Skip to main content
Top

2015 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Reflexive Learning, Socio-cognitive Conflict and Peer-assessment to Improve the Quality of Feedbacks in Online Tests

Authors : Franck Silvestre, Philippe Vidal, Julien Broisin

Published in: Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Our previous works have introduced the Tsaap-notes platform dedicated to the semi automatic generation of multiple choice questionnaire providing feedbacks: it reuses interactive questions asked by teachers during lectures, as well as the notes taken by students after the presentation of the results as feedbacks integrated into the quizzes. In this paper, we introduce a new feature which aims at increasing the number of contributions of students in order to significantly improve the quality of the feedbacks used in the resulting quizzes. This feature splits the submission of an answer into several distinct phases to harvest explanations given by students, and then applies an algorithm to filter the best contributions to be integrated as feedbacks in the tests. Our approach has been validated by a first experimentation involving master students enrolled in a computer science course.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Biggs, J., Tang, C.: Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. McGraw-Hill Education, UK (2011) Biggs, J., Tang, C.: Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. McGraw-Hill Education, UK (2011)
2.
go back to reference Black, P., Wiliam, D.: Assessment and classroom learning. Assess. Educ. 5(1), 7–74 (1998)CrossRef Black, P., Wiliam, D.: Assessment and classroom learning. Assess. Educ. 5(1), 7–74 (1998)CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Boud, D., Cohen, R., Sampson, J.: Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with Each Other. Routledge, New York (2014)CrossRef Boud, D., Cohen, R., Sampson, J.: Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with Each Other. Routledge, New York (2014)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Caldwell, J.E.: Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Sci. Educ. 6(1), 9–20 (2007)CrossRef Caldwell, J.E.: Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Sci. Educ. 6(1), 9–20 (2007)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dochy, F., Segers, M., Sluijsmans, D.: The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Stud. High. Educ. 24(3), 331–350 (1999)CrossRef Dochy, F., Segers, M., Sluijsmans, D.: The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Stud. High. Educ. 24(3), 331–350 (1999)CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gauci, S.A., Dantas, A.M., Williams, D.A., Kemm, R.E.: Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 33(1), 60–71 (2009)CrossRef Gauci, S.A., Dantas, A.M., Williams, D.A., Kemm, R.E.: Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 33(1), 60–71 (2009)CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hattie, J., Jaeger, R.: Assessment and classroom learning: a deductive approach. Assess. Educ. 5(1), 111–122 (1998)CrossRef Hattie, J., Jaeger, R.: Assessment and classroom learning: a deductive approach. Assess. Educ. 5(1), 111–122 (1998)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Higgins, R.: Be more critical: rethinking assessment feedback. DYE. V, PC4000 (2000) Higgins, R.: Be more critical: rethinking assessment feedback. DYE. V, PC4000 (2000)
9.
go back to reference Miller, T.: Formative computer-based assessment in higher education: the effectiveness of feedback in supporting student learning. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 34(2), 181–192 (2009)CrossRef Miller, T.: Formative computer-based assessment in higher education: the effectiveness of feedback in supporting student learning. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 34(2), 181–192 (2009)CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nicol, D., Milligan, C.: Rethinking technology-supported assessment practices in relation to the seven principles of good feedback practice. In: Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, pp. 64–77 (2006) Nicol, D., Milligan, C.: Rethinking technology-supported assessment practices in relation to the seven principles of good feedback practice. In: Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, pp. 64–77 (2006)
11.
go back to reference QTI, I.: Question and test interoperability (2006) QTI, I.: Question and test interoperability (2006)
12.
go back to reference Ricketts, C., Wilks, S.: Improving student performance through computer-based assessment: Insights from recent research. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 27(5), 475–479 (2002)CrossRef Ricketts, C., Wilks, S.: Improving student performance through computer-based assessment: Insights from recent research. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 27(5), 475–479 (2002)CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Scouller, K.: The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. High. Educ. 35(4), 453–472 (1998)CrossRef Scouller, K.: The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. High. Educ. 35(4), 453–472 (1998)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shaffer, D.M., Collura, M.J.: Evaluating the effectiveness of a personal response system in the classroom. Teach. Psychol. 36(4), 273–277 (2009)CrossRef Shaffer, D.M., Collura, M.J.: Evaluating the effectiveness of a personal response system in the classroom. Teach. Psychol. 36(4), 273–277 (2009)CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Silvestre, F., Vidal, P., Broisin, J.: Tsaap-notes-an open micro-blogging tool for collaborative notetaking during face-to-face lectures. In: 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 39–43. IEEE (2014) Silvestre, F., Vidal, P., Broisin, J.: Tsaap-notes-an open micro-blogging tool for collaborative notetaking during face-to-face lectures. In: 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 39–43. IEEE (2014)
16.
go back to reference Silvestre, F., Vidal, P., Broisin, J.: Semi automatic generation of online tests providing feedbacks based on collaborative note taking. In: 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), IEEE (to appear) Silvestre, F., Vidal, P., Broisin, J.: Semi automatic generation of online tests providing feedbacks based on collaborative note taking. In: 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), IEEE (to appear)
17.
go back to reference Topping, K.: Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Rev. Educ. Res. 68(3), 249–276 (1998)CrossRef Topping, K.: Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Rev. Educ. Res. 68(3), 249–276 (1998)CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Uhari, M., Renko, M., Soini, H.: Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures. BMC Med. Educ. 3(1), 12 (2003)CrossRef Uhari, M., Renko, M., Soini, H.: Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures. BMC Med. Educ. 3(1), 12 (2003)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reflexive Learning, Socio-cognitive Conflict and Peer-assessment to Improve the Quality of Feedbacks in Online Tests
Authors
Franck Silvestre
Philippe Vidal
Julien Broisin
Copyright Year
2015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_25

Premium Partner