Top

Journal of Materials Science

Published in:

12-06-2022 | Review

Progress in 3D printing for bone tissue engineering: a review

Authors: Weiwei Lan, Xiaobo Huang, Di Huang, Xiaochun Wei, Weiyi Chen

Published in: Journal of Materials Science | Issue 27/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Effective clinical methods for large bone defects are not yet available on account of the complex intrinsic structure and mechanical characteristics of natural bone tissue. It remains a challenge to restore bone damage to its original form by tissue engineering. With the continuous development of three-dimensional (3D) printing in recent years, the emergence of new technical supports and material innovations has established the foundation for bone tissue engineering (BTE). 3D printing has significant advantages for personalized treatment, as it allows for the specific fabrication of scaffolds with appropriate size, shape and intrinsic structural characteristics via patients’ computerized axial tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging. In this review, we first systematically reviewed the development of 3D printing, printing methods and the selection of printing inks, then focused on the application of high-strength hydrogels in 3D printing for BTE. A brief anticipation of the future development of 3D printing was presented.

Graphical abstract

next article A review on current status and mechanisms of room-temperature magnetoelectric coupling in multiferroics for device applications

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Marrella A, Lee TY, Lee DH et al (2018) Engineering vascularized and innervated bone biomaterials for improved skeletal tissue regeneration. Mater Today 21(4):362–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.10.005CrossRef

Zhang T, Wei Q, Zhou H et al (2021) Three-dimensional-printed individualized porous implants: a new “implant-bone” interface fusion concept for large bone defect treatment. Bioactive Mater 6:3659–3670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.030CrossRef

Nie L, Chen D, Suo J et al (2012) Physicochemical characterization and biocompatibility in vitro of biphasic calcium phosphate/polyvinyl alcohol scaffolds prepared by freeze-drying method for bone tissue engineering applications. colloids and surfaces. B Biointerfaces 100:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.04.046CrossRef

Zhang Z, Jia B, Han Y et al (2021) Biodegradable ZnLiCa ternary alloys for critical-sized bone defect regeneration at load-bearing sites: in vitro and in vivo studies. Bioactive Mater 6:3999–4013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.045CrossRef

Swanson W, Zhang Z, Xiu K et al (2020) Scaffolds with controlled release of pro-mineralization exosomes to promote craniofacial bone healing without cell transplantation. Acta Biomater 118:215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.052CrossRef

Shi R, Huang Y, Ma C et al (2018) Current advances for bone regeneration based on tissue engineering strategies. Front Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-018-0629-9CrossRef

Ratheesh G, Vaquette C, Xiao Y (2020) Patient‐specific bone particles bioprinting for bone tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater 9(23):2001323. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202001323CrossRef

Lin K-F, He S, Song Y et al (2016) Low-temperature additive manufacturing of biomimic three-dimensional hydroxyapatite/collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(11):6905–6916. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b00815CrossRef

Jose M, Thomas V, Johnson K et al (2008) Aligned PLGA/HA nanofibrous nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 5:305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.07.019CrossRef

10.

Nakano T, Ishimoto T, Matsugaki A et al (2020) Control of crystallographic orientation by metal additive manufacturing process of β-type Ti alloys based on the bone tissue anisotropy. MATEC Web of Conf 321:05002. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202032105002CrossRef

11.

Schatkoski VM, doAmaralMontanheirodeMenezes TLBRC et al (2021) Current advances concerning the most cited metal ions doped bioceramics and silicate-based bioactive glasses for bone tissue engineering. Ceramics Int 47(3):2999–3012CrossRef

12.

Camara-Torres M, Duarte S, Sinha R et al (2021) 3D additive manufactured composite scaffolds with antibiotic-loaded lamellar fillers for bone infection prevention and tissue regeneration. Bioactive Mater 6(4):1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.031CrossRef

13.

Yinze X, Gao R-N, Zhang H et al (2020) Rationally designed functionally graded porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds with high strength and toughness built via selective laser melting for load-bearing orthopedic applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 104:103673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103673CrossRef

14.

Zhang H, Huang H, Hao G et al (2021) 3D Printing hydrogel scaffolds with nanohydroxyapatite gradient to effectively repair osteochondral defects in rats. Adv Funct Mater 31(1):2006697. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202006697CrossRef

15.

Zhai X, Ma Y, Hou C et al (2017) 3D-printed high strength bioactive supramolecular polymer/clay nanocomposite hydrogel scaffold for bone regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00224CrossRef

16.

Wang X, Xu S, Zhou S et al (2016) Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review. Biomaterials 83:127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012CrossRef

17.

Bai L, Zhao Y, Chen P et al (2021) Targeting early healing phase with titania nanotube arrays on tunable diameters to accelerate bone regeneration and osseointegration. Small 17(4):2006287. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202006287CrossRef

18.

Bai L, Liu Y, Du Z et al (2018) Differential effect of hydroxyapatite nano-particle versus nano-rod decorated titanium micro-surface on osseointegration. Acta Biomater 76:344–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.06.023CrossRef

19.

Koons G, Diba M, Mikos A (2020) Materials design for bone-tissue engineering. Nat Rev Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-0204-2CrossRef

20.

Wang Y, Huang X, Zhang X (2021) Ultrarobust, tough and highly stretchable self-healing materials based on cartilage-inspired noncovalent assembly nanostructure. Nature Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21577-7CrossRef

21.

Hua M, Shuwang W, Ma Y et al (2021) Strong tough hydrogels via the synergy of freeze-casting and salting out. Nature 590(7847):594–599. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03212-zCrossRef

22.

Hua J, Ng PF, Fei B (2018) High-strength hydrogels: microstructure design, characterization and applications: high-strength hydrogels: a review of microstructure design, characterization and applications. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 56:1325–1335. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.24725CrossRef

23.

Hirsch M, Charlet A, Amstad E (2020) 3D printing of strong and tough double network granular hydrogels. Adv Func Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202005929CrossRef

24.

Manavitehrani I, Le TYL, Daly S et al (2018) Formation of porous biodegradable scaffolds based on poly(propylene carbonate) using gas foaming technology. Mater Sci Eng, C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.088CrossRef

25.

Yao H, Kang J, Li W et al (2017) Novel β-TCP/PVA bilayered hydrogels with considerable physical and bio-functional properties for osteochondral repair. Biomed Mater. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aa8541CrossRef

26.

Nahanmoghadam A, Asemani M, Gooadrzi V et al (2020) Design and fabrication of bone tissue scaffolds based on pcl/phbvcontaining hydroxyapatite nanoparticles: dual-leaching technique. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37087CrossRef

27.

Lan W, Zhang X, Xu M et al (2019) Carbon nanotube reinforced polyvinyl alcohol/biphasic calcium phosphate scaffold for bone tissue engineering. RSC Adv 9:38998–39010. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA08569FCrossRef

28.

Kazimierczak P, Benko A, Pałka K et al (2020) Novel synthesis method combining a foaming agent with freeze-drying to obtain hybrid highly macroporous bone scaffolds. J Mater Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.006CrossRef

29.

Bandyopadhyay A, Mitra I, Bose S (2020) 3D printing for bone regeneration. Curr Osteoporos Rep 18:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-020-00606-2CrossRef

30.

Han X, Sun M, Chen B et al (2021) Lotus seedpod-inspired internal vascularized 3D printed scaffold for bone tissue repair. Bioactive Mater 6(6):1639–1652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.019CrossRef

31.

Bendtsen ST, Quinnell SP, Wei M (2017) Development of a novel alginate-polyvinyl alcohol-hydroxyapatite hydrogel for 3D bioprinting bone tissue engineered scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 105(5):1457–1468. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36036CrossRef

32.

Wang C, Huang W, Zhou Y et al (2020) 3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Bioactive Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.004CrossRef

33.

Maroulakos M, Kamperos G, Tayebi L et al (2018) Applications of 3D printing on craniofacial bone repair: a systematic review. J Dent. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.11.004CrossRef

34.

Lipian M, Kulak M, Stepien M (2019) Fast track integration of computational methods with experiments in small wind turbine development. Energies 12(9):1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091625CrossRef

35.

Zuo H, Liu Z, Zhang L et al (2021) Self-healing materials enable free-standing seamless large-scale 3D printing. Sci China-Mater. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-020-1603-yCrossRef

36.

Pasricha A, Greeninger R (2018) Exploration of 3D printing to create zero-waste sustainable fashion notions and jewelry. Fashion Text. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-018-0152-2CrossRef

37.

Kelly C, Miller A, Hollister S et al (2017) Design and structure-function characterization of 3d printed synthetic porous biomaterials for tissue engineering. Adv Healthcare Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701095CrossRef

38.

Tay YWD, Panda B, Paul SC et al (2017) 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review. Virtual Phys Prototyp 12(3):261–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2017.1326724CrossRef

39.

Yang Y, Zhang Q, Xu T et al (2020) Photocrosslinkable nanocomposite ink for printing strong, biodegradable and bioactive bone graft. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120378CrossRef

40.

Daly AC, Cunniffe GM, Sathy BN et al (2016) 3D Bioprinting of developmentally inspired templates for whole bone organ engineering. Adv Healthcare Mater 5(18):2353–2362. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600182CrossRef

41.

Palmieri V, Lattanzi W, Perini G et al (2020) 3D-printed graphene for bone reconstruction. 2D Mater 7(2):022004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ab6a5dCrossRef

42.

Feng Z, Li Y, Hao L et al (2019) Graphene-reinforced biodegradable resin composites for stereolithographic 3d printing of bone structure scaffolds. J Nanomater 2019:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9710264CrossRef

43.

Xi L, Zhang Y, Gupta H et al (2020) A multiscale study of structural and compositional changes in a natural nanocomposite: Osteoporotic bone with chronic endogenous steroid excess. Bone 143:115666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2020.115666CrossRef

44.

Midha S, Dalela M, Sybil D et al (2019) Advances in three-dimensional bioprinting of bone: Progress and challenges. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 13(6):925–945. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2847CrossRef

45.

Tang A, Ji J, Li J et al (2021) Nanocellulose/pegda aerogels with tunable poisson’s ratio fabricated by stereolithography for mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell culture. Nanomaterials 11(3):603. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11030603CrossRef

46.

van Bochove B, Grijpma DW (2019) Photo-crosslinked synthetic biodegradable polymer networks for biomedical applications. J Biomater Sci-Polym Ed 30(2):77–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2018.1553105CrossRef

47.

Wei Y, Zhao D, Cao Q et al (2020) Stereolithography-based additive manufacturing of high performance osteoinductive calcium phosphate ceramics by a digital light-processing system. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 6(3):1787–1797. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01663CrossRef

48.

Chen Y, Furukawa T, Ibi T et al (2021) Multi-scale micro-stereolithography using optical fibers with a photocurable ceramic slurry. Optical Mater Express 11(1):105–114. https://doi.org/10.1364/ome.404217CrossRef

49.

ZhouFuHe L‐YJY (2020) A review of 3D printing technologies for soft polymer materials. Adv Functional Mater 30(28):2000187. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202000187CrossRef

50.

Heinrich MA, Liu W, Jimenez A et al (2019) 3D Bioprinting: from benches to translational applications. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201805510CrossRef

51.

Anandakrishnan N, Ye H, Guo Z et al (2021) Fast stereolithography printing of large-scale biocompatible hydrogel models. Adv Healthc Mater 10(10):e2002103. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202002103CrossRef

52.

Safonov A, Maltsev E, Chugunov S et al (2020) Design and fabrication of complex-shaped ceramic bone implants via 3d printing based on laser stereolithography. Appl Sci 10(20):7138CrossRef

53.

Le Guehennec L, Dorien VH, Plougonven E et al (2020) In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of calcium-phosphate scaffolds three-dimensional printed by stereolithography for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 108(3):412–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36823CrossRef

54.

Amler AK, Dinkelborg PH, Schlauch D et al (2021) Comparison of the translational potential of human mesenchymal progenitor cells from different bone entities for autologous 3d bioprinted bone grafts. Int J Mol Sci 22(2):796. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22020796CrossRef

55.

Thavasiappan K, Venkatesan MS, Ariffuddeen M et al (2020) Design, analysis, fabrication and testing of PC porous scaffolds using rapid prototyping in clinical applications. Biomedicine 39(2):339–345. https://doi.org/10.51248/.v39i2.204CrossRef

56.

Chimene D, Kaunas R, Gaharwar AK (2020) Hydrogel bioink reinforcement for additive manufacturing: a focused review of emerging strategies. Adv Mater 32(1):1902026. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201902026CrossRef

57.

Tromans G (2006) Rapid manufacturing: an industrial revolution for the digital age, pp 211–219.

58.

Truby RL, Lewis JA (2016) Printing soft matter in three dimensions. Nature 540(7633):371–378. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21003CrossRef

59.

Nadgorny M, Ameli A (2018) Functional polymers and nanocomposites for 3d printing of smart structures and devices. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(21):17489–17507. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b01786CrossRef

60.

Yang K, Grant JC, Lamey P et al (2017) Diels–alder reversible thermoset 3d printing: isotropic thermoset polymers via fused filament fabrication. Adv Functional Mater 27(24):1700318. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201700318CrossRef

61.

Nowicki MA, Castro NJ, Plesniak MW et al (2016) 3D printing of novel osteochondral scaffolds with graded microstructure. Nanotechnology 27(41):414001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/27/41/414001CrossRef

62.

Alizadeh-Osgouei M, Li Y, Vahid A et al (2020) High strength porous PLA gyroid scaffolds manufactured via fused deposition modeling for tissue-engineering applications. Smart Mater Med 2:15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smaim.2020.10.003CrossRef

63.

Chen G, Chen N, Wang Q (2019) Fabrication and properties of poly(vinyl alcohol)/β-tricalcium phosphate composite scaffolds via fused deposition modeling for bone tissue engineering. Compos Sci Technol 172:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.004CrossRef

64.

Distler T, Fournier N, Gruenewald A et al (2020) Polymer-bioactive glass composite filaments for 3d scaffold manufacturing by fused deposition modeling: fabrication and characterization. Front Bioengin Biotechnol 8:552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00552CrossRef

65.

Yang C, Li J, Chongzun Z et al (2019) advanced antibacterial activity of biocompatible tantalum nanofilm via enhanced local innate immunity. Acta Biomater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.027CrossRef

66.

Nulty J, Freeman FE, Browe DC et al (2021) 3D bioprinting of prevascularised implants for the repair of critically-sized bone defects. Acta Biomater 126:154–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.003CrossRef

67.

Ojansivu M, Rashad A, Ahlinder A et al (2019) Wood-based nanocellulose and bioactive glass modified gelatin-alginate bioinks for 3D bioprinting of bone cells. Biofabrication 11(3):035010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab0692CrossRef

68.

Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K et al (2016) 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv 34(4):422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011CrossRef

69.

Okafor-Muo OL, Hassanin H, Kayyali R et al (2020) 3D Printing of solid oral dosage forms: numerous challenges with unique opportunities. J Pharm Sci 109(12):3535–3550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2020.08.029CrossRef

70.

Lv C, Zhu L, Shi J et al (2018) The fabrication of tissue engineering scaffolds by inkjet printing technology. Mater Sci Forum 934:129–133. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.934.129CrossRef

71.

Rajzer I, Rom M, Menaszek E et al (2015) Conductive PANI patterns on electrospun PCL/gelatin scaffolds modified with bioactive particles for bone tissue engineering. Mater Lett 138:60–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.09.077CrossRef

72.

Gao G, Schilling AF, Yonezawa T et al (2014) Bioactive nanoparticles stimulate bone tissue formation in bioprinted three-dimensional scaffold and human mesenchymal stem cells. Biotechnol J 9(10):1304–1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400305CrossRef

73.

Cui X, Dean D, Ruggeri ZM et al (2010) Cell damage evaluation of thermal inkjet printed chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 106(6):963–969. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22762CrossRef

74.

Vanderburgh JP, Fernando SJ, Merkel AR et al (2017) Fabrication of trabecular bone-templated tissue-engineered constructs by 3d inkjet printing. Adv Healthcare Mater 6(22):1700369. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700369CrossRef

75.

Barui S, Panda AK, Naskar S et al (2019) 3D inkjet printing of biomaterials with strength reliability and cytocompatibility: quantitative process strategy for Ti-6Al-4V. Biomaterials 213:119212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.023CrossRef

76.

Liao B, Xia RF, Li W et al (2021) 3D-Printed Ti6Al4V scaffolds with graded triply periodic minimal surface structure for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Eng Perform 30:4993–5004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05580-zCrossRef

77.

Kamboj N, Aghayan M, Sara Rodrigo-Vázquez C et al (2019) Novel silicon-wollastonite based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering produced by selective laser melting. Ceram Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.08.208CrossRef

78.

Hull SM, Lindsay CD, Brunel LG et al (2021) 3D Bioprinting using universal orthogonal network (UNION) bioinks. Adv Func Mater 31(7):2007983. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202007983CrossRef

79.

Kim SH, Yeon YK, Lee JM et al (2018) Precisely printable and biocompatible silk fibroin bioink for digital light processing 3D printing. Nat Commun 9:1620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04517-wCrossRef

80.

He Y, Wang F, Wang X et al (2021) A photocurable hybrid chitosan/acrylamide bioink for DLP based 3D bioprinting. Mater Des 202:109588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109588CrossRef

81.

Hong H, Seo YB, Kim DY et al (2020) Digital light processing 3D printed silk fibroin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 232:119679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119679CrossRef

82.

Ouyang L, Armstrong JPK, Lin Y et al (2020) Expanding and optimizing 3D bioprinting capabilities using complementary network bioinks. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc5529CrossRef

83.

Duymaz BT, Erdiler FB, Alan T et al (2019) 3D bio-printing of levan/polycaprolactone/gelatin blends for bone tissue engineering: characterization of the cellular behavior. Eur Polymer J 119:426–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.08.015CrossRef

84.

Micic M, Antonijevic D, Milutinovic-Smiljanic S et al (2020) Developing a novel resorptive hydroxyapatite-based bone substitute for over-critical size defect reconstruction: physicochemical and biological characterization and proof of concept in segmental rabbit’s ulna reconstruction. Biomed Eng Biomedizinische Technik 65(4):491–505. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2019-0218CrossRef

85.

Demirtas TT, Irmak G, Gumusderelioglu M (2017) A bioprintable form of chitosan hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Biofabrication 9(3):035003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7b1dCrossRef

86.

Liu X, Gaihre B, George MN et al (2021) 3Dbioprinting of oligo (poly ethylene glycol fumarate) for bone and nerve tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 109(1):6–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37002CrossRef

87.

Anada T, Pan C-C, Stahl AM et al (2019) Vascularized bone-mimetic hydrogel constructs by 3d bioprinting to promote osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Int J Mol Sci 20(5):1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20051096CrossRef

88.

Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A (2013) Bone tssue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today 16:496–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017CrossRef

89.

Ardelean IL, Gudovan D, Ficai D et al (2018) Collagen/hydroxyapatite bone grafts manufactured by homogeneous/heterogeneous 3D printing. Mater Lett 231:179–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.08.042CrossRef

90.

Aldana A, Valente F, Dilley R et al (2020) Development of 3D bioprinted GelMA-alginate hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties. Bioprinting 21:e00105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00105CrossRef

91.

Chimene D, Lennox KK, Kaunas RR et al (2016) Advanced bioinks for 3d printing: a materials science perspective. Ann Biomed Eng 44(6):2090–2102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1638-yCrossRef

92.

Yang Yang, Song Xuan, Li Xiangjia et al (2018) Recent progress in biomimetic additive manufacturing technology: from materials to functional structures. Adv Mater 30(36):1706539. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201706539CrossRef

93.

Ouyang L, Rui Yao Y, Zhao WS (2016) Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells. Biofabrication 8(3):035020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020CrossRef

94.

Siu TL, Rogers JM, Lin K et al (2018) Custom-made titanium 3-dimensional printed interbody cages for treatment of osteoporotic fracture-related spinal deformity. World Neurosurg 111:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.160CrossRef

95.

Nune KC, Misra RDK, Gaytan SM et al (2015) Interplay between cellular activity and three-dimensional scaffold-cell constructs with different foam structure processed by electron beam melting. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 103(5):1677–1692. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35307CrossRef

96.

Yu W, Zhao H, Ding Z et al (2016) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of MgF2 coated AZ31 magnesium alloy porous scaffolds for bone regeneration. Colloids Surf B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.10.037CrossRef

97.

Dumas M, Terriault P, Brailovski V (2017) Modelling and characterization of a porosity graded lattice structure for additively manufactured biomaterials. Mater Des 121:383–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.021CrossRef

98.

Zheng Y, Han Q, Wang J et al (2020) Promotion of osseointegration between Implant and bone interface by titanium alloy porous scaffolds prepared by 3D printing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 6(9):5181–5190. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00662CrossRef

99.

Soro N, Attar H, Brodie E et al (2019) Evaluation of the mechanical compatibility of additively manufactured porous Ti–25Ta alloy for load-bearing implant applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 97:149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.019CrossRef

100.

Kuo T-Y, Chin W-H, Chien C-S et al (2019) Mechanical and biological properties of graded porous tantalum coatings deposited on titanium alloy implants by vacuum plasma spraying. Surf Coat Technol 372:399–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.05.003CrossRef

101.

Weng Z, Bai L, Liu Y et al (2019) Osteogenic activity, antibacterial ability, and Ni release of Mg-incorporated Ni-Ti-O nanopore coatings on NiTi alloy. Appl Surf Sci 486:441–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.259CrossRef

102.

Lee JW, Wen HB, Battula S et al (2015) Outcome after placement of tantalum porous engineered dental implants in fresh extraction sockets a canine study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 30(1):134–142CrossRef

103.

Liu S, Hu X, Ma X et al (2016) Promotion of osteointegration under diabetic conditions by tantalum coating-based surface modification on 3-dimensional printed porous titanium implants. Colloids Surf B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.09.018CrossRef

104.

Bandyopadhyay A, Mitra I, Shivaram A et al (2019) Direct comparison of additively manufactured porous titanium and tantalum implants towards in vivo osseointegration. Addit Manuf 28:259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.04.025CrossRef

105.

Zhao DW, Ma ZJ, Wang TN et al (2019) Biocompatible porous tantalum metal plates in the treatment of tibial fracture. Orthop Surg 11(2):325–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12432CrossRef

106.

Zhao G, Li S, Chen X et al (2019) Porous tantalum scaffold fabricated by gel casting based on 3D printing and electrolysis. Mater Lett 239:5–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.12.047CrossRef

107.

Xiong Z, Liu W, Qian H et al (2021) Tantalum nanoparticles reinforced PCL scaffolds using direct 3D printing for bone tissue engineering. Front Mater 8(10):3389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.609779CrossRef

108.

Li Y, Zhou J, Pavanram P et al (2018) Additively manufactured biodegradable porous magnesium. Acta Biomater 67:378–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.008CrossRef

109.

Zhao S, Xie K, Guo Y et al (2020) Fabrication and biological activity of 3D-printed polycaprolactone/magnesium porous scaffolds for critical size bone defect repair. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 6(9):5120–5131. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01911CrossRef

110.

Bobby Kannan M, Chappell J, Khakbaz H et al (2020) Biodegradable 3D porous zinc alloy scaffold for bone fracture fixation devices. Medi Dev Sens. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds3.10108CrossRef

111.

Chou D-T, Wells D, Hong D et al (2013) Novel processing of iron-manganese alloy based biomaterials by inkjet 3D printing. Acta Biomater 9(10):1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.016CrossRef

112.

Martinez D, Han S, Kim N (2018) Magnesium alloy 3D printing by wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM). MRS Adv 3:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2018.553CrossRef

113.

Xu W, Zhuang Y, Zhang X et al (2019) Preparation of medical magnesium matrix composite for bone defect and design method of 3D printed material. Sci Adv Mater 11(6):824–834. https://doi.org/10.1166/sam.2019.3557CrossRef

114.

Pei X, Ma L, Zhang B et al (2017) Creating hierarchical porosity hydroxyapatite scaffolds with osteoinduction by three-dimensional printing and microwave sintering. Biofabrication 9(4):045008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa90edCrossRef

115.

Driscoll JA, Lubbe R, Jakus AE et al (2020) 3D-printed ceramic-demineralized bone matrix hyperelastic bone composite scaffolds for spinal fusion. Tissue Eng Part A 26(3–4):157–166. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0166CrossRef

116.

Gmeiner R, Mitteramskogler G, Stampfl J et al (2015) Stereolithographic ceramic manufacturing of high strength bioactive glass. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 12(1):38–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.12325CrossRef

117.

Tesavibul P, Felzmann R, Gruber S et al (2012) Processing of 45S5 bioglass (R) by lithography-based additive manufacturing. Mater Lett 74:81–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2012.01.019CrossRef

118.

Hartmann M, Pfaffinger M, Stampfl J (2021) the role of solvents in lithography-based ceramic manufacturing of lithium disilicate. Materials 14(4):1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14041045CrossRef

119.

Baumgartner S, Gmeiner R, Schoenherr JA et al (2020) Stereolithography-based additive manufacturing of lithium disilicate glass ceramic for dental applications. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl 116:111180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111180CrossRef

120.

Li X, Yuan Y, Liu L et al (2020) 3D printing of hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate scaffold with hierarchical porous structure for bone regeneration. Bio-Des Manuf 3(1):15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-019-00056-5CrossRef

121.

Raja N, Sung A, Park H et al (2021) Low-temperature fabrication of calcium deficient hydroxyapatite bone scaffold by optimization of 3D printing conditions. Ceram Int 47(5):7005–7016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.051CrossRef

122.

Mirkhalaf M, Dao A, Schindeler A et al (2021) Personalized baghdadite scaffolds: stereolithography, mechanics and in vivo testing. Acta Biomater 15(132):217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.012CrossRef

123.

Fernandes MH, Alves MM, Cebotarenco M et al (2020) Citrate zinc hydroxyapatite nanorods with enhanced cytocompatibility and osteogenesis for bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl 115:111147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111147CrossRef

124.

Koksal OK, Wrobel P, Apaydin G et al (2019) Elemental analysis for iron, cobalt, copper and zinc decorated hydroxyapatite synthetic bone dusts by EDXRF and SEM. Microchem J 144:83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2018.08.050CrossRef

125.

Chen S, Shi Y, Zhang X et al (2019) Biomimetic synthesis of Mg-substituted hydroxyapatite nanocomposites and three-dimensional printing of composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 107(11):1549–3296. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36757CrossRef

126.

Deng C, Yao Q, Feng C et al (2017) 3D printing of bilineage constructive biomaterials for bone and cartilage regeneration. Adv Func Mater 27:1703117. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201703117CrossRef

127.

Inzana JA, Olvera D, Fuller SM et al (2014) 3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomaterials 35(13):4026–4034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.064CrossRef

128.

Huang T, Fan C, Zhu M et al (2019) 3D-printed scaffolds of biomineralized hydroxyapatite nanocomposite on silk fibroin for improving bone regeneration. Appl Surf Sci 467:345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.166CrossRef

129.

Yao Q, Wei B, Guo Y et al (2015) Design, construction and mechanical testing of digital 3D anatomical data-based PCL–HA bone tissue engineering scaffold. J Mater Sci Mater Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5360-8CrossRef

130.

Hassanajili S, Karami-Pour A, Oryan A et al (2019) Preparation and characterization of PLA/PCL/HA composite scaffolds using indirect 3D printing for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl 104:109960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109960CrossRef

131.

Belaid H, Nagarajan S, Barou C et al (2020) Boron nitride based nanobiocomposites: design by 3d printing for bone tissue engineering. ACS Appl Bio Mater 3(4):1865–1874. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b00965CrossRef

132.

Grottkau BE, Hui Z, Yao Y et al (2020) Rapid fabrication of anatomically-shaped bone scaffolds using indirect 3D Printing and perfusion techniques. Int J Mol Sci 21(1):315. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21010315CrossRef

133.

Li X, Wang Y, Wang Z et al (2018) Composite PLA/PEG/nHA/Dexamethasone scaffold prepared by 3D printing for bone regeneration. Macromol Biosci 18(6):e1800068. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201800068CrossRef

134.

Bose S, Koski C, Vu AA (2020) Additive manufacturing of natural biopolymers and composites for bone tissue engineering. Mater Horiz 7(8):2011–2027. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0mh00277aCrossRef

135.

Hung BP, Naved BA, Nyberg EL et al (2016) Three-dimensional printing of bone extracellular matrix for craniofacial regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2(10):1806–1816. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00101CrossRef

136.

Lee H, Yang GH, Kim M et al (2018) Fabrication of micro/nanoporous collagen/dECM/silk-fibroin biocomposite scaffolds using a low temperature 3D printing process for bone tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl 84:140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.013CrossRef

137.

Lohrasbi S, Mirzaei E, Karimizade A et al (2020) Collagen/cellulose nanofiber hydrogel scaffold: physical, mechanical and cell biocompatibility properties. Cellulose 27(2):927–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02841-yCrossRef

138.

Drury J, Mooney D (2003) Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 24:4337–4351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-5CrossRef

139.

Xu Z, Fan C, Zhang Q et al (2021) A self-thickening and self-strengthening strategy for 3d printing high-strength and antiswelling supramolecular polymer hydrogels as meniscus substitutes. Adv Func Mater 31:2100462. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202100462CrossRef

140.

Ni T, Liu M, Zhang Y et al (2020) 3D bioprinting of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-laden silk fibroin double network scaffolds for cartilage tissue repair. Bioconjug Chem 31(8):1938–1947. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00298CrossRef

141.

Jiang P, Changyou Y, Yuxiong G et al (2019) Direct ink writing of high-strength and swelling-resistant biocompatible physical-crosslinking hydrogels. Biomater Sci 7:1805–1814. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9BM00081JCrossRef

142.

Gao F, Xu Z, Liang Q et al (2018) Direct 3D printing of high strength biohybrid gradient hydrogel scaffolds for efficient repair of osteochondral defect. Adv Func Mater 28(13):1706644. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201706644CrossRef

143.

Daly R, Harrington TS, Martin GD et al (2015) Inkjet printing for pharmaceutics - a review of research and manufacturing. Int J Pharm 494(2):554–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.03.017CrossRef

144.

Lin H, Zhang D, Alexander PG et al (2013) Application of visible light-based projection stereolithography for live cell-scaffold fabrication with designed architecture. Biomaterials 34(2):331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.048CrossRef

145.

Dybowska-Sarapuk L, Kielbasinski K, Arazna A et al (2018) Efficient inkjet printing of graphene-based elements: influence of dispersing agent on ink viscosity. Nanomaterials 8(8):602. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8080602CrossRef

146.

Zhong M, Zhang F, Youyi Yu et al (2018) Flexible micro-supercapacitors assembled via chemically reduced graphene oxide films assisted by a laser printer. Nanotechnology 29(43):43LT01. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aad886CrossRef

147.

Kyle S, Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A et al (2017) ‘Printability’ of candidate biomaterials for extrusion based 3d printing: state-of-the-art. Adv Healthc Mater 6(16):1700264. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700264CrossRef

148.

Shen Y, Tang H, Huang X et al (2020) DLP printing photocurable chitosan to build bio-constructs for tissue engineering. Carbohyd Polym 235:115970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115970CrossRef

149.

Zhou L, Ramezani H, Sun M et al (2020) 3D printing of high-strength chitosan hydrogel scaffolds without any organic solvents. Biomater Sci 8(18):5020–5028. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00896fCrossRef

150.

Jiang P, Lin P, Yang C et al (2020) 3D printing of dual-physical cross-linking hydrogel with ultrahigh strength and toughness. Chem Mater 32(23):9983–9995. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02941CrossRef

151.

Li Q, Xu Z, Zhang D et al (2020) T-shaped trifunctional crosslinker-toughening hydrogels. Sci China-Technol Sci 63(9):1721–1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1537-6CrossRef

152.

Song X, Shi D, Song P et al (2021) Fused deposition modeling of poly(ether ether ketone) scaffolds. High Temp Mater Process (London) 40(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/htmp-2021-0009CrossRef

153.

Bertassoni LE, Cardoso JC, Manoharan V et al (2014) Direct-write bioprinting of cell-laden methacrylated gelatin hydrogels. Biofabrication 6(2):024105. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024105CrossRef

154.

Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T et al (2014) The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials 35(1):49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078CrossRef

155.

Liu W, Heinrich MA, Zhou Y et al (2017) Extrusion bioprinting of shear‐thinning gelatin methacryloyl bioinks. Adv Healthc Mater 6(12):1601451. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601451CrossRef

156.

Gasek N, Weiss DJ (2020) Effect of temperature on gelation and cross-linking of gelatin methacryloyl for biomedical applications. Phys Fluids 32(3):033102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5144896CrossRef

157.

Avallone PR, Raccone E, Costanzo S et al (2021) Gelation kinetics of aqueous gelatin solutions in isothermal conditions via rheological tools. Food Hydrocoll 111:106248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106248CrossRef

158.

Yin J, Yan M, Wang Y et al (2018) 3d bioprinting of low-concentration cell-laden gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) bioinks with a two-step cross-linking strategy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(8):6849–6857. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b16059CrossRef

159.

Xavier JR, Thakur T, Desai P et al (2015) Bioactive nanoengineered hydrogels for bone tissue engineering: a growth-factor-free approach. ACS Nano 9(3):3109–3118. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn507488sCrossRef

160.

Liu W, Zhong Z, Ning H et al (2018) Coaxial extrusion bioprinting of 3D microfibrous constructs with cell-favorable gelatin methacryloyl microenvironments. Biofabrication 10(2):024102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa9d44CrossRef

161.

Gao Q, Niu X, Shao L et al (2019) 3D printing of complex GelMA-based scaffolds with nanoclay. Biofabrication 11(3):035006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab0cf6CrossRef

162.

Wang Y, Huang X, Shen Y et al (2019) Direct writing alginate bioink inside pre-polymers of hydrogels to create patterned vascular networks. J Mater Sci 54:7883–7892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03447-2CrossRef

163.

Ansari S, Sarrion P, Hasani-Sadrabadi MM et al (2017) Regulation of the fate of dental-derived mesenchymal stem cells using engineered alginate-GelMA hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 105(11):2957–2967. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36148CrossRef

164.

Kesti M, Mueller M, Becher J et al (2015) A versatile bioink for three-dimensional printing of cellular scaffolds based on thermally and photo-triggered tandem gelation. Acta Biomater 11:162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.033CrossRef

165.

Duan B, Kapetanovic E, Hockaday LA et al (2014) Three-dimensional printed trileaflet valve conduits using biological hydrogels and human valve interstitial cells. Acta Biomater 10(5):1836–1846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.005CrossRef

166.

Abar B, Alonso Calleja A, Kelly A et al (2020) 3D printing of high-strength, porous, elastomeric structures to promote tissue integration of implants. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37006CrossRef

167.

Zhong L, Chen J, Ma Z et al (2020) 3D printing of metal-organic framework incorporated porous scaffolds to promote osteogenic differentiation and bone regeneration. Nanoscale 12(48):24437–24449. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nr06297aCrossRef

168.

Wang X, Fang J, Zhu W et al (2021) Bioinspired highly anisotropic, ultrastrong and stiff, and osteoconductive mineralized wood hydrogel composites for bone repair. Adv Func Mater 31:2010068. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202010068CrossRef

169.

Wan Z, Zhang P, Liu Y et al (2020) Four-dimensional bioprinting: current developments and applications in bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 101:26–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.10.038CrossRef

170.

Kim SH, Seo YB, Yeon YK et al (2020) 4D-bioprinted silk hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 260:120281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120281CrossRef

171.

Darabi MA, Khosrozadeh A, Wang Y et al (2020) An Alkaline based method for generating crystalline, strong, and shape memory polyvinyl alcohol biomaterials. Adv Sci 7(21):1902740. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201902740CrossRef

172.

Hua M, Wu D, Wu S et al (2021) 4D printable tough and thermoresponsive hydrogels. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(11):12689–12697. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c17532CrossRef

173.

Senatov FS, Niaza KV, Zadorozhnyy MY et al (2016) Mechanical properties and shape memory effect of 3D-printed PLA-based porous scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 57:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.036CrossRef

174.

Senatov FS, Zadorozhnyy MY, Niaza KV et al (2017) Shape memory effect in 3D-printed scaffolds for self-fitting implants. Eur Polymer J 93:222–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.06.011CrossRef

Title: Progress in 3D printing for bone tissue engineering: a review
Authors: Weiwei Lan
Xiaobo Huang
Di Huang
Xiaochun Wei
Weiyi Chen
Publication date: 12-06-2022
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Materials Science / Issue 27/2022
Print ISSN: 0022-2461
Electronic ISSN: 1573-4803
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07361-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphical abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 27/2022

Injectability study and rheological evaluation of Pluronic-derived thermosensitive hydrogels containing mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for bone regeneration

Molecular dynamics study of domain switching dynamics in KNbO3 and BaTiO3

Significant enhancement of surface area and structural distortion of carbon nitride by recrystallization method

Nanoarchitectonics of (110) directed polyethylene glycol stabilized cerium nanoparticles for UV filtering applications

Additive manufacturing of continuous BF-reinforced PES composite material and mechanical and wear properties evaluation

Synthesis, properties, and applications of MBenes (two-dimensional metal borides) as emerging 2D materials: a review

Premium Partners