Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Water Resources Management 2/2018

25-10-2017

Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA): an Ex-Post Analysis of Water Services by the Legal Review in Portugal

Authors: Bruno Eustaquio de Carvalho, Rui Cunha Marques, Oscar Cordeiro Netto

Published in: Water Resources Management | Issue 2/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper adopts an ex-post regulatory impact assessment (RIA) to analyze the effects of Law no.194/2009 on public-private partnerships (PPP) in the water sector in Portugal. Although the water services have been improving concerning coverage and safety since 1990, any change in regulation can have both “positive and negative” consequences either for customers, providers or local governments. This context can provide the opportunity to observe a national experiment of regulatory reform and assess its outcomes based on the following multiple targets: (i) customer protection; (ii) governance; (iii) financial, infrastructure and operational sustainability; and (iv) environmental improvement. To evaluate the impact of this legal reform, three steps were considered: (i) the status quo, scenarios and perspective; (ii) assessment; and (iii) consultation. Additionally, two aid methods were used: (i) expert opinions (Delphi) and (ii) multicriteria decision modelling method (TOPSIS) based on similarity distance to ideal solution. In fact, Law no.194/2009 reduced the gap in terms of performance between the concessions, but amplified the contrasts when all perspectives are compared. Regarding policy objectives, the major gap to overcome in a possible review of this legal framework is linked to the “economic-financial, operational and infrastructural sustainability objective”. Failures in any of these aspects can result in an ongoing PPP not meeting customer, municipality and concessionaire’s expectations.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Afshar A, Mariño MA, Saadatpour M, Afshar A (2011) Fuzzy TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis applied to Karun reservoirs system. Water Resour Manag 25:545–563CrossRef Afshar A, Mariño MA, Saadatpour M, Afshar A (2011) Fuzzy TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis applied to Karun reservoirs system. Water Resour Manag 25:545–563CrossRef
go back to reference Araral E, Wang Y (2013) Water governance 2.0: a review and second generation research agenda. Water Resour Manag 27:3945–3957CrossRef Araral E, Wang Y (2013) Water governance 2.0: a review and second generation research agenda. Water Resour Manag 27:3945–3957CrossRef
go back to reference Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, p 400CrossRef Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, p 400CrossRef
go back to reference Bottomley PA, Doyle JR (2001) A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: good, better, and best. Int J Manag Sci 29:553–560 Bottomley PA, Doyle JR (2001) A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: good, better, and best. Int J Manag Sci 29:553–560
go back to reference Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M et al (2011) Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One 6(6):e20476CrossRef Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M et al (2011) Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One 6(6):e20476CrossRef
go back to reference Brown AC, Stern J, Tenenbaum B, Gencer D (2006) Evaluating infrastructure regulatory systems. WB, Washington DCCrossRef Brown AC, Stern J, Tenenbaum B, Gencer D (2006) Evaluating infrastructure regulatory systems. WB, Washington DCCrossRef
go back to reference Carvalho BE, Marques RC, Netto OC (2017) Regulatory impact assessment ( RIA ): from the state of art until conceptual and framework proposal model. Int J Confl Manag 6:111–126 Carvalho BE, Marques RC, Netto OC (2017) Regulatory impact assessment ( RIA ): from the state of art until conceptual and framework proposal model. Int J Confl Manag 6:111–126
go back to reference Dunn WN (1994) Public policy analysis — an introduction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs Dunn WN (1994) Public policy analysis — an introduction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
go back to reference French S (2011) Expert judgement, meta-analysis and participatory risk analysis. Report. University of Warwick French S (2011) Expert judgement, meta-analysis and participatory risk analysis. Report. University of Warwick
go back to reference Gordon TJ (1994) The Delphi method. United Nations University, USA Gordon TJ (1994) The Delphi method. United Nations University, USA
go back to reference Greco S, Matthias E, Figueira JR (eds) (2015) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Berlin Greco S, Matthias E, Figueira JR (eds) (2015) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Berlin
go back to reference Hasson F, Keeney S (2011) Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technology Forecasting Social Change 78:1695–1704CrossRef Hasson F, Keeney S (2011) Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technology Forecasting Social Change 78:1695–1704CrossRef
go back to reference Jadidi O, Hong TS, Firouzi F (2009) TOPSIS extension for multi-objective supplier selection problem under price breaks. International Journal Management Science Engineering Management 4(3):217–229 Jadidi O, Hong TS, Firouzi F (2009) TOPSIS extension for multi-objective supplier selection problem under price breaks. International Journal Management Science Engineering Management 4(3):217–229
go back to reference Lima VF (2010) A Avaliação de Impacto Regulatório e sua aplicação no Brasil. Dissertation, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Lima VF (2010) A Avaliação de Impacto Regulatório e sua aplicação no Brasil. Dissertation, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
go back to reference Marques RC, Berg S (2010) Revisiting the strengths and limitations of regulatory contracts in infrastructure industries. J Infrastruct Syst 16:334–342CrossRef Marques RC, Berg S (2010) Revisiting the strengths and limitations of regulatory contracts in infrastructure industries. J Infrastruct Syst 16:334–342CrossRef
go back to reference Massarutto A, Antonioli B, Ermano P (2013) Assessing the impact of water service regulatory reforms in Italy: a multidimensional approach. Water Policy 15:1046–1063CrossRef Massarutto A, Antonioli B, Ermano P (2013) Assessing the impact of water service regulatory reforms in Italy: a multidimensional approach. Water Policy 15:1046–1063CrossRef
go back to reference Mendonça EC (2009) Metodologia para avaliação de desempenho de sistemas de drenagem urbana. Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, p 195 Mendonça EC (2009) Metodologia para avaliação de desempenho de sistemas de drenagem urbana. Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, p 195
go back to reference Meng F, Fu G, Butler D (2016) Water quality permitting: from end-of-pipe to operational strategies. Water Res 101:114–126CrossRef Meng F, Fu G, Butler D (2016) Water quality permitting: from end-of-pipe to operational strategies. Water Res 101:114–126CrossRef
go back to reference Miser H, Quade E (1985) Handbook of systems analysis: overview of uses, procedures, applications and practices. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester Miser H, Quade E (1985) Handbook of systems analysis: overview of uses, procedures, applications and practices. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
go back to reference Montibeller G, von Winterfeldt D (2015) Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis. Risk Anal 35:1230–1251CrossRef Montibeller G, von Winterfeldt D (2015) Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis. Risk Anal 35:1230–1251CrossRef
go back to reference Mutikanga HE, Sharma SK, Vairavamoorthy K (2011) Multi-criteria decision analysis: a strategic planning tool for water loss management. Water Resour Manag 25:3947–3969CrossRef Mutikanga HE, Sharma SK, Vairavamoorthy K (2011) Multi-criteria decision analysis: a strategic planning tool for water loss management. Water Resour Manag 25:3947–3969CrossRef
go back to reference Pinto FS, da Cruz NF, Marques RC (2015) Contracting water services with public and private partners: a case study approach. J Water Supply Res Technol 64:194–210CrossRef Pinto FS, da Cruz NF, Marques RC (2015) Contracting water services with public and private partners: a case study approach. J Water Supply Res Technol 64:194–210CrossRef
go back to reference Rowe G, Wright G (1999) The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal Forecast 15:353–375CrossRef Rowe G, Wright G (1999) The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal Forecast 15:353–375CrossRef
go back to reference Roy B, Słowiński R (2013) Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. European Journal Decision Process 1:69–97CrossRef Roy B, Słowiński R (2013) Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. European Journal Decision Process 1:69–97CrossRef
go back to reference Shih HS, Shyur HJ, Lee ES (2007) An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematic Computing Model 45:801–813CrossRef Shih HS, Shyur HJ, Lee ES (2007) An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematic Computing Model 45:801–813CrossRef
go back to reference Spiller M, McIntosh BS, Seaton RAF, Jeffrey PJ (2015) Integrating process and factor understanding of environmental innovation by water utilities. Water Resour Manag 29:1979–1993CrossRef Spiller M, McIntosh BS, Seaton RAF, Jeffrey PJ (2015) Integrating process and factor understanding of environmental innovation by water utilities. Water Resour Manag 29:1979–1993CrossRef
go back to reference von der Gracht HA (2012) Consensus measurement in Delphi studies. Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technology Forecast Social Change 79:1525–1536CrossRef von der Gracht HA (2012) Consensus measurement in Delphi studies. Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technology Forecast Social Change 79:1525–1536CrossRef
go back to reference Wright JTC, Giovinazzo RA (2000) Delphi: a tool to support prospective planning. Research in Business Administration 1:2–16 Wright JTC, Giovinazzo RA (2000) Delphi: a tool to support prospective planning. Research in Business Administration 1:2–16
Metadata
Title
Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA): an Ex-Post Analysis of Water Services by the Legal Review in Portugal
Authors
Bruno Eustaquio de Carvalho
Rui Cunha Marques
Oscar Cordeiro Netto
Publication date
25-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Water Resources Management / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1833-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Water Resources Management 2/2018 Go to the issue