Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Applying Big Data Concepts to Improve Flat Steel Production Processes Read chapter Read first chapter

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Prediction of Compressive Strength of Geopolymers Using Multi-objective Feature Selection

Authors : Lasyamayee Garanayak, Sarat Kumar Das, Ranajeet Mohanty

Published in: Big Data in Engineering Applications

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

To reduce the carbon dioxide emission to the environment, production of geopolymer is one of the effective binding materials to act as a substitute of cement. The strength of the geopolymer depends upon different factors such as chemical constituents, curing temperature, curing time, super plasticizer etc. In this paper, prediction models for compressive strength of geopolymer is presented using recently developed artificial intelligence techniques; multi-objective feature selection (MOFS), functional network (FN), multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) and multi gene genetic programming (MGGP). The MOFS is also used to find the subset of influential parameters responsible for the compressive strength of geopolymers. MOFS has been applied with artificial neural network (ANN) and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA II). The parameters considered for development of prediction models are curing time, NaOH concentration, Ca(OH)2 content, superplasticizer content, types of mold, types of geopolymer and H2O/Na2O molar ratio. The developed AI models were compared in terms of different statistical parameters such as average absolute error, root mean square error correlation coefficient, Nash-Sutcliff coefficient of efficiency.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Three Different Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Computing Techniques for Forecasting Long-Period Daily Streamflows
next chapter Application of Big Data Analysis to Operation of Smart Power Systems
Literature
1.
ASTM. (2013). International Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). (ASTM C109/C109M) West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States.
2.
Bach, F. R. (2008). Bolasso: Model consistent Lasso estimation through the bootstrap. In A. McCallum & S. T. Roweis (Eds.), Proceedings of 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, (ICML2008), Helsinki, Finland (pp. 33–400).
3.
Castillo, E., Cobo, A., Gutierrez, J. M., & Pruneda, E. (1998). An introduction to functional networks with applications. Boston: Kluwer.MATH
4.
Castillo, E., Cobo, A., Manuel, J., Gutierrez, J. M., & Pruneda, E. (2000). Functional networks: A new network-based methodology. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 15, 90–106.CrossRef
5.
Cervante, L., Xue, B., Zhang, M., & Shang, L. (2012). Binary particle swarm optimisation for feature selection: A filter based approach. In Proceedings of Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2012 IEEE Congress, Brisbane, QLD (art. no. 6256452, pp. 881–888).
6.
Das, S. K. (2013). Artificial neural networks in geotechnical engineering: Modeling and application issues, Chapter 10. In X. Yang, A. H. Gandomi, S. Talatahari & A. H. Alavi (Eds.), Metaheuristics in water, geotechnical and transport engineering (pp. 231–270). London: Elsevier.CrossRef
7.
Das, S. K., & Suman, S. (2015). Prediction of lateral load capacity of pile in clay using multivariate adaptive regression spline and functional network. The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering., 40(6), 1565–1578.CrossRef
8.
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197.CrossRef
9.
Forman, G. (2003). An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 1289–1305.MATH
10.
11.
Gandomi, A. H., & Alavi, A. H. (2012). A new multi-gene genetic programming approach to nonlinear system modeling. Part II: Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering Problems. Neural Computing and Applications, 21(1), 189–201.CrossRef
12.
Guyon, I., & Elisseeff, A. (2003). An introduction to variable and feature selection. The Journal of Machine Learning Research., 3, 1157–1182.MATH
13.
He, X., Zhang, Q., Sun, N., & Dong, Y. (2009). Feature selection with discrete binary differential evolution. In Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computational Intelligence, AICI 2009, Shanghai (Vol. 4, art. no. 5376334, pp. 327–330).
14.
15.
Juenger, M. C. G., Winnefeld, F., Provis, J. L., & Ideker, J. H. (2011). Advances in alternative cementitious binders. Cement and Concrete Research Cement and Concrete Research, 41, 1232–1243.CrossRef
16.
17.
Mehta, P. K. (2004). High-performance, high-volume fly ash concrete for sustainable development. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Sustainable Development and Concrete Technology, Beijing, China (pp. 3–14).
18.
Nazari, A., Hajiallahyari, H., Rahimi, A., Khanmohammadi, H., & Amini, M. (2012). Prediction compressive strength of Portland cement-based geopolymers by artificial neural networks. Neural Computing and Applications, 1–9.
19.
Nazari, A., & Pacheco-Torgal, F. (2013). Predicting compressive strength of different geopolymers by artificial neural networks. Ceramics International, 39, 2247–2257.CrossRef
20.
Nazari, A., & Riahi, S. (2012). Prediction of the effects of nanoparticles on early-age compressive strength of ash-based geopolymers by fuzzy logic. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 22(2), 247–267.CrossRef
21.
Neshatian, K., & Zhang, M. (2009). Pareto front feature selection: Using genetic programming to explore feature space. In Proceedings of 11th Annual conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, GECCO’09 (pp. 1027–1034). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
22.
Pacheco-Torgal, F., Abdollahnejad, Z., Camões, A. F., Jamshidi, M., & Ding, Y. (2012). Durability of alkali-activated binders: A clear advantage over Portland cement or an unproven issue? Construction and Building Materials, 30, 400–405.CrossRef
23.
Pacheco-Torgal, F., Castro-Gomes, J., & Jalali, S. (2008). Alkali-activated binders: A review. Part 2. About materials and binders manufacture. Construction and Building Materials, 22(7), 1315–1322.CrossRef
24.
Pacheco-Torgal, F., Castro-Gomes, J., & Jalali, S. (2007). Investigations about the effect of aggregates on strength and microstructure of geopoly-meric mine waste mud binders. Cement and Concrete Research, 37, 933–941.CrossRef
25.
Pacheco-Torgal, F., Moura, D., Ding, Y., & Jalali, S. (2011). Composition, strength and workability of alkali-activated metakaolin based mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 3732–3745.CrossRef
26.
Rashad, A. M. (2014). A comprehensive overview about the influence of different admixtures and additives on the properties of alkali-activated fly ash. Materials and Design, 53, 1005–1025.CrossRef
27.
Searson, D. P., Leahy, D. E., & Willis, M. J. (2010). GPTIPS: An open source genetic programming toolbox from multi-gene symbolic regression. In Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong (Vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 77–80).
28.
Singh, B., Ishwarya, G., Gupta, M., & Bhattacharyya, S. K. (2015). Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments. Construction and Building Materials, 85, 78–90.CrossRef
29.
Smith, G. N. (1986). Probability and statistics in civil engineering: An introduction. London: Collins.
30.
31.
32.
Xue, B., Cervante, L., Shang, L., Browne, W. N., & Zhang, M. (2012). A multi-objective particle swarm optimisation for filter based feature selection in classification problems. Connection Science, 24(2–3), 91–116.CrossRef
33.
Xue, B., Cervante, L., Shang, L., Browne, W. N., & Zhang, M. (2014). Binary PSO and rough set theory for feature selection: A multi-objective filter based approach. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 13(2), art. no. 1450009.CrossRef
34.
Yang, Y., & Pedersen, J. O. (1997). A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. Proceedings of Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’97) (Vol. 97, pp. 412–420), Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
35.
Zare, H., Haffari, G., Gupta, A., & Brinkman, R. R. (2013). Scoring relevancy of features based on combinatorial analysis of Lasso with application to lymphoma diagnosis. BMC Genomics, 14, art. no. S14.CrossRef
36.
Zhu, Z., Ong, Y. S., & Dash, M. (2007). Wrapper-filter feature selection algorithm using a memetic framework. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics, 37(1), 70–76.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prediction of Compressive Strength of Geopolymers Using Multi-objective Feature Selection
Authors
Lasyamayee Garanayak
Sarat Kumar Das
Ranajeet Mohanty
Copyright Year
2018
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Book
Big Data in Engineering Applications

Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8475-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-10-8476-8

Copyright Year: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8476-8_16

Premium Partner

    Image Credits