Top

Published in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

6. Reactor 3D Software Performance on Penetration and Perforation Problems

Authors : Aleksandr E. Kraus, Evgeny I. Kraus, Ivan I. Shabalin

Published in: Behavior of Materials under Impact, Explosion, High Pressures and Dynamic Strain Rates

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

To verify the REACTOR3D software package, numerous methodological numerical calculations of the processes of solids dynamic interaction have been carried out, and the comparison of the calculation results with the existing experimental data has been performed. The problem of the penetration of a high-strength elongated rod made of hardened steel into a massive target made of aluminum alloy has been solved, and a non-monotonic dependence of the penetration depth of the rod on the velocity, like the one in the experiment, has been obtained. The results of calculations for the collision of compact bodies of arbitrary shape with a massive target fit with good accuracy in the self-similar modeling Zlatin curve in dimensionless coordinates L/H (crater depth to the striker length) and E/Y (kinetic energy to the yield point). Based on numerical calculations, the engineering formula for the hole diameter in a thin target at a high-speed collision (2–5 km/s) with a metal sphere has been modified.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Shaped-Charge Treatment Effects Accompanying the Formation of Hard Structure and New Phase States in Coatings on Titanium

next chapter Numerical Simulation of Thermodynamic Parameters for Gold Alloys Under Shock-Wave Loading

Pradhan PK, Gupta NK, Ahmad S et al (2017) Numerical investigations of spherical projectile impact on 4 mm thick mild steel plate. Procedia Eng 173:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.045CrossRef

Nguyen LH, Lässig TR, Ryan S et al (2015) Numerical modelling of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene composite under impact loading. Procedia Eng 103:436–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2015.04.043CrossRef

Zhang CG, Batuev SP, Radchenko PA, Radchenko AV (2019) Modeling of fracture of spatial concrete structures under impulse loads. Mech Solids 54:883–889. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654419060049CrossRef

Radchenko AV, Radchenko PA (2014) Modeling of space debris interaction with an element of a solid-propellant rocket engine. Mech Solids 49:683–689. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654414060107CrossRef

Orlov MY, Glazyrin VP, Orlov YN (2020) Research of the projectile’s layout for penetration capability through metal targets. J Phys Conf Ser 1709:012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1709/1/012001CrossRef

Johnson GR, Beissel SR, Gerlach CA (2015) A 3D combined particle-element method for intense impulsive loading computations involving severe distortions. Int J Impact Eng 84:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.06.006CrossRef

Kraus EI, Shabalin II (2016) Reactor2D: A tool for simulation of shock deformation. AIP Conf Proc 1770:030092. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4964034CrossRef

Petrov IB, Favorskaya AV, Shevtsov AV et al (2015) Combined method for the numerical solution of dynamic three-dimensional elastoplastic problems. Dokl Math 91:111–113. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562415010202MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Fedorov SV, Veldanov VA, Smirnov BE (2015) Numerical analysis of the effect of speed and strength of elongated high-density alloy strikers on the depth of their penetration into a steel obstacle. Bull Bauman Moscow State Techn Univ Ser “Mech Eng” 1:65–83

10.

Fedorov SV, Veldanov V, Gladkom NA, Smirnov BE (2016) Numerical analysis of penetration into a steel obstacle of segmented and telescopic high-density alloy strikers. Bull Bauman Moscow State Techn Univ “Mech Eng” Ser 3:100–117

11.

Abgaryan KK, Eliseev SV, Zhuravlev AA, Reviznikov DL (2017) High-speed implementation. Discrete-element modeling and experiment. Comput Res Simul 9:937–944

12.

Abgaryan KK, Zhuravlev AA, Zagordan NL, Reviznikov DL (2015) Discrete-element modeling of ball introduction into a massive obstacle. Comput Res Simul 7:71–79

13.

Watson E, Steinhauser MO (2017) Discrete particle method for simulating hypervelocity impact Phenomena. Materials (Basel) 10:379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10040379CrossRef

14.

Haustein M, Gladkyy A, Schwarze R (2017) Discrete element modeling of deformable particles in YADE. SoftwareX 6:118–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2017.05.001CrossRef

15.

Kraus EI, Shabalin II (2016) A few-parameter equation of state of the condensed matter. J Phys Conf Ser 774:012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/774/1/012009CrossRef

16.

Kraus E, Shabalin I (2019) Melting behind the front of the shock wave. Therm Sci 23:519–524. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI19S2519KCrossRef

17.

Kraus EI, Shabalin II (2021) A new model to determine the shear modulus and Poisson’s ratio of shock-compressed metals up to the melting point. High Press Res 41:353–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957959.2021.1976775CrossRef

18.

Kraus EI, Shabalin II (2018) Simulation of fracture in 3D dynamic problems of collision of solid bodies. B: AIP conference proceedings. c 030165

19.

Kraus EI, Shabalin II (2013) Impact loading of a space nuclear powerplant. Frat ed Integrità Strutt 7:138–150. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.24.15CrossRef

20.

Kraus EI, Shabalin II, Shabalin TI (2017) Automatic tetrahedral mesh generation for impact computations. B: AIP conference proceedings. c 030129

21.

Wilkins ML (1999) Computer simulation of dynamic Phenomena. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefMATH

22.

Fomin VM, Gulidov AI, Sapozhnikov GA, Shabalin II (1999) High-velocity solids interaction. SB RAS, Novosibirsk

23.

Whiffin AC (1948) The use of flat-ended projectiles for determining dynamic yield stress—II. Tests on various metallic materials. Proc R Soc London Ser A Math Phys Sci 194:300–322. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.0082CrossRef

24.

Jones SE, Gillis PP, Foster JC (1987) On the equation of motion of the undeformed section of a Taylor impact specimen. J Appl Phys 61:499–502. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.338249CrossRef

25.

Jones SE, Drinkard JA, Rule WK, Wilson LL (1998) An elementary theory for the Taylor impact test. Int J Impact Eng 21:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-743x(97)00036-5CrossRef

26.

Sen S, Banerjee B, Shaw A (2020) Taylor impact test revisited: determination of plasticity parameters for metals at high strain rate. Int J Solids Struct 193–194:357–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.02.020CrossRef

27.

Wilkins ML, Guinan MW (1973) Impact of cylinders on a rigid boundary. J Appl Phys 44:1200–1206. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1662328CrossRef

28.

Forrestal MJ, Piekutowski A J (2000) Penetration experiments with 6061-T6511 aluminum targets and spherical-nose steel projectiles at striking velocities between 0.5 and 3.0km/s. Int J Impact Eng 24:57–67.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00033-0

29.

Xiao YK, Wu H, Fang Q et al (2017) Hemispherical nosed steel projectile high-speed penetration into aluminum target. Mater Des 133:237–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2017.08.002CrossRef

30.

Lu ZC, Wen HM (2018) On the penetration of high strength steel rods into semi-infinite aluminium alloy targets. Int J Impact Eng 111:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJIMPENG.2017.08.006CrossRef

31.

Merzhievskii LA, Titov VM (1988) High-speed collision. Combust explos. Shock Waves 23:589–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00756540CrossRef

32.

Merzhievsky LA (1997) Crater formation in a plastic target under hypervelocity impact. Int J Impact Eng 20:557–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-743x(97)87444-1CrossRef

33.

Shanbing Y, Gengchen S, Qingming T (1994) Experimental laws of cratering for hypervelocity impacts of spherical projectiles into thick target. Int J Impact Eng 15:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(05)80007-7CrossRef

34.

Sun Y, Shi C, Liu Z, Wen D (2015) Theoretical research progress in high-velocity/hypervelocity impact on semi-infinite targets. Shock Vib 2015:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/265321CrossRef

35.

Zlatin NA, Krasilshchikov AP, Mishin GI, Popov NN (1974) Ballistic installations and their application in experimental research. Nauka, Moscow

36.

Kraus EI, Fomin VM, Shabalin II (2020) Construction of a unified curve in modeling the process of crater formation by compact projectiles of different shapes. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 61:855–865. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021894420050211MathSciNetCrossRef

37.

Witt W, Loffler M (1998) The electromagnetic gun-closer to weapon system status. Mil Technol 80–86

38.

Fomin VM, Postnikov BV, Sapozhnikov GA, Fomichev VP (2000) A multistep method for acceleration of bodies. Dokl Phys 45:489–492. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1318997CrossRef

39.

Medvedev AE, Shabalin AI (1999) Analytical representation of the N.A. simulation curve. Zlatin. Phys Mesomech 2:105–107

40.

Kraus AE, Kraus EI, Shabalin II (2020) Impact resistance of ceramics in a numerical experiment. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 61:847–854. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002189442005020XCrossRef

41.

Rosenberg Z, Bless S, Yeshurun Y, Okajima K (1988) A new definition of ballistic efficiency of brittle materials based on the use of thick backing plates. B: Chiem CY, Kunze H-D, Meyer LW (peд) Proceedings of IMPACT 87 symposium, impact loading and dynamic behavior of materials. DCM Informationsgesellschaft Verlag, cc 491–498

42.

Rozenberg Z, Yeshurun Y (1988) The relation between ballistic efficiency and compressive strength of ceramic tiles. Int J Impact Eng 7:357–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(88)90035-8CrossRef

43.

Moynihan TJ, Chou S-C, Mihalcin AL (2000) Application of the depth-of-penetration test methodology to characterize ceramics for personnel protection. Def Technol 15:829–836. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA376698

44.

Buruchenko SK, Schäfer CM, Maindl TI (2017) Smooth particle hydrodynamics GPU-acceleration tool for asteroid fragmentation simulation. Procedia Eng 204:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2017.09.726CrossRef

45.

Verma PN, Dhote KD (2018) Characterising primary fragment in debris cloud formed by hypervelocity impact of spherical stainless steel projectile on thin steel plate. Int J Impact Eng 120:118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.05.003CrossRef

46.

Dening D, Xiaowei C (2018) Material failure models in SPH simulation of debris cloud. Explos Shock Waves 38:948–956. https://doi.org/10.11883/BZYCJ-2017-0328

47.

Plassard F, Mespoulet J, Hereil P (2011) Hypervelocity impact of aluminium sphere against aluminium plate: experiment and LS-DYNA correlation. B: Proceedings of the 8th European LS-DYNA users conference. cc 23–34

48.

Hosseini M, Abbas H (2006) Growth of hole in thin plates under hypervelocity impact of spherical projectiles. Thin-Walled Struct 44:1006–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2006.08.024CrossRef

49.

Kim J-T, Woo S-C, Kim J-Y, Kim T-W (2018) Debris dispersion analysis for the determination of impact conditions via traceback technology. Int J Impact Eng 122:472–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJIMPENG.2018.09.012CrossRef

50.

Stilp AJ, Hohler V, Schneider E, Weber K (1990) Debris cloud expansion studies. Int J Impact Eng 10:543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(90)90087-CCrossRef

51.

Piekutowski AJ (2001) Debris clouds produced by the hypervelocity impact of nonspherical projectiles. Int J Impact Eng 26:613–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00122-1CrossRef

52.

Piekutowski AJ (1990) A simple dynamic model for the formation of debris clouds. Int J Impact Eng 10:453–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(90)90079-BCrossRef

Title: Reactor 3D Software Performance on Penetration and Perforation Problems
Authors: Aleksandr E. Kraus
Evgeny I. Kraus
Ivan I. Shabalin
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Behavior of Materials under Impact, Explosion, High Pressures and Dynamic Strain Rates
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17072-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-17073-7

Copyright Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17073-7_6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner