Skip to main content
Top

2015 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

31. Reducing MCMC Computational Cost with a Two Layered Bayesian Approach

Authors : Ramin Madarshahian, Juan M. Caicedo

Published in: Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

One of the major challenges in the implementation sampling techniques in the Bayesian approaches is the computational cost involved with the estimation of the likelihood and/or posterior, especially in problems where the models being updated are computationally expensive. This paper proposes the use of surrogate models in a two-layer Bayesian approach to reduce the computational cost of estimating these PDF. In the first layer, the posterior is written in a traditional manner. The second layer attempts to estimate the PDF of the first layer with a surrogate model. Only a few runs of the structural model are needed to create the required samples. Preliminary results are shown with a numerical example to identify the stiffness of a structural system. Only ten simulations of the structural model are used to estimate the posterior PDF.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Zárate BA, Caicedo JM (2008) Finite element model updating: multiple alternatives. Eng Struct 30(12):3724–3730CrossRef Zárate BA, Caicedo JM (2008) Finite element model updating: multiple alternatives. Eng Struct 30(12):3724–3730CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Friswell M, Mottershead JE (1995) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics, vol 38. Springer, BerlinMATH Friswell M, Mottershead JE (1995) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics, vol 38. Springer, BerlinMATH
3.
go back to reference Modak S, Kundra T, Nakra B (2002) Prediction of dynamic characteristics using updated finite element models. J Sound Vib 254(3):447–467CrossRef Modak S, Kundra T, Nakra B (2002) Prediction of dynamic characteristics using updated finite element models. J Sound Vib 254(3):447–467CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rajan S (1995) Sizing, shape, and topology design optimization of trusses using genetic algorithm. J Struct Eng 121(10):1480–1487CrossRef Rajan S (1995) Sizing, shape, and topology design optimization of trusses using genetic algorithm. J Struct Eng 121(10):1480–1487CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Beck JL, Au S-K (2002) Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using markov chain monte carlo simulation. J Eng Mech 128(4):380–391CrossRef Beck JL, Au S-K (2002) Bayesian updating of structural models and reliability using markov chain monte carlo simulation. J Eng Mech 128(4):380–391CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Robert CP, Casella G (2004) Monte Carlo statistical methods, vol 319. Citeseer Robert CP, Casella G (2004) Monte Carlo statistical methods, vol 319. Citeseer
7.
go back to reference El-Beltagy MA, Keane A (1999) Metalmodeling techniques for evolutionary optimization of computationally expensive problems: promises and limitations. El-Beltagy MA, Keane A (1999) Metalmodeling techniques for evolutionary optimization of computationally expensive problems: promises and limitations.
8.
go back to reference Meckesheimer M, Booker AJ, Barton RR, Simpson TW (2002) Computationally inexpensive metamodel assessment strategies. AIAA J 40(10):2053–2060CrossRef Meckesheimer M, Booker AJ, Barton RR, Simpson TW (2002) Computationally inexpensive metamodel assessment strategies. AIAA J 40(10):2053–2060CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Madarshahian R, Caicedo JM, Zambrana DA (2014) Evaluation of a time reversal method with dynamic time warping matching function for human fall detection using structural vibrations. In: Atamturktur HS et al (eds) Model validation and uncertainty quantification, vol 3. Springer, New York, pp 171–176CrossRef Madarshahian R, Caicedo JM, Zambrana DA (2014) Evaluation of a time reversal method with dynamic time warping matching function for human fall detection using structural vibrations. In: Atamturktur HS et al (eds) Model validation and uncertainty quantification, vol 3. Springer, New York, pp 171–176CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Taguchi G, Yokoyama Y et al (1993) Taguchi methods: design of experiments, vol 4. American Supplier Institute, Dearborn Taguchi G, Yokoyama Y et al (1993) Taguchi methods: design of experiments, vol 4. American Supplier Institute, Dearborn
11.
go back to reference Owen AB (1992) Orthogonal arrays for computer experiments, integration and visualization. Stat Sin 2(2):439–452MATHMathSciNet Owen AB (1992) Orthogonal arrays for computer experiments, integration and visualization. Stat Sin 2(2):439–452MATHMathSciNet
14.
go back to reference Shan S, Wang GG (2010) Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 41(2):219–241CrossRefMATHMathSciNet Shan S, Wang GG (2010) Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 41(2):219–241CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
15.
go back to reference Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mech Des 129(4):370–380CrossRefMathSciNet Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mech Des 129(4):370–380CrossRefMathSciNet
18.
go back to reference Wang L, Beeson D, Akkaram S, Wiggs G (2005) Gaussian process meta-models for efficient probabilistic design in complex engineering design spaces. In: ASME 2005 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 785–798 Wang L, Beeson D, Akkaram S, Wiggs G (2005) Gaussian process meta-models for efficient probabilistic design in complex engineering design spaces. In: ASME 2005 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 785–798
19.
go back to reference Papadrakakis M, Lagaros ND, Tsompanakis Y (1998) Structural optimization using evolution strategies and neural networks. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 156(1):309–333CrossRefMATH Papadrakakis M, Lagaros ND, Tsompanakis Y (1998) Structural optimization using evolution strategies and neural networks. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 156(1):309–333CrossRefMATH
20.
go back to reference Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 23(1):1–13CrossRef Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 23(1):1–13CrossRef
21.
go back to reference James F (2006) Statistical methods in experimental physics, vol 7. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefMATH James F (2006) Statistical methods in experimental physics, vol 7. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefMATH
22.
go back to reference Patil A, Huard D, Fonnesbeck CJ (2010) Pymc: Bayesian stochastic modelling in python. J Stat Softw 35(4):1 Patil A, Huard D, Fonnesbeck CJ (2010) Pymc: Bayesian stochastic modelling in python. J Stat Softw 35(4):1
Metadata
Title
Reducing MCMC Computational Cost with a Two Layered Bayesian Approach
Authors
Ramin Madarshahian
Juan M. Caicedo
Copyright Year
2015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15224-0_31