Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Introduction to Information Quality Read chapter Read first chapter

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. Quality of Images

Authors : Gianluigi Ciocca, Silvia Corchs, Francesca Gasparini, Carlo Batini, Raimondo Schettini

Published in: Data and Information Quality

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

An image is the result of the optical imaging process which maps physical scene properties onto a two-dimensional luminance distribution; it encodes important and useful information about the geometry of the scene and the properties of the objects located within this scene [339, 611, 687].

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Data Quality Issues in Linked Open Data
next chapter Models for Information Quality
Literature
1.
Mittal A, Moorthy AK, Bovik AC (2012) No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 21(12):4695–4708MathSciNetCrossRef
36.
Bartleson C (1982) The combined influence of sharpness and graininess on the quality of color prints. Journal of Photographic Science 30(2):33–38
37.
Batini C, Scannapieco M (2006) Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques (Data-Centric Systems and Applications). Springer, New YorkMATH
39.
Batini C, Barone D, Cabitza F, Ciocca G, Marini F, Pasi G, Schettini R (2008) Toward a unified model for information quality. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Quality in Databases and Management of Uncertain Data, Auckland, August 2008, pp 113–122
70.
Bhattacharya S, Sukthankar R, Shah M (2011) A holistic approach to aesthetic enhancement of photographs. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 7S:21:1–21:21
73.
Bianco S, Ciocca G, Marini F, Schettini R (2009) Image quality assessment by preprocessing and full reference model combination. In: Image Quality and System Performance VI. SPIE, vol 7242, pp 1–9
74.
91.
Brandao T, Queluz MP (2008) No-reference image quality assessment based on dct domain statistics. Signal Processing 88(4):822–833CrossRefMATH
108.
111.
Carnec M, Callet PL, Barba D (2008) Objective quality assessment of color images based on a generic perceptual reduced reference. Signal Processing: Image Communication 23(4):239–256
117.
118.
Chandler DM (2013) Seven challenges in image quality assessment: past, present, and future research. ISRN Signal Processing
131.
Chikkerur S, Sundaram V, Reisslein M, Karam L (2011) Objective video quality assessment methods: a classification, review, and performance comparison. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 57(2):165–182CrossRef
143.
Ciancio A, da Costa A, da Silva E, Said A, Samadani R, Obrador P (2009) Objective no-reference image blur metric based on local phase coherence. Electronics Letters 45(23):1162–1163CrossRef
149.
Corchs S, Gasparini F, Marini F, Schettini R (2011) Image quality: a tool for no-reference assessment methods. Image Quality and System Performance VIII 7867(1):786712CrossRef
150.
Corchs S, Gasparini F, Marini F, Schettini R (2012) A sharpness measure on automatically selected edge segments. Image Quality and System Performance IX 8293(1):82930ACrossRef
151.
Corchs S, Gasparini F, Schettini R (2014) No reference image quality classification for jpeg-distorted images. Digital Signal Processing 30:86–100CrossRef
152.
Corchs S, Gasparini F, Schettini R (2014) Noisy images-jpeg compressed: subjective and objective image quality evaluation. In: IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics
153.
Corner BR, Narayanan RM, Reichenbach SE (2003) Noise estimation in remote sensing imagery using data masking. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24(4):689–702CrossRef
163.
Datta R, Joshi D, Li J, Wang JZ (2006) Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. In: Proceedings of the ECCV, pp 7–13
191.
Eckbert M, Bradley A (1998) Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression. Signal Processing 70(3):177–200CrossRefMATH
199.
Engeldrum PG (2001) Psychometric scaling: avoiding the pitfalls and hazards. In: IS&T’s 2001 PICS Conference Proceedings, pp 101–107
246.
270.
Gonzales RC, Woods R (2008) Digital Image Processing. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
286.
H Tang NJ, Kapoor A (2011) Learning a blind measure of perceptual image quality. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp 305–312
300.
Hasler D, Süsstrunk SE (2003) Measuring colorfulness in natural images. Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VIII 5007:87–95CrossRef
321.
I3A (2007) Fundamentals and review of considered test methods. CPIQ Initiative Phase 1 White Paper
322.
332.
ISO (2005) Image Technology Colour Management - Architecture, Profile Format and Data Structure - Part 1: Based on ICC.1:2004-10. ISO 15076-1. ISO, 2005
333.
334.
ITU (2002) Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality for television pictures. Technical report, ITU-R Rec. BT. 500-11
339.
Janssen T (2001) Computational Image Quality. SPIE Press
340.
Janssen T, Blommaert F (2000) A computational approach to image quality. Displays 21:129–142CrossRef
345.
Jayaraman D, Mittal A, Moorthy A, Bovik A (2012) Objective quality assessment of multiply distorted images. In: Proceedings of the of the Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, pp 1693–1697
359.
Keelan BW (2002) Handbook of Image Quality: Characterization and Prediction. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRef
383.
Kusuma T, Zepernick HJ (2003) A reduced-reference perceptual quality metric for in-service image quality assessment. In: Joint First Workshop on Mobile Future and Symposium on Trends in Communications (SympoTIC ’03), pp 71–74
389.
Larson EC, Chandler DM (2010) Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy. Journal of Electronic Imaging 19(1):011006-1–011006-21
409.
417.
Lundstrom C (2006) Technical report: Measuring digital image quality. Tech. rep., Linkoping UniversityLinkoping University, Visual Information Technology and Applications (VITA), The Institute of Technology
422.
MacDonald L, Jacobson R (2006) Assessing image quality. In: Digital Heritage: Applying Digital Imaging to Cultural Heritage. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann
429.
Marziliano P, Dufaux F, Winkler S, Ebrahimi T (2002) A no-reference perceptual blur metric. In: IEEE 2002 International Conference on Image Processing, pp 57–60
450.
Moorthy A, Bovik A (2011) Visual quality assessment algorithms: what does the future hold? Multimedia Tools and Applications 51:675–696CrossRef
474.
Nishiyama M, Okabe T, Sato I, Sato Y (2011) Aesthetic quality classification of photographs based on color harmony. In: 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp 33–40
499.
Pessoa A, Falcao A, e Silva A, Nishihara R, Lotufo R (1998) Video quality assessment using objective parameters based on image segmentation. In: Proceedings of the SBT/IEEE International Telecommunications Symposium (ITS ’98), vol 2, pp 498–503
502.
Pinson M, Wolf S (2004) A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 50(3):312–322CrossRef
509.
Ponomarenko N, Lukin V, Zelensky A, Egiazarian K, Astola J, Carli M, Battisti F (2009) A database for evaluation of full reference visual quality assessment metrics. Advances of Modern Radioelectronics 10:30–45
527.
de Ridder H, Endrikhovski S (2002) Image quality is fun: reflections on fidelity, usefulness and naturalness. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers 33:986–989CrossRef
531.
Rouse DM, Hemami SS (2008) Analyzing the role of visual structure in the recognition of natural image content with multi-scale SSIM. In: Proceedings of the SPIE: HVEI XIII, vol 6806, pp 1–14
541.
Saha S, Vemuri R (2000) An analysis on the effect of image activity on lossy coding performance. In: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS 2000), Geneva, vol 3, pp 295–298
546.
554.
Schettini R, Gasparini F (2009) A review of redeye detection and removal in digital images through patents. Recent Patents on Electrical Engineering 2(1):45–53CrossRef
561.
Seshadrinathan K, Bovik AC (2010) Motion tuned spatio-temporal quality assessment of natural videos. Transaction Imgage Processing 19(2):335–350MathSciNetCrossRef
565.
567.
Sheikh H, Bovik A (2006) Image information and visual quality. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15(2):430–444CrossRef
568.
Sheikh HR, Wang Z, Cormack L, Bovik AC (2005) LIVE Image Quality Assessment Database Release 2
578.
Sikora T (2001) The MPEG-7 visual standard for content description-an overview. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 11(6):696–702MathSciNetCrossRef
586.
Soundararajan R, Bovik A (2012) Rred indices: reduced reference entropic differencing for image quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 21(2):517–526MathSciNetCrossRef
587.
Soundararajan R, Bovik A (2013) Video quality assessment by reduced reference spatio-temporal entropic differencing. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 23(4):684–694CrossRef
598.
Suthaharan S (2009) No-reference visually significant blocking artifact metric for natural scene images. Signal Processing 89(8):1647–1652CrossRefMATH
604.
TASI (1979) Technical advisory service for images
610.
Thurstone LL (1927) A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review 34:273–286CrossRef
611.
Torgerson W (1958) Theory and Methods of Scaling. Wiley, New York
612.
Tourancheau S, Autrusseau F, Sazzad Z, Horita Y (2008) Impact of subjective dataset on the performance of image quality metrics. In: 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP 2008), pp 365–368
618.
632.
633.
652.
Wang Z, Simoncelli EP (2005) Reduced-reference image quality assessment using a wavelet-domain natural image statistic model. In: Proceedings of SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, vol 5666, pp 149–159
653.
Wang Z, Bovik A, Evans B (2000) Blind measurement of blocking artifacts in images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference Image Processing, pp 981–984
654.
Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13(4):600–612CrossRef
655.
Watson AB, Borthwick R, Taylor M (1997) Image quality and entropy masking. In: SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging Conference, vol 3016, pp 2–12
659.
Wee CY, Paramesran R, Mukundan R, Jiang X (2010) Image quality assessment by discrete orthogonal moments. Pattern Recognition 43(12):4055–4068CrossRefMATH
681.
Xue W, Zhang L, Mou X, Bovik AC (2014) Gradient magnitude similarity deviation: a highly efficient perceptual image quality index. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 23(2):684–695MathSciNetCrossRef
686.
Ye P, Doermann D (2012) No-reference image quality assessment using visual codebooks. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 21(7):3129–3138MathSciNetCrossRef
687.
Yendrikhovskij S (1999) Image quality: between science and fiction. In: PICS, pp 173–178
693.
Zhang X, Wandell BA (1997) A spatial extension of cielab for digital color-image reproduction. Journal of the Society for Information Display 5(1):61–63CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quality of Images
Authors
Gianluigi Ciocca
Silvia Corchs
Francesca Gasparini
Carlo Batini
Raimondo Schettini
Copyright Year
2016
Book
Data and Information Quality

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24104-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-24106-7

Copyright Year: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24106-7_5

Premium Partner

    Image Credits