Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Published in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 11-12/2020

22-06-2020 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Recent advances in additive manufacturing technology for bone tissue engineering scaffolds

Authors: Xuan Zhou, Yihua Feng, Jiahui Zhang, Yanbin Shi, Li Wang

Published in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Issue 11-12/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Appropriate scaffolds for tissue-engineered bone not only require mechanical strength, but also conditions that promote new bone growth. Bone tissue engineering scaffolds should establish the internal pore structure of the scaffolds and promote new bone growth. Additive manufacturing technology is widely used in the field of bone tissue engineering because it can directly and accurately construct the pore structure in 3D space, ensure internal connectivity of the scaffolds, and directly use biological materials. This paper reviews the development of additive manufacturing technology for bone tissue engineering. The differences between various additive manufacturing technologies are reviewed, with emphasis on the application of new technologies and materials. This paper also reviews the modeling processes used in bone tissue engineering, with emphasis on the optimization of the architectural design to achieve gradient structure and improved porosity and mechanical properties. Finally, this paper summarizes the 3D bioprinting technology that has fluid containing nutrients, matrix, and cells as constituent materials. Current problems and directions for the future development of additive manufacturing technology in the field of bone tissue engineering are also discussed.
previous article Study on deformation difference between the contact zone and the non-contact zone of the flexible 3D stretch bending profile and roller dies based on pre-stretching amount
next article Experimental investigations on longitudinal-torsional vibration-assisted milling of Ti-6Al-4V

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
Campana V, Milano G, Pagano E et al (2014) Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice. J Mater Sci Mater Med 25(10):2445–2461
2.
Zhao W K, He B, Zhou A, et al. 2019 D-RADA16-RGD-reinforced nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 ternary biomaterial for bone formation [J]. Tissue Eng Regener Med
3.
Oryan A, Alidadi S, Moshiri A, et al. Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions. 2014:9,18.
4.
Jariwala S H, Lewis G S, Bushman Z J, et al. (2015) 3D printing of personalized artificial bone scaffolds [J]. 3d Print Addit Manuf
5.
Polo-Corrales L, Latorre-Esteves M, Ramirez-Vick JE (2014) Scaffold design for bone regeneration. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 14(1):15–56
6.
Oliveira P L S , Vaz F M H F , de Oliveira José Martinho Marques (2018) Biofabrication of glass scaffolds by 3D printing for tissue engineering [J]. Int J Advan Manuf Technol
7.
Domingos M, Gloria A, Coelho J et al (2017) Three-dimensional printed bone scaffolds: the role of nano/micro-hydroxyapatite particles on the adhesion and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells [J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med 095441191668023
8.
Yong MD (2018) Preparation and properties of 3D porous bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Southwest University Master’s thesis
9.
Wu SL, Liu XM, Yeung KWK et al (2014) Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering [J]. Mater Sci Eng R 80(1):1–36
10.
Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A (2013) Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today 16(12):496–504
11.
Moore S (2015) Kevin O’Sullivan, Verdecchia F. Shrinking the supply chain for implantable coronary stent devices [J]. Ann Biomed Eng 44(2):1–11
12.
Bikas H, Lianos AK, Stavropoulos P (2019) A design framework for additive manufacturing [J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103(9-12):3769–3783
13.
14.
15.
16.
Yi L, Zuhao L, Guangkai R, Zhonghan W, Chihua G, Chenyu S, Marquis of Haihun, Dankai W (2019) Application and progress of bioactive scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. China Tissue Eng Res 23:963–970
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Zhang R (2016) 3D printing, filament winding forming and performance analysis of skeleton biological scaffold. Harbin Institute of Technology
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
Wang X, Xu S, Zhou S et al (2016) Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review [J]. Biomaterials 83:127–141
31.
Song JE, Tripathy N, Cha SR et al (2017) Three-dimensional duck’s feet collagen/PLGA scaffold for chondrification: role of pore size and porosity [J]. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 29(7-9):1–19
32.
33.
Zhang J (2018) Bionic design and optimization of individualized tissue engineering bone scaffold. Shaanxi University of Science & Technology Master’s thesis
34.
Chua CK, Leong KF, Cheah CM et al (2003) Development of a tissue engineering scaffold structure library for rapid prototyping. Part 1: investigation and classification [J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21(4):291–301
35.
Gómez S, Vlad MD, López J et al (2016) Design and properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering [J]. Acta Biomater 42(5):341–350
36.
Kapfer SC, Hyde ST, Mecke K et al (2011) Minimal surface scaffold designs for tissue engineering [J]. Biomaterials 32(29):6875–6882
37.
Gang XIA (2017) Bone scaffold structures modeling with controlling surface morphology and pore size distribution [D]. Guangzhou:South China University of Technology
38.
Yoo DJ (2011) Porous scaffold design using the distance field and triply periodic minimal surface models [J]. Biomaterials 32(31):7741–7754
39.
Melchels FPW, Barradas AMC, Van Blitterswijk CA et al (2010) Effects of the architecture of tissue engineering scaffolds on cell seeding and culturing [J]. Acta Biomater 6(11):4208–4217
40.
Yoo D (2012) New paradigms in internal architecture design and freeform fabrication of tissue engineering porous scaffolds [J]. Med Eng Phys 34(6):762–776
41.
Park SH, Park DS, Shin JW, Kang YG, Kim HK, Yoon TR et al (2012) Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering fabricated from two different materials by the rapid prototyping technique: PCL versus PLGA. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23:2671–2678
42.
Korpela J, Kokkari A, Korhonen H, Malin M, Närhi T, Seppälä J (2013) Biodegradable and bioactive porous scaffold structures prepared using fused deposition modeling. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 101:610–619
43.
Kang H-W, Cho D-W (2012) Development of an indirect stereolithography technology for scaffold fabrication with a wide range of biomaterial selectivity. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 18:719–729
44.
Park JH, Jung JW, Kang H-W, Cho D-W (2014) Indirect three-dimensional printing of synthetic polymer scaffold based on thermal molding process. Biofabrication. 6:025003
45.
Lohfeld S, Tyndyk M, Cahill S, Flaherty N, Barron V, McHugh P (2010) A method to fabricate small features on scaffolds for tissue engineering via selective laser sintering. J Biomed Sci Eng 3:138–147
46.
Yeong W, Sudarmadji N, Yu H, Chua C, Leong K, Venkatraman S et al (2010) Porous polycaprolactone scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering fabricated by selective laser sintering. Acta Biomater 6:2028–2034
47.
Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J, Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P (2012) A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 33:6020–6041
48.
Lam CXF, Mo XM, Teoh SH, Hutmacher DW (2002) Scaffold development using 3D printing with a starch-based polymer. Mater Sci Eng C 20:49–56
49.
van Noort R (2012) The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 28:3–12
50.
Guneta V, Wang JK, Maleksaeedi S et al (2014) Three dimensional printing of titanium for bone tissue engineering applications: a preliminary study. J Biomimet Biomater Biomed Eng 21:101–115
51.
Haifeng Z, Zijiao D, Mao X, Danyang Z, Chao D, Wenbo J, Dong H (2016) Experimental study on tissue engineering bone constructed by 3D printing PLA-HA composite material. Int J Orthop 37(1)
52.
Jiao X, Liu Z, Li X, Jianfei F, Weimin Y (2018) Study on fabrication of HA/PCL composite tissue engineering scaffolds by 3D printing. J Beijing Univ Chem Technol 48(12)
53.
Xu N, Ye X, Wei D et al (2014) 3D artificial bones for bone repair prepared by computed tomography-guided fused deposition modeling for bone repair. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(17):14952–14963
54.
Kim J, Ahn G, Kim C et al (2018) Synergistic effects of beta tri-calcium phosphate and porcine-derived decellularized bone extracellular matrix in 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffold on bone regeneration. Macromol Biosci 18(6):1800025
55.
56.
Melchels FP, Feijen J, Grijpma DW (2010) A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. Biomaterials. 31:6121–6130
57.
Matsuo A, Chiba H, Takahashi H et al (2010) Clinical application of a custom-made bioresorbable raw particulate hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactide mesh tray for mandibular reconstruction [J]. Odontology. 98(1):85–88
58.
59.
Elomaa L, Teixeira S, Hakala R et al (2011) Preparation of poly (ε-caprolactone)-based tissue engineering scaffolds by stereolithography. Acta Biomater 7(11):3850–3856
60.
Jiabin Z, Ma Z, Hongqing C, Yunlong L (2018) Study on preparation and properties of 45S5 bioactive bone tissue scaffold by 3D printing. Beijing Biomed Eng 37:6
61.
Tesavibul P, Felzmann R, Gruber S et al (2012) Processing of 45S5 Bioglass by lithography-based additive manufacturing [J]. Mater Lett 74:81–84
62.
Thavornyutikarn B, Tesavibul P, Sitthiseripratip K et al (2017) Porous 45S5 bioglass-based scaffolds using stereo lithography effect of partial pre-sintering on structural and mechanical properties of scaffolds [J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 75:1281–1288
63.
Pattanayak DK, Fukuda A, Matsushita T, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Sasaki K et al (2011) Bioactive Ti metal analogous to human cancellous bone: fabrication by selective laser melting and chemical treatments. Acta Biomater 7:1398–1406
64.
(2015) Selective laser sintering of aliphatic-polycarbonate/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for medical applications [J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(1-4):15-25
65.
Tan C, Li S, Essa K, et al. (2019) Laser powder bed fusion of Ti-rich TiNi lattice structures: process optimisation, geometrical integrity, and phase transformations [J]. Int J Machine Tools Manuf
66.
67.
Guo L, Jianbing Y, Yan X et al (2015) Construction of HA/PCL bone tissue engineering scaffold by selective laser sintering [J]. J Dental Mater Instruments 24(2):64–68 87
68.
Guanghui J, Xiaofei S, Yan X et al (2015) Construction of nano-hydroxyapatite and polycaprolactone composite artificial bone scaffolds by selective laser sintering [J]. Acad J Second Mil Univ 36(12):1289–1294
69.
Yoo JJ, Kim HJ, Seo S-M (2014) Preparation of a hemiporous hydroxyapatite scaffold and evaluation as a cell-mediated bone substitute [J]. Ceram Int 40:3079–3087
70.
Yin B, Xue BJ, Wu ZH et al (2018) A novel hybrid 3D-printed titanium scaffold for osteogenesis in a rabbit calvarial defect model. Am J Transl Res 10(2):474–482
71.
Mancuso E, Alharbi N, Bretcanu OA et al (2016) Three-dimensional printing of porous load-bearing bioceramic scaffolds [J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med 231(6):575
72.
Chia HN, Wu BM (2015) Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials [J]. J Biol Eng 9(1):4
73.
Zocca A, GomesC M, Bernardo E, et al. (2013) LAS glass-ceramic scaffolds by three-dimensional printing [J]. J Eur Ceramic Soc
74.
Cox SC, Thornby JA, Gibbons GJ et al (2015) 3D printing of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds intended for use in bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 47:237–247
75.
Gao G, Schilling AF, Yonezawa T et al (2014) Bioactive nanoparticles stimulate bone tissue formation in bioprinted three-dimensional scaffold and human mesenchymal stem cells. Biotechnol J 9(10):1304–1311
76.
Gu Y, Chen X, Lee JH et al (2012) Inkjet printed antibiotic-and calcium-eluting bioresorbable nanocomposite micropatterns for orthopedic implants. Acta Biomater 8(1):424–431
77.
Chen L, He Y, Yang Y, et al. (2016) The research status and development trend of additive manufacturing technology [J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol
78.
Shiming Z, Xilin L, Wang J, Wenhui H, Wang L (2017) Research progress of 3D printing technology in bone tissue engineering. Industrial Technol Vocation Educ 15(4)
79.
Li J, Chen M, Fan X et al (2016) Recent advances in bioprinting techniques: approaches, applications and future prospects [J]. J Transl Med 14(1):271
80.
Hu CR, Qiu B (2018) 3D bioprinting: applications in cells, scaffolds and bone tissue engineering. Zhongguo Zuzhi Gongcheng Yanjiu 22(2):316–322
81.
Bendtsen ST, Quinnell SP, Mei W (2017) Development of a novel alginate-polyvinyl alcohol-hydroxyapatite hydrogel for 3D bioprinting bone tissue engineered scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res 105(5):1457
82.
Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M (2016) Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials. 76(37):321
83.
Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32(8):773–785
84.
Poldervaart MT, Wang H, Van der Stock J et al (2013) Sustained release of BMP-2 in bioprinted alginate for osteogenicity in mice and rats. PLoS One 8(8):e72610
85.
86.
Xu X, Zhou J, Jiang Y et al (2018) 3D printing process of oxidized nanocellulose and gelatin scaffold [J]. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 29(12):1–24
87.
Oldinski RA, Ruckh TT, Staiger MP et al (2011) Dynamic mechanical analysis and biomineralization of hyaluronan-polyethylene copolymers for potential use in osteochondral defect repair [J]. Acta Biomater 7(3):1184–1191
88.
Gao G, Yonezawa T, Hubbell K et al (2015) Inkjet-bioprinted acrylated peptides and PEG hydrogel with human mesenchymal stem cells promote robust bone and cartilage formation with minimal printhead clogging [J]. Biotechnol J 10(10):1568–1577
89.
Tanaka Y, Yamaoka H, Nishizawa S et al (2010) The optimization of porous polymeric scaffolds for chondrocyte/atelocollagen based tissue-engineered cartilage [J]. Biomaterials 31(16):4506–4516
90.
Zhou G, Jiang H, Yin Z et al (2018) In vitro regeneration of patient-specific ear-shaped cartilage and its first clinical application for auricular re-construction [J]. Ebiomedicine 28:287–302
91.
Zhang X, Du X, Li D et al (2018) Three dimensionally printed pearl powder/poly-caprolactone composite scaffolds for bone regeneration [J]. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed:1–26
92.
Ahn CB, Kim Y, Park SJ et al (2017) Development of arginine-glycine-aspartate-immobilized 3D printed poly (propylene fumarate) scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering [J]. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 29(7-9):1–27
93.
Wüst S, Godla ME, Müller R et al (2014) Tunable hydrogel composite with two-step processing in combination with innovative hardware upgrade for cell-based three-dimensional bioprinting. Acta Biomater 10(2):630–640
94.
Shim JH, Lee JS, Kim JY et al (2012) Bioprinting of a mechanically enhanced three-dimensional dual cell-laden construct for osteochondral tissue engineering using a multi-head tissue/organ building system [J]. J Micromech Microeng 22(8):085014
95.
Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK et al (2016) A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol 34(3):312
Metadata
Title
Recent advances in additive manufacturing technology for bone tissue engineering scaffolds
Authors
Xuan Zhou
Yihua Feng
Jiahui Zhang
Yanbin Shi
Li Wang
Publication date
22-06-2020
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Issue 11-12/2020
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05444-1

Other articles of this Issue 11-12/2020

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 11-12/2020 Go to the issue

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

On processing strategy to minimize defects while drilling borosilicate glass with microwave energy

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Development of a hybrid DLT cloud architecture for the automated use of finite element simulation as a service for fine blanking

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Development of a novel component-based open CNC software system

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Detecting machine chatter using audio data and machine learning

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Warm stamping of ultra-high strength steel sheets at comparatively low temperatures using rapid resistance heating

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Design of a flexible bio-inspired stretch-forming machine for the fabrication of large radius bends parts

Premium Partners

    Image Credits