Skip to main content
Top

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. Property and Privacy in Context

Authors : Melissa Lukings, Arash Habibi Lashkari

Published in: Understanding Cybersecurity Law and Digital Privacy

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this chapter, we will explore the intersecting, albeit unique, concepts of ownership, property, and possession. We will distinguish between public, private, and personal data as seen in the eyes of the law, connecting those concepts to our foundational legal knowledge from the first chapter. At the end of this chapter, we will realize the intersection of (personal) property, (data) privacy, and (cyber) security and how these concepts are dealt with in modern legal systems around the world.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Williams, G. Thomas Hobbes: Moral and political philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Williams, G. Thomas Hobbes: Moral and political philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
2.
go back to reference Cotton, J. (1991). James Harrington’s political thought and its context. Garland Publisher. Cotton, J. (1991). James Harrington’s political thought and its context. Garland Publisher.
3.
go back to reference Hirschmann, N. J. (2009). Gender, class, and freedom in modern political theory (p. 79). Princeton.CrossRef Hirschmann, N. J. (2009). Gender, class, and freedom in modern political theory (p. 79). Princeton.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sreenivasan, G. (1995). The limits of Lockean rights in property. Oxford University Press. Sreenivasan, G. (1995). The limits of Lockean rights in property. Oxford University Press.
6.
go back to reference Locke, J. (1963). Works, 10 volumes, London, 1823; reprinted. Scientia Verlag. Locke, J. (1963). Works, 10 volumes, London, 1823; reprinted. Scientia Verlag.
7.
go back to reference Tully, J. (1980). A discourse on property: John Locke and his adversaries. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Tully, J. (1980). A discourse on property: John Locke and his adversaries. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Udi, J. (2015). Locke and the fundamental right to preservation: On the convergence of charity and property rights. The Review of Politics, 77(2), 191–215.CrossRef Udi, J. (2015). Locke and the fundamental right to preservation: On the convergence of charity and property rights. The Review of Politics, 77(2), 191–215.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Proast, J. (1999a). In M. Goldie (Ed.), The argument of the letter concerning toleration briefly considered and answered, in the reception of Locke’s politics (Vol. 5). Pickering & Chatto. Proast, J. (1999a). In M. Goldie (Ed.), The argument of the letter concerning toleration briefly considered and answered, in the reception of Locke’s politics (Vol. 5). Pickering & Chatto.
12.
go back to reference Hill, L. (2007). Adam Smith, Adam Ferguson and Karl Marx on the division of labour. Journal of Classical Sociology, 7(3), 339–366.CrossRef Hill, L. (2007). Adam Smith, Adam Ferguson and Karl Marx on the division of labour. Journal of Classical Sociology, 7(3), 339–366.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hobsbawm, E. (2004). Marx, Karl Heinrich. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Hobsbawm, E. (2004). Marx, Karl Heinrich. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.
14.
go back to reference Oakley, A. (1984). Marx’s Critique of political economy: 1844 to 1860 archived 10 September 2015 at the Wayback machine (p. 51). Routledge. Oakley, A. (1984). Marx’s Critique of political economy: 1844 to 1860 archived 10 September 2015 at the Wayback machine (p. 51). Routledge.
17.
go back to reference Austin, L. M. “Property and the rule of law” (2014) 20:2 Legal Theory 79. Austin, L. M. “Property and the rule of law” (2014) 20:2 Legal Theory 79.
18.
go back to reference Clarke, A., & Kohler, P. (2005). Property law: commentary and materials. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Clarke, A., & Kohler, P. (2005). Property law: commentary and materials. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rose, C. M. (1985). Possession as the origin of property. The University of Chicago Law Review, 52(1), 73–88.CrossRef Rose, C. M. (1985). Possession as the origin of property. The University of Chicago Law Review, 52(1), 73–88.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rudmin, F. W., & Berry, J. W. (1987). Semantics of ownership: A free-recall study of property. The Psychological Record, 37(2), 257–268.CrossRef Rudmin, F. W., & Berry, J. W. (1987). Semantics of ownership: A free-recall study of property. The Psychological Record, 37(2), 257–268.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Callies, D. L., & Breemer, J. D. (2000). The right to exclude others from private property: A fundamental constitutional right. Wash UJL & Pol’y, 3, 39. Callies, D. L., & Breemer, J. D. (2000). The right to exclude others from private property: A fundamental constitutional right. Wash UJL & Pol’y, 3, 39.
22.
go back to reference Katz, L. (2008). Exclusion and exclusivity in property law. University of Toronto Law Journal, 58(3), 275–315.CrossRef Katz, L. (2008). Exclusion and exclusivity in property law. University of Toronto Law Journal, 58(3), 275–315.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Newman, C. M. (2016). Vested use-privileges in property and copyright. Harv JL & Tech, 30, 75. Newman, C. M. (2016). Vested use-privileges in property and copyright. Harv JL & Tech, 30, 75.
24.
go back to reference Baron, J. B. (2013). Rescuing the bundle-of-rights metaphor in property law. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 82, 57. Baron, J. B. (2013). Rescuing the bundle-of-rights metaphor in property law. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 82, 57.
25.
go back to reference von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K., & Wiber, M. G. (2006). The properties of property. Changing Properties of Property, 40, 1–39. von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K., & Wiber, M. G. (2006). The properties of property. Changing Properties of Property, 40, 1–39.
26.
go back to reference Alexander, G. S. (2011). Governance property. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 160, 1853. Alexander, G. S. (2011). Governance property. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 160, 1853.
27.
go back to reference Niles, R. D. (1933). The rationale of the law of fixtures: English cases. NYULQ Review, 11, 560. Niles, R. D. (1933). The rationale of the law of fixtures: English cases. NYULQ Review, 11, 560.
28.
go back to reference Hetland, J. R. (1965). Real property and real property security: The Well-being of the law. California Law Review, 53, 151.CrossRef Hetland, J. R. (1965). Real property and real property security: The Well-being of the law. California Law Review, 53, 151.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference O’Keefe, K. M. (1983). The classification issue and the law of fixtures: A chattel by any other name… . J. St. Tax’n, 2, 37. O’Keefe, K. M. (1983). The classification issue and the law of fixtures: A chattel by any other name… . J. St. Tax’n, 2, 37.
30.
go back to reference Rahmatian, A. (2008). A comparison of German moveable property law and English personal property law. Journal of Comparative Law, 3, 197. Rahmatian, A. (2008). A comparison of German moveable property law and English personal property law. Journal of Comparative Law, 3, 197.
31.
go back to reference Niles, R. D. (1934). The intention test in the law of fixtures. NYULQ Review, 12, 66. Niles, R. D. (1934). The intention test in the law of fixtures. NYULQ Review, 12, 66.
32.
go back to reference Moore, A. D. (1998). Intangible property: Privacy, power, and information control. American Philosophical Quarterly, 35(4), 365–378. Moore, A. D. (1998). Intangible property: Privacy, power, and information control. American Philosophical Quarterly, 35(4), 365–378.
33.
go back to reference Carnahan, W. (1934). Tangible property and the conflict of Laws. University of Dayton Law Review, 2, 345.CrossRef Carnahan, W. (1934). Tangible property and the conflict of Laws. University of Dayton Law Review, 2, 345.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Arezzo, E. (2007). Struggling around the natural divide: The protection of tangible and intangible indigenous property. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law, 25, 367. Arezzo, E. (2007). Struggling around the natural divide: The protection of tangible and intangible indigenous property. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law, 25, 367.
35.
go back to reference Child, J. W. (1990). The moral foundations of intangible property. The Monist, 73(4), 578–600.CrossRef Child, J. W. (1990). The moral foundations of intangible property. The Monist, 73(4), 578–600.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hardy, I. T. (2000). Not so different: Tangible, intangible, digital, and analog works and their comparison for copyright purposes. University of Dayton Law Review, 26, 211. Hardy, I. T. (2000). Not so different: Tangible, intangible, digital, and analog works and their comparison for copyright purposes. University of Dayton Law Review, 26, 211.
37.
go back to reference Horwitz, M. J. (1981). History of the public/private distinction. U Pa L Rev, 130, 1423.CrossRef Horwitz, M. J. (1981). History of the public/private distinction. U Pa L Rev, 130, 1423.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference DeCew, J. W. (1986). The scope of privacy in law and ethics. Law and Philosophy, 5(2), 145–173. DeCew, J. W. (1986). The scope of privacy in law and ethics. Law and Philosophy, 5(2), 145–173.
39.
40.
go back to reference Al-Fedaghi, S. (2018). Privacy things: Systematic approach to privacy and personal identifiable information. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), 16(2). Al-Fedaghi, S. (2018). Privacy things: Systematic approach to privacy and personal identifiable information. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), 16(2).
41.
go back to reference Gratton, E. (2013). If personal information is privacy’s gatekeeper, then risk of harm is the key: A proposed method for determining what counts as personal information. Alb LJ Sci & Tech, 24, 105. Gratton, E. (2013). If personal information is privacy’s gatekeeper, then risk of harm is the key: A proposed method for determining what counts as personal information. Alb LJ Sci & Tech, 24, 105.
43.
go back to reference Austin, L. M. (2006). Reviewing pipeda: Control, privacy and the limits of fair information practices. Can Bus LJ, 44, 21. Austin, L. M. (2006). Reviewing pipeda: Control, privacy and the limits of fair information practices. Can Bus LJ, 44, 21.
44.
go back to reference Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (SC 2000, c 5). Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (SC 2000, c 5).
45.
go back to reference Shackelford, S. J. (2016). Protecting intellectual property and privacy in the digital age: the use of national cybersecurity strategies to mitigate cyber risk. Chap. L. Rev., 19, 445. Shackelford, S. J. (2016). Protecting intellectual property and privacy in the digital age: the use of national cybersecurity strategies to mitigate cyber risk. Chap. L. Rev., 19, 445.
46.
go back to reference Kosseff, J. (2017). Defining cybersecurity law. Iowa L Rev, 103, 985. Kosseff, J. (2017). Defining cybersecurity law. Iowa L Rev, 103, 985.
47.
go back to reference Kosseff, J. (2016). Positive cybersecurity law: Creating a consistent and incentive-based system. Chap L Rev, 19, 401. Kosseff, J. (2016). Positive cybersecurity law: Creating a consistent and incentive-based system. Chap L Rev, 19, 401.
48.
go back to reference Salmond, J. W. (1907). The law of torts. Stevens and Haynes. Salmond, J. W. (1907). The law of torts. Stevens and Haynes.
49.
go back to reference Lunney, M., & Oliphant, K. (2008). Tort law: text and materials. Oxford University Press. Lunney, M., & Oliphant, K. (2008). Tort law: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
50.
go back to reference Malone, W. S. (1970). Ruminations on the Role of Fault in the History of the Common Law of Torts. La. L. Rev., 31, 1. Malone, W. S. (1970). Ruminations on the Role of Fault in the History of the Common Law of Torts. La. L. Rev., 31, 1.
Metadata
Title
Property and Privacy in Context
Authors
Melissa Lukings
Arash Habibi Lashkari
Copyright Year
2022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88704-9_2

Premium Partner