Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Argumentation
Published in: Argumentation 4/2017

23-11-2016

Radiolab’s Sound Strategic Maneuvers

Author: Justin Eckstein

Published in: Argumentation | Issue 4/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

How might argumentation scholars approach sound? Using the analytics afforded by strategic maneuvering, this essay identifies three unique features of sonic presentational devices: they are immersive, immediate and embodied. Although these features offer arguers presentational resource, they also pose new problems to the reasonable resolution of disagreement: immersion hazards overlap (mask), immediacy risks rate of delivery beyond reflection (velocity), and materiality can coerce listeners (force). To theorize strategic use of sound, I reconstruct and analyze a popular Radiolab segment “The Unconscious Toscanini of the Brain.” I find Radiolab uses three different sonic figures: (1) synchronicity, or the translation of data into sound to foreground temporal relations; (2) musical stings, an auditory invocation of embodied memory and (3) the wave, a sonic strategy to arouse and narrow attention. I conclude that Radiolab’s use of sound is reasonable because it extends the critical discussion.
previous article Argumentative Writing Behavior of Graduate EFL Learners
next article Laypeople’s Evaluation of Arguments: Are Criteria for Argument Quality Scheme-Specific?

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
I selected diegetic/non-diegetic because Radiolab is a podcast. If my paradigm case involved an urban setting, then I would adopt sound object/soundscape. These different terms share the same basic features. Like diegetic sound, sound objects are sounds at the center of a listener’s attention, while soundscapes, like non-diegetic sound, sit at periphery of a listener’s attention.
 
2
Some may argue that recording a sound gives it a degree of fixity. While sound can be recorded and replayed, this prompts a qualitatively different mode of interpretation (Chion 2016; Sterne 2003). Capturing sound for study through recording and repetition is like ascertaining the qualities of a train as it speeds by—the observer apprehends broad shapes and themes, but not precise descriptions. Moreover, attempts to alter sounds immediacy, such as slowing it down or speeding it up create entirely different objects. For instance, think of the difference a voice sound when it is slowed down or speed up.
 
3
Some research even suggests that distractions, like loud noises, can create the conditions for persuasion (e.g., Buller 1986).
 
Literature
Abumrad, Jad. 2012. The terrors and occasional virtues of not knowing what you’re doing. Transom Review 8: 1–22.
Augoyard, Jean. F., and Henri Torgue. 2005. Sonic Experience: A Guide to Everyday Sounds. Trans. A. McCartney. Quebec: McGill-Queens University Press.
Birdsell, David S., and Leo Groarke. 1996. Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 33: 1–10.
Birdsell, David S., and Leo Groarke. 2007. Outlines of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 43: 103–113.
Bruner, Gordon C. 1990. Music, mood, and marketing. Journal of Marketing 54: 94–104.CrossRef
Chion, Michael. 1994. Audio-Visual. Trans. C. Gorbamn. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chion, Michael. 2016. Sound: An Acoulogical Treatise. Trans James. A Steintrager. Durham: Duke University Press.
Corbin, Alain. 1998 The Village Bells. Trans. Martin Thom. New York: Columbia University Press.
DeNora, Tia. 2000. Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Dyson, Francis. 2009. Sounding New Media. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Eckstein, Justin. 2014. Yellow rain: Radiolab and the acoustics of strategic maneuvering. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3: 35–56.CrossRef
van Eemeren, F.H. 2010. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
van Eemeren, FransH, and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. London: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2001. Managing disagreement: Rhetorical analysis within a dialectical framework. Argumentation and Advocacy 37: 15–157.
Fullberg, Paul. 2003. Using sonic branding in the retail environment. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 3(2): 193–198.CrossRef
Gautier, Ana Maria Ocha. 2014. Aurality: Listening and Knowledge in Nineteenth-Century Colombia. Durham: Duke University Press.
Goodale, Greg. 2010. Sonic Persuasion. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Goodale, Greg. 2013. The sonorous envelope and political deliberation. Quarterly Journal of Speech 99: 218–224.CrossRef
Goodman, Steve. 2012. Sonic Warfare: Sound, Affect, and the Ecology of Fear. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Groarke, Leo, and S. Dewey. 2003. Are musical arguments possible. In Proceedings of the Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, et al., 419–423. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Press.
Groarke, Leo. 2014. Going multimodal: What is a mode of arguing and why does it matter? Argumentation 29(2): 133–155.CrossRef
Guéguen, Nicholas, Céline Jacob, Hélène Le Guellec, Thierry Morineau, and Marcel Lourel. 2008. Sound level of environmental music and drinking behavior: A field experiment with beer drinkers. Alcholism Clinical and Experimental Research 32: 1795–1798.CrossRef
Gunn, Joshua. 2010. On speech and public release. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 13: 175–215.CrossRef
Gunn, Joshua, Greg Goodale, Markio Hall, and Rosa A. Eberly. 2013. Auscultating again: Rhetoric and sound studies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 43(5): 475–489.CrossRef
Gustafsson, Clara. 2015. Sonic branding: A consumer-oriented literature review. Journal of Brand Management 22: 20–37.CrossRef
Harold, Christine, and Kevin M. DeLuca. 2005. Behold the corpse: Violent images and the case of Emmett Till. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 8(2): 263–286.CrossRef
Hirschkind, Charles. 2006. The Ethical Soundscape. New York: Columbia University Press.
Horowitz, Seth S. 2012. The Universal Sense. New York: Bloomsbury.
Huron, David. 1989. Music in advertising: An analytic paradigm. The Musical Quarterly 73: 557–574.CrossRef
Idhe, Don. 2007. Listening and Voice: Phenomenologies of Sound. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Jackson, Daniel. 2003. Sonic Branding: An Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.CrossRef
Johnstone, Henry W. 1990. Rhetoric as a Wedge: A Reformation. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 20: 333–338.CrossRef
Kellaris, James J., and Robert Kent. 1992. The influence of music on consumers’ temporal perceptions: Does time fly when you’re having fun? Journal of Consumer Psychology 1: 365.CrossRef
Kjedlsen, Jens E. 2015. The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation 29: 115–132.CrossRef
LaBelle, Brandon. 2010. Acoustic Territories. New York: Bloomsbury.
Manolescu, Beth Innocenti. 2005. Norms of presentational force. Argumentation and Advocacy 41: 139–151.
McLuhan, Marshal. 1994. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
McLuhan, Marshall., and Bruce R. Powers. 1989. The Global Village. London: Oxford University Press.
Milliman, Ronald E. 1982. Using background music to affect the behavior of supermarket shoppers. Journal of Marketing 46: 86–91.CrossRef
Park, Whan C., and Mark S. Young. 1986. Consumer response to television commercials: The impact of involvement and background music on brand attitude formation. Journal of Marketing Research 23: 11–24.CrossRef
Pfister, Damien. 2014. Networked Media, Networked Rhetorics. State College: Penn State University Press.
Schafer, R.Murray. 1977. The Soundscape. Merrimac, MA: Destiny Publishers.
Sterne, Jonathan. 2012. MP3: The Meaning of a Format. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRef
Westermann, Carl Frank. 2008. Sound branding and corporate voice. In Usability of Speech Dialogue Systems, ed. Thomas Hempel, 147–155. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Radiolab’s Sound Strategic Maneuvers
Author
Justin Eckstein
Publication date
23-11-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Argumentation / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0920-427X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8374
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9416-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Argumentation 4/2017 Go to the issue

BookReview

Fernando Leal Carretero (coord.): Argumentación y Pragma-Dialéctica: Estudios en Honor a Frans van Eemeren

OriginalPaper

Laypeople’s Evaluation of Arguments: Are Criteria for Argument Quality Scheme-Specific?

Book review

Christian Plantin: Dictionnaire de l’Argumentation. Une Introduction aux Études d’Argumentation

OriginalPaper

Argumentative Writing Behavior of Graduate EFL Learners

OriginalPaper

Brothers in Arms: Virtue and Pragma-Dialectics

Original Research

“You Think That Says a Lot, but Really it Says Nothing”: An Argumentative and Linguistic Account of an Idiomatic Expression Functioning as a Presentational Device