forman, C., Keller, F., & Gootz, M. (2017). CO2-to-X and coal-to-X concepts in pulverized coal combustion power plants. Energy Procedia, 114, 7171–7185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1821 CrossRef

38.

SacitHerdem, M., Farhad, S., Dincer, I., & Hamdullahpur, F. (2013). Thermodynamic modeling and assessment of a combined coal gasification and alkaline water electrolysis system for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39, 3061–3071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.068 CrossRef

39.

Samiee, L., & Gandzha, S. (2019). Power to methanol technologies via CO2 recovery: CO2 hydrogenation and electrocatalytic routes. Reviews in Chemical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2019-0012

40.

Chauvy, R., Meunier, N., Thomas, D., & De Weireld, G. (2019). Selecting emerging CO2 utilization products for short- to mid-term deployment. Applied Energy, 236, 662–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.096 CrossRef

41.

Yara Fertilizer Industry Handbook (2017). Oslo - Norway.

42.

Dawson, C. J., & Hilton, J. (2011). Fertiliser availability in a resource-limited world: Production and recycling of nitrogen and phosphorus q. Food Policy, 36, S14–S22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.012 CrossRef

43.

World Bank. Population Estimates and Predictions n.d.. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/population-estimates-andprojections. Accessed 27 Feb 2019.

44.

Stewart, W. M., & Roberts, T. L. (2012). Food security and the role of fertilizer in supporting it. Procedia Eng, 46, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.448 CrossRef

45.

Meessen, J. H., Petersen, H. (2010). Urea. Uhlmann’s Encycl. Ind. Chem., Wiley-VCH Verlag CmbH & Co. KGaA; https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.a27_333.

46.

Barzagli, F., Mani, F., & Peruzzini, M. (2011). From greenhouse gas to feedstock: Formation of ammonium carbamate from CO2 and NH3 in organic solvents and its catalytic conversion into urea under mild conditions. Green Chemistry, 13, 1267–1274. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0gc00674b CrossRef

47.

Driver, J. G., Owen, R. E., Makanyire, T., Lake, J. A., Mcgregor, J., & Styring, P. (2019). Blue urea: Fertilizer with reduced environmental impact. Front Energy Research, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00088 CrossRef

48.

Technical and economic feasibility studies of Assaluyeh carbon dioxide collection project and construction of urea production unit. 2019.

49.

Basu, A., Gradassi, M., Sills, R., Technology, U., & Exploration, B. P. (2001). Use of DME as a gas turbine fuel (pp. 1–6). ASME Turbo-Expo, New Orleans.

50.

Matzen, M., & Demirel, Y. (2016). Methanol and dimethyl ether from renewable hydrogen and carbon dioxide: Alternative fuels production and life-cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1068–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.163 CrossRef

51.

Mevawala, C., Jiang, Y., & Bhattacharyya, D. (2019). Techno-economic optimization of shale gas to dimethyl ether production processes via direct and indirect synthesis routes. Applied Energy, 238, 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.044 CrossRef

52.

Álvarez, A., Bansode, A., Urakawa, A., Bavykina, A. V., Wezendonk, T. A., & Makkee, J. G. (2017). Challenges in the greener production of Formates/formic acid, methanol, and DME by heterogeneously catalyzed CO2 hydrogenation processes. Chemical Reviews, 117, 9804–9838. CrossRef

53.

Catizzone, E., Bonura, G., Migliori, M., Frusteri, F., & Giordano, G. (2018). CO2 recycling to dimethyl ether : State-of-the-art and perspectives. Molecules, 23, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23010031 CrossRef

54.

Marketsandmarkets. Dimethyl Ether Market by Raw Materials (Coal, Methanol, Natural gas and Bio-based feedstock), by Applications (Aerosol Propellant, LPG Blending, Transportation fuel and Others), and by Region - Trends & forecasts to 2020 n.d.. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/dimethyl-ether-market-1120.html.

55.

Transparency Market Research. Dimethyl Ether Market (Raw Material - Coal, Methanol, and Natural Gas; Application - Aerosol Propellants, LPG Blending, Transportation Fuel, Power Plant Fuel, and Chemical Feedstock) - Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecast 20 n.d.. https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/dimethyl-ether-market.html.

Title: Polygeneration Systems in Fossil Fuel Power Plants: The Role of Power-to-X in CO2 Mitigation
Authors: Amirhossein Khalili-Garakani
Leila Samiee
Kazem Kashefi
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Whole Energy Systems
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87652-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-87653-1

Copyright Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87653-1_12