Top

Published in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

6. Relation Artefacts Type IV

Author : Prof. Torkil Clemmensen

Published in: Human Work Interaction Design

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This chapter is about relation artefacts Type IV which are socio-technical interventions in organizational and wider contexts. Three subtypes of these relation artefacts move the design from the technical to the social: interaction interoperability checkups, digital legacy interventions, and organizational strategy alignments. The HWID platform is shown to provide a massive push toward such interventions, through the continuous relations building between empirical work analysis and interaction design activities that aims to create new local sociomaterial realities for stakeholders involved. Ways of avoiding falling into a ‘techno-determinism’ trap and instead keeping the relations to the social, and vice versa, are introduced. The chapter ends with a summary of how to do socio-technical HCI design interventions.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Relation Artefacts Type III

next chapter HWID Research

Available only for authorised users

https://www.computerworld.dk/art/29809/nordea-presses-af-ibms-doedsdom-over-os-2, https://www.computerworld.dk/art/29021/os-2-paa-vej-til-bedemanden.

To increase transparency of the data analysis process, the authors published anonymous interview transcripts, the Nvivo 10 project file of interview analysis, and the survey data in excel format.

Alon, L., & Nachmias, R. (2020). Anxious and frustrated but still competent: Affective aspects of interactions with personal information management. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 144, 102503.

Baets, W. (1992). Aligning information systems with business strategy. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 1(4), 205–213.

Bang, A. L., & Eriksen, M. A. (2014). Experiments all the way in programmatic design research. Artifact: Journal of Design Practice, 3(2), 1–4.

Bardoel, E. A., & Drago, R. (2016). Does the quality of information technology support affect work–life balance? A study of Australian physicians. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(21), 2604–2620.

Cajander, Å., Larusdottir, M., Eriksson, E., & Nauwerck, G. (2015). Contextual personas as a method for understanding digital work environments. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 468, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27048-7_10.

Chavan, A. L. (2005). Another culture, another method. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 21(2). (Citeseer).

Chivukula, S. S., Brier, J., & Gray, C. M. (2018). Dark Intentions or Persuasion? UX Designers’ Activation of Stakeholder and User Values. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems, 87–91.

Clemmensen, T., Hertzum, M., & Abdelnour-Nocera, J. (2020). Ordinary user experiences at work: A study of greenhouse growers. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), June(Article no 16), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386089.

Clemmensen, T., Iivari, N., Rajanen, D., & Sivaji, A. (2021). Organized UX professionals. In HWID2021 Unpublished Proceedings (pp. 1–25). Retrieved from https://www.hwid2021.com/.

Clemmensen, T., & Katre, D. (2012). Adapting e-gov usability evaluation to cultural contexts. In Usablity in government systems user experience design for citizens and public servants (pp. 331–344). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-391063-9.00053-5.

Clemmensen, T., & Nørbjerg, J. (2019). (not) Working (with) collaborative robots in a glass processing factory. Worst Case Practices Teaching Us the Bright Side.

Erlandsson, M., & Jansson, A. (2007). Collegial verbalisation–A case study on a new method on information acquisition. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(6), 535–543.

Fallman, D. (2003). Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In CHI’03 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 225–232). Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA: ACM. 05–10 Apr 2003.

Feinberg, M. (2017). A design perspective on data. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2952–2963). https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025837.

Feltovich, P. J., Prietula, M. J., & Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In: K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.) (2006). Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Følstad, A., & Hornbæk, K. (2010). Work-domain knowledge in usability evaluation: Experiences with Cooperative Usability Testing. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(11), 2019–2030. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSS.2010.02.026.

Friedland, L. (2019). Culture eats UX strategy for breakfast. Interactions, 26(5), 78–81.

Gothelf, J., & Seiden, J. (2013). Lean UX-Applying lean principles to improve user experience. In LEAN UX-Applying Lean Principles to Improve User Experience. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

Gruning, J., Bullard, J., & Ocepek, M. (2015). Medium, access, and obsolescence: What kinds of objects are lasting objects? In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3433–3442).

Gulotta, R., Odom, W., Forlizzi, J., & Faste, H. (2013). Digital artifacts as legacy: Exploring the lifespan and value of digital data. In CHI’13. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466240.

Gutwin, C., Cockburn, A., & Gough, N. (2017). A field experiment of spatially-stable overviews for document navigation. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5905–5916). https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025905.

Hertzum, M. (2020). Usability testing: A practitioner’s guide to evaluating the user experience. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, 13(1), i–105.

Hertzum, M., & Simonsen, J. (2010). Clinical overview and emergency-department whiteboards: A survey of expectations toward electronic whiteboards. In Proceedings of the 8th Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics (pp. 14–18).

Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2008). Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28(1), 6.

Jansen, B. J., Salminen, J. O., & Jung, S.-G. (2020). Data-driven personas for enhanced user understanding: Combining empathy with rationality for better insights to analytics. Data and Information Management, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2020-0005.

Jansson, A., Erlandsson, M., & Axelsson, A. (2015). Collegial verbalisation–the value of an independent observer: an ecological approach. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 16(5), 474–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2015.1027322.

Jansson, A., Erlandsson, M., Fröjd, C., & Arvidsson, M. (2013). Collegial collaboration for safety: Assessing situation awareness by exploring cognitive strategies. In Workshop at INTERACT 2013–14th IFIP TC13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Cape Town, South Africa, September 2013 (pp. 35–40).

Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25(4), 529–560.

Joshi, S. G., & Bratteteig, T. (2016). Designing for prolonged mastery. On involving old people in participatory design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 28(1).

Kehr, F., Bauer, G., Jenny, G. F., Güntert, S. T., & Kowatsch, T. (2013). Towards a design model for job crafting information systems promoting individual health, productivity and organizational performance.

Khadka, R., Batlajery, B. V., Saeidi, A. M., Jansen, S., & Hage, J. (2014). How do professionals perceive legacy systems and software modernization? In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering-ICSE 2014, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/2568225.2568318.

Kolko, J. (2015). Design thinking comes of age. Harvard Business Review, 93(9), 66–71. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/09/design-thinking-comes-of-age.

Koskinen, I., Binder, F. T., & Redström, J. (2008). Lab, field, gallery, and beyond. Artifact: Journal of Design Practice, 2(1), 46–57.

Kwon, G. H., Smith-Jackson, T. L., & Bostian, C. W. (2011). Socio-cognitive aspects of interoperability: Understanding communication task environments among different organizations. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 18(4), 1–21.

Lachner, F., Naegelein, P., Kowalski, R., Spann, M., & Butz, A. (2016). Quantified UX: Towards a common organizational understanding of user experience. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction-NordiCHI’16 (pp. 56:1–56:10). https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971501.

Lárusdóttir, M., Cajander, Å., & Gulliksen, J. (2014). Informal feedback rather than performance measurements-User-centred evaluation in Scrum projects. Behaviour and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.857430.

Meneweger, T., Wurhofer, D., Fuchsberger, V., & Tscheligi, M. (2018). Factory workers’ ordinary user experiences: An overlooked perspective. Human Technology, 14(2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.201808103817.

Mertens, R., Brusilovsky, P., Vornberger, O., & Ishchenko, S. (2009). Bridging the gap between time-and structure-based navigation in web lectures. International Journal on E-Learning, 8(1), 89–105.

Miaskiewicz, T., Sumner, T., & Kozar, K. A. (2008). A latent semantic analysis methodology for the identification and creation of personas. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2008 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vol. 1, pp. 1501–1510). https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357290.

Nahum-Shani, I., Qian, M., Almirall, D., Pelham, W. E., Gnagy, B., Fabiano, G. A., Waxmonsky, J. G., Yu, J., & Murphy, S. A. (2012). Experimental design and primary data analysis methods for comparing adaptive interventions. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 457.

Neate, T., Bourazeri, A., Roper, A., Stumpf, S., & Wilson, S. (2019). Co-created personas: Engaging and empowering users with diverse needs within the design process. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems-CHI’19 (pp. 1–12). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300880.

Neave, N., Briggs, P., McKellar, K., & Sillence, E. (2019). Digital hoarding behaviours: Measurement and evaluation. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 72–77.

Nielsen, L. (2019). Personas-User focused design. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7427-1.

Nielsen, L., Hansen, K. S., Stage, J., & Billestrup, J. (2015). A template for design personas. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 7(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijskd.2015010104.

Paay, J., Raptis, D., Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M. B., Ruder, E. V, & Lauridsen, B. M. (2017). Investigating cross-device interaction between a handheld device and a large display. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 6608–6619). https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025724.

Pfister, J. (2017). “ This will cause a lot of work.” Coping with transferring files and passwords as part of a personal digital legacy. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 1123–1138).

Plaskoff, J. (2017). Employee experience: the new human resource management approach. Strategic HR Review, 16(3), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-12-2016-0108.

Rai, A. (2017). Editor’s comments: Diversity of design science research. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), iii–xviii.

Raptis, D., Kjeldskov, J., & Skov, M. B. (2016). Continuity in multi-device interaction. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction-NordiCHI’16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971533.

Reinecke, K., & Bernstein, A. (2013). Knowing what a user likes: A design science approach to interfaces that automatically adapt to culture. Mis Quarterly, 427–453.

Seidelin, C. (2020). Towards a Co-design perspective on data-Foregrounding data in the design and innovation of data-based services. Ph. D. thesis, IT University Copenhagen.

Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488.

Shin, Y., Hur, W., Kim, H., & Cheol Gang, M. (2020). Managers as a missing entity in job crafting research: Relationships between store manager job crafting, job resources, and store performance. Applied Psychology, 69(2), 479–507.

Sturm, C., Aly, M., von Schmidt, B., & Flatten, T. (2017). Entrepreneurial & UX mindsets: Two perspectives-one objective. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (pp. 60:1–60:11). https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3119912.

Tharanathan, A., Bullemer, P., Laberge, J., Reising, D. V., & Mclain, R. (2012). Impact of functional and schematic overview displays on console operators’ situation awareness. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 6(2), 141–164.

Vertesi, J., Kaye, J., Jarosewski, S. N., Khovanskaya, V. D., & Song, J. (2016). Data Narratives: Uncovering tensions in personal data management. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 478–490).

Wania, C. E., Atwood, M. E., & McCain, K. W. (2006). How do design and evaluation interrelate in HCI research? In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 90–98).

Xin, X., Cai, W., Zhou, W., Baroudi, S. El, & Khapova, S. N. (2020). How can job crafting be reproduced? Examining the trickle-down effect of job crafting from leaders to employees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 894.

Yang, R., Ming, Y., Ma, J., & Huo, R. (2017). How do servant leaders promote engagement? A bottom-up perspective of job crafting. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(11), 1815–1827.

Title: Relation Artefacts Type IV
Author: Prof. Torkil Clemmensen
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Human Work Interaction Design
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71795-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-71796-4

Copyright Year: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71796-4_6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"