Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Empirische Sozialforschung im Überblick Read chapter Read first chapter

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. Qualitätskriterien in der empirischen Sozialforschung

Authors : Nicola Döring, Jürgen Bortz

Published in: Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel vermittelt folgende Lernziele: Wissenschaft von Nicht-Wissenschaft, Pseudo- und Parawissenschaft abgrenzen können. Wissen, wozu Kriterien der wissenschaftlichen Qualität in der empirischen Sozialforschung dienen und wie man sie strukturieren kann. Die wichtigsten Gütekriterien der quantitativen Sozialforschung erläutern können. Die wichtigsten Gütekriterien der qualitativen Sozialforschung darstellen können. Die wichtigsten Gütekriterien der Mixed-Methods-Sozialforschung kennen.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Wissenschaftstheoretische Grundlagen der empirischen Sozialforschung
next chapter Forschungs- und Wissenschaftsethik
Literature
Ambach, W. (2012). Experimentelle Psychophysiologie in Grenzgebieten. Würzburg: Ergon.
Anderson, C. A. & Dill, K. E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 772–790.
APA (American Psychological Association). (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington: American Psychological Association.
APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards. (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology. Why do we need them? What might they be? Washington: American Psychological Association.
Barker, C. & Pistrang, N. (2005). Quality criteria under methodological pluralism: Implications for conducting and evaluating research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35(3), 201–212.
Bortz, J., Lienert, G. A. & Boehnke, K. (2008). Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik (3. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.
Boykoff, M. T. & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 125–136.
Bryman, A., Becker, S., & Sempik, J. (2008). Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 261–276.
Campbell, D. T. (1957). factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–311.
Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Carpenter, J. C. (2012). First sight: ESP and parapsychology in everyday life. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1976). The design and conduct of quasi-experiments and true experiments in field settings. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational research (pp. 223–326). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Cooper, H. (2010). Reporting research in psychology: How to meet journal article reporting standards. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2012). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., & Smith, L. T. (2008). Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 215–229.
Emden, C. & Sandelowski, M. (1998). The good, the bad and the relative. Part One: Conceptions of goodness in qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 4(4), 206–212.
Farrington, D. P. (2003). Methodological quality standards for evaluation research. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587(1), 49–68.
Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Flick, U. (2008). Managing the quality of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Geiger, W. & Kotte, W. (2007). Handbuch Qualität: Grundlagen und Elemente des Qualitätsmanagements: Systeme – Perspektiven (5.Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Vieweg & Teubner.
Girden, E. R. & Kabacoff, R. (2010). Evaluating research articles from start to finish. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Grunenberg, H. (2007). Empirische Befunde zur Qualität qualitativer Sozialforschung. Resultate einer Analyse von Zeitschriftenartikeln. In U. Kuckartz, H. Grunenberg & T. Dresing (Hrsg.), Qualitative Datenanalyse: computergestützt (S. 210–226): VS Verlag.
Haldeman, D. C. (1999). The pseudo-science of sexual orientation conversion therapy. Angles, 4(1), 1–4.
Haldeman, D. C. (2002). Gay rights, patient rights: The implications of sexual orientation conversion therapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(3), 260–264.
Hannes, K. (2011). Chapter 4: Critical appraisal of qualitative research. In: Noyes J, Booth A, Hannes K, Harden A, Harris J, Lewin S, Lockwood C (Eds.), Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 1 (updated August 2011). Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group, 2011. Retrieved November 29, 2013, from URL http://​cqrmg.​cochrane.​org/​supplemental-handbook-guidance.
Hellferich, C. (2005). Die Qualität qualitativer Daten. Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer Interviews (2. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Ickinger, J. (2006). Methodisches Vorgehen bei UFO-Falluntersuchungen. Zeitschrift für Anomalistik, 6, 116–162.
Keller, D. K. & Casadevall-Keller, M. L. (2010). The Tao of research: A path to validity. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 214–222.
Lamnek, S. (2010). Qualitative Sozialforschung: Lehrbuch. Mit Online-Materialien (5.Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz.
Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., & Lohr, J. M. (Eds.). (2003). Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology: Concluding thoughts and constructive remedies. New York: Guilford.
Lilienfeld, S. O., Ruscio, J., & Lynn, S. J. (Eds.). (2008). Navigating the mindfield: A user’s guide to distinguishing science from pseudoscience in mental health. Amherst: Prometheus.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Denzin, N. K. (Eds.). (2003). Turning Points in Qualitative Research: Rifts, Ruptures and Revolutions in Interpretive Inquiry. Walnut Creek: Altamira.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.
Makel, M. C., Plucker, J. A., & Hegarty, B. (2012). Replications in psychology research: How often do they really occur? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 537–542.
Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358(9280), 483–488.
Mayring, P. (2002). Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken. Weinheim: Beltz.
Meyer, C. & Reiter, S. (2004). Impfgegner und Impfskeptiker. Geschichte, Hintergründe, Thesen, Umgang. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz, 47(12), 1182–1188.
Meyrick, J. (2006). What is good qualitative research? A first step towards a comprehensive approach to judging rigour/quality. Journal of Health Psychology, 11(5), 799–808.
Noyes, J., Popay, J., Pearson, A., Hannes, K., & Booth, A. (2008). Chapter 20: Qualitative research and cochrane reviews. In J. P. T. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: Wiley. Retrieved December 6, 2013, from http://​handbook.​cochrane.​org/​.
O’Cathain, A. (2010). Assessing the quality of mixed methods research: Toward a comprehensive framework. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), The Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 531–555). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
O’Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research Policy, 13(2), 92–98.
Olatunji, B. O., Parker, L. M., & Lohr, J. M. (2005). Pseudoscience in contemporary psychology: Professional issues and implications. The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 4(2), 19–36.
Parker, I. (2004). Criteria for qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(2), 95–106.
Rahmstorf, S. (2007). Alles nur Klimahysterie? Universitas, 9, 895–913.
Reichardt, C. S. (2011). Criticisms of and an alternative to the shadish, cook, and campbell validity typology. New directions for evaluation. Special issue: Advancing Validity in Outcome Evaluation. Theory and Practice, 2011(130), 43–53.
Reid, A. & Gough, S. (2000). Guidelines for reporting and evaluating qualitative research: What are the alternatives? Environmental Education Research, 6(1), 59–91.
Roethlisberger, F. J., Dickson, W. J., & Wright, H. A. (1939). Management and the worker: An account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago. Havard: Harvard University Press.
Sales, B. D. & Folkman, S. (Eds.). (2000). Ethics in research with human participants. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Schou, L., Høstrup, H., Lyngsø, E. E., Larsen, S., & Poulsen, I. (2012). Validation of a new assessment tool for qualitative research articles. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(9), 2086–2094.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Steinke, I. (1999). Kriterien qualitativer Forschung. München: Juventa.
Steinke, I. (2009). Die Güte qualitativer Marktforschung. In R. Buber & H. Holzmüller (Hrsg.), Qualitative Marktforschung. Konzepte – Methoden – Analysen (2.Aufl.,S. 261–289). Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Storm, L., Tressoldi, P. E., & Di Risio, L. (2010). Meta-analysis of free-response studies, 1992–2008: Assessing the noise reduction model in parapsychology. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 471–485.
Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight „Big-Tent“ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 16(10), 837–851.
Truzzi, M. (1996). Pseudoscience. In G. Stein (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of the Paranormal (pp. 560–575). Amherst: Prometheus.
Wendt, A. & Duvall, R. (2008). Sovereignty and the UFO. Political Theory, 36(4), 607–633.
Westermann, R. (2000). Wissenschaftstheorie und Experimentalmethodik: Ein Lehrbuch zur Psychologischen Methodenlehre. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522–537.
Wunder, E. (2001). Die Wahrnehmung der Struktur der deutschsprachigen UFO-Szene: Eine multidimensionale Skalierung von Expertenurteilen. Zeitschrift für Anomalistik, 1(1), 75–101.
Metadata
Title
Qualitätskriterien in der empirischen Sozialforschung
Authors
Nicola Döring
Jürgen Bortz
Copyright Year
2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Book
Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41088-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-41089-5

Copyright Year: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5_3