Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Reliability-Based Assessment of Liquefaction Potential Using SPT Approach

Authors : G. S. Bhatia, K. Bhargava, A. Mondal

Published in: Local Site Effects and Ground Failures

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Earthquake-induced liquefaction is one of the most complex and interesting phenomenon in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Liquefaction is a very significant phenomenon in alluvial soil deposits consisting of silty sand or sandy silt type of soils. Many different methods are available at present to assess the liquefaction potential of soil using in situ field test data. Generally, field tests like SPT are carried out and liquefaction assessment is done for each borehole. Different boreholes provide different depths up to which soil has potential for liquefaction for particular peak ground acceleration (PGA) and magnitude of Earthquake. Maximum liquefaction depth obtained from different boreholes is used to convey the liquefaction depth of the area in consideration. The greatest drawback of this approach is that results of only one borehole are used to conservatively predict the liquefaction potential of the entire area and results of remaining boreholes are neglected as they have predicted lesser depth of liquefaction. In case some more boreholes are drilled and assessment is done then there is quite a good probability that liquefaction depth of that area will change depending upon the SPT results from new boreholes. In this paper liquefaction potential assessment of alluvial soil site is carried out using SPT-based approach as proposed by NCEER [5]. SPT data of 25 boreholes are analyzed and converted into the equivalent single borehole using probabilistic approach to assess the liquefaction potential of alluvial soil site. Probabilistic approach is used to assess 95 percentile values of all variables required to assess Liquefaction potential like SPT blow counts, percentage fines, and soil density. As there is uncertainty present in the evaluation of these parameters at the site and in the laboratory, it is appropriate to evaluate these parameters based on a probabilistic approach using the best fit probabilistic distribution curve. Parameters required for assessing CSR (Cyclic Stress Ratio) like overburden pressure and effective overburden pressure are also analyzed using probabilistic distribution curves considering data from 25 boreholes and converting them into an equivalent single borehole. Factor of Safety (FOS) obtained using 50, 95, and 98 percentile values of different parameters is compared for converted equivalent single borehole.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference BIS (1981) IS 2131:1981, Method for standard penetration test for soils. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi BIS (1981) IS 2131:1981, Method for standard penetration test for soils. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
2.
go back to reference Cetin KO, Seed RB, Kiureghian AD, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF Jr, Kayen RE, Moss RE (2004) Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(12):1314–1340CrossRef Cetin KO, Seed RB, Kiureghian AD, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF Jr, Kayen RE, Moss RE (2004) Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(12):1314–1340CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2000) Probability, reliability and statistical methods in engineering design. Wiley, New York Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2000) Probability, reliability and statistical methods in engineering design. Wiley, New York
4.
go back to reference Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2008) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, USA Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2008) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, USA
5.
go back to reference NCEER (1997) Proceedings of the NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. National Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research, Report No. NCEER-97-0022, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY NCEER (1997) Proceedings of the NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. National Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research, Report No. NCEER-97-0022, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
6.
go back to reference Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Am Soc Civ Eng J Soil Mech Found Div 97(SM9):1249–1273CrossRef Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Am Soc Civ Eng J Soil Mech Found Div 97(SM9):1249–1273CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Seed HB, Idriss IM (1982) Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Monograph series. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA Seed HB, Idriss IM (1982) Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Monograph series. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA
8.
go back to reference Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung R (1985) Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. Am Soc Civ Eng J Geotech Eng Div 111(12):861–878 Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung R (1985) Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. Am Soc Civ Eng J Geotech Eng Div 111(12):861–878
9.
go back to reference Youd TL, Idriss IM (2001) Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(4):297–313CrossRef Youd TL, Idriss IM (2001) Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(4):297–313CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reliability-Based Assessment of Liquefaction Potential Using SPT Approach
Authors
G. S. Bhatia
K. Bhargava
A. Mondal
Copyright Year
2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9984-2_28